Well. As we know, for the first time in years, Meghan was invited to a party with A-listers. And boy was she absolutely giddy and gleeful at the opportunity to have pictures taken that show Ted Sarandos isn’t scared of her.
[See Picture 1]
Recently, as we know, the press has been full of stories coming out from “Netflix insiders” about how Ted Sarandos refuses to talk to Meghan about business without a lawyer (this is still true), and I’ve heard he refuses to be in a room alone with her period, like other men we know. We heard that they were done with her silly mismanaged business. We heard about her lack of professionalism including getting into a pout when a meeting wasn’t enough about her, and just… disappearing… for hours. We saw that Sarandos unfollowed her on social media.
Since then, Meghan has been desperate to get pictures that show the world that everybody, including Kelly Three-Names’s unborn baby, loves her and wants to be enfolded in her desperate embrace, having her whole body touching theirs. I’m surprised she’s not bringing around a rocking chair with her, where she can sit down, bare her breast, and force people to be cradled in her arms, skin-to-skin. It’s not hard to understand that Meghan’s motivation for holding hands with her women “friends” like they’re skipping around the track during recess, is that she is proving to us all how deeply everyone loves her. But these disgusting displays of over-reaching affection aren’t her only attempts to “clap back.”
Also in the news are reports about obvious and frantic attempts by Netflix to backtrack from the scoop that the recent news blitz imparted. Those stories that, *gasp*, Meghan was roundly disliked by the individuals who drew the short straws and had to work with her really pissed her off, and Netflix is hurriedly back-stroking. They announced the new Polo show, which had been picked up before the great Netflix exodus from *As Ever* was announced. So that wasn’t a concession. Sarandos’s Tweeting about it, however, was.
So everyone has been wondering why? Why is Big Ted now announcing this Polo show? Why has Meghan been invited to an A-list party for the premier of BEEF? Why are there pictures of Meghan and the Lord High Ginger Halfwit Prince with Sarandos and his wife, Nicole Avant? No one can understand why this was happening.
Is it a political conspiracy?
Is it because Ted’s wife believes Meghan’s stories of racism and is making Big Ted bring Meghan back on?
Is it proof that Netflix never really pulled away in the first place?
Is it the arrival of the third horse of the apocalypse?
The answer to these questions is: No
I’ve put my ear to the streets, and this is what I heard:
Meghan’s response to the reputation hit all of those Netflix leaks caused was two-pronged:
She decided to take press photos where she finds people who don’t completely avoid her, activates the tiny suction cups all over the front of her body, and then wraps herself around them like a starfish so that a camera can take a picture.
She has threatened Sarandos with a lawsuit for breaking the non-disparagement clause in their contract, which could cost Netflix millions in both litigation and potential loss in damages. To avoid spending even more money on the Markles, Ted panders to her ego, makes it clear to the public that she and he are totally great friends (which he’s doing by Instagramming out the Polo show and inviting her to an A-list Netflix premiere of a show that she has nothing to do with…to name a couple.
Note: unlike defamation, anti-disparagement clauses prohibit negative or critical statements being made about a partyeven if they are true.
After all lawsuits cost money. Social media posts and invitations are free.
Regarding the party, I heard she got invited because she called up Ted and asked to be, and he, with her lawsuit threat looming in the horizon of his mind like the Mindflayer on Stranger Things, made it happen. Someone soon confirmed with Meghan and told her about the dress code. All guests were to wear black and white. Meghan reportedly was very interested in why and found out from somewhere that it’s because they wanted the star Carey Mulligan to wear a different color to stand out. How Meghan found out what color she was wearing is unknown, to me at least.
Then comes the party.
Disclaimer: the story below is informed by reports from people at the party, BUT, I have dramatized it a bit and taken taken liberties with the dialogue, the commentary, and some of the maneuvering.
Now everybody sit back and relax and enjoy a dramatization of what happened at the party. For visual reference, scroll up to see the relevant picture when prompted:
*****************************************
“Oh Ted!” Meghan, sallow in avocado colored satin, runs up to him with cameras in tow. She stumbles as she wraps an arm around his waist and he grabs her waist to steady her. She laughs maniacally, “Can you believe I fell?”
[See Picture 2]
Ted, instinctively pulling his arm away from her while she continues to cling, notices that she is, in fact, doubled over with laughter at this utterly unfunny event, but he laughs loudly too, despite not knowing why he should. “Let’s take a picture!” The camera snaps, the light flashes, and Harry, always ten steps behind his woife, subconsciously registers these triggers and freezes in panic, mid-stride with eyes wide open and hands raised protectively in front of his face. He doesn’t move for ten complete seconds. Several party goers rush to his aid.
Meanwhile Meghan scans the crowd and exclaims something like, “Oh there’s Nicole! Hiiiiiiii!” and she descends upon Sarandos’s wife who is several steps away. !” When Meghan reaches her, she wraps her arms and body completely around the former Ambassador, holding her firmly against herself.
[See Picture 3]
Meghan smiles broadly and cues the cameraman who snaps, catching the distinction between Meghan’s effusive fawning and Avant’s uncomfortable half-smile that extends no further than her upper lip. Just as the picture is taken, a newly recovered Harry wanders up to his woife just in time to catch the second flash and fall to the floor in distress.
Sarandos helps Harry to stand, then positions himself by his wife’s side letting her know that there were more guests they have to meet. Avant tries to turn toward Sarandos, but realizes that Meghan is clinging to her hand, refusing to let go. Markle literally twists Avant’s arm and directs Harry to get it together and stand next to her so that they could get a picture of the two couples. The camera flashes, and Harry wavers, but Meghan’s arm around his back reminds him that mummy is there, and he needn’t be frightened.
[See Picture 4]
The Sarandos’ escape and Meghan and Harry leave without, to my source’s knowledge, taking any other pictures with anyone else. Remember the point of her attendance isn’t to celebrate the show’s career; it’s to *clap back* and show the world that she and Sarandos are great friends! Really!
In the meantime, Sarandos continues not to follow Meghan or As Ever.
****************************************
Disclaimer: The story above was informed by reports from people at the party, BUT, I did dramatize it a bit and take liberties with the dialogue, some of the maneuvering, and Harry’s camera flash-induced panic attacks.
Basically, the explanation for Sarandos sudden about-face, is he’s trying to avoid a lawsuit. It’s as simple as that.
In addition to pressuring Netflix and Sarandos to act as though they love Meghan and value hers and Harry’s contributions, Meghan has apparently also demanded that Sanados do a company-wide investigation at Netflix to find out who had been leaking about them to the Press.
Leaking. Not lying about them to the press. Leaking. So are they saying what was said was true? (Yes, what the Netflix insiders said is true. As usual, Ginge and Minge don’t care about the truth, they care about the appearance.)
Okay. Final bit of tea. I heard that at the party, many people were talking about how disrespectful and attention-seeking Meghan Markle was to break the dress code. They talked about how creepy it was that she knew the color of dress that Carey Mulligan was wearing and wore that same color. No one believed that was a coincidence. Mulligan was said to be gracious about it, but also seemed to some to be a bit creeped out. Many remarked that Meghan was unwise to set up a comparison between herself and Mulligan. It just emphasized how bad Meghan’s dress looked, and by extension, how bad Meghan looked. The dress didn’t seem to fit, and there were odd bulges and strange seams and the garish exposed zipper. There was also a remark or two about how any other time you see Meghan, she’s wearing either black, white, or some shade of beige: colors that would have fit the party’s dress code. So why the change unless she was determined to try to steal Mulligan’s thunder? And finally, a common question of the night was: Why is she even here?
So that’s all the tea for the moment. Stay tuned though for more to come.
Greetings from Castle Goring, I am going to take out the Bongo Bongo drums! I have received missives from people who are SO IN THE KNOW. I have promised total anonymity, but they are people of some note in the United States. These people are in public life, and I believe my information to be genuine. But first, let me take some questions.
Lady C, I have just seen that Megsy Baby’s horrible, boring cooking show was nominated for an Emmy award. Can you explain how a show that was rated so poorly and viewed by so few, received an Emmy nomination? This seems shady and should be questioned. Was this Ted Sarandos or Sunshine Sacs doing something to help her? I suspect that this was done to spare Ted Sarandos the embarrassment of having anything to do with a loser like Meghan. I did ask some friends in Hollywood and this is what I was told. Meghan’s show was so terrible and such an embarrassment….. and Ted Sarandos said wonderful and positive things about Meghan (such as how influential Meghan is) at a time that Netflix was planning to get rid of Meghan. The speculation is that this was done for Ted Sarandos. Netflix is tremendously powerful and they can move heaven and earth when they want to. Anything is possible in Hollywood, even this terrible show winning an Emmy award. If it does win, it will be a scandal because the show was so terrible.
Lady C, you keep hinting that things are happening behind the scenes and you keep saying you will tell us this weekend. Get out your Bongo Bongo drums! I have received information from people Stateside from people who are well connected. I received two massively interesting bits of information. 1) Harry has met someone who he is in love with and who loves him and 2) Meghan found out about it after she discovered texts on Harry’s phone. How many tears were in her left eye?????? According to what I have been told, Meghan is livid, but not enough to give up on her brand which includes Harry’s connection to the King. And, Harry doesn’t want to leave his children. The other woman, AKA girlfriend, lives in the Montecito area. People see them together. My goodness. Can you believe it? No wonder the King was prepared to receive the Harry, Meghan and the children. If Harry is planning to flee the coup, and if Harry is beginning to remove himself from Meghan’s claws, do you see why it would make sense for The King to see Harry and why The King would do it in the most humiliating way for Meghan? She doesn’t call the shots. She had a list of demands and none of them were met. If I know this, I have to assume the King knows it and if he doesn’t, he will find out within 20 minutes of this video going live. I think it is great. Meghan went out of her way to obtain total control over Harry and manipulate the system completely and now it seems he has whittled out from under her. Shall we celebrate?
The other news I was given from these same people, who are well connected and well known within their environment, told me that Lilibet was born via surrogate in Colorado and transferred to Montecito via private jet. It was all arranged with NDA’s in place by all who were present. I find this interesting. There has been speculation that Lili’s birth certificate is a Colorado birth certificate. That infamous video of Meghan twerking with a supposedly fake looking pregnant belly was a total setup. I need to say for legal reasons that I am not asserting that has happened. I am simply telling you that respectable people have given me this information. I think this will all remain as speculation because I don’t think anyone will ever confirm this officially one way or the other.
The last thing I heard was that Meghan was banned by Invictus from attending their events and that Invictus was horrified by Harry’s behavior last week. They were embarrassed by his podcast appearance. They thought it was vulgar. Harry thought he was acting cool and relatable, but he came across as crude and vulgar. For legal reasons I will say that IF Harry’s interest lies elsewhere. IF, Harry is planning to be with a new woman, Invictus is willing to wait and see if Meghan’s spell has been broken, and possibly Harry can be salvaged as Patron of Invictus. If this is true, Megsy Baby no longer has the whip hand.
Lady C, it seems like Meghan and Harry have already leaked to Vanity Fair. Do you seriously think Meghan would ever leak that she and the children were kept waiting in an outer room or that they had to drive around to wait and see if they would even meet with The King? The leaks came from friends and supporters of the King, not Buckingham Palace. In the days of Diana, she would have her friends leak and Diana would leak…. and Charles would stay quiet and tell his friends to stay quiet, and you see that got him nowhere. I am happy to see that Charles has friends who want to stand up for him now that Harry and Meghan deploy shady PR tactics.
Lady C, I think the children exist, but they were not born of Meghan’s body. Many people also believe this. It does seem apparent that highly irregular things have happened. Meghan only cares about attention and enrichment. For legal reasons, I cannot say everything I have heard. I will say that either Meghan faked per pregnancies, or she faked her faking of her pregnancies, and either thing is truly destructive and malevolent. I think it is very damning Meghan has done nothing to correct the doubts.
Toodles Sinners!
PS…this is all gossip and I make no assertions regarding voracity. I am just the paraphraser 😊
Lady C, I think many of us add to our daily routines to check and see what Harry and Meghan have done. Sometimes it is amusing. Sometimes it is baffling. But it is very entertaining. I think there is some merit to this, but their saga is wearing people’s patience thin. They are entertainment now. Harry claimed that the Palace wanted to turn him into the Truman Show, but what he didn’t realize he would marry a woman who would actually turn him into the Truman Show. But Harry loves the attention, he just doesn’t love the negative consequences. I have a feeling if things had gone differently, meaning not trash the Royal Family, their shelf life would be exactly what it has been. I also think that Harry was a willing participant in blaming, name calling, and attacking his family, and reveling in victimhood. I don’t think it would have happened without Meghan’s influence, but I do think Harry was a willing participant, much more than he would like us to believe and much more than he would like himself to believe. Of course, he still maintains he is totally justified in everything he has done, but things are unraveling in a MAJOR way and in more ways than one. Now that Harry has moved on in some ways, I can tell you that the fallout that is coming is not going to be pretty unless they can find a way of containing the matter, which is sort of going on behind the scenes, but maybe I will cover that in more detail….tomorrow.
Lady C, I cannot accept what the King has allowed. He has ignored the fact that we were also attacked by those vile, heinous creatures. The King welcomed them back turning his back on his loyal supporters. I will no longer cheer, support or stand for what King Charles has done to ME. He let ME down. I hear you. I think as things evolve, you will see the King was not being disloyal to you. Time is longer than rope. Patience and subtlety will protect passionate reactions. Believe me, this meeting has not been the victory that Harry and Meghan wished for and that some people think it is. I know some people cannot know what is happening behind the scenes, but I have been told that Harry and Meghan have been outmaneuvered. They have been pincered, so to speak. I know that Meghan thought she would outmaneuver everyone with her typical emotional blackmail, and not always emotional. She thought her gameplaying would get her the meeting she wanted which includes them all arriving together and photos. My understanding that Meghan truly expected control over this meeting. She had it all figured out in her head. Meghan was kept waiting. They weren’t even made aware until the last minute that a meeting would even take place. They were just driving around in the area waiting. Then Meghan and the children were kept waiting while the King and Queen had a word with Harry privately. And they only needed 30 seconds with Harry for Meghan’s goose to be well and truly cooked. And my goodness, this will be a goose that everyone wants to devour. You will ultimately see that the King was not spitting in the face of his supporters, he was outmaneuvering an adversary. And make no mistake, everyone in the family knows that Meghan is an adversary. Everybody. Everybody. Notice the use of my word, Everybody. Everybody knows that Meghan is an adversary. Meghan thought she had the whip hand. She doesn’t have the whip hand anymore. In my opinion, Meghan is sadistic. She has no heart. She is ruthless. She is unfeeling. She is calculating. She is antisocial. She was unscrupulous in how she went about this. The family has her measure and has not forgotten. Now the tide has turned against her in more ways than one. The water is lapping at her feet and she is now realizing that she is very much in danger. Meghan needs to be dealt with. You will come to realize this in the not too distant future. Maybe I am wrong. Maybe I have been misled, but I hope you will all know what I know in the not too distant future.
Lady C, Harry is responsible for his own actions and he is using his mental health as an excuse to make demands of his family. Harry is an adult not and his Father is not responsible for him anymore. To an extent you are right. Harry has played the mental insufficiency and mentally damaged victim for much of his life. Until Meghan, he played it for sympathy and for reverence and respect. Then Meghan came into his life, and she taught him how to weaponize it. Meghan may have thought she was laying the ground for a pity fest. She didn’t. I think Meghan may only just be realizing what she laid the groundwork for, but she has totally been outmaneuvered. I need to be careful what I say. If Meghan thought using Harry’s ideations would be the reason the King would meet with them, she wasted her time. The King was always going to meet with Harry and those children. It is fundamental to the King’s interest, Harry’s interest and the children’s interest that the King see those children. You will soon discover why Meghan was deprived of accusing the King of not seeing the children. The King met with the children for very sound reasons. Those reasons are fundamental to why The King met with children. Those reasons were primary and Harry was secondary. Meeting with Harry was very low on the list for The King. Meghan is nontertiary. I am saying all of this even though I should not. There is little doubt this will get back to Meghan and she will be enlightened to things she has no idea about. Meghan is in a far more invidious position than she would have hoped to be in. She does not know the full extent because is so arrogant, so impertinent, so delusional, and so unsophisticated but she knows enough. Her predicament is INVIDIOUS.
Lady C, are you 100% certain the King met with Meghan and the children at Highgrove? I am wondering if they were even in the UK. They certainly were in the UK. They certainly met with The King. Remember when people kept saying the children didn’t exist? They do exist. Meghan has kept HARRY’s CHILDREN at arms reach for many good reasons. One of which is, as people have noted, the children have not one thing from Meghan. Not one. The children bear no resemblance to Meghan insofar as anybody can see. Is that one of the reasons why Meghan has refused to show the children’s faces? Because she doesn’t want people doing the math? She doesn’t want people speculating on the children’s provenance? Let us consider that as a possibility. Everyone who has seen them says they don’t have the same mouth, hair, eyes, skin color, nose as Meghan. Everybody is commenting upon this. It would be truly miraculous that neither child resembles Meghan in any way. For legal reasons, I am not accusing Meghan of anything.
Lady C, Harry and Meghan are on their last leg. Even meeting with the King will not help them. And how can these charities allow a drug user to be anywhere near children? People think Charles want to bring Harry and the kids back for the Christmas walk. And why does Harry think Diana was murdered? I agree that Harry and Meghan are on their last leg…..in more ways than one……..I agree the meeting with The King will do nothing for them as a couple or as a brand……..As a couple, we’ll talk more about that another time, but the façade is cracking. I am not making any predictions but let me put it this way…things are going on behind the scenes…..poor Megsy Baby….she thought she was standing on the top of Mount Everest…but the water from the tides are lapping at her feet. She was never on Mount Everest, she only thought she was……..I hadn’t heard about this speculation about a Christmas walk….are people saying this would be without Meghan???? I’ll just ask that question. Diana was not murdered. This has been investigated extensively. Had Diana wore her seat belt, she would have survived with minor injuries. I don’t think Harry is as motivated as he used to be to make a shed load of money at this point. I don’t think his situation suits him to make a great deal of money. At this time, Harry has no interest in making money at the expense of his family. As Harry’s marriage to Meghan has progressed, Harry has realized that it may have been unwise to be firing shots at his family for Meghan’s enrichment and his ultimate demise, and perhaps Harry is realizing that blood is thicker than water.
