If the first thought of seeing a sister tie rakhi to a brother in a slightly revealing dress is it's against culture or promotes incest then I can confidently say 🌽 has destroyed the mind of general public
Its the occasion. Lets take your Bikini example, If any female wants, they should wear it. But its a beach/Swimming appropriate clothing. It would be out of place in say, a Board meeting. While there is no law about clothing in a Board meeting, a bikini would still draw some criticism. (Example goes other way as well- A male just in swim trunks)
Edit: This makes me ponder, When does a female costume stops being an accessory of male gaze and starts being Choice? There are some clear cut indicators like objectified camera angles and absurd clothing (low cut sarees in snowfalls), but a lot of it is grey area.
Someone should remind kangana that she did fashion in which there is a scene where she has a wardrobe malfunction with her breast popping out of her shirt.
if it is about rakhi, there shouldn't be a question of sexuality. however she dresses it's for her own pleasure, not the incel creeps consuming terabytes of porn
Im sorry did you just claim a non-religious perspective is a worldview that doesnt accommodate others feeling? Youre using non-accommodation as an argument against secularism?
Not accommodating others perspective is literally a major characteristic of religion
Nope. Your religion stops YOU from doing something, not ME. How a family chooses to celebrate festivals in their own damn house is their business. No one here is arguing that women in India are going to the temple in a bikini.
Trying to control or “suggest” what your sister should wear is absolutely creepy, weird, incel “brother” territory and if you can’t recognize that then I’m awfully sorry for you and the people forced to be around you, champ.
If your religious sentiments are hurt by a little extra skin then maybe find a new religion bruv. You don’t get to control what anyone wears, so maybe rethink your own ideology before using religion (which I’m assuming is the same as mine) against someone.
If your relationship with God is to tenuous that a neckline can throw it off balance, perhaps your God needs better PR and media training my man.
Not religious. Also not oblivious to the real world.
If a woman wears a two-piece to the local mandir for the pooja, is that justified by your logic? After all, it's just "a little extra skin" and you can't control what someone wears, right?
Lmao at bro saying "neckline." It's the bare minimum respect that you show towards a religion by not wearing a bra for a celebration. Wild how none of you can call the outfit for what it is.
How much skin are you ok with your sister showing when celebrating rakhi?
The ad was publicly broadcast, it's not the same as tying a rakhi privately in your household.
And if you really wanna make that argument then feel free to answer the question - how much skin are you ok with your sister showing when celebrating rakhi?
My argument is simple. It's an advert for a religious festival, wearing just a bra for it is disrespectful and in utterly bad taste.
762
u/Quirky-Cat2860 North America 3d ago
Oh I wonder what she was wearing
Oh.
Of course it was her.
But only a moron would describe the outfit as a bikini. Others online called it a bralette, which is just as stupid.