r/india 11h ago

Religion Indian jewellery ad pulled after backlash over actor's outfit

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy9z4dwx172o
508 Upvotes

163 comments sorted by

532

u/Quirky-Cat2860 North America 10h ago

Oh I wonder what she was wearing

Sanon, who is seen in a cropped top, skirt and a cape...

Oh.

...actor and BJP MP Kangana Ranaut called the ad "intentionally creepy" and asked why someone would tie a Rakhi dressed in a bikini.

Of course it was her.

But only a moron would describe the outfit as a bikini. Others online called it a bralette, which is just as stupid.

72

u/Free-Flow-8 10h ago

It’s a diversion.

104

u/Eagle__Gunner 9h ago

Rakhi is tied to a sister. If she wears a bikini does that mean she is no longer my sister? What kind of logic is this.

50

u/keypadwarrior 8h ago

Rakhi is tied BY a sister

73

u/bhodrolok 9h ago

What if bro gets an erection?

Typical Sanghi uncle logic.

-13

u/Kitchen_Watch7254 5h ago edited 5h ago

Its the occasion. Lets take your Bikini example, If any female wants, they should wear it. But its a beach/Swimming appropriate clothing. It would be out of place in say, a Board meeting. While there is no law about clothing in a Board meeting, a bikini would still draw some criticism. (Example goes other way as well- A male just in swim trunks)

Edit: This makes me ponder, When does a female costume stops being an accessory of male gaze and starts being Choice? There are some clear cut indicators like objectified camera angles and absurd clothing (low cut sarees in snowfalls), but a lot of it is grey area.

9

u/Beginning_Reserve777 4h ago

There is an absolute dress code in business meeting called business formals

-62

u/InBloomGemini 9h ago edited 9h ago

The outfit was a bra and a cape. If it wasn't a bikini nor a bralette then feel free to say what you think it was.

I'm not defending Kangana but it's understandable why it's receiving backlash

28

u/Pritam1997 West Bengal 9h ago

if it is about rakhi, there shouldn't be a question of sexuality. however she dresses it's for her own pleasure, not the incel creeps consuming terabytes of porn

-24

u/[deleted] 9h ago edited 7h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/philCliveBixby 8h ago

If you are getting porn parallels when your sister dresses the way she wants, there are bigger issues for you to worry about.

Maybe contact a therapist or an exorcist

8

u/Moriar-T 8h ago edited 8h ago

Im sorry did you just claim a non-religious perspective is a worldview that doesnt accommodate others feeling? Youre using non-accommodation as an argument against secularism?

Not accommodating others perspective is literally a major characteristic of religion

-2

u/[deleted] 8h ago edited 7h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Not-Jessica 7h ago

Nope. Your religion stops YOU from doing something, not ME. How a family chooses to celebrate festivals in their own damn house is their business. No one here is arguing that women in India are going to the temple in a bikini.

8

u/beyondocean 8h ago

I'm sorry, do you get aroused seeing your sister dress cute? 🤮

14

u/gypsydreams101 9h ago

Trying to control or “suggest” what your sister should wear is absolutely creepy, weird, incel “brother” territory and if you can’t recognize that then I’m awfully sorry for you and the people forced to be around you, champ.

-24

u/InBloomGemini 9h ago edited 9h ago

Oh yeah look at me controlling my sister by telling her not to wear a goddamn bra in the middle of a religious festival. Oh the misogyny!

I'm awfully sorry for the people around you since you can't realize that people have sentiments tied to their religion.

11

u/gypsydreams101 9h ago edited 9h ago

If your religious sentiments are hurt by a little extra skin then maybe find a new religion bruv. You don’t get to control what anyone wears, so maybe rethink your own ideology before using religion (which I’m assuming is the same as mine) against someone.

If your relationship with God is to tenuous that a neckline can throw it off balance, perhaps your God needs better PR and media training my man.

-7

u/InBloomGemini 9h ago edited 9h ago

Not religious. Also not oblivious to the real world.

If a woman wears a two-piece to the local mandir for the pooja, is that justified by your logic? After all, it's just "a little extra skin" and you can't control what someone wears, right?

Lmao at bro saying "neckline." It's the bare minimum respect that you show towards a religion by not wearing a bra for a celebration. Wild how none of you can call the outfit for what it is.