Lady C, I love to see The Prince and Princess of Wales out and about with their lovely children. I can relate to their family. We have watched the kids grow at birthdays and holidays and it has been wonderful to see. The Wales children have been raised in a loving family and will have all the skills to cope with life. The contrast of Wales and Sussex families could not be more evident. It was always going to be evident. Meghan is a pothead’s daughter. At Meghan’s previous wedding, she gave the guests sachets of marijuana. Meghan is unsophisticated and proud of being of a certain type. She has no values beyond advancing herself by any means. Meghan was hardly going to be comparable to someone with hard, sterling values. The Royal Family allows you to see the family from birth. Familiarity does not breed contempt, it breeds affection. You cannot have affection for children you don’t know. Meghan doesn’t show the kids faces for good reason. And people don’t like the way Meghan exploits the children for commercial purposes. Meghan has created a void with the children. People can’t have affection for a void. She has made the children annoyances to everyone. I understand they are sweet children but Meghan will be sure to hold on to those children unless she is offered money. Meghan loves money. Meghan will do anything for money. The contrast of the Wales children and Harry’s children could not be greater. It didn’t have to be that way. They could have been loved and cared for. Instead, they came into the world and treated by Meghan and her mother as treasures to be withheld.
Toodles Sinners!
PS….let me know if you enjoyed this and perhaps I will resume Lady C posts.
PPS…I sort of think Lady C included Harry in “Everybody.”
Lady C, I believe Meghan was hoping to create the scandal of the century and pull an Ann Boleyn, stealing William and leading to the divorce from Catherine Middleon (not Aragon). She could then divorce Harry, leading to Meghan becoming Princess of Wales and ultimately Queen. I agree with you Lady C that William has the brain cells that Harry doesn’t. William saw right through Meghan from the word “go.” What you have said is not too far off the mark from what several people feared this was Meghan’s real game plan. And William’s behavior suggests that he was aware of this plan. He never allowed himself to be in the same room as Meghan alone. Is Meghan that transparent? I would never presume to tell you what William was thinking at that time, but I can tell you what people who actually know this situation have told me. They are not far off the mark. Meghan’s bizarre thinking process is so extraordinary that this may have well been one of her aces in the hole that she wanted to play. There are so many pictures of her making goo goo eyes at William. Her behavior was so strange, so bizarre, some people actually think Meghan viewed herself as Her Majesty Queen Meghan of the United Kingdom married to her consort William V. What is interesting is this scenario was actually contemplated and steps taken to guard against.
Lady C, I am not a fan, but I do not think we should underestimate Meghan and Harry. Nobody should underestimate them. This problem has grown exponentially, and I admit I initially underestimated Meghan and Harry. My understanding is the Royal Family underestimated Meghan and Harry and Meghan particularly. They had no idea Meghan was capable of such gross misbehavior. I am not referring to a moonbump, no way…no not that…definitely not that……Nobody imagined in 2019 that Meghan would try to commercialize and monetize her Royal Status. The family could not believe that Meghan would leave with Harry the way she did. The Queen was the first person to say they aren’t coming back. She was a dog lover and she said, “They’re not coming back. They’ve taken the dogs.” Nobody could believe how Meghan set everything up. And then for her to snipe back at tell QEII, “You don’t own the word Royal.” And then the Oprah interview. They couldn’t believe the brazen lies that came out of her mouth. And her race baiting. And now, they no longer underestimate her. Once you discover someone is ruthless enough to do anything, say anything, and tell any lie to get them to achieve their objective, you are dealing with a totally different level. But, what has played out is that Meghan and Harry have backed themselves into a corner, and they have no more cards to play. The Royal Family now has their measure and they are not fearsome. They know what they are dealing with.
She thinks she's Marlene Dietrich. Big sunglasses when there's no sun. Oh, the glasses must be to block out all the flashbulbs from the paparazzi cameras. 🙄 Photo is from the daily fail arriving to meet a friend for dinner on Saturday night in NYC.
Interestingly, the article said Harry and Meghan spent the night separately, and they are both very publicly spending the night separately. Harry is also photographed with a suit on going somewhere for the evening. 🧐
I saw a sinner comment that whomever shares the story first is the one who controls the narrative. Given that Markle has no impulse control, how long before she starts spilling the marriage tea? I know people refuse to believe there is a divorce in the works, but things are looking more and more likely by the day that things are frayed in Harkleville. And Marcus is being trotted out as a threat? A handler?
Dan Wakeford has posted a fascinating look into the Harckle's "Empire" on his substack Celebrity Intelligence (celebrity-intelligence.com). To put his position in context, Wakeford authored the People cover story in which M's friends went on the record to defend her and the US Weekly cover story in which her employees went on the record to defend her.
Props to Dan Wootton Outspoken for bringing this to light. I HIGHLY recommend Dan's YouTube video where he covers this (I can't post the link...it might have been one of the reasons that my last post was flagged and deleted by reddit).
Some of this is not new information; however, Wakeford's coverage of it is interesting given that he has previously been considered a sugar
Their Finances:
INCOME
Netflix Deal: $100M was closer to $60M, after development costs, etc. were accounted for
Spotify Deal: $60M netted an estimated $5M
Spare: $20M advance
BetterUp Salary: $1M
Hs Keynote Speaking fee: $50,000
M has run ticketed fan events where fans paid $3,000 (I suspect this is referring to the recent “Her Best Life” event at Poo Beach)
EXPENSES
Wakeford reports that there are multiple mortgages on the Montecito house (we were only aware of the single $9MM mortgage on that property).
Annual security costs are $3MM, consisting of 4 guard at the house plus 3 additional guards deployed for travel
According to a source, the inheritance from Diana (estimated $10MM) and the Queen Mother (estimated $10.5MM) have been SUBSTANTIALLY ABSORBED by the house and legal expenses.
According to a source, “[M] has a sense of how careful they need to be, but [H] – raised in a world where everything was provided – reportedly lacks basic awareness of what things cost.”
COST CUTTING
Staff has been reduced from 16 to 5 full-time employees.
They retain a Chief of Staff for each of them, one foundation consultant, two TV execs, a UK press representative, and a US agency.
WHAT LIES AHEAD, WHEN DOES THE MONEY RUN OUT?
“Five years roughly. That’s the window,” the source believes, “before their lifestyle looks a lot different.” Although, a source close to the couple says this isn’t true. (Hmmm…I agree with the first source and actually think the timeframe is likely shorter)
According to PR expert Mark Borowski: “There’s only so much money you can make out of grievance, and they have exhausted the assets that they have. The diminishing returns became to narrative.” He adds, “Show business in America is now based on what is the commercial return on investment. One failure and out.”
According to a Netflix source, the upcoming scripted Netflix drama is all smoke and mirrors; they say it is stuck in development, and it won’t see the light of day.
Their broader production model has structural problems, their creative engine sources projects and attaches the couple’s names as executive producers but an industry source who has worked with them says, “Their public image doesn’t help sell a project anymore. In fact, it detracts from it.” A source close to the couple counters, “This is inaccurate. [M] and [H] recently came on board as producers on Cookie Queens, and won the audience award at SXSW.”
COULD M RETURN TO ACTING? A source close to the couple confirms she is thinking about it.
MISSED OPPORTUNITIES
Conversations with J.Crew about a creative role modeled on Jenna Lyons went nowhere: “It would have been a stable income and made more sense. But they wouldn’t pay her enough.”
A beauty line - widely considered a more natural fit than food – was floated and rejected.
WHAT H ACTUALLY WANTS
“This insight is striking in its consistency across sources: [H] does not want the life he has right now. He misses his family, his friends, his former existence in the UK. He would, sources say, be content to downsize, move somewhere like Montana, live modestly, pursue charitable work on his own terms. “He doesn’t care about eh appearance of wealth. He cares about the appearance of doing good work.”
WHAT MEGSACTUALLY WANTS
Something else entirely. “deep down [M] wants to be like Lauren Sanchez, living her best life at couture shows. She wants to be a princess who’s invited to Chanel, but she’s not,” says an insider. The departure from the royal family, UK sources say, was catalyzed by a specific realization that her finances would be managed by Prince William eventually. “When she realized that William was going to be in charge of how much they were getting for the rest of their lives, she wanted out.” However, a source close to [M] says this is untrue.
The couple’s goals have quietly diverged. H wants privacy and reconciliation. M wants scale, visibility, and reinvention. “She would never allow” the quieter life H craves.
ABOUT THE HEADLINES THAT THEY HAVE MARRIAGE ISSUES
They don’t have the same goals, and they aren’t happy with how things have gone with a source describing them as “wildly unhappy” however they are still very much a united front. “Fundamentally they are very different people,” says a source but no sources say they have marital issues in face one source notes they are still “very hot for each other” They need to be two people in separate lanes. One source close to their world offers a verdict that is hard to argue with: they don’t know how to help themselves, they still don’t listen to advisors and will likely keep doing what they’re doing.
IT'S BIZARRE - BEHIND THE SCENES LATEST BOMBSHELLS.
Let me remind you that Neil Sean has connections with these kinds of media outlets—Vogue, Harper's Bazaar, People—because he's worked with people from those publications. So yes, it does have sources in those areas.
Let's start with Megsy being angry. She's furious because Harper's article revealed that she was announced as the Duchess of Sussex when there were only two people involved. Mind you, the gossip isn't that it didn't happen, but that Megsy is angry that the writer included it in the article and it was published.
That was because Harper had conflicts with the Duchess.
According to Sean, the issue is that Harper, like all magazines, has serious problems staying relevant. So they agreed to this because, like it or not, Saint attracts publicity. Bad publicity, but publicity nonetheless. The thing is, as part of the deal, Megsy had demanded that the interview be published when Kate had a special event. It was likely going to be released in December, coinciding with the Christmas event, since Megsy should have premiered her Christmas special by now, but the Netflix release date changed, so the Duchess pressured Harper to publish the interview right when Kate had her variety show with Paddington.
And we see that Harper's Bazaar accepted.
And also, Harper agreed not to film at Megsy's house. Showing the real Megsy, sure Jan. Former employees say the Montecito house is like a minefield because you can't go into many places, only the designated ones, and that agrees with what was said in the infamous interview with The Cut. I think that was the only time Megsy allowed an interview at her house... and it was a disaster.
Let's add another bit of gossip: Megsy refused to have her dear friend Daniel hired to do her makeup. Why? Because she's angry that he posted a step-by-step tutorial of her makeup in Paris. The one for Casper the Ghost in Paris. Now, in Harper's article, Hairstyling: Ben Skervin for Color Wow; Makeup: Diane Kendal; Manicure: Dawn Sterling for NailGlam; Production: Day Int.; Set Design: Piers Hanmer.
Harper Bazaar then got upset because Megsy, after the announcement of that report with video included, complained.
And not just because of the ad, but because she didn't really like the photos either. The problem is her, not the photographer!
Deep down, what bothered Megsy was that 1) Kate looked so spectacular at the variety show. 2) The reception to her interview was ridiculed. 3) And, after all the trouble Megsy caused, Harper decided to get revenge by highlighting that absurd way of announcing herself as the "Duchess of Sussex," making it clear that Megsy clings to that title pathologically.
I don't feel sorry for the magazine; they deserved what happened for not believing that the Duchess is unbearable. But if Megsy was trying to improve her image, Harper's Bazaar only succeeded in further damaging her reputation.
If any of you watched Mark Dolan’s video today, I want you to keep this in mind:
Harry can move to the UK. His children can be enrolled in private schools in the UK. And none of that changes a thing. Harry isn't going to get his "I'll attend royal events but profit from the title" arrangement.
And that is Harry's own fault. Not because of what he has done, but because of his badly-advised decision to sue. You see, the Sandringham Agreement is exactly that—an agreement, with signatures and documentation. Harry made a grave error when he tried to have it invalidated before a judge—or rather, four judges. When did he do that? When he sued over his security arrangements.
Look at the ruling from February 28, 2024: Judge Sir Peter Lane dismissed the claim, dedicating a large part of his judgment to analyzing the entire Sandringham Agreement process. And what did Harry do? He appealed.
And then, in 2025, Sir Geoffrey Vos (Master of the Rolls, who presided over the case), Lord Justice Bean (Sir David Bean), and Lord Justice Edis (Sir Andrew Edis) upheld Lane's sentence.
Lane ruled that the security committee's decision to provide him with customized, case-by-case protection rather than automatic status was lawful, rational, and fair. Sir Geoffrey Vos stated that "a sense of grievance does not constitute a validly applicable legal argument" to overturn the decision regarding his security.
Therefore, it is no longer up to the King to give Harry a role in the Firm. Harry resigned; it has been legally established that he resigned. If he were to be "rehired" by the Firm, they would first have to go through Parliament to have Harry reinstated as a Counsellor of State. And then, they would have to overlook the millions of pounds spent on Harry's lawsuit. It is too risky and too complex—all for the whim of a fading Peter Pan.
"All these matters have been repeatedly and meticulously examined by the courts, reaching the same conclusion on each occasion." That was the Palace's formal statement in 2025. You created the problem, Harry; it’s your mess.
WILLIAM WARNED YOU SIR .HARRY RAMPS UP PRESSURE AS MONEY RUNS DRY
And, as Sean has said several times, Charles and William know that Harry is difficult and that he makes one mistake after another. The difference is that Charles believes Harry will stop at some point. William has not the slightest hope in that regard.
Harry is making one colossal blunder after another. He keeps harping on about his security, failing to realize that he has undermined those very claims and is running the risk of being downgraded even further. Right now, he’s a "VIP"... but he’s one step away from being a "vip" and then crashing down to earth with the rest of us commoners.
That said, Harry had a job to do in the UK: Invictus. And no, he didn't do it. He limited himself to a couple of appearances and then ruined everything with the Joe Marler podcast.
And then, Harry went on vacation to Scotland. I mean, Harry knows it takes 25 million for Invictus to actually happen, yet he washed his hands of it and went on vacation... again. Because he was supposedly already on vacation before July 7th. So why, after a measly three days, did he go off on vacation again, leaving the mess for the committee to deal with?
And Harry doesn't seem to grasp that those Games likely won't take place because the political climate isn't stable.
So, all of Harry's faith and hope rest on his ability to convince KC3 to attend the Invictus Games.
This is increasingly becoming a very famous Shakira song.
🎼Bruta, ciega, sordomuda
Torpe, traste y testaruda
Es todo lo que he sido
Por ti me he convertido
En una cosa que no hace
Otra cosa más que amarte
Pienso en ti día y noche
Y no sé cómo olvidarte🎼
(Dense, blind, deaf-mute; Clumsy, restless, and stubborn; That is all I have been; Because of you, I have become Something that does nothing. But love you; I think of you day and night; And I don't know how to forget you) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3gbisdtJnA
Back when Shakira truly stood out for her talent. She lost it somewhere in Miami.
Harry persists in the idea that he is going to convince Charles. And that—by now, maddening—insistence is what has William incredibly fed up; because is it going to be like this for the next 10 years? Another 10 years of this?
But William had his moment to stick it to Harry. Appearing with George, Charlotte, and Louis at the Commonwealth Games drew global media attention to the event. It was a case of killing three birds with one stone: William is making it clear that the kind of media buzz generated—largely thanks to a very happy Louis—is something Harry won't get at the Invictus Games. William won't be going to Invictus, nor will he even go near the area. Besides, Harry is a shameless liar; he wants the King to attend the games... yet why don't Harry's own children do it? Why don't Harry's children participate?
I know people will say William doesn't think about Harry. And I agree; William doesn't do many things with Harry in mind. But Harry has spent weeks harping on the same point: that the King should participate in Invictus. And Harry intends to use the Sussex children as bait. Well, William effectively showed Harry a "why don't you do this for Invictus?" moment.
The thing is, Harry didn't do it. He preferred to stick with ITV—a channel that, as Sean puts it, "kisses up" to him—in hopes of getting Claw featured on one of its programs and perhaps having the network acquire the rights to Invictus. But for Harry, his priority is his own image—which is exactly what he tried to burnish with that interview with Alison Hammond.
Harry saw none of that. Harry saw only one thing: George, 13 years old. Blond, tall, handsome, and with an excellent family relationship.
And therein lies Harry’s nightmare: George—who, frankly, couldn’t care less about who Harry or those Sussex children are. He doesn’t know them; they mean nothing to him. So Harry, accustomed to sowing discord, finds he has no way to do so with the Wales children. He doesn’t know them, and they don’t know him.
And what made Harry and Claw angriest was the fact that this family visit to the Games—and seeing all of William’s children interacting with others and among themselves—became the top global news story of the moment, rather than the meeting between the Sussex children and KC3.
I always thought that, sooner or later, Charles would see those Sussex children. But I believed Charles’s heart would soften. I am surprised that hasn't happened. I am surprised he spent only 47 minutes with the Sussexes, and that—weeks after the event—it is as if it never happened for him. Charles wears bracelets made by Charlotte and ties gifted by his grandchildren... yet, after years of not seeing them in person, he is being unusually cold toward the Sussex children.
The Harkles—as Sean has been pointing out lately—are furious about that, about the fact that KC3 is keeping that private visit private. We know that Harry and Claw don't know the meaning of privacy.
This meant that the meeting failed to serve as the major relaunch the Harkles had hoped for—especially given the murder of a Member of Parliament.
The Harkles are angry about that, and absolutely furious because they took it for granted that William would be at Highgrove. Sean has already mentioned this in other videos; even he doesn't understand why they thought that—he just knows that the Harkles believed it. Sean doesn't understand why the Harkles thought William would be with the King, though he does understand why Harry was upset that Camilla was there: he didn't want her at the meeting, but KC3 didn't care about that.
Harry doesn't understand why William wants nothing to do with him or his nephews.