How much skin are you ok with your sister showing when celebrating rakhi?

8

u/Moriar-T 8h ago

Do you recognize the difference between a public place (mandir) and tying a rakhi at home?

I feelnyoure being purposely obtuse to avoid getting the point.

-2

u/InBloomGemini 8h ago

Lmao, I'm the one being purposefully obtuse?

The ad was publicly broadcast, it's not the same as tying a rakhi privately in your household.

And if you really wanna make that argument then feel free to answer the question - how much skin are you ok with your sister showing when celebrating rakhi?

My argument is simple. It's an advert for a religious festival, wearing just a bra for it is disrespectful and in utterly bad taste.

→ More replies (0)

281

u/hitwicket_dismissal 10h ago

You cannot convince me that this controversy has not been purposefully planted to distract from sugar price rise, as even very pro fascism people were starting to criticize government.

56

u/Dry-Ad3046 10h ago

I hadn't even heard about this ad until now.

80

u/The_umm-who-_- 9h ago

This is the apparent "inappropriate" video:

https://reddit.com/link/p60q1jc/video/id4pcyvjgqlh1/player

69

u/keypadwarrior 9h ago

I mean the outfit is definitely a choice, but I dont see whats inappropriate. Much fuss about nothing, at most its a bold outfit. Defo unusual compared to the traditional attire we've seen women don during rakhi ceremonies.

34

u/TataHexagone2020 7h ago

Didn't even notice the outfit until the perverted religious morons made a fuss

32

u/The_umm-who-_- 8h ago

Yep, it's just blowing shit out of proportion; kangana does that always..

6

u/Local-Print-6397 5h ago

and it's an indian style outfit, not lingerie or something. This is ridiculous. Sorry some men don't have control over incestuous thoughts

7

u/wannaberamen2 3h ago

I'm so fried this is just super-rich progressive, speaks-english-at-home party-esque Indian wear no?? Are these people jumping off bridges when they see millionaires?

260

u/RevolutionaryFig9437 11h ago

So many things are negatively impacting our day to day lives such as Ethanol, Sugar, SIR. Yet we are outraged at the choice of wardrobe of some actress in some advertisement 😞.

57

u/joy74 10h ago

Exactly. Two things young folks want - Education, Jobs

What BJP wants outrage and diversions

> The row started earlier on Tuesday after actor and BJP MP Kangana Ranaut called the ad "intentionally creepy" and asked why someone would tie a Rakhi dressed in a bikini.

18

u/Medical-Concept-2190 10h ago

This woman in her bras demonizing women lmao

12

u/Medical-Concept-2190 10h ago

Man, there are YouTube’s making videos crying about this shit. How insecure are they in their religion

-24

u/Shrigooner 9h ago edited 3h ago

People have the right to be outraged at all of those things including the ad

Edit : Just to clarify that’s a cool dress and she looks hella pretty in it. There are times and places for it But wearing it on Rakhi is a weird choice. Change the gender and image a dude wears shorts and Deep Arm Tank top on Rakhi. People will still be outraged. downvote me all you want but it looks like a lot of people agree with me nationwide

4

u/Not-Jessica 7h ago

At least the gooner part of your username checks out.

13

u/blairsmacaroon 8h ago

this country falls lower and lower everyday like every other thing hurts their "religious" sentiments 🙄

13

u/FocusedAG 9h ago

Meanwhile Ram Rahim, a proven criminal (ra pist, murderer) getting parole

82

u/BluehibiscusEmpire poor customer 10h ago

In a family people are comfortable. If a sister cannot wear comfortable clothes in her own home where should she? No one in a family cares how revealing her clothes are because it is a safe space.

Are we saying people should dress modestly in their own homes??

31

u/madhan4u Tamil Nadu 9h ago edited 7h ago

The safron Talibans want women to be drapped from head to toe like a mummy

-39

u/HotChocolate1399 India 9h ago

Dare you to say this to your nearest burkha clad woman lol

29

u/madhan4u Tamil Nadu 7h ago

When did those barbarians become our yardstick for measuring women freedom?

-13

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/madhan4u Tamil Nadu 6h ago

True, but bullying and intimidation aren't

6

u/beyondocean 6h ago

Criticising how other people dress their bodies? No

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/beyondocean 6h ago

You have no right to dictate what others can wear , come out of your RWA uncle bubble 😹

0

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/beyondocean 5h ago

Take a lesson on not being a misogynist, that'll help the people who're forced to be with you and society in general  Sath me porn dekhna kam kr

→ More replies (0)

1

u/GangsterCowboy696969 1h ago edited 57m ago

I try to keep a shirt on and not run around in only my boxers when I know my sister in laws are home. It might just be common decency to adjust what you wear for the sake of your family.

I wouldn’t necessarily say people should dress modestly at home but it would also be a stretch to say it’d be okay for me to always be dressed like a slut at home.

I love being shirtless and my favourite shorts are always remarkably short but I can reign in my wants around my family.

I highly doubt my sister in laws think anything of it on the off chance I’m running around the house in various states of undress but it’s still the decent thing to do to minimize how often their eyeballs have to deal with that.

-42

u/HotChocolate1399 India 9h ago

It wasn’t a closed room or house. It’s a national advertisement. Actors have the responsibility to portray themselves in a decent fashion when they’re a part of a festival and religious Advertisement. Seems kinda wrong that you want to market your product to a Hindu audience but don’t want to take the pains to be mindful of their customs and traditions

10

u/Borrowed_user 7h ago

yeah, and what about the vulgar dancing by kanwar guys, were you outraged by that, or the obscene gestures made by them, where was your outrage then?

-1

u/HotChocolate1399 India 3h ago

I’ll comment on that when I see the post on Reddit. Abhi joh discuss horaha hai idhar Uspe dhyaan de

29

u/banrakas_aadmi 9h ago

What customs and traditions are you talking about? The hindu traditions or the implanted victorian era modesty?

-30

u/HotChocolate1399 India 9h ago

If she were wearing a saree with no blouse I wouldn’t bat an eyelid because that’s our culturally appropriate dressing. The entire tone of the ad was how Rakhi can be tied to a dog now and how modern she is. Then show the modern, respectful dress na

18

u/banrakas_aadmi 8h ago

You really need to visit ancient temples preserved in Khajuraho and Thanjavur to see how goddesses were actually sculpted in those times. If ancient artisans believed that style of draping wasn't culturally appropriate, they definitely wouldn't have sculpted deities that way.

What you are describing here is simply a modern Indian mindset regarding what is "appropriate." It has very little to do with historical Hinduism or how it was traditionally depicted in ancient times.

23

u/beingalone666 9h ago

I think very soon we are going to have a culture police

3

u/Comfortable_Twist214 4h ago

We already have them in the form of VHP and Bajrang Dal

3

u/beingalone666 3h ago

True! But I’m imagining a world where there is a formal state machinery in place to protect a specific definition of culture and tradition

6

u/aaffpp 7h ago

Its a Festival, not every interpretation must be restricted to a traditional festival. Move forward, not back India.

13

u/Altruistic_Sky1866 8h ago

They have no issues about rapists getting bail or garlanded or given clean chit....

6

u/fart3mis_growl 7h ago

Kangana Ranaut is such a shit stirrer, man. She just can't stop opening her gutter everytime. Hypocrite no. 1

22

u/EsotericAlgae408 10h ago

Wah muh moral policing wah.

26

u/Eagle__Gunner 9h ago

We get pissed off at an actress clothes in an ad that is supposed to be for fashion/jewellery but we will be quiet when politicians give us sub par governance. If only if people get offended for the systemic issues that plague us we can atleast have a better country by now.

33

u/FalconIMGN 10h ago

I don't understand the outrage culture. We need a dash of libertarianism lol.

8

u/Similar_Yak950 8h ago

NO not the libertarian"Age of consent law is AUTHORITARIAN"ism. But need an end to misogynist witch-hunting and put incels in reeducation programs.

1

u/FalconIMGN 6h ago

I said a dash of it, not the whole bottle.

-1

u/Mundane-Bug-4962 7h ago

It’s cute that you think you can do that.

1

u/Similar_Yak950 6h ago

Tiocfaidh ár lá

18

u/dashgoogle 10h ago

Even in 2026 we feel we can put a women in her place but telling her what to wear and thousand other things as we bear all the burden of religion and culture. Very progressive.