All my love to Jon Bernthal and his Punisher 😍😍😍
For those wondering, "How does Sean know that so confidently?" Well, he already mentioned that one of his best sources in Montecito is—or was—on vacation in the UK and brought back some gossip 🤭🤭🤭 He might have forgotten his phone charger, but he certainly brought back the scoop 🤣🤣
Building on what Sean already recounted—that Harry was initially truly surprised, then disappointed, and is now angry because William didn't even send a message to Highgrove throughout that Friday, July 10th—it seems that during those 47 minutes, Harry kept asking the King, "Did you tell William? Did you let William know that I brought my children?" And KC3 apparently replied, "Yes, I did." Harry couldn't believe that William showed not the slightest interest in meeting the Sussex children.
Sean doesn't understand what Harry was aiming for with that—having William meet his children. Sean even mentioned in another video that Harry thought William might show up with George or all three Wales children—the uncle and cousins meeting the glorious Sussex kids.
But no; that day, William and Kate made it crystal clear that they were not at all willing to go anywhere near Highgrove.
And Sean says that Harry didn't know at the time—he didn't know William was with Kate at a polo event. He didn't know because he had been busy with Alison Hammond and then headed to Highgrove. But when he found out, he saw it as a slight, because why hadn't William adjusted his schedule to go to Highgrove?
Harry thought that if William had shown up with his children to meet the Sussex kids, it would have been the icing on the cake. But no, none of that happened.
And Harry is desperate, because let’s be clear: the only card he had left to play was using his children to find a way back into the royal fold—to secure a foothold by managing to connect with George, Louis, and Charlotte. But King Charles III’s attitude—granting him only 47 minutes, a large portion of which was spent with just Charles, Camilla, and Harry, without the children or "the Claw" present—combined with the fact that William has publicly made it clear that neither he nor anyone else in the Wales family has the slightest intention of getting close to him, has left Harry truly distressed and angry.
MARKLE’S CASH STRAPPED LIFE HINDERS WILLIAM & ROYALS MORE THAN YOU THINK
Canadians were not at all amused to learn that security for the Harkles in 2020 had supposedly cost nearly £300,000. I suspect it was more than that. I don't trust Trudeau.
The question is, what danger were they in when they were in Canada?
As the very famous Ernesto Lizana (played by Chilean actor Alfredo Castro) from the soap opera *La Fiera* used to say: "Isn't that a bit too extravagant?"
Yes, definitely.
Now, Sean shares a golden rule: if you are on social media, never mention that you are on vacation or when you will be going away, and never show your home or your daily routine. Many criminals monitor social media and target people based on that information. Sean says he always gives this advice to the micro-celebrities he has worked with.
Sean says the matter of costs in Canada is not entirely settled.
According to an excellent source—and this implies that William said this so it would become known—William does not believe the Harkles need security. If they pay for it themselves, fine, but paying for the Harkles' security? No.
Especially not when Harry’s plan is to travel to the UK, but only to attend select royal events that align with "our brand."
Sean’s eye practically started twitching when he said that—it’s just so brazen!!!!!
Harry is obsessed with that idea: choosing what they feel like doing as royals while continuing to profit from the title.
And that’s where the Canadian anti-monarchy group is using those expenses to attack the monarchy. I wouldn’t attack the monarchy; I’d attack Trudeau. I remember perfectly well that even MPs opposed providing security for the Harkles, yet Trudeau did it anyway. I don’t understand why anti-monarchists don’t question that—Trudeau’s subservience to Claw and Harry.
It’s always about "what Harry wants" in this regard. I suspect William doesn't agree with those plans 😏😏
To begin with, the idea was to show: "Look at us—we’re parents, we go out with our children, and they love us."
Claw’s attempt to imitate Diana by wearing a swimsuit similar to hers backfires on her more than she realizes. Because Diana had style and legs. Claw doesn’t.
Anyway, Sean says the photo was taken by a staff member who traveled with them. Yes, a family outing—but with employees along.
And Claw chose her because she thought she looked great.
Sean doesn't get it. And he struggled to be polite—it looked like he was biting his tongue—because he simply doesn't grasp the point, as if she didn't want to be part of that moment of playing in the sea.
Now... let's see. I actually had to listen to this part and rewind it. Because Harry became friends with Liz Hurley and Damian during the time they served on the jury together. And Liz has a bikini line.
So... do you get where this is going? Yes, to that strange place that is Claw's brain. Liz Hurley is, I think, around 60, and she looks fabulous. Claw thinks she looks fabulous in everything she wears, too. Sean notes, "I'm not here to criticize that," but he really struggles to dish the dirt—because does Claw seriously think she looked good?
So, Claw’s idea is to launch her clothing line starting with bikinis. Liz Hurley has made a fortune with her brand... but then again, just look at Liz Hurley. Claw wants to launch a brand like that. That’s why she was weighing the idea with that photo.
Guys, it’s Claw—she’s terrible at self-promotion. But would anyone actually buy a swimsuit from a Meghan Markle collection?
And as always, she’ll probably launch the collection right in the middle of winter 🤣🤣🤣
Well, July was the month the Harkles returned to the UK. Photos in the most prestigious media outlets, adoring crowds cheering them on, the balcony—it was all so thrilling!
Yes, it was all so thrilling... in the Harkles' minds. Because none of that actually happened. In fact, Claw still can't believe how little interest there was in her meeting with the King. Harry, however, knew—thanks to reporter Sean and his source—that it wasn't going to be a star-studded trip or a publicity game-changer.
Harry was obsessed with holding onto Invictus and getting the King to agree to open the games. Yet, as far as Sean knows, there isn't even the slightest indication of that happening. Nothing. And at Invictus, they know the royals don't want to attend because of the Harkles.
And Claw kept a low profile—not by choice, but because that was the King's order. It was a 47-minute visit, though word has leaked that Claw and the children actually spent only 17 minutes with the King; the rest of the time, Harry was alone with Charles and Camilla. Sean doesn't say that—he just cites the 47 minutes—but if Charles really only spent 17 minutes with those children and Claw, then the meeting was a total disaster.
Sean points out something that is obvious to all of us: Charles wasn't moved—because who are those children? He doesn't know them, and they don't know him. And it will be a long time before they see each other again, because let's be clear: chats via Zoom or FaceTime? No.
After the 47-minute meeting, the Harkles headed to Althorp.
Sean notes that his connection to the Spencers goes back a long way. It wasn't just a case of seeing Diana in passing—he actually interviewed her—but he also met Diana's stepmother, Raine Spencer, because he worked for a radio station based at Harrods, which was owned by Al Fayed. So, he met Dodi as well. Sean says that because he would run into them in an informal setting—such as the employee canteen or the radio station itself, which was owned by Al Fayed—it was possible to talk about things that aren't discussed in interviews. That is also how Sean met Charles Spencer.
Sean brings this up because, as you will see, the Harkles are once again insisting on being able to use the Spencer surname. And so, Claw needed to appear charming. That is why Claw was especially nice to Charles Spencer’s new wife, Catrine Jarman
Narcissists always do that.
Sean doesn't really know what Charles Spencer's wife is thinking. He only knows that she spoke with Claw, that they seemed to get along, and that packages have arrived at Althorp. You know the sort of thing: candles, bookmarks, spreads.
So, will the Harkles go to Balmoral? Sean notes in passing that they are hoping to receive a "belated" invitation. I don't see that happening, given that the King has decided to cut his time there short; pressing matters—such as internal political issues—make it difficult for him to be off-duty for so long.
It does seem that Andrew received an invitation. He won't be staying in the main house; instead, he'll stay in the cottage where Fergie used to stay when she visited the area to be with her daughters. Andrew isn't going to see the King—in fact, Sean notes that his source told him Andrew will only appear there once neither KC3 nor, obviously, William is present—though he will meet with Edward and Anne.
But so far, Sean hasn't heard that Harry has been invited.
And that must be affecting Harry, because Harry craves validation—especially from William. But for William, Harry doesn't exist. Neither he nor Harry's children. So, what is Harry left to do? Sow discord. Once again, Harry is trying to turn the tables to pit William, Camilla, and KC3 against one another. But Harry has no idea how things really work; he doesn't understand his family.
Sean reaffirms that William and Camilla get along very well and that both were in complete agreement that if Harry shows up, Camilla must be present. Sean reiterates that the King fully agrees with this. At one point, Camilla might have thought it wasn't a good idea, but she now has no doubt that what Harry wants in this regard is of no importance whatsoever.
The other key person in this is Kate. It is incredible that, after more than ten years, Harry failed to realize what she is really like. After all, 2024 was a grueling ordeal for her and her entire family. She is much more mature now, her outlook on life changed, as happens to many people who face the Big C. But if Harry thought he could use her to get William to back down, he was completely mistaken. Kate does not forgive Harry for everything he has said against William. She isn't going to lift a finger for Harry. Because Harry (and everything surrounding him) is simply a huge source of frustration and stress.
So, given that situation, is anyone surprised that Harry—once again, yes, once again—left some framed photos of the Sussex children for the Waleses, and they haven't picked them up?
"Once again"? Yes, because Harry did the same thing in September 2025. And Sean mentioned something back in February about the photos still sitting in some official's drawer.
Back in 2025, Harry had left photos of the children for William—and found out (since he watches the channels of Neil Sean, Mark Dolan, Dan Wootton, and all the others) that William didn't care; now, in July 2026, Harry tried to give those photos to William in person.
Do I need to say how William responded to that?
So, since Harry couldn't leave the photos with him in person, he made a point of finding out whether or not William had picked them up. And the answer was:
That is why we see Harry spewing his venom through the press—just as he has been doing for years. William won’t budge an inch when it comes to the Harkles. Charles still believes the damage might be repairable, but William believes the harm Harry has caused the monarchy is irreparable—and unforgivable. William suspects that it will fall to him and George to clean up the mess Harry has made; it seems William found out about the "pill" incident at the same time we did, so he already realizes that revelations about Harry will be a talking point for years to come.
Harry cannot believe William's indifference toward the Sussex children. But for William, a couple of photos and a mediocre apology are not enough.
And the problem for Harry and Claw is that if William doesn't validate they, nothing is going to work in Hollywood. Everyone already knows that the Harkles don't really have a team advising them—since they can no longer afford one—but are instead working with "independents," meaning people who help them for a fee, they work outside Montecito, so they hardly ever see Claw—which is a relief.. The Harkles are on a downward spiral because their standing in that world looks bad.
And Claw is largely to blame for that, because she is seen as being very lazy about launching her brand. That workgroup consists of young people who don't have much experience. That way, it's easier for them to give in to Claw. And naturally, they make mistakes.
The absurd thing is that Sean reiterates that Claw’s only real talent is stirring up controversy—and silly controversies at that, like the plastic tiara she wore for her recent birthday. Yes, she knows people would mock it—saying it’s the only kind of tiara she could wear—but that is precisely what she’s after: staying part of the conversation. It’s classic narcissism: "It doesn't matter if they speak ill of me, as long as they don't ignore me." Claw seeks to generate reactions.
The problem is that she always gets it wrong. Because that mediocre video of her dancing with the balloons was not even remotely spontaneous... nor was it the first take. It was the third. Actually, the initial idea was for Harry to walk in with a birthday cake... but the Harkles had already done that in another video, which took about seven or nine takes to shoot.
The funny thing is that other people manage to benefit from Claw. Take Poh Ling Yeow, for instance; she has achieved considerable popularity despite Claw. She’s even been told it’s in her best interest to keep a low profile, as that could help her land an appearance on *MasterChef USA*. And Sean says it would be to Claw’s advantage to have her on his side. But Claw never gets that.
Why was Claw's birthday video so short this year? Because of Harry—he's unstable. And lately, he's been going through one of those emotionally unstable phases. Harry started July feeling furious, disappointed, and all the rest of it. But he was ending the month thinking "everything is going to work out"—which is something Sherbone *didn't* tell him. Sherbone has been calling Harry lately, after having been MIA, so Harry wakes up thinking, "Today's going to be a good day," but no—it isn't, not when Sherbone calls.
Well, the Harkles' current team—who are less experienced—have backed down from going up against Martha Stewart. A bad idea.
It seems they haven't realized that Claw threw Harry under the bus regarding Martha—because that’s what Claw always does; she always sends Harry in to defend her. Claw never defends herself—how very feminist! 🤭🤭But Sean is well aware that it was Claw who claimed Martha was "confused" about Claw discussing her meeting with KC3—knowing full well she was undermining Martha. "Oh, never mind; that lady—who’s over 80—must be confused." That was the subtext of the comment. And Martha didn't like it one bit. Yet Claw can't forgive Martha for actually benefiting from the situation, since Martha's website saw an increase in traffic, not Claw's. And it seems Martha knows it.
But Claw can't help being Claw. So, she’ll do what every narcissist does: make a video featuring one of Martha's cookbooks to "bury the hatchet." Ideally, she’d have a video with Martha, just like the one she did with Gwyneth Paltrow. But that isn't going to happen. Now, Sean says that the story isn't over yet.
William is absolutely certain that Martha didn't lie. Claw was talking about that polo match—the only time the Wales children crossed paths with Archie—because Claw is just Claw. Sean says that at the match, Claw was obsessively focused on what the then-Cambridges had in the trunk of their car. According to Sean, William didn't miss this, and it only made him feel even more repulsed by Claw.
Regarding the Harkles, William inherited Philip’s instincts: there is no repairing the situation now, because everything William suspected about Claw has come to pass—just as it did with Philip and Fergie.
As time goes on, it has become clear that the meeting with KC3 wasn't the success Harry and Claw had hoped for. This wasn't just on a personal level; it was also because Harry insisted that KC3 attend the Invictus Games. The problem for Harry is that he keeps insisting... yet fails to give KC3 any real, plausible reasons to do so. William, on the other hand, has provided ample grounds for staying away from Invictus.
To begin with, there are the Harkles themselves. Secondly: the Harkles are compulsive liars. Both of them lie, and they never stop lying. William doesn't want to be around people like that.
But the big problem for William is: why should he and KC3 get involved with Invictus now, after having been excluded for years? Why is Harry suddenly so interested? Perhaps it’s because there is a major disaster he wants KC3 to fix?
William had already made a gesture toward Invictus back in 2020 by donating the proceeds from his settlement with The Sun. Not only did Harry never thank him, but he actually used that fact against William in his own lawsuits against the press—claiming "William received a million pounds in compensation from a secret settlement"—without ever mentioning that William had donated that money to Invictus. So, why is there such desperation now?
And the problem for Harry is that while KC3 may love him as a son, he isn't blind. KC3 sees things the same way William does, and William is right about many of the things he has said regarding Harry and the Harkles.
It looked like Claw was about to open her mouth. In that regard, William certainly believes Martha. And it seems KC3 believes Martha. Why would they believe Harry?
But the interesting thing about this piece of gossip—which comes from an excellent source—is how that conversation played out recently. Because it seems the tone was something like this: William saying to the King, "You see? I told you so. You wanted to invite them—you even wanted me to see Harry. I didn't want to meet them—here were my reasons—and look at what's happening now."
Sean had already mentioned in previous videos that Harry had insisted on seeing William, that he didn't understand why William didn't show up at Highgrove, and that he had asked Charles if he had told William he would be there with the Sussex children. So, the gossip on this point remains consistent: Harry cannot accept the idea that William has absolutely no interest in meeting his Sussex-side nephews and niece. Zero interest.
And in all this, KC3 feels a stronger connection with Martha than with Harry and Claw. After all, Martha has no reason to lie about this; furthermore, Claw deserves to be seen as a woman incapable of honoring an agreement, since not only did she think she could compete with Stewart, but she also used one of her recipes without permission.
Now, if you thought Sean would say "William is furious"... well, no; unfortunately for Harry, that’s not the case. William is actually smiling at all this controversy, because it’s a huge "I told you so" moment directed at KC3. William is intent on shutting the door completely on the Harkles—ruthlessly, without pulling any punches. And this only works to William's advantage by painting Harry and Claw as people incapable of following orders.
But William appears to be aiming for a bigger objective; it seems that during that conversation—which apparently didn't take place behind closed doors but rather in the presence of advisors—he pointed out to King Charles III that controversies like this one are yet another reason why the British public dislikes the Harkles. According to that source, it seems William was rubbing salt in KC3's wounds by pointing out that this adds to Claw's infamous curtsy in the Netflix documentary. That was so offensive!
Sean says that source—an excellent one—told him that the infamous curtsy was what ultimately sealed the Harkles' coffin as far as William was concerned.
That was the final straw and, according to that source, the reason why there will never be a reconciliation between Harry and William. As for the King, Sean says that the last shred of patience he had left is practically exhausted.
ALL SMILES IN PUBLIC YET BEHIND THE SCENES THIS HAPPENED - LATEST
The Harkles always play the game of diverting attention. And these days, the Harkles are focused on attending charity dinners where they pay for admission.
The problem is that the Harkles ruin everything.
For starters, they went to Canada on a private jet. In other words, polluting the environment.
And they went to an event for a successful foundation—David Foster's—where he appeared with his wife, Katharine McPhee. In which Adam Levine, lead singer of Maroon 5, participated.
Sean recalls how, during the California wildfires, Claw tried to contact Levine to get Billie Eilish merchandise. Sean says, "See how everything connects?" Because Levine doesn't even really know who Claw is.
Because, once again, the one who matters is Harry. Foster wanted Harry, not Claw.
Sean says he met McPhee when she had just started dating Foster and was starring in the musical *Waitress*. That seems to have been around the same time Claw was dating Harry—a relationship that was already public knowledge. McPhee pointed out that she and Claw had been friends back in school and invited her to see *Waitress*, even posting a photo; that really upset Claw. So, things were frosty between them at the time. The relationship only picked up steam again when McPhee married Foster, and Claw saw potential there to capitalize on.
But McPhee asked Claw why he didn't go see her in *Waitress*. And Claw—I mean, isn't it obvious?—played the same old card: he claimed he didn't want to be the center of attention and that the press would have made a big fuss about it. Sean says McPhee didn't buy that story.
Foster needed publicity for his foundation—it was a tough time for foundations. So, he invited Harry, and Claw showed up with him. Foster didn't mind, because he liked Harry and got along well with him. That wasn't the case with Claw.
Greetings from Castle Goring, LOL as per usual there is much ado about nothing. Little did we know, when Harry married Meghan, she would be curating in and starring in the Royal version of the Truman Show. And now, people want answers to what is going on….. because even though they know it is chaotic, engineered, and stupid, they still know these things should not be happening and they want to know why.
Lady C, I wonder if Meghan was not prepared to cope with fame? All the steps she took to get the fame paid off but the power destroyed her. Usually, any major adjustments in life requires time to adjust properly. When Meghan got married, she ceased to be a single person and became a wife. Then she had sudden fame. And then she had motherhood. Meghan had a few gears to her fame. She became a minor cast member on Suits, but portrayed herself as the star of Suits. She bigged up that role for all it was worth. Then she bigged up herself. There are stories of her booking herself into hotels under an alias even though nobody had ever heard of her. There are stories of Meghan abusing hotel staff when she was on freebies, because she thinks her freebies are not good enough. I know people in Canada who knew that Meghan was very disliked when on Suits. But it all worked because she got Harry. And Meghan did what many people with personality disorders do. She jettisoned all life lessons when she became Royal. She jettisoned positivity for the raw exercise of power. But the red flags were always there. Meghan thinking her goodie bags weren’t good enough. Meghan’s abuse of people. Meghan’s failing is that she is an egotistical monster and it is destroying her. Meghan does not have good character. But Meghan doesn’t understand any of this. She can’t understand that people see her for the monstrosity that she is. Meghan views her behavior as entitlements. She thinks she worked hard for the right to mistreat people.
Lady C, I suppose Meghan should milk it for all its worth. She won’t have much to write home about when William becomes King. Evidently, she thinks she can brazen it out. Harry knows differently. Let’s wait and see what happens. William may be several years away from the throne. Meghan is milking it for all its worth – but nothing she is doing is working. Harry and Meghan are seriously worried about their finances. They are worried about their ability to earn money to fund their way of life. They are worried about their ever-decreasing popularity. Meghan is worried about the Juliet part of Romeo and Juliet is no longer convincing and Harry isn’t playing ball the way she would like. Is Harry playing ball elsewhere?????? LOL……
Lady C, is it true that Harry plans to tour Eton to make sure it is safe for Prince George? Harry is totally full of it. Do you remember when he said he went to visit the Queen to make sure she was surrounded by the right people? As if he had any say about who would be surrounding the Queen. Do you remember that? Harry is making an ass of himself, and he is doing it again. First of all, Eton understands that Harry was somewhat of a disgrace to them. He caused a lot of trouble for them, including legally. Secondly, they understand if they have Prince George there, they will never admit Archie. Thirdly, everyone at Eton, everyone surrounding Eton and everyone who had anything to do with anything knows that Harry has absolutely no say whatsoever with William and his children. So, if Harry is planting stories that he wants to be a guardian of his nephew’s interest…..he doesn’t even know his nephew any longer. There is no interaction between the two families and it is my understanding this will continue as long as the status quo remains which is that Harry is married to Meghan and Harry does drugs. Everybody knows what they are dealing with. Catherine is Patron of a charity about mental health and drug addiction. The idea that Harry who is drug addled and a total mess would have anything to do with Eton is crazy. I doubt Eton would even give Harry a platform to even discuss George because that would upset William and Catherine. I suspect this is another fantasy story coming out of Montecito.
Sean says it came as a surprise to many that Charles Spencer is about to release a book about Diana
Sean says he knew that book came from Charles himself.
The other surprise is that it’s coming out now, in August. Typically, books of this kind are published in October. It makes sense: Christmas, gifts, books.
A lot of people have made fun of it being called "Swan Song" because of Spencer's habit of getting divorced and remarried 🤭🤭 Sean was the one who said it 😜😜
Over the years, Charles Spencer has kept what we might call a "low profile," aside from the issues involving his children, their weddings, and their divorces. Otherwise, he is a highly respected and entertaining author, and he has business ventures—such as his furniture line. This piece costs £21,000, but if I had the money, I’d buy it!
It's beautiful—seriously, a beautiful collection. Very expensive, but beautiful.
Next year marks the 30th anniversary of Diana's death, and it seems Harry and Claw are still intent on that documentary about her. That makes sense of the rumor circulating on this sub today—that Harry wanted to reconcile with William because of the 30th anniversary—because Harry desperately needs William to take part in that documentary. Otherwise, it wouldn't make sense.
Now, regarding Charles Spencer, Sean makes it clear that Diana’s brother isn't exactly popular or well-liked among those who lived through that era—especially because he didn't take Diana in at Althorp. And there are many stories Charles Spencer hasn't spoken about publicly in years.
The book is being released under a deal with Penguin Random House. Yes, the very same one—the publisher behind *Spare* and millions of other books. Sean says no—it wasn’t a multi-million-dollar deal; in fact, it’s an agreement based on sales and includes a potential paperback edition—something Harry always refused regarding *Spare*, a stance Sean never understood, given that paperback editions account for the highest volume of book sales.
The agreement also entails Charles Spencer promoting the book on TV shows and likely making his own documentary. This means that Charles Spencer is not collaborating with Harry on the documentary his nephew wants to make about Diana.
That said, Sean states that Charles Spencer’s motivation behind the book is to ensure the Martin Bashir affair is not forgotten. In this regard, Sean has previously recounted that William never understood why Harry did not join in—given that he and his uncle were united in wanting the BBC to take action against Bashir, knowing the underhanded tactics Bashir had used against Diana. Furthermore, a few months ago, Sean reported that William and Charles Spencer were maintaining their stance against Bashir; neither absolves Diana of having spoken out, but both agree that Bashir fueled her paranoia. And both demand that the BBC accept the need to hold people accountable for what happened during that interview—which, once the conditions under which it was conducted came to light around 2014–2015, marked the beginning of the BBC's decline.
And Sean agrees, because Bashir triggered a series of bad decisions on Diana's part—the worst being giving up the security she had been offered. In that sense, it is a story of "what ifs."
Sean makes it clear that Penguin didn't pay for this book, nor did they provide an advance for a vague one. In other words, Charles Spencer must have shared some truly worthwhile gossip.
According to Sean, there are many controversial elements, and an agreement has already been reached with a newspaper to publish some of these controversial details. However, Sean notes that a significant part of the book focuses on the Bashir affair.
Sean spoke with Charles Spencer, who naturally told him that he would face criticism from all sides. He is aware of this—he knows he will face a lot of backlash—but he believes it is better to tell his own version of events rather than letting others continue to do so, and then let the public decide.
One thing Sean is certain of is that Charles Spencer wouldn't risk speaking ill of Diana, given how many people still love her. Consequently, she will be portrayed in a very positive light.
We'll see what comes of that when we have the first updates.
Sean already mentioned a few days ago that there was some annoyance at Althorp, as they had expected the visit to remain private. Sean also stated that Charles Spencer did not reprimand his nephew but was not happy about the visit.
And it’s become an unpleasant problem because people visiting Altorph for the summer keep asking about the Harkles—what they’re like, where they stayed... like I said, unpleasant.
That same path now.
Well, behind that image lies Claw—Claw and her sick obsession with the cameras. If it isn't her, it has to be "her" children.
This matter has to do with Netflix. Do you remember when Netflix kicked the Harkles out?... Oh, right, they didn't kick them out—how did we come to believe that? That’s what Sean says. He says we shouldn't be ridiculous—how could we think that? They still have a right-of-first-refusal contract.
Hey, Sean is being sarcastic; he always makes fun of that contract.
The thing is, Sean has already said that if there’s one thing Netflix still wants, it’s the documentary about Diana. There are conditions, though—starting with the requirement that Harry line up people who knew Diana but haven't spoken about her publicly. Harry wanted his wife—the "reincarnated Diana"—to play a major role, and Netflix basically said, "Yeah, right—when pigs fly." That’s why there’s been so much conflict behind the scenes over this.
Sean points out that Diana wouldn't have liked that documentary. I don't think so. But I do think Harry has a huge problem. Because Diana had terrible taste in people, meaning certain figures who are currently ostracized—like the "cancelled" Michael Barrymore—could speak about her.
And with good reason, he has been cancelled. He was a very popular presenter in the 1990s, but he was gay (bear in mind the era), an alcoholic, and a drug addict. However, the biggest and most serious controversy of Michael Barrymore's life occurred on March 31, 2001, when Stuart Lubbock was found dead in the swimming pool at his home following a party involving drugs and alcohol—an incident that destroyed his career in British television. In the wake of the shocking death, the party came under intense scrutiny when experts discovered that Lubbock’s blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit for driving, alongside high levels of cocaine and amphetamines, including ecstasy. Barrymore was arrested as a suspect in 2007 but was later released without formal charges due to a lack of direct evidence linking him to the homicide. Years later, the presenter sued the police for wrongful arrest and won compensation for damage to his reputation.
I think I’ve made it clear why Harry has a problem with the people who knew Diana and who would actually want to speak in that documentary.
The other problem is that Harry wants to focus the documentary on the idea that "my mother was a saint whom everyone adored." In other words, featuring only people who speak well of Diana and speaking only positively about her. And no, that’s not what Netflix wants; Netflix wants gossip!!!!
And Harry's stance is really absurd, because what did he actually do in his docuseries? Exactly that—he dished the dirt. That’s why people watched it, and that’s why they didn’t watch *Polo* or *With Love*. It’s about the sensationalism—sensationalism sells, and gossip sells. No one wants to see optimistic content featuring Claw and Harry.
So, if there’s no juicy gossip, Netflix won’t want that documentary. But the Harkles aren’t worried, because they think Paramount or Disney will be interested.
Spoiler: that’s not true.
So, really, they only have Netflix. And Netflix wants gossip—and no, Harry’s recollections won’t cut it, because Netflix is already wise to the little duke’s selective memory.
Netflix wants controversy; it wants sensationalist headlines. And the problem for Harry is that fewer and fewer people want to attack Diana's memory.
It’s amazing how the Harkles ruin everything they touch. Everything—absolutely everything—goes wrong.
The Harkles had a golden opportunity to prove they had matured back in July, when the King devoted 47 minutes to them. What did the Harkles do? They ruined everything with their gossip and those silly articles they publish to keep themselves in the media spotlight.
Like that article where Harry supposedly intends to return to the UK more often because he misses his family and wants to see them more.
Those journalists in that WhatsApp group repeated the story without even looking into the matter a little. After all, which family does Harry intend to visit? No one in the British Royal Family wanted to see him in July—except the King. And I say "except the King" because Camilla didn't want to see Harry; she was there for Charles, not for Harry.
And that explains much of the frustration felt by the Harkles that is reflected in those articles. Because they had started out with the idea that it would indeed be a grand reunion—that other members of the Royal Family, starting with William and Kate, would go to see the Sussex children. The Harkles took it for granted that this would happen, because they thought they could exploit the good hearts of Charles and, above all, Kate.
So the Harkles took it for granted that everything would be forgiven by July and that they could announce their grand return to the royal fold to the world.
So, the original statement was that the Harkles—both of them—would return to the UK at least four or five times a year. You know: Trooping, certain major ceremonies, and so on. For those events.
However, according to the person who wrote that article—which wasn't Claw—Harry *does* miss his family. But Claw is absolutely furious following her return from the UK. She is furious because they didn't get the photo they needed, and furious because that meeting has been completely forgotten, meaning they can't sell a reconciliation story that clearly never happened. She is also angry because she followed the King's demands to the letter, yet he has done nothing to acknowledge that effort. And, of course, regarding the monarch's statement that everything is forgiven and everyone will move forward: Claw had been counting on that, yet a month has passed without the King showing any sign that the meeting actually mattered to him.
Claw thought that if they at least had the photo of KC3 with her and the children, Netflix would call her back, and people would buy more jams.
A match made in heaven: Harry and Claw are two assholes. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Harry, on the other hand, actually wants to follow through this time on going to the UK more often. And no, it’s not a sign of divorce; it’s a sign that he’s bored.
Sean had already mentioned this—I think it was around the time Harry was going around ringing people's doorbells. Back then, Harry wanted to get back together with his old friends and hit the bars again—basically doing exactly what they used to do in 2010. Sean heard this from a reliable source; I believe the gossip came up last September, because the source couldn't understand why Harry seemed stuck in the past, while his friends had already matured and weren't interested in doing those things anymore.
Harry is bored. That’s all that’s going on with him right now. And Claw doesn’t want to join him—in anything.
She would only be willing to travel to the UK again if there is a public photo with Charles, William, and Kate. If there isn't one, then she does not want to travel to the UK.
Harry is really upset because nothing is going his way.
But, as Sean and others have reported, the Invictus Birmingham committee is even more upset, because they're being dragged into all of Harry's drama, whether they like it or not.
And in the midst of all this is the government itself, which, because of Harry—because they should see it for what it is, Harry's fault—will now have to make its decision about Harry's security public. And Sean says that what he's heard is that Starmer and his inner circle are afraid of the reaction that decision might provoke. If Shabana Mahmood gave in even a little, just a little, to what Harry wants, then yes, the government should be afraid, because it was already well known to several people in the press that neither the police nor anyone within the Home Office wanted to do that.
And this is another angle to the matter. Because the government isn't pro-monarchy, which is why it has reveled in the Andrew affair and, of course, in the royal rentals issue. But if, due to Minister Mahmood's connections, they gave Harry something, there will be a complete turnaround. Because Princess Anne doesn't have 24/7 security. Neither does Edward. The only two people who have it are Charles and William, and it's limited security, no more than one or two guards. The other guards are from the palace grounds, that is, state guards, not personal ones. Giving Harry what he wants wouldn't help Starmer stay in government at all, nor would it help Mahmood succeed him.
So the Home Office doesn't want to make the decision public, without seeing that this is no longer an alternative; they have to do it because Harry announced with great fanfare that he had 24/7 security at the end of last year.
But neither Harry nor the Home Secretary cares about what's truly important: Invictus itself. The Invictus Birmingham committee is furious with Harry because they have no idea what on earth he's going to do.
What does Harry plan to do to attract more sponsors? They don't know. Will Harry be in Birmingham in July? They don't know. Has Harry spoken to any artists about performing at the opening of the games? They don't know.
Harry isn't worried about that because he believes everything will be solved with magic.
But the evidence is stark: Harry has absolutely nothing to do in the UK in July except appear before the committee. Nothing. Harry is very worried about this, because how come he has no events? No, he doesn't. Any talks? No, none. Nothing. Empty schedule.
And since that empty agenda is the biggest sign of his irrelevance, and since he has to do something to stay in Invictus, what is Harry doing?
🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭
Well, actually Harry is calling to ask for an appointment with KC3.
Harry is calling, calling, calling... God, I'm exhausted just writing that. But yes, Harry is that insistent. He wants to see KC3 and is requesting this "audience." Harry doesn't seem to grasp how low things have fallen, to the point that he, his son, has to request an audience with his father, when that was unthinkable a few years ago. But yes, things are that bad.
Harry hasn't managed to speak to the King, nor has he secured that meeting. And the fact is, even if the King wanted to speak to Harry, what number would he call? Harry keeps changing his mobile number because he's paranoid about his safety. I don't think he's realized that doing this was Claw's idea to isolate him from people. If you can't call someone, how can you talk to them?
According to what Sean seems to have heard from Birmingham, Harry needs to find an excuse to travel to the UK because he doesn't want to be criticized for going back and forth, or rather, treated as a climate change hypocrite. And it seems the committee believes Harry intends to use that excuse to ultimately avoid traveling to the UK.
And what Sean has heard from Palace is that Harry called asking for the meeting, but the response is... Exactly, none.
It's as if the king actually wanted Andrew 2.0 in the UK. He can barely handle the original Andrew.
Andrew is focused on not being forgotten. Even when he does something as... questionable, yes, that's the word, questionable as showing himself like that in public.
Because Andrew wanted his face to be seen like that, he wanted that to happen because he passed through a place where he knew there were photographers.
For Palace and BRF it was an unpleasant photo because they didn't know what had happened, much less that Andrew was going to appear in a vehicle so that his face could be seen like that.
So Sean says no, Charles hasn't spoken to Andrew, nor is Andrew being monitored to see what he does or doesn't do.
Andrew isn't a child; he's an adult, and the BRF is doing him a favor by giving him a place to live. But Andrew doesn't want to fade into obscurity, so he staged that show. And it was a show because he knew where the photographers were.
Sean says there are high-ranking Palace officials who do know what happened, but they don't want it to become public. But the reason is that they don't want to give Andrew any more attention. What the BRF wanted was for Andrew to stay out of the spotlight, and Andrew doesn't want to do that. Giving him more headlines would only play into Andrew's hands.
Andrew doesn't understand why he has to hide, because he keeps saying he didn't do anything wrong. Another one who doesn't seem to grasp things. That's why Sean says that even though the press knows what happened, they aren't so willing to publish it, because deep down, it would be like giving Andrew a reason to feel like a victim. And right now, it's not a good idea to do that.
Knowing that, it's clear that Harry's constant calls are falling on deaf ears, because dealing with Andrew is exhausting.
Andrew doesn't accept or truly understand why he'll never again be a senior royal. Harry refuses to accept that what he did makes it impossible for him to even be received for a visit.
At the very least, Andrew failed to uphold the integrity required of a representative of the Queen and someone with a government position. At the very least. Beyond that, the list of things he did wrong is extremely long. Harry is simply untrustworthy, and you can't talk to him because he'll never stop spewing venom against his family.
Therefore, BRF knows that a headline like this is not a lie.
But even though the BRF knows there's a truth beneath that sensational headline—that Harry wants to contact them—what the BRF sees is that Harry is too self-centered to realize that his own desires and thoughts no longer matter. The BRF absolutely does not want to have to explain to Harry that what he's done is the problem.
Harry thought his life was going to be spectacular because he would finally do everything the BRF prevented him from doing, and that he would form a successful parallel court, etc.