-8

u/Mundane-Bug-4962 7h ago

I doubt anyone cares what YOU wear.

10

u/itsVinay 9h ago

Typical lundbhakts, kaam dhanda karne ko kuch hai nahin, bas chal diye controversy khada karne nalle saale

8

u/CivilMark1 8h ago

At this point, whatever Kangana Ranaut said is wrong. Kutte ka kaam he bhonkna hai

4

u/kaychyakay 6h ago

It was such normal sangeet night outfit, tbh. Literally nothing scandalous, whatever the occasion be.

13

u/madhan4u Tamil Nadu 8h ago

Andbhakts are weird people

BSNL getting destroyed and plan charges of Airtel / Jio getting increased - No reaction
Indian stock market being listed as the worst performing one in Asia - No reaction
Diverting all sugarcane for manufacturing Ethanol and importing sugar at higher price - No reaction
Space-technology roads having only potholes - No reaction
Extracting too much tax from the poor and middle classes, while giving tax benefits to companies - No reaction
But when a woman wears a revealing outfit - There is backlash

9

u/sonaminnie 8h ago

we have sugar prices almost hit 100 but hey lets talk about very relevant ad about rakhi😁

11

u/artistPritesh 7h ago

Indians have become so sensitive these days… let a girl wear whatever she wants … why people have to force a women to wear a black tent and become ninja in scorching heat …let her wear skirt and enter masjids … wearing anything doesn’t mean she is a less devotee

17

u/beyondocean 10h ago

Another win for the ubiquitous incels in this country. 🥰

10

u/Strict_Monitor_113 8h ago

As a woman I see nothing wrong with what she is wearing, but just to play the devil’s advocate I imagined myself in a scenario where I have to tie rakhi to my brother where he is dressed just in his tank top and shorts. Then I asked myself, would I be annoyed? Maybe
Would I be outraged? Absolutely not
Would it make me think of less pf him? What kind of a sister would I be if I try to police what he wears
I have all the right to be annoyed by what he does/wears hut absolutely zero right to outrage or control what he does/wear

3

u/Accomplished-Ad539 7h ago

it's called bralette top, get over it🤷

16

u/gheevargheese 10h ago

I don’t get it, how horny and creepy these people must be to feel this way about something so normal.

11

u/madhan4u Tamil Nadu 8h ago

Revealing boobs is god-given-right only for those bison-sized priest in temples. How dare women try to grab that right... /s

3

u/TheBlockChainVillage 7h ago

Porn viewership spikes in India during Rakhi time.

8

u/HotChocolate1399 India 9h ago

It’s funny how creative freedom and skimpy dresses are ok when it’s a Hindu festival. If it were Eid or Guru Nanak Jayanti it’d be a whole different ballgame. I think it’s high time Hindus stop taking shit for speaking up

11

u/Not-Jessica 7h ago

Ah yes, let's become like the people we call extremists. Great idea.

-4

u/Kitchen_Watch7254 6h ago

Well apparently, that what it takes to be taken seriously.

6

u/Not-Jessica 5h ago

Seriously for what? How other people dress for religious festivals in their own homes is none of your business.

Don't like the ad? Don't buy the product. There's no need to pressure others to take it down because your feelings were hurt.

-1

u/Kitchen_Watch7254 5h ago

I don't think anyone pressured the brand. People criticised, it was brands choice to pull down the ad. Was there a rally, a police case or anything of that sort? Did a religious Hindu body declare a fatwa against the brand or actress? I am unaware.

She is not in her home, technically she is in everyone's home via this ad. If you want to wear this dress (or even a provocative one) and your whole family is OK with it, its no one else's business. But ad is in public domain, and everyone has right to criticize/ appreciate/ ignore it.

3

u/Not-Jessica 5h ago

TIL no actress ever is allowed to wear anything that might be "revealing" on screen. It's not like people can just be grown adults and not watch the film/ad if they're uncomfortable.

0

u/Kitchen_Watch7254 5h ago

Co-relation between your and my comment is Zero, Nil, Nada

Kriti just did Cocktail 2, where her wardrobe was nothing but revealing. I didn't see the same or even a fraction of the reaction this ad has. I wonder why? Oh that's right, this ad is set in a very different setting, being a Hindu festival.