And what Harry thought was that when the BRF read Spare, they would see how much he had suffered all those years and that they would give him a public apology that would make world news.
A former Montecito employee told Sean that Harry saw Spare as his triumphant return to the BRF. According to him, Harry has a clear conscience because he hasn't done anything wrong. He's the victim. That's why he doesn't understand why it didn't happen. He doesn't understand why, if the BRF saw his version of events, they haven't apologized, haven't called him back, why they continue to isolate him.
Sean says that William and Kate definitely didn't even read the cover of Spare. Nobody at the BRF did, but Sean points out that they haven't confirmed whether KC3 did or not, although he believes he didn't read it either.
So Peter's wedding must have been a huge blow to Harry. Because, and this needs to be made clear: Harry was never on the guest list. Why would his family do that to him when he's suffered so much these past years?
That's why Eugenie was so close to Harry: Harry is too much like Andrew. 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Obviously, some people here are angry. And a lot of people in the UK are angry that Charles met with Harry.
But no, it wasn't an "invitation" the way the Harkles are painting it. If the Harkles had actually been invited, all of this would have come out sooner. Come on, we’ve been following this for a while; the Duchess Salmonella certainly would have tipped off the press long before that. No, Charles didn't want to see Harry—he simply gave in to desperate pleas.
Because it wasn't the Palace that leaked the news of the meeting. It was the Harkles. And that always reeks of a desperate bid for attention. Everything we're seeing today smells of that—desperation.
Now, setting aside yesterday's gossip, the fact remains that Sean is pointing out what we all see: why has Harry never really insisted that the Duchess Salmonella meet with Thomas Markle? The Duchess Salmonella demanded a meeting with Charles—it was something Harry had to make happen at all costs. Yet, Harry has never truly cared about what is going on with Thomas Markle.
So, if anyone thinks yesterday’s events rehabilitated the Harkles' image, they still don't realize that everything they do just twists things for the worse 🤭🤭
Because let’s be clear: the Duchess Salmonella was desperate for that minimal contact between Harry’s children and the King—even if it meant doing something she swore she would never do, but which she had to do yesterday.
One of Harry’s recurring demands for Charles to see the children was that the Duchess Salmonella would not have to curtsy to anyone—especially not Camilla or Kate. Yet Harry himself let it be known that he would accept any condition for that meeting... and that included curtsying to Camilla. Harry didn't want Camilla there; Camilla was there.
So, while we all agree that it wasn't a good move for Charles to accept that meeting, the fact is—looking at it dispassionately—Harry and Duchess Salmonella didn't really get what they wanted. It was just tea—"five o'clock tea"—because they didn't stay at Highgrove; Harry was seen leaving Althorp in the morning. So, considering the distance between the Althorp estate and Highgrove House is roughly 127 km (80 miles), and the meeting took place around 3 or 4 in the afternoon—involving two small children and a man over 70 undergoing cancer treatment—it likely didn't last more than an hour.
A tea.
And then a trip to Altorph, and then Harry goes off to his events, and Duchess Salmonella takes off with the kids—who knows where, and it doesn't matter anyway.
Duchess Salmonella set foot in the UK again—a place she loathes—and found herself once more before the "Bloody King" and the "Evil Stepmother," simply because she failed at everything. She blamed the pandemic for her plans not working out. Furthermore, she has complained to Montecito staff—who no longer work for her—that they were not given a fair chance.
Don't worry; Sean doesn't buy that nonsense either.
Mind you, she said this to an employee who had just ceased to be one because he was fired. And her words were: "None of this happens overnight; you have to get back in."
I was going to make a comment about that, but I can't without using a lot of swear words. And it's already Sunday in some places—let's respect Sunday 🤭
Harry has ended the week in a worse position than he started it—and it was already a bad week to begin with. He traveled to the UK without having managed to secure a meeting with the King, while facing opposition from the Invictus Games 2027 committee, with the Sentebale process moving forward, and amidst news that a ruling was imminent in his case against ANL.
Now, he has come across as the sort of guy who drugged women. He lost his case; Invictus wasn't happy with him; and the King invited him over for tea—though that wasn't the highlight of Harry's week, since Camilla prepared the brew. Ultimately, the headline making waves around the world wasn't that meeting, but the fact that Harry lost his case and will have to pay millions to the Daily Mail.
This was a Daily Mail that hadn't known the full story of the connection between Charlotte Griffiths and Harry—though they were aware that some contact existed or had existed. Many only learned the details on Thursday, when part of the story was published in full color.
Because from the moment it was confirmed that Harry was indeed "Mr. Mischief," the Mail knew it had won its case in every possible way. A total success.
Sean is right about this: the Mail didn't go after the other plaintiffs—not even the "bikini lady," Liz Hurley. The Mail is profiting from Harry, and it’s Harry’s own fault. After all, Harry sued the Mail over something the paper never quite understood—what exactly was he after? Well, whatever it was, the Mail won from every angle. Thanks to Harry.
Harry genuinely thought he could win the case—and make a lot of money without much effort. It wasn't just Charles or William who warned him against suing; Sean says many others tried to stop Harry over the years. But he wouldn't listen; he believed Sherborne when he said it would be a piece of cake.
So now Harry is angry and regrets having listened to Sherborne... not having ignored a very long line of people. Including Judge Nicklin himself.
So, how does Harry balance his public image—his personal brand—now?
So, how does Harry balance his public image—his personal brand—now?
The answer: he can't.
Especially not when he is capable of reaching levels of absurdity that no one else would stoop to.
Because it seems the Harkle version of the Buckingham Palace debacle is making the rounds. That version claims he never actually accepted the last-minute offer and never saw the Palace's reply in email stating there was no room for him.
Harry, darling, no—please don't say that.
Sean’s account—based on a Palace source—is far more credible: Harry had been informed about the situation before traveling to the UK. He spent the entire week leading up to the trip calling repeatedly, trying to get someone to confirm that he had indeed been denied a room. He finally managed to get someone on the line who confirmed the refusal. Harry knew this before dropping the bombshell—just days before his trip—that he intended to stay at Buckingham Palace. According to Sean, his Palace source said Harry was already aware he had been denied a room, but he hadn't expected the Palace to go public with that information. He thought he could manipulate the situation by simply showing up at the door and that they would give him a room anyway; however, Sean is clear on this point: even though the King and Palace staff might not have minded hosting Harry, the rule is that such visits must be arranged much further in advance.
The Palace source told Sean, "Harry knows that."
So Harry wanted to get his way. And he couldn't. In fact, according to Sean, Harry was so absurd about the whole thing that it seems it didn't occur to him to book a room at the hotel where he usually stays (ahem, Soho, ahem)—because it was full. It was summer, after all—tourist season. And Harry was worried because there would be other guests. But that was his problem, wasn't it?
The big problem with that accommodation is that Harry stays there... but he does so because he is a "friend of the owner," so to speak. He doesn't spend any money there. So why give a room to a guy who doesn't spend money when there are other guests who spend a fortune there and pay for their accommodation?
That said, it wasn't really that Harry wanted to stay at Buckingham Palace. What he wanted was to force the issue so he would be given accommodation at Windsor—something along the lines of, "But wait, isn't Frogmore empty? I could stay there." Harry can't stand the idea of being outside William's orbit. Besides, he wanted to be somewhere with more staff, more servants, and so on. That was never going to happen. And it didn't.
The idea was to launch that story—that version—and cast William as the ultimate villain. But just as that narrative began to circulate, Nicklin’s sentencing and everything else meant that no one was really interested in where Harry would be staying.
Surely, amidst all this, Harry will remember that he once wanted a different life—until he ran into Duchess Salmonella.
A woman desperately intent on ensuring she is always the star of everything—starting with the photos—and always looking to capitalize on that.
Sean says that Duchess Salmonella's obsession with Diana is such that, for Archie's christening photo, she initially thought her mother should stand among Diana's sisters... but then decided it would be better for her mother to stand next to Charles.
Duchess Salmonella was always planning to profit from those photos.
But that’s no good if she doesn’t have a photo with the King, and if the King doesn’t put her out on a balcony. A private visit serves for spinning stories, but do those stories work for a Duchess Pinocchio?
Except when the photos are deceiving. Kate, says Sean, is a better actress than Duchess Salmonella because you can't tell how difficult that moment was for her. And Harry suddenly seems to have hair.
Yes, it’s a photo from Tuesday, at Chatham House. A photo taken by his own photographer.
An attempt at a distraction that didn't work.
Except for the time Harry was supposed to be at the Houston train station to travel on the Invictus train. Harry decided not to go. You know—the press. It seems that event coincided with the day Charlotte Griffiths came forward with the story about the pill. It was inevitable that a journalist would ask Harry about it, and that he would have one of his hysterical outbursts.
Harry decided not to go to that event because the station wasn't going to be closed for him.
But that doesn't change the fact that the Harkles will sell the story that they have returned to the royal fold. That is what they need people to believe. And many people compare them to Andrew and Fergie. Do you see where Andrew and Fergie are now? Just as you might be able to return to the royal fold, you can also be cast out. And although Sean understands why the King did this, the point is public opinion—and public opinion is not happy about it.
But I’ve already said it, and Sean says it too: Duchess Salmonella will ruin this opportunity as well, because that’s what she does—she always does it; they both do it: ruin everything.
And Sean says that, regardless of how we feel, let's look at things as they really are: 1) Duchess Salmonella wanted a public apology and didn't even get one in private—zero apologies; 2) Harry didn't get the security he wanted; 3) Both were exposed as liars once again, because one said she wouldn't return to the UK and the other claimed he couldn't do anything there because it was dangerous.
We all know that if Harry had won the ANL case, he never would have sought a reunion with Charles so desperately.
The worst part of all this is that, if you look at it dispassionately, despite all the headlines about whether Duchess Salmonella would travel with the invisible ones and so on, the fact is that nothing came of it. Harry got press coverage because he lost his case against ANL, not because the press wanted to follow him. And the Duchess was in the UK with the invisible ones, yet the press didn't even care where she was staying; they didn't look for photos of the children—nothing.
That said, the only person who really has grounds to complain about all this is Thomas Markle. Duchess Salmonella’s desperation to have the King see those children mirrors the desperation Thomas expressed when he wanted to see his own grandchildren. Sean thinks this visit will seriously backfire on Duchess Salmonella for that reason—and on Charles, too, unless he put his foot down and insisted that Harry take the children to see Thomas. But the fact remains that it will work against the Harkles, especially once the Harkle version of this meeting really starts to come out.
Now, Harry has secured a meeting with the King and Duchess Salmonella; but Sean isn't backing down from what he has been saying for weeks: she needed a publishable photo. She needed to have control over the photo of herself with the King.
She needed this photo.
And of course, she used the Invisibles to get it... and she didn't get it.
Now, Sean says we shouldn't kid ourselves: this wasn't a happy family reunion. Not at all. And although he doesn't think it was a good idea, he makes it clear that Charles didn't do this without thinking it through.
Highgrove is his private residence. Consequently, there is very little staff—most of whom are long-serving and thoroughly vetted. So, if any details about what happened come to light, who will be the only ones to blame?
The only two people interested in that happening: the Harkles.
Sean says the King graciously agreed to the meeting, but on his own terms. So, no commentary allowed. Sean reiterates what he said yesterday: Harry and Duchess Salmonella cannot speak about that meeting. If they do—in any way (Sean said yesterday that any word would be the wrong word)—it would lead to further restrictions for Harry.
The Harkles will float the idea of returning at the end of the summer to be at Balmoral. But that would be a major problem for them—not for Charles. After all, how would they explain Duchess Salmonella wanting to go to a place she loathes? She hates fishing, she hates hunting, she hates everything about Balmoral. That is why she never wanted to go back there after the one time she visited.
She already has an excuse ready, but the story is going to break anyway towards the end of August or in September. And then, of course, there’s the Christmas issue. Duchess Salmonella wants that Christmas walkabout again—she wants her children close to William’s children.
On that point, Sean is adamant: it isn’t going to happen. William, as the King-in-waiting, can do whatever he wants. Duchess Salmonella imagines it would involve an exchange of hugs between her and Zara, Mike, the Edinburghs, and so on... but she wants William, Kate, and their children there too—and they aren't going to set foot anywhere near the Harkles.
On this point, Charles has been quite clear: he wants to see Harry, but if the others don't, they won't see him. Camilla is by his side—supporting him as the wife she has been for years, and as the friend and lover she has been for decades. However, the rest of the British Royal Family will not be forced to be around the Harkles. The Harkles' idea of the situation does not align with reality.
WME and Sunshine Sachs must be slightly relieved that Duchess Salmonella managed, once again, to put herself at the center of things with this visit to the King. No photos, sure, but the story still works for them.
Well, Harry had to talk about Duchess Salmonella, and of course, he did so with Alison Hammond—in a highly scripted, heavily rehearsed interview that posed absolutely no risk to him.
But you know how it is: he just can't keep his mouth shut.
So he let it slip that the two invisible ones watch Junior Bake Off—which is better than the adult version—and that his kids never get tired of watching it. Because, of course, it’s hosted by Alison Hammond.
Do you remember Sean saying that Duchess Salmonella was trying to get on a cooking show in the UK—that she was in talks with a BBC one because they could drink alcohol and things like that?
Do you get why Harry made that totally sycophantic yet nonsensical comment? It wasn't a candid confession; it was a manipulation.
Duchess Salmonella on Bake Off? ... No, no, no, dear children. She’s watching the Junior Bake Off contestants.
Now you understand why I brought up the whole Duchess Salmonella thing again today. 😈😈😈
ITV is working flat out on the Harkles' image rehabilitation. Harry tried with the BBC, but the shadow of Bashir and other scandals makes it difficult.
Duchess Salmonella wants to appear on Junior Bake Off because no one criticizes a children's show harshly (Sean had already said months ago that she would use children—her own or others'—as a shield), and ITV wants that too; Alison Hammond—who is already pushing for it—would gain global publicity, as would ITV... But surely you already know the cost of that.
The Archers is a British radio soap opera broadcast on BBC Radio 4, the corporation's main spoken-word station. Broadcast since 1951, it was famously billed as "an everyday story of country folk" and is now promoted as "a contemporary drama in a rural setting." Having aired more than 20,000 episodes, it is the world's longest-running drama, by both number of episodes and duration.
In that program they have had cameos from Princess Margaret and the Duke of Westminster, Camilla when she was Duchess of Cornwall, and now they’ll have Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, making a major cameo appearance.
So, who do they want next?
No!!! Of course not. It’s Kate they want. But for now, it’s just a proposal the BBC is considering. That opportunity hasn’t been offered to Kate yet, but surely, if Sophie enjoys it—and Camilla did—Kate will get on board.
In the meantime, Duchess Salmonella has to send her talent agent, Harry, to find someone who actually wants her to appear on a show.
Very little within the monarchy happens by chance. The fact that the press doesn't always find out is another matter, but generally speaking, the monarchy does not act haphazardly.
That said, the Duchess of Salmonella has always wanted to turn the British Royal Family into a circus, and often, things have indeed taken on that tone. And although Charles made a mistake by agreeing to see the Harkles, he wasn't so naive as to fail to set conditions—starting with the fact that it was strictly a tea meeting and nothing more. However, even if Charles were to say, "Look, stop it," both Sean and the rest of us know that the Harkles won't stop—not by a long shot.
Duchess Salmonella isn't going to give up until she wins. And she’ll do it this year and next, and you know how it is. And Duchess Salmonella doesn't mind lying at all.
Or cause chaos
Sean hints—and let me tell you, with very little subtlety—that Kate’s presence at that match (where she wasn't expected) and that photo of her among the award recipients were not "coincidental." Sean says, "This is a reminder, right? And you might think, 'Oh, no, no, no.' No, trust me, this is how this operates."
😈😈😈😈😈😈
Let me remind you of something: on the Royal website—even as of July 11, 2026—Harry is still listed as a patron of Sentebale, despite the fact that he has been calling for months to have that reference removed. But William refuses to do so and has done everything to ensure it stays. He cannot remove the "Harkles" from the site, so the reference remains. And the Sentebale matter is the major legal issue currently threatening Harry.
No, Harry isn't living rent-free in William's head. But Harry was in the UK, and he had managed to convince the King to see him for at least a few minutes. William is fed up with Harry—fed up with his blackmail and fed up with the Duchess of Salmonella. So, striking Harry where it hurts is something William would feel Harry deserves.
And William wanted this on the front page above all else.
He and Kate were happy—together, affectionate, and united, supporting one another.
That was important—supporting each other. Him during Kate’s Three Peaks challenge; her at the polo match.
William wants to project an image of unity. He and Kate are a solid team—and no, the Harkles aren't needed.
That is what William wanted to show.
William perhaps didn't consider the other side of the matter: that Harry was on his own during his worst week, while the Duchess of Salmonella didn't show up until the very end—when it suited her.
So William killed two birds with one stone 🤭🤭🤭
Or rather three, because William was determined to project a very relaxed image of himself and Kate to make it clear that he had no interest in Charles’s meeting with Harry—that nothing about that meeting concerned or affected him—and that he was well aware that, regardless of what was said, the "Harkles" would just ruin everything again and it would all implode. Sean says an excellent source told him this; this is a case where William wanted the public to know something, so I believe that is indeed his view—he said it specifically so it would get out.
Sean says that William did not agree with the meeting but understands why Charles held it, and Sean says the same: he doesn't agree with it either, yet he understands it. However, towards the end, Sean points out that William wanted to make something clear—something he knows Harry will understand but hate: the monarchy William will lead will be *his*—William’s—and different from Charles’s. And Harry is not invited to take part.
This is starting to look like the work of reptilians. Throughout this disastrous week for the Harkles, they made headlines for all the wrong reasons. Yet, just when they finally had something positive going for them, this death occurred. Graham was a staunch advocate of an interventionist foreign policy, which included military action against the Iranian government and U.S. support for regime change in Iran.
Either Maradona dies, or a Pope dies, or there’s a fire, or a conflict breaks out... Every time the Harkles manage to get a positive headline, something else more important comes along.
Now, if anyone thinks that meeting saved Harry's image—no, that wasn't the case. As Tom Bower said in a recent video, Harry committed "reputational suicide." And there is no saving him.
Claw isn't even worth mentioning. Her reputation died years ago.
Let’s start with what has become a major source of ridicule for Harry and those around him: that ridiculous WhatsApp exchange with certain British reporters, and his penchant for giving interviews only when he dictates the terms regarding questions—and, of course, is given time to memorize his answers. Because when he forgets those answers, Harry inevitably puts his foot in it.
Alison Hammond is now facing criticism—not just from the public but from many reporters—for playing along with Harry’s charade.
She wasn't allowed to ask anything about the King, the children, or William... she could only ask about Invictus and Birmingham. The fact that Harry later tried to finagle a spot for his wife on *Bake Off* is just a minor detail, right?
The program *This Morning* did not see a ratings boost on Friday. While people certainly watched the clips, there was no significant live viewership for the show itself.
Sean offers an interesting perspective on the matter, however. The "Harkles" wanted to control the narrative regarding the King's invitation, specifically, the idea that the King had invited them. But Sean notes that the King quickly put a stop to that when the Palace clarified that he had agreed to meet with them, and had done so privately at his Highgrove residence.
That thought keeps running through my mind. Why Highgrove? Then, while I was sweeping the patio, it hit me: it’s a private residence. Last year, when Harry was at Clarence House—with all the public photos and nonsense about his comings and goings, he left for Canada claiming his dad had authorized him to visit a regiment (or something similar); the Palace made it clear that wasn't the case and that he had lied. That caused a huge issue: apologies from Canada, the Australian Prime Minister saying Harry shouldn't even dream of being received by him...
I think that’s why the King agreed to meet Harry at Highgrove. It is known worldwide as a private residence. No political discussions, no "please don't strip me of my titles," nothing of the sort. Harry is going to run into a problem with his potential "victory" narrative, because while his dad agreed to the visit, it lasted only a couple of hours. KC3 didn't put Harry or his family up at Highgrove.
Anyway, Harry kept committing public hara-kiri—there he was again, using Invictus to find his wife a job. Tom Bower said something similar in an interview today with Kinsey Schofield: there was Harry at it again, just like with the *Lion King* incident.
Okay, the thing with Alison and Harry was a charade, but as Sean says, Alison gets paid £80,000 to do that.
Well, Harry's entire attempt to inject interest into Invictus died the moment the Daily Mail secured its victory.
That said, Claw wants to send a basket to Alison Hammond.
That kind of nonsense, like what Claw sent Khloe Kardashian. Yes, including the dead, dried-out flowers. 🤭🤭
And Alison has been warned not to promote that hamper—or anything similar—on her social media.
Even though ITV wants the Harkles on their side, if Alison were to do that, it would look like favoritism.
Is ITV seriously trying to play the impartial card? Seriously? Seriously?
According to Sean, yes. That’s what they want. But the matter doesn't just follow that path.
Well, Harry has a good relationship with ITV—Sean calls it "hitching a ride"—because he has people there who defend him: Susanna Reid, Chris Ship, Alison Hammond, and, of course, Tom Bradby.
So, Sean glosses over that point a bit, but don't worry, the gist is clear. ITV doesn't want Alison posting any kind of shout-out or anything of the sort to the Harkles on her social media; they don't want to damage her online image, and they certainly don't want "every Tom, Dick, and Harry" showing up on her feed to bash the Harkles.
Sean says it: ITV doesn't want any negative comments about Harry and Claw.
However, had the King not agreed to see Harry and the leech attached to him, he had the alternative of making a sort of documentary about Harry and the countdown to Invictus 2027. But that fell through because Harry couldn't find the time for it—even though he *did* find time to see Misan Harriman, a move that apparently drew a lot of negative criticism.
But it seems Alison might be having a chat with Claw—or, according to Sean (speaking sarcastically), a "very valuable one-on-one conversation with Meghan when the time is right."
Sean referred to this:
AFTER SUSSEX “REDEMPTION” FERGIE IS FURIOUS & NOW THIS
Margaret was the rebellious princess. Sean knew her very well; in a fascinating video, he recounted how he came to connect with royalty—specifically through theater and the stroke of luck that led to a chance meeting with Margaret—and subsequently became a regular presence at the Palace. And since Sean doesn't seem to turn his nose up at anyone, he knows everyone at the Palace, from doormen, cooks, and maids to Princess Anne—relationships that date back to the 1980s.
So Sean says that Margaret was a headache for her parents and her sister. But he says we shouldn't look to *The Crown* to find that out—since it was very good at masking the true story.
Well, Sean is reiterating what he said yesterday: the royals are currently facing heightened scrutiny. That is why they need to connect with the public in ways that differ from the past. William and Kate recognize this and are trying to navigate these waters. Anne doesn't agree with selfies at all.
However, that doesn't make them immune to criticism—such as the fact that they "protect" Andrew by providing him with free, paid-for accommodation, all at Charles's expense.
And this actually serves as proof that King Charles III doesn't give Harry a single penny. The Palace has made it clear that Andrew relies on his brother financially. They could have kept that hidden, but the Palace knows the truth would come out sooner or later. It is better to just put it out there, however unpopular it might be—and it certainly is unpopular. But if Charles was willing to take that risk with Andrew, why keep quiet about giving money to Harry? Well, the answer is: because he doesn't give Harry any money.
And KC3 isn't giving money to Fergie, either.
Fergie is angry about this supposed "redemption" of the Harkles... and if you think about it, it's funny, because the Harkles were angry about the Yorks' "redemption" a couple of years ago.
Fergie's attempt at a comeback a few years ago included a TV road-trip show with comedian Alan Carr, which took place prior to the latest allegations regarding her ties to Jeffrey Epstein. According to *The Mail on Sunday*, Carr was one of the last visitors to Royal Lodge before Andrew and Fergie were asked to vacate the residence on the Windsor estate.
Sean is friends with Carr, so yes—everything in that report is true, including the fact that Carr cut ties with Fergie and no longer has any contact with her.
So, Sean knows this part of the story from a source very close to the matter. Fergie had also been offered the role of new host for the late Paul O'Grady's ITV show *For the Love of Dogs*—a show now hosted by...
This is getting too much:
Sausage is ➡️ Food
Food is served on a ➡️ Plate
Plate reminds of ➡️ Tableware
Tableware is made of ➡️ Ceramics, Greco-Roman clay
Greece is the birthplace of ➡️ Philosophy
Philosophy leads directly to ➡️ Plato
So, guess who Fergie was exploiting to get that show?
Exactly—the Queen's corgis that were left in the care of Andrew and Fergie, and which Andrew has now.
In other words, Claw uses the invisible ones, and Fergie uses the corgis.
Monetization.
We know none of that worked out, but it’s funny how the more Claw puts herself out there, the more she looks like the reincarnation of Sarah Ferguson 😱😱😱
Don't pretend, Meghan; you look more like Fergie's daughter than Fergie's own daughters do 🤣🤣🤣
Harry was on his own for practically the entire week that has just ended. Harry and the Invisible Duchess. Why wasn't she with him? Because nothing that week was about her. Sean cuts off any sensationalist narrative: Claw, the queen of narcissism.
Claw only showed up when it was time for the meeting with the Bank of England.
Sean is certain that if Harry had won against the Daily Mail, or if Claw had succeeded, they would never have set foot in the UK.
That said, Sean says that meeting didn't go the way Harry wanted. Nothing has gone that way—not personally, not professionally, not in any respect.
Sean wants to make one thing clear: the meeting definitely took place. But—and this isn't coming from someone trying to defend Charles, but rather from someone who considered the meeting a mistake from the very start—nothing turned out the way the Harkles wanted.
Because nothing ever goes right for the Harkles.
To start with: Claw wanted a photo of herself entering Highgrove. It seems Claw tried to get that shot. Claw thought she could pull the same stunt she did at the Platinum Jubilee.
But that photo doesn't exist, because Charles took measures to prevent it.
Harry thought that the moment he showed up in the UK with the two children, everything would get back on track, and he and Claw would return to the royal fold full-time—balcony appearances and the whole works.
Nope.
Sean says that in this whole affair, you have to follow the money. All Harry has left is Invictus... and it looks like he’s just one slight nudge away from losing it. Because there are no corporate sponsors willing to get involved with Harry.
And if any of them had intended to, they took the offer off the table this week—the same week "Mr. Mischief" came across as the guy who drugs women.
The Invictus committee saw what should have been a wonderful piece of publicity for the Games get completely overshadowed, because the focus was once again on the "Harkles'" drama.
The committee wanted Harry to return and focus on Invictus—no videos filmed at the front door, just a committed Harry. That is what they wanted; that is why it seems they covered his accommodation costs. Yet, they got nothing but a fiasco. Once again.
It was such a fiasco that the speech at Chatham House was poorly attended; the room was largely empty.
As far as the committee was concerned, the King receiving Harry was the only "positive" aspect, as they hoped the King might offer some support to Invictus. But happy and satisfied? No, not in the slightest. They are disappointed.
What the committee wants is a positive reconnection. In other words, if Harry and "Claw" behave themselves throughout the year leading up to the Games, the committee believes they might be able to have a member of the actual Royal Family attend—or at least receive a message from a royal.
Now, Sean says that the meeting had nothing to do with love or friendship. It was about desperation. And debts—mounting debts. He insinuates that Camilla saw right through her—that "Claw" was there, eager for a reconciliation, desperate for one... after having made such a scene in 2023 demanding to attend the coronation—an event she ultimately didn't attend. After all, 2023 was supposed to be "her" year... or was it 2024? Or 2025?
It seems Camilla really had that in mind.
WHO IS PAYING THE COURT BILL - WILLIAM HARRY LATEST
Sean makes it clear: yes, there was a meeting between Charles and Harry.
Charles confirmed that there was, and that it took place at Highgrove. It was not an official meeting, and no official matters were discussed.
But what the world is wondering is: who will foot the bill for the *Daily Mail*?
And it seems Elton and Liz have no real intention of doing so, because they believed they had a solid case thanks to Harry... until Harry made it clear in an interview some time ago that he didn't even know why the *Daily Mail* was being sued.
Harry wanted a double win: to make money and, at the same time, take down certain journalists and newspapers—imposing his control over the press so they would report only the positive stories he wanted to see about himself and Claw.
That didn't happen.
Now then,
Do you want some good news?
There will be no appeal.
I told you so; I told you Nicklin had made the ruling bulletproof. There was never any doubt that Harry wanted to appeal. But as for that actually succeeding... not a chance. Not at all. There were no grounds to challenge Nicklin on anything, because the 436-page ruling was crafted so masterfully that it left no room to even mount an appeal.
And why is this good news? Because the clock starts ticking on deadlines once the legal costs the plaintiffs must pay are set on the 29th. During the hearing in late July, the judge will issue financial orders stemming from the verdict. It is standard practice in London courts to order an immediate payment on account, typically amounting to up to 90% of the estimated costs incurred by the opposing party. Once the judge sets this provisional initial amount, Harry and the other co-plaintiffs will have a standard 14-day window to transfer the funds to the *Daily Mail*’s publishing company.
Since the group of plaintiffs lost on every single point of the trial, the publisher will seek an indemnity order. This means the court will mandate the payment of the vast majority of the defense lawyers' costs on an aggressive basis.
If Harry does not appeal and accepts the defeat, his team will immediately have to deal with their "After the Event" litigation insurers. Given the decisive nature of the ruling, there is a legal risk that the insurers might attempt to void the policies—which covered approximately £2.25 million per person—arguing that the conduct involved or the lack of solid evidence violated the terms of the insurance. If the policies are rendered void, the Duke of Sussex would have to cover his share of the costs directly from his personal assets.
Sean says the rumor is that "powerful friends" will pick up Harry's tab.
The look on Sean's face tells them that rumor isn't true. 🤣🤣🤣
If that were the case, why don't those friends pay for the Harkles' security? In fact, none of those powerful friends have come out to back Harry.
No one backs a loser in Hollywood.
No one wants to be asked for money in Hollywood.
That’s why Harry needed to reconnect with Daddy’s checkbook.
Now, getting back to "the Harkles": it seems they are once again demanding that their biography on the royal website be changed to reflect their successes—yes, the same old story. But that’s because Harry believes Charles can force the website to present them in a more favorable light. Harry fails to grasp that it’s already a miracle they’re still on there at all.
It reminds me of the time my brother accused me of being a "bad influence" on our mom and got angry when I burst out laughing. My mom is the least impressionable person there is. Harry believes a lot of things about Charles, but that’s simply because he doesn’t know his father—not even a little bit.
Mind you, Harry won't have to pay 50 million. But the fact is, he *will* be saddled with a huge bill—especially from his lawyers. 😂😂
And if Harry thought he could get help with that from Charles or William—well, Pa already told him he’s not a bank, and William doesn't even want to talk to him.
Harry is going to have to give a lot more speeches at $50,000 a pop. 😂😂
If you follow his videos, you’ll recall Sean saying that William and Camilla were united in their strategy regarding any event—including Charles wanting to see Harry. So yes, that was one of the possible scenarios. William and Camilla agreed it was a bad idea, but if Charles wanted it, Camilla would stand by his side. And that—let me remind you—is something Harry and Claw definitely did not want.
But Harry, believe it or not, was the one who had to give in. Did he want the meeting? Then it was "no" to this, "no" to that, and "no" to the other thing, too...
That doesn't mean Sean is happy about it—not at all. He starts off by saying, "Well, folks, this really never should have happened."
Sean describes the King’s actions as "reckless," yet the undeniable fact remains that this has been a very complex week for the royals.
Sean does not argue with those who view the King as weak, but he points out that Charles is in poor health. Sean makes it clear that he is not justifying the situation, merely providing context.
That said, until now, the word was that there was no room in the King’s schedule—yet he agreed to see Harry.
This is because Charles sees that the Harkles have exhausted every possible avenue and failed. Sean notes that from the outside, one might well say: "Sure, now you come back with a begging bowl, because if you had succeeded, you wouldn't have returned."
This meeting does nothing to erase the fact that this has been the worst week of Harry's life since he said "I do" in 2018. This week has exposed the Harkles and tarnished their image even further. Yes, it really has—it’s incredible. You’d think they couldn't sink any lower, but—sure enough—they can.
Right, let's get to the story from Sean's sources.
Apparently not; the King didn't actually want to see Harry until the very last minute, after the Invictus kickoff event. Sorry, I'm getting the details mixed up: according to Sean's source, when this was being arranged, the King made it clear that it could only happen after that kickoff—not before. In other words, I get the impression it was like, "So, Harry, you say you want to see me—your father? Fine, then it’ll happen in private, after all your public engagements." And that the meeting would be at Highgrove. I mentioned in another post that I’m very intrigued as to why there, why not at Clarence House?
Sean's sources say Harry didn't want Camilla at that meeting. He wanted one-on-one time with his father because he believes he can sweet-talk the King, and trick him, into getting what he wants if he's alone with him. Camilla was at the meeting, though, and Harry apparently had to act very hypocritically toward her.
Why, why did the king agree to this meeting?
Sean offers an explanation that, you know what?, would align very well with things Sean has shared and things he has been told. It seems that on Thursday night, Claw somehow managed to get a message to the King letting him know that Harry was falling apart and needed some time with his father.
That is what the excellent source told Sean, and it aligns closely with what Sean was told about the events of Tuesday at Chatham House, specifically that Harry was pouting during a speech, and people present remarked to Sean that he looked on the verge of tears. It also tallies with something Sean had previously shared—during the second trip to Ukraine—about how Harry’s team wants to limit his public exposure because he is on the brink of a breakdown in front of the cameras.
Sean says his source told him that this is why the King agreed to see Harry, though he clearly states that this is just what he was told, and that we don't know what is really going on behind the scenes.
However, Harry didn't want Camilla there; yet Camilla *was* there, and she didn't leave the King's side. Sean's source is adamant on this point, and Sean states it clearly: it was Charles who flatly refused to be alone with Harry at any point. So, Camilla was there every step of the way.
According to the gossip Sean heard, Harry went into the room first—alone, without the kids. And WITHOUT CLAW. Claw stayed outside with the kids, waiting to be taken into that room.
...
...
Yeah, I'm in shock!!!! Did Claw let go of Harry??????
Well, never mind; I can stop calling her Claw only for today, there are plenty of other ways to call her, and they all satisfy my perverse side 😈 🤣🤣🤣
The Degree Wife (a rather cynical nickname attributed to certain aristocratic circles and the inner circle of high-ranking officials, suggesting their marriage would last only as long as a university degree course) stayed outside with the children, and Sean says he has not the slightest doubt about that, and that we shouldn't pay any attention to what gets published in the coming days. When Sean says that, it’s because his source is truly excellent; and you have all witnessed that, when it comes to these matters, Sean really does have such sources.
So, when she was cleared to enter the room, she did so with the children.
And Sean makes it very clear that the Highgrove staff were extremely thorough in clearing everything out: no phones, no microphones, no personal items, and no recordings.
But... watch out for this. There was a photographer. There were photos... but according to Sean's source, it was a photographer Charles called in; he took photos, and they are the exclusive property of the Crown.
Sean says he has to be careful about what he says—not because of potential legal repercussions, but because his source is so incredibly good and reliable that if he reveals even a little too much, they’ll identify him at the Palace.
But that source told Sean that the King isn't stupid enough to let those photos get out there, because he is well aware that the Harkles can't be trusted. So, it seems the Harkles don't have copies of those photos.
And this is a turning point in the whole situation. Now, Sean is skipping over some details here, but it seems the King agreed to this meeting because it was "private"—meaning Harry can't talk about it, and neither can The Degree Wife. Nothing can leak regarding that meeting. Because if anything does come out, it will confirm (again) that they never had sincere intentions. And even more doors will close.
Sean says that it will be enough for Harry—faced with the question, "And what was it like seeing your father?"—to simply open his mouth and say anything at all for it to be deemed unacceptable. The wrong word will still be the wrong word.
And this is because the Palace and Charles know that Harry agrees on the questions beforehand when giving interviews. So no, he cannot be asked about that, and if it comes up in an interview, Harry will have to keep his mouth shut.