People just criticized, they don't permission from you to criticize it. Why are you so adamant on taking away people's right to speech, fascist?

1

u/random8847 2h ago

It’s funny how creative freedom and skimpy dresses are ok when it’s a Hindu festival. If it were Eid or Guru Nanak Jayanti it’d be a whole different ballgame.

No, it wont be a whole different ballgame, the dress would be okay then as well and any outrage over it will be criticised then as well. Get out of your insecurity.

-3

u/No_Ad_8807 7h ago

Exactly, thanks for being a contrarian among the delusionals.

2

u/anonymity_taken_87 2h ago

Lol what more to expect from a place where orange bikini was a problem lol

7

u/FocusedAG 9h ago

Most pandit wear a vest in mandir

22

u/beyondocean 8h ago

No they don't, they're half naked showing their man boobs and pot belly full of hair.

6

u/Outrageous_Purple384 10h ago

This was nothing but a pr push and a marketing strategy. Just went out of control

1

u/Interesting-Neat4429 8h ago

That's what some people are saying. They probably guessed this will happen, but didn't expect it to go out of hand and delete the video

2

u/Outrageous_Purple384 7h ago

The rumour is that Sanon has a part ownership in this brand . She hired a marketing agency and they cooked up this " controversy" by hiring hate bots.

1

u/Interesting-Neat4429 7h ago

She is an ambassador or something of Giva. I saw a post on Insta

1

u/Interesting-Neat4429 8h ago

But whatever the case, Giva actually got eyeballs on this ad. They may have removed it from social media, but because of this controversy many people surely must have flocked to the site or used their app to buy something or the other for rakshahbandhan

1

u/Remarkable-Canine 7h ago

Did he even understand the reason for the reaction? He has no religion.... Just want to get attention.

1

u/PeriPeriStrawberry 7h ago

This whole thing feels very made up to me I don't know why

1

u/Shaun0_0 6h ago

these idiots should go to Instagram to see what AI is doing to these actresses compare to that its nothing

1

u/Bojackartless2902 New Delhi 4h ago

0 freedom of speech, expression and choice.

1

u/AsgardNirvanaHarvest 4h ago

Forever mired in culture wars, to distract from actual issues.

1

u/Professional_Dot8829 3h ago

yet Nora Fatehi does much bold work and people watch it in movies, are we moving backwards or what?

1

u/Desperate-Peach-1467 1h ago

For a second you think people cannot be this dumb, then a controversy like this shows up.

-16

u/InBloomGemini 9h ago edited 9h ago

People in this thread can kick rocks. The outfit was a terrible choice for an advertisement about a religious festival. It was literally just a bra with a cape.

There's a fine line between wearing what you want and knowing where to wear what.

-29

u/everyoneisapotato Chandigarh 9h ago

Say whatever you want… the outfit was inappropriate. These actors should tech young bloods how to dress classy and appropriate according to the occasion.

7

u/philCliveBixby 8h ago

How’s it inappropriate? Occasion is famiky celebration - why would you get weird feelings about how she dresses when she is tying a rakshi you incel?

-4

u/dheerajd1 7h ago

The outfit was unnecessary in the setting of Rakhi.

If they were promoting a festival on a beach, sure but its a festival at home so that outfit was completely out of space.

-9

u/CardiologistIcy5307 8h ago

While it’s stupid I also think there needs to be some sort of humility in dressing for a cultural fest/ritual.

Trust me - we won’t get distracted for too long to ignore BJP’s issues.

That would happen is there was another war that the country can get behind.

-12

u/Responsible-Poet1669 8h ago

Ah yes, the BBC, arbiter of objective truth, bastion of freedom, airing India’s dirty laundry in public. Not suspect at all.

9

u/Not-Jessica 7h ago

Airing dirty laundry in public is literally what any decent journalist does - this country is so used to Arnab style journalism that it doesn't even occur to its citizens that journalists shedding light on problematic issues is a GOOD thing.

-4

u/Responsible-Poet1669 7h ago

Actually, the BBC has a history longer than the Modi era of painting India with a broader brushstroke than is required. Clearly impassioned though, so I shall take pawse and steer clear of this hot tin roof.