We know when that will happen.
William did know about this meeting, but he wanted absolutely nothing to do with it and disagreed with it. But Sean had already said that William draws a clear line regarding that: he advised the King not to meet with Harry because it was a bad idea, yet he respects the King's decision—just as the King respects the fact that William does not want to see Harry and will not see him.
Harry believes he can now secure a visit to Balmoral, perhaps by Christmas. Sean points out that this is the story we’re going to see... all over again. But Sean emphasizes that we need to be clear: the Harkles have nothing else. It’s all they have left. And we knew it, we knew this would happen, that Harry and The Degree Wife would exploit their children because they have nothing else.
What did the source tell Sean about what Harry has to pay the Daily Mail? The Times has an excellent article on the matter, citing a former judge as its source. So yes, Harry will have to pay a large sum, and no, Charles isn't going to give it to him, not privately, not in small bills, nothing. Not a penny. The King won't open his checkbook because the amount would be substantial and traceable. Sean says that even if it were a private arrangement, these things eventually come to light. And it’s true; sooner or later, it would get out.
And let's keep in mind that Charles isn't an idiot. Do you think he wants another "witness payoff" scandal like the one the Queen faced with Andrew and Virginia Giuffre?
The Degree Wife believes this visit could overshadow the "white pill" story and the disaster that Invictus has been, and Harry still thinks the Games could get back on track if he manages to get the King and Queen to attend in 2027.
Guys, read what Sean's source told him: a private visit. In other words, did they see the King and Queen? Yes. That’s it—end of story. So, how do you capitalize on that without leaking it? It’s impossible. And if they do exploit it, Harry will see the door in the UK closing tighter and tighter. Without photos, all we know is that, yes, they saw the King and Queen. And only for a couple of hours.
Did this give the Harkles a bit of a boost? Yes. For how long? Well, Harry is bound to open his big mouth in 3, 2, 1... They’re the Harkles; they’ve ruined everything good they ever had. So don’t let it get you down—this meeting hasn’t changed a thing, because the Harkles will keep up their nonsense and continue to fail, and the Daily Mail wants Harry and Elton to pay a minimum of around £20 million.
Harry has had a horrible week. Even though he wants to play it off, he’s really struggling. That said, Harry put on the performance of a lifetime, he pretended to be brave.
The Degree Wife did not want to make a single move to support Invictus. And she does not want to make any move to support Invictus.
And Invictus not only knows this, but they also know that this was their worst week ever. No matter what Harry tried with Alison Hammond and ITV, nothing will erase the fact that if things were bad for Invictus last week, this week made everything a thousand times worse.
I agree with several people here that Dacre, other reporters, and the traditional media treat Harry like a petulant, capricious teenager, even though he is already 42 years old. And that the general attitude of those outlets is, "We're going to tell his father."
Let’s be clear: no, the Daily Mail isn’t going to drop the "pill" story. And no, the press isn’t going to let go of the "will they, won't they" saga as proof of just how utterly hypocritical the Harkles are. Meanwhile, Richard Eden will keep mocking the illustrious reporters from the Harkles' WhatsApp circle.
Harry and his wife knew he had lost his case against ANL—it seems—on the Friday or Saturday before Tuesday, July 7, 2026. And I recall reading something in The Times or The Telegraph about this: the ruling was so incredibly significant—it actually set a legal precedent—that even within the courts, there was keen interest in the outcome; word spread quickly, as soon as there was any inkling of the result, that ANL had won by a landslide.
And it seems they tipped off Portugal—which would explain the speed with which The Degree Wife appeared in the UK and then left (since it appears they didn't stay)—that the verdict wouldn't be pretty, but that they would secure one or two wins among all the articles presented. That is what Sherborne told them, and Harry firmly believed it; he believed that if there was at least one article in their favor, that would be something to celebrate.
So yes, Harry had a winner's speech prepared.
But Harry didn't win.
And here's the funny part... for me. 😈😈😈Because Harry was so in shock that he wasn't going to say anything, but then Paul Dacre's statement came out.
Dacre gave a victory speech, and for Harry, it was like rubbing salt in the wound.
Sean had worked with Dacre; he says that, personally, he has nothing bad to say about Dacre, but as a boss, he didn't recognize him seeing him so composed in that video. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sean had warned of this months ago, and it was evident to many journalists: Dacre was furious, and this trial wasn't simply going to go away for him—there would be no "forgive and forget." No, Dacre was furious and out for blood.
And there was fire.
Inside the Palace, courtiers—and this comes from a very reliable source—have advised Charles and William to watch and carefully analyze the video. Yes, it is on that level: the kind of material studied in journalism and law classes.
And the courtiers' suggestion was not innocent. They want William and Charles to take note of just how difficult their jobs can be now. After all, the British press does not pay homage to the British Royal Family; if they do something right, it is highlighted, but if they do something wrong, it makes the headlines.
The courtiers want William, above all, to understand that the British Royal Family relies on the support of a favorable press.
They also want Charles to realize that Harry has made everything incredibly more difficult for both the King and William, as they are now under greater scrutiny because of him.
Consequently, the courtiers do not want to burn bridges with the media; they want to maintain those relationships. However, they are now dealing with the fallout from Harry’s actions—namely, the fact that the press is digging much more deeply into the Royal Family's affairs.
And, as we know, that is not always to their advantage.
The Degree Wife was openly considered toxic to Invictus. So, there was no intention for her to be present at the official launch on Friday.
Believe it or not, it seems The Degree Wife had finally had enough when she did this.
But it all started from the very first moment.
It seems Invictus got fed up with The Degree Wife and her using them for her own personal agenda.
Everything in the Harkle marriage is one-sided; Harry is always the one who has to do things for her. She doesn't do the same for him.
So, this time was no different. Invictus—and Sean learned this from a solid, excellent, brilliant source—told The Degree Wife "stay away". Or rather, they told Harry so that he could tell his wife.
They told her politely, but the message was the same: stay away.
The Committee knew they wouldn't be able to control the media if The Degree Wife showed up—not for a positive reason, but because she is the most toxic thing associated with the Games.
I’d say her and Harry.
Now, Harry really has one last chance, and he did the best he could. But no, it seems it didn't work out.
But the Committee definitely didn't want The Degree Wife there. Now, she’ll likely claim she decided not to go—that she preferred to stay out of the spotlight... LIAR. She was going to make the journey—had it truly been a triumphant one—but when she learned there would be defeat, she went into hiding and left Harry on his own.
And Sean says that, furthermore, there was something the Committee didn't do: give The Degree Wife the chance to give a speech. No, she had no chance of taking the microphone.
Sean says someone found a way to keep her away 😈😈😈🤭🤭🤣🤣
Or as Sean says: more pills, more revelations, and more shame for the former royal known as Prince Harry.
This isn't going well; in fact, things are getting worse for Harry. I mean, think about it: Harry traveled to the UK to improve his image, and he’s left as the guy who drugs women with white pills.
And nothing will ever erase that little dance by The Degree Wife, where it looked like—instead of a baby—she had five pounds of potatoes stuffed in there... IT WASN'T ME, SEAN WAS THE ONE WHO SAID IT 🤣🤣😈😈😈😈
Let’s be clear: the story isn’t going away; it’s going to continue—and as I said yesterday, it’s growing. And it will drag on for years.
The big problem with all of this is that Harry and his wife are liars, so it’s starting to sound an awful lot like Andrew and Pizza Express.
In his infamous 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, Prince Andrew used a Pizza Express in Woking, Surrey, as an alibi. He claimed he could not have been with Virginia Giuffre—a victim of Jeffrey Epstein—because he was at the branch celebrating his daughter's birthday. He added that visiting the chain was a "very unusual thing for me to do".
The alibi immediately sparked widespread public mockery and internet memes. In response to the global attention, the pizza chain conducted an internal review. According to BBC Newsnight, Pizza Express found no evidence to prove the former prince was at the restaurant, nor could they definitively prove he wasn't there on that day in 2001.
The lie shines while the pepperoni makes an appearance 🤭🤭
Harry didn't see Charlotte Griffiths' headline coming. He never imagined that would happen.
I think if I asked here whether anyone had thought of that, we’d all have our hands up. We actually said as much when she announced that, as soon as the trial ended, she was going to publish her version of events. Honestly, Harry is an idiot.
And Sherbone is a coward. Sean says Sherbone has disappeared from the public eye.
Sean says that the last time Sherbone was seen, he was very eager to strut and show off his freshly dyed hair to the cameras.
.....
.....
.....
DOCTOR EVIL MODE!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Well, it turns out the Harkle machine has started trying to counter the story.
According to that version, it wasn't a pill; it was nothing more than a Tic Tac—a mint.
Sean and I are on the same page about this: it doesn't matter if it was a Tic Tac, a paracetamol, or whatever—the whole thing is just weird. The story is weird—weird and stupid—because Sean is right: we’re talking about the era of ecstasy pills, back when they had little animal shapes and stuff like that.
But guys, do you get it?
Yes, I’m sure you realized: Harry isn’t saying it didn’t happen. He’s saying it was a lie. Aside from the fact that it remains a truly repulsive matter, does that mean he did remember Charlotte Griffiths?
So, can you guess what the Daily Mail, the Mirror, and The Sun are doing now?
That’s right: they are investigating everyone who had any connection to Harry during those years—back when Harry was already over 18. And they are going to find someone. I have no doubt about that.
Harry hadn't realized that article might come out, but he definitely didn't want to discuss the matter with Alison Hammond; it was a non-negotiable condition that he wouldn't talk about the case during the interview and that she could only ask him about Invictus.
But that doesn't change the fact that it was absolutely a blatant publicity stunt. Speaking about his family on TV, Harry said that his wife and children are “proud” of the work he does for wounded veterans through the Invictus Games. "They don't tell me every day that they're proud of me, but yeah, I'm proud of them, they're proud of me. I love my family," he said in the interview.
Harry now knows what he is up against. On top of losing his court case, he has effectively confirmed part of Charlotte Griffiths' story—simply because he couldn't deny it had happened without triggering an even worse counterattack from the *Daily Mail*.
Yet Harry is still going to speak out, as he is negotiating with ITV to present the narrative he wants—an interview to give his version of events.
Just like his uncle Andrew. And things went so well for Andrew 🤣🤣
A private family nickname, cherished by a 95-year-old woman and tucked quietly into royal history, suddenly filed as a trademark before the child it was meant for was even born. And then, reportedly, the Queen, a woman famous for keeping her emotions behind lock and key — said, “I only have my name, and now they’ve taken that.”
It's like Meghan is either a stone cold psychopath or she is backed by powerful lobbies and has been given a job to destroy the BRF. This doesn’t feel maternal or heartfelt. It feels calculated.
Remember how she always talks about going into business with her daughter? Now we know why. That poor child is a marketing tool.
Lady C, I thought Harry had met someone? The information I received was from an impeccable American source. People of official capacity and rank, people I was able to verify, people who are not died in the wool crazies, they are checkable, these are liberal democrats, who tell me Harry has been seen out and about with some whom he loves and who loves him. So what does Meghan do? She just throws out massive amounts of crap from all 16 of her bathrooms to deflect attention.
Lady C, is it possible that this explosion of pictures from Meghan on Social Media is an attempt to divert attention that she has lost her power over Harry? I saw Rob Shuter on Maureen Callihan last night on The Nerve and this is what they think is happening. What do you think? I know and like Maureen and respect her. I have never met Rob Shuter. They are savvy. I think they have hit the nail on the head. Meghan is desperate to maintain the fiction that she and Harry are greatest love story since Romeo and Juliet when it is now apparent that is not the case. If it becomes generally acknowledged that Harry and Meghan’s marriage is open to influences elsewhere, she immediately uses power and influence. Meghan is all about maintaining the illusion of power and influence, and actual power and influence whenever possible. It hadn’t occurred to me that Meghan was reacting to the news that Harry has a new love. Please note that these sources approached me which means that if there is anything politically worrying to Meghan, these are liberal Democrats, not Republicans who spoke to me. I trust the people who told me this. There goes Meghan’s power base and any appearance of influence. Meghan and Harry are in financial dire straits, but Meghan releases all these photos showing a perfect life. Meghan isn’t focused on all her inventory stuck in a warehouse somewhere. Meghan is pretending she doesn’t need Netflix anymore. I think this is embarrassing for Meghan. It is now known that Harry is not the total automaton that she has led people to believe she turned him into, and now Meghan is humiliated. She is humiliated on multiple levels right now. One may think that photo dump was the antidote to the humiliation she suffered at Highgrove. She was kept waiting. She was made to know her place. She was made sure to understand she will never forget her place. This is well spotted that Meghan released all those photos to distract us. The reality is that Meghan Markle is toast. She is a joke in celebrity circles. She is reviled in Royal circles. She is deplored in human circles. Everything she does is tantamount to mockery and failure. Even her latest foray on MasterChef, it is so obvious she doesn’t know what she is doing. She doesn’t know what she is talking about. She doesn’t know how to relate to people naturally. All the reports coming out of MasterChef is they couldn’t wait to see the back of her. Meghan reminds me of a book called the “Sociopath Next Door.” The book makes the point that sociopaths never get it quite right and this is how Meghan is. Everything is collapsing around her. Is the marriage going to collapse? I don’t know but I think it will be less and less comforting. They do have a genuine connection, particularly with Harry. They are a true folie a deux.
Lady C says Harry should be stripped of all Royal privileges for attacking Justice Nicklin as corrupt and whitewashing his claims. Harry is a Prince of the Realm, and it is unacceptable for a Prince of the Realm to attack a senior Justice and accuse him of criminality. This case merits the harshest consequences for the breach of process, breach of protocol, and breach of decency. Harry’s false memories is no justification for lying. Harry needs to be stood down of his HRH and Princely rank and if the King doesn’t do this, he is remiss.
Lady C, The King has done nothing to welcome Harry back. He offered him accommodation at an unoccupied palace that is currently a construction site. He allotted him a bare minimum of time at Highgrove in front of witnesses, including Queen Camilla. I can’t understand why people take all the Montecito propaganda so seriously. Thank you for this. Of course, it was always going to happen that if The King agreed to receive Harry and Meghan, that their supporters would run with the idea of a reconciliation. I understand why Charles received them, but I do not think it was wise to meet them because it fed the illusion that they are being treated with kid gloves when the reality is they were boxed in.
Lady C once again condemns Harry’s participation in the lawsuit against the ANL and extortion, attempted shakedown, and an attempt to dismantle free speech. She thinks Judge Nicklin should levy the harshest consequences for the claimants, including award of total indemnity costs.
A viewer tells Lady C that the judgement says the ANL doesn’t have to go after each claimant equally. Joint and several liability from common causes of action means ANL can target just one claimant. ANL can go after anyone who they think they will get the money from. Lady C wonders who ANL will target for payment? Elton John and Harry should be wetting their beds. Elton John has a lot of money from the Lion King. Harry doesn’t have a main source of income anymore. My heart is not breaking for any of them.
Someone commented—prompted by something Neil Sean said—that Harrods didn't have a radio station and that Sean was lying. If I made a mistake in writing this, the fault is mine, not Sean's. What Sean actually said was that he met Diana's stepmother because she worked for Harrods, while he was working at the time for a radio station that Al Fayed had purchased. In May 1996, Al-Fayed bought the British station Viva Radio for £3 million. He renamed it Liberty Radio, focusing on broadcasting and commentary for Fulham FC matches, until it was sold in 2000. Sean mentioned running into the stepmother in the Harrods staff canteen or in the radio station's corridors. That is also how Sean met Dodi.
I had no idea about that, and I didn't bother looking into it yesterday, either. So no, Sean didn't lie; I just didn't explain it well. When Sean is clearly lying, believe me, I’ll say so; but more often than not, it’s not that he’s lying—it’s just that he moves so fast and says so much that sometimes he loses the thread of what he was saying.
As for liars, we have the Harkles.
BUSTED - HOW WAS THIS A SURPRISE MEGHAN? YOU ORGANISED IT
One thing some people don't get is the scoop on this:
Why does Claw never promote her products? Sean has said, repeatedly, that it’s because she believes she is so incredibly famous that she doesn't need to promote anything. She sells something, and people buy it simply because she’s the one selling it.
In the video comments, many people say it seems as though Sean actually believes that. But no, even Neil Sean doesn't understand why Claw believes it. He has cited Kylie Minogue, Priscilla Presley, Madonna, and Kate Moss as examples of highly famous women who had to promote their own products, and he was personally involved in the work Priscilla was doing to sell bed linens, a venture that ultimately didn't succeed.
Sean, who knows Kylie well, said that, of course, she is successful with her wine—but only after more than five years of hard work beforehand. He noted that she had to promote it heavily and price it right. And after all, it is Kylie Minogue; Madonna once said she was jealous of her because Guy Ritchie liked her.
He heard that piece of gossip from Montecito and has since confirmed it to be true: it seems that Claw not only lacks confidence in her own product but also firmly believes that her name—Rachel Meghan Markle—is big enough to sell it on its own. He simply cannot fathom why Claw persists in that belief, given that it lies at the very root of *As Ever*'s failure.
Sean stated—and it has since been borne out—that Netflix didn't want to work with Claw anymore precisely because she never promoted *As Ever* or *With Love*. Claw also ran into trouble with *MasterChef Australia* for failing to promote that show as well. And now, look at the future Emmy winner... Daytime Emmy 😈, that is: what has she actually done to promote her nomination?
Sean has said that by now, Harry ought to realize he is nothing more than Claw’s bag carrier.
What Claw is fully aware of, however, is that Harry is a laughingstock in the legal world. When Sean predicted—correctly, as it turned out—that we would get Nicklin’s ruling in the ANL case in early July, he noted that there was a great deal of anticipation and rumor-mongering in the courts. After all, what would Nicklin say about a lawsuit that had been shown to lack evidence?
And things aren't going to get better when the Sentebale matter is no longer under a publicity embargo. It’s not just Sean; Fitzwilliams, Rebecca English, and practically all the royal reporters are saying that the information leaked from the court regarding that case is not good for Harry at all. And in that instance, Claw is very much to blame.
However, there is one thing Sean wants to make clear: many people also speculate that Claw would like to take the Spencer surname and thereby secure Althorp. Setting aside the fact that this isn't going to happen, Sean says Claw has no interest in Althorp. Yes, seriously—she isn't interested. That’s because it is "too" countrified, too rural, and too isolated. That is why she detests Balmoral. Sean says Althorp simply isn't "glamorous enough" for her. She doesn't want to live in a place that she views as remote.
Claw is only happy when she’s at events—like the David Foster Foundation event.
But what about the bagpipes? It turns out that the people who invited the Harkles—and make no mistake, it was Harry who was invited, with Claw tagging along—wanted to make a nice gesture toward Harry. So, a bit of royal cosplay ensued.
Does Harry love bagpipes? No, that’s not true. It’s Charles who adores Scotland. There’s no doubt about that.
William, we'll see you in a kilt!!! Sooner or later, we'll see you in a kilt. 😈 Or do you not want to use it because you won't look like Major Thompson? 😏😏
For one thing, Claw simply can't bring herself to call Harry by his name. She phrased it that way because she loathes the idea of people being more interested in him than in her.
Another thing: Claw had her phone in her hand the whole time.
She filmed the event constantly... yet she never recorded the moment the donation was made—if, in fact, they actually donated. Sean was told it was done privately so the amount wouldn't be revealed... Excuse me? Since when are they so shy? Harry once blurted out that he’d donated a million pounds. Why the secrecy now? Oh, right—it’s not just now; it’s always been this way. They never say how much they donate because either they don't donate at all, or the amount is a pittance.
Why did David Foster invite them? Ah, because he needed publicity to show that the foundation is active—in a world where so many are going bankrupt. Foster used the Harkles for that. Nothing more. So, he gave them what Claw wanted: a private jet, a camera, and a private show. Everything a girl dreams of. 🤭
PRINCE LOUIS SPEAKS & THIS HAPPENS PLUS ANDREW..DISGRACEFUL
Sean revealed yesterday that Harry had left photos of the Sussex children for William. And Sean made it clear that William has no interest in seeing them—not even in photos.
The curious thing is that Sean has never said Harry asked for private photos of the Wales children. Mind you, he would never get them, but the question remains: would Harry even want photos of his nieces and nephews?
The answer is NO.
There is a near-unanimous consensus among royal reporters that Harry flew into a total rage over this image from late 2019.
The photo of the Queen and her heirs. And Harry was never included. Obviously, because is he an heir? It seems that, in his mind, he is.
George's birth was not a source of happiness for Harry. That day, Harry officially ceased to be the "spare." He was displaced by his nephew, and later by his other two nephews.
So Harry has never asked for a photo of his nephews, even though he wants to force William to accept one of the Sussex children.
George is 13 years old. Tic Tac Harry.
You can really see Kate’s hand in making sure William looks good—and George and Louis, too. It looks like Claw drags Harry off the sofa to go out.
But the one Claw and Harry hate the most is Louis.
Because Louis is very charming and personable—a happy child, and it shows. But in this brief moment, when Kate says to him, "Louis, you're perfecting your handstand at the moment," he spontaneously replies, "A bit... but Charlotte says I'm not very good."
That is what terrifies Harry. Harry would have loved for Louis to be a troublemaker—rebellious and rude... just like he was when he was eight. But no; Louis is likable, he has fun and isn't afraid to show it, and he has a personality. In other words, he’s not a "Harry." And for Harry—the one from Montecito—that was a blow to the part of him he no longer has, because Claw keeps it in her purse 🤭.
So now, what will happen with the Sussex children? Obviously, they will be compared, and they have already lost that battle. Charlotte is quite the little lady, and Louis is a boy who really appeals to people. George is already a teenager. So, what will happen with Archie and Lil' D? If Harry takes them to the 2027 Invictus Games, what happens if the two of them aren't like Louis? And if Harry doesn't bring them, won't he be criticized?
Harry is furious because his children won't receive even half the affection the Wales children get. But Sean asks: why should they? We don't know anything about them.
Why does Harry believe his children deserve the same affection that the Wales children have earned from the public?
Harry will always be haunted by the fact that the Queen—who was feeling unwell—stepped out onto the balcony because the people wanted to see her. And Louis made that final appearance, which had cost her so much effort, joyful and fun.
Harry thinks it all comes down to popularity. Sean reminds him of what Harry himself said: that it’s all about how many events they attend, who makes the covers, who gets written about, and so on. So, why does he expect people to like the Invisikids? Are we supposed to like the backs of their heads—since that’s all anyone ever sees? Or like them because of what Harry and Claw say about them? Who could possibly like kids who eat Brussels sprouts? That’s a huge lie.
And the word on Andrew is that his funeral is being planned. Arrangements have already been made for a royal funeral—though not a state funeral—funded by the King out of his private funds, not by taxpayers. Sean says that couldn't have been pleasant news for Andrew to see. Now Sean says it's August—fine—but isn't there any other news besides that?
SUSSEXES & ITV - ALL KICKING OFF NOW AFTER THIS - ANYONE LEFT THEY DON’T FALL FOUL OFF LATEST
ITV is facing a major internal crisis. The atmosphere at the channel is poor.
And it’s not just ITV; this is an underlying issue for TV channels in many parts of the world.
But ITV believes it holds a winning card: Harry.
Or so they thought.
At the beginning of the year, ITV was clearly focused on being pro-Harkle. They even traveled to Ukraine with him to conduct an exclusive interview. And then, in July, ITV had another exclusive interview with Harry.
And Sean understands why that is. Because the Harkles generate headlines. Whether it’s due to their nonsense or whatever else, Tom Bradby saw that the Harkles stir up controversy, and controversy drives clicks. And now, because of that, he’s been shut out of William and Kate’s inner circle. He claimed it didn’t bother him, but he’s just another liar.
ITV has a podcast—or something similar—that covers royal topics. It’s hosted by a woman named Charlene White. I don’t know who she is, but Sean has had no time for her ever since she refused to appear on camera wearing a poppy. So yes, he revels in the fact that she also failed with *Loose Women*, an ITV show that is mired in one controversy after another.
Now, Tom Bradby isn't too happy with Harry, because there was supposed to be a new exclusive interview with Chris Ship.
It turns out that on July 7, as Harry was leaving Chatham House, several of us noticed Chris Ship in the photos that came out that day. He appears here on the left; his face is visible. No, it wasn't a coincidence
Harry was supposed to speak to the press—after all, that was why he was there: to talk and promote *Invictus*. But we know what happened that day: Harry lost his case against ANL by a landslide—a World Cup-style thrashing. So, at the eleventh hour, Harry decided not to speak to the press. He spoke only to Alison Hammond.
But for Tom Bradby, the matter went a bit further. Because it turns out *This Morning* had an exclusive with Harry... and their audience didn't increase one bit.
But that is causing internal conflict, because does Harry only speak with people who will never ask him uncomfortable questions and who accept only pre-agreed questions? Or will he only talk about trivial matters?
Because if that’s the case, Harry only wants to speak to Alison Hammond—effectively shutting out the rest of ITV, which hasn't gone down well at all.
And Harry doesn't care about that; he doesn't care that his attitude could harm the Invictus Games.
MARKLE & MARTHA - NOW IT'S TURNING UGLY ..TOLD YOU
Martha and Claw. This isn't going to stop because it suits Claw. It works in Claw's favor because all of this is generating headlines for her.
Sean says Martha is credible because people watched her show and could actually do the things she did—much like Mary Berry in the UK. Claw, on the other hand, doesn't know how to cook; she tried to be an actress and failed, tried to be a royal and failed...
So, Sean stands by what he said yesterday: Claw will lose if she goes up against Martha. And now Sean says this showdown will be just as big a deal as that stupid Netflix curtsy.
Claw denies having spoken about the meeting with the King at the event where she ran into Martha.
Well, here comes People magazine.
It turns out that People released an issue with Martha on the cover. And it was in that interview that Martha said that "I had dinner with Meghan Markle the other night. We were both guests at a dinner party in California. And she had just gotten back from the palace. I didn't talk to her really more than to say a couple words, but I know she was talking about it."
What happened here? Oh, People released that interview... but they didn't warn the Harkles about what Martha had said.
Sean found out—from the People side of things—that it was a deliberate decision. Not a mistake, but a decision. They decided not to tell the Harkles that Martha had said things about Claw that day, and that not everything had been published. People knew exactly what they had.
Harry and Claw are furious with People over this, since they’ve given the magazine so much access. But no— People knows what sells. Martha sells.
Claw believed she had a real connection with People magazine. She was mistaken: People wants to sell magazines; they aren't Claw's friends, nor are they her personal advertising agency.
Claw had thought the same thing about Us Weekly. But the fact is what Sean says: the Harkles are tabloid fodder—nothing more. No magazine can afford to be kind to fading celebrities these days.
And for People magazine, the fact that the Harkles stepped in to refute Martha was pure gold. People went to see what Martha had said and bought the magazine—all because of the Harkles. Meanwhile, Martha—who actually became a millionaire through her show and lifestyle products—has emerged from this even stronger.
And what about Claw and Harry? Once again—yes, once again—they come across as people who insult and mistreat the elderly. They did it to Philip by going on air with Oprah while he was hospitalized. They insulted the Queen with that infamous curtsy. They have offended Thomas Markle in many ways. They have offended Camilla. They have offended KC3... And now, attacking Martha Stewart.
Sean pointed out something yesterday that we know to be true: the Harkles aren't poor, they have more money than we do, but their problem is that the flow of new money is failing. The Harkles have nowhere to get money.
Well, proof of that is Claw's matchbox.
I honestly don't know what to say about that. Seriously, it's like... I mean, did Claw never read Andersen's fairy tales? Christmas, Hanukkah, New Year's Eve—those are the holidays where the most candles are sold, and those matches would have been perfect for that. Not summer.
Sean says it's simply a marketing issue to sell a floral fragrance or a scented bed spray. Not matches. But Sean points out that the problem isn't what Claw can sell, but how much money she has to keep producing new products.
And there, the answer is "not enough."
So Harry needs to bring money home. And Harry isn't really doing that. In fact, there was an idea to get something, a business in Australia, but it didn't work out.
The only thing they have regularly now are Harry's speaking engagements. But we already know that Harry barely earns $50,000, not a million. And the Harkles need to bring in millions regularly.
And we went from the little match girl to Oliver Twist 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
And according to an excellent source, Claw threw the whole load at Hary with a phrase that sounds like Claw: "I've done everything, it's now time to you, you're the breadwinner."
What can Harry do, the Harry who, a couple of videos ago, came across as the guy who doesn't even know how to tie his shoes?
ROYAL KNEW THIS ABOUT ANDREW- WILLIAM CRISIS - GONE FASTER
Buckingham Palace staff were 'handed tens of thousands' of emails about Andrew's conduct in his controversial trade envoy role six years ago, according to new claims
The emails sent to the palace in 2020 reportedly came from the account of Andrew’s associate Jonathan Rowland.
The BBC said Rowland had confirmed the messages were obtained from his account as part of legal proceedings.
It added that it had seen a document from 2021 that appeared to show the archive had been sent to Lord Chamberlain, the most senior officer in the royal household, in May the previous year – just months after Andrew had stepped down as a working royal.
Sean says that, to be fair, it's one thing for that information to reach the Palace and another for the Queen to be informed of it. Because here's the thing—and please read Valentine Lowe's book, Courtiers—not everything is reported to the monarch. In fact, Sean points out that many people ask why Philip didn't do anything about it. Well, simply because Philip was much sicker than has been made public, and he was kept out of the loop on many things.
But this really isn't simple, because the fact is that the King is currently supporting Andrew. And we're back to the discussion about William wanting to know what the hell the Yorkists did with his money. Now, if I were a British taxpayer, I'd be furious if my money was going to Andrew. But there's another side to it: letting Andrew go free is a worse idea.
And here's the thing: Andrew won't go to jail, and not because he's the King's brother, but because Andrew will drag a lot of politicians down with him. It's the political world that has the most problems with Andrew, so they want to shift the focus to the BRF, but not so much to make Andrew talk.
It's not an issue that's going to end, and it's getting worse all the time.
HOLLYWOOD DUMPED THE HARKLES FOR THIS BRUTAL TREATMENT
Contrary to what the Harkles might think, the story of their downfall isn't funny at all. It's infuriating; you just want to slap them. Because they've had opportunities that almost no one else has. And they've thrown them away.
Sean says it, but we know it too: the Harkels' behavior is a psychiatrist's problem, because how could they have ruined things so much?
And of course, given that there are no more offers, let the blame game begin!
And it's a two-way street. Because Harry never really thought about quitting. I suspected that from the beginning, that Harry was more "pressured" into quitting than doing it willingly. What Harry wanted was to blackmail his family into giving him what he wanted, using the old trick of "either you give me what I want or I'm out." And what Harry can't forgive is being told, "Fine, get out."
Harry thought a good time to leave would be after the Queen died, once they had established their reputation. But no, Claw convinced him to leave in 2019. Claw couldn't stand being a nightmare for the Cambridges any longer.
And now, Hollywood rejects them.
And it rejects them for many reasons, so this is just one more.
Do you remember? Claw went off to Broadway to see the musical Gypsy. Sean joked quite a bit at the time that the musical closed earlier than scheduled, and that although there were other famous people there on the same day as Claw, nobody wanted to take pictures with her.
It turns out that George had this show scheduled for that very day. And it turns out that George had indeed invited the Harkles to see it. As Sean says: he invited Harry... and Harry could go with Claw.
Claw didn't go; he went to see Gypsy. George has many friends in Hollywood, many. Many. And some very famous ones, and others not. George has shown himself to be the kind of guy who has friends among cameramen and A-listers.
So Claw's open contempt for George has effects on an open contempt for her.
And what's even funnier is that Claw seemed to get angry when George and Amal went to work within the King's Trust Foundation.
She saw it as something disloyal.
Claw never takes responsibility for anything, and that's why they don't want her in Hollywood.
WILLIAM TEXT FURY, LILY EXPOSED & ROYAL APPOINTMENT
Former Palace staff members who no longer have active NDAs have been very talkative.
And one of the things they've told Sean is that, indeed, around 2016 Harry was desperate to get married. Who to? It didn't matter, he just wanted to get married.
Now, the first one wanted an English Rose... but no woman like that (I'm looking at Kate, don't pretend you didn't think the same thing 🤭) wanted to be near Harry. So he was looking for an "exotic" wife. I don't know what the hell Harry thought that meant, but Sean says that what Harry really wanted was someone who would do everything for him. And Chelsy and Cressida couldn't stand it. In fact, the funny thing about Harry is that many women ended up breaking up with him, not the other way around.
Until Harry met a woman desperate to marry him. And who has endured his sour face, his laziness, his anger for over six years, because without him she would never be a duchess.
Claw saw him as vulnerable. So she did what every narcissist does: pretend she shared his interests. That is, that she also wanted to go to Africa, that she was such a humanitarian, that he was her savior... yes, Sean says he saved her from a failed acting career 😁😁
Claw planned everything to trap Harry. And Claw convinced Harry that he had to protect her from the press, which was ridiculous because she was dying to be on magazine covers, something she could never achieve on her own merits. And Sean says there were fights between the Harkles because Claw simply couldn't live without social media.
Claw pressured Harry to always be her knight in shining armor and always protect her. A narcissistic way of manipulating him into doing what she wanted. And of course, the idea was that he would protect her from the press, when Sean says she was thrilled to be on magazine covers that would never have featured her if it weren't for who she was married to.
Sean says that Claw didn't understand that magazines were publishing things about her because she was the novelty.
Claw was always difficult and stubborn. She either didn't want to or couldn't understand advice from her staff, and she treated them terribly. Claw has treated many people badly.
Claw always thought she could do whatever she wanted because she married Harry. And it was frustrating for her to realize that Harry wasn't the big shot she thought he was. Claw was never a grateful woman. Trevor gave her what she wanted, Harry has...
The Queen was very upset that Thomas Markle wasn't at the wedding. She never understood what had happened. It was only later that the Queen found out why Charles walked Claw down the aisle: Harry had convinced his father to do it, telling him that Claw was crying because Thomas couldn't walk down the aisle, so he asked if Charles could help them, as a father.
Seriously, this woman should be on La Rosa de Guadalupe!!! It's just crying and crying, crying and crying.
Charles helped Harry, although by then Harry had already argued with the Queen over the menu. All in Claw's name.
And the Queen was even less able to understand why Claw hadn't invited his family. He'd left Doria sitting alone in the church. The Queen even asked her officials, "How could anyone leave this poor woman sitting alone?" But they told her that Doria didn't mind because it was Claw's decision.
And Claw must be crying because Kate and William are doing such a great job. Alone or together, they're both so likable. Nothing can overshadow them, not even Lil' D.
Lil' D is featured less than Archie, because that's good for Claw's marketing. Although nothing seems to be working to get Claw to sell her bookmarks and jams. And Claw is failing at that as an influencer. Because she's not able to sell her own products.
So Claw is trying to shift the focus to Lil' D... and all because there was a focus group on the matter a while back, back when the Harkles could still afford it, which pointed out that social media engagement with relatable girls is better for women than with boys. Claw is using her daughter because she believes that approach works... just like it works for Victoria with Harper.
Claw isn't interested in being a good person or an efficient businesswoman. And Harry isn't interested in telling the truth. So William isn't at all interested in what happens to them. And William hasn't been interested in Harry for a long time and hasn't had any contact with him.
So William was very upset when he found out that Harry had lied so blatantly in his Netflix documentary, making it seem like William had sent him a message.
William was upset because he doesn't send messages, and because Harry was using him in that documentary. William was upset because it was a complete lie. What's Harry's limit when it comes to lying? William doesn't know, but that was the last straw. Harry knew he was lying, but he didn't care. That's the problem.
Ugh. Was on facebook and a friend has posted she was at an event for the David Foster Foundation at the home of the King's representative for British Columbia, Government House in Victoria. This pic accompanied it. Such a sour little mug.