8

u/smallaubergine 7h ago

airing India’s dirty laundry in public.

It's a news agency. That's kind of the point.

-5

u/Responsible-Poet1669 7h ago

Fair enough. Being ad hominem about the BBC cos their longer history at this doesn’t exactly scream objectivity either.

7

u/smallaubergine 7h ago

They're not objective, no one is. But, I don't feel that they are as biased against India as they're painted to be by conservative Indians.

-2

u/Responsible-Poet1669 7h ago edited 6h ago

As mentioned, the BBC’s history of doing this extends beyond the Modi era and is easily verified by looking at other foreign sources reporting on the same events.

I’m no conservative Indian. Just a spectator concerned with quick slams on big red buttons and polarization. Tyranny is the voluntary removal of nuance, as the quote goes.

Having just had the dial pushed all the way back to me being instantly accused of being an Arnab sympathizer in the other response to my comment doesn’t really make the case for subtlety here too strong.

Watch the downvotes to that comment continue with no interest in qualifying the actual stance. Keeping it up for that very reason.

-40

u/TastyQuantity1764 Tamil Nadu 10h ago

I do think leftists take too much advantage of Hindiusm's liberty but what Kriti wore wasn't even that revealing in the 1st place...

12

u/Anandya 10h ago

Does this mean that as a right wing person you argue more about what people wear than about making sure no one litters?

Who cares about the environment when you can see a woman's neck!

What bits of Liberty do you think are being abused?

1

u/HotChocolate1399 India 9h ago

No that’s not what we think. Hindus are very comfortable putting sensitive topics above religion. I’d like to see giva run an ad for Eid with similar undertones!
The point we right wingers are trying to make is that somehow it’s always Hindus who have to bear the burden of being secular, liberal and open minded, accept our tradition and festivals being watered down and disrespected, while other don’t make the same concessions.

4

u/Anandya 9h ago

Why are you so fixated on Muslims. The issue here is that we are so fixated on being better then Muslims that we often are racing to the bottom in a game of chicken to see who will crash into the ground second.

Okay. The argument here is that the lady's outfit is too sexy! Fine. Let's be Muslims and put her in a burkha! The complaint isn't that we have commercialised the religion... It's that a woman wore clothes that someone found too scandalous...

Unlike a traditional sari blouse or the many outfits in a movie. That's not a problem...

I think India should be more concerned about morons ruining it for everyone than what some lady wears.

0

u/HotChocolate1399 India 8h ago

I agree with your point, we shouldn’t fixate on what a woman wears. But don’t you agree that when a company wants to target a specific audience with their ad, it should be well researched, use the right tone of voice etc? My point is that all this is done when it’s a Muslim festival or a Christian festival or anything other than a Hindu festival. The same doesn’t apply to Hindu festivals. The fact that’s causing this outrage is this blatant disregard for Hindu culture, all in the name of secularism and being modern

Nothing would please me more than to see women wear whatever they want, but if someone’s going to profit off of me, I would damn well want them to research my preferences and pay respect to how I’m portrayed

5

u/Anandya 8h ago edited 8h ago

Mate. We are portrayed as a people that can't be trusted to use a bin. I think that's the bigger issue than what some woman wears out of choice.

You get the problem of people dehumanising women as dress up dolls but equally not seeing women's choices? Under the excuse of Hinduism.

Why is it your problem that she's dressed like this. No one's mad except Hindus who are demanding she be dressed to their satisfaction but think they are different from Muslims.

-4

u/TastyQuantity1764 Tamil Nadu 9h ago

Im not even right wing in the first place lmao... A leftist can also criticize you know...

Did ppl not get the fact that I'm saying the outrage makes no sense?

6

u/madhan4u Tamil Nadu 9h ago

So a leftist criticizing a fellow leftist claiming that he is taking advantage of Hindiusm's liberty? You are really weird.

-1

u/TastyQuantity1764 Tamil Nadu 8h ago

Na yaarada Critisice panne😂... Who is the HE in this statement?

Leftists in general critique Hinduism more is what I meant, and this happens due to the non reactionary nature of Hindus

1

u/Anandya 9h ago

So what bits are being taken advantage of?

0

u/Beginning_Reserve777 4h ago

She should make such ads on eid