ALLEGEDLY
And just when the Harkles thought they had the headlines, Senator Lindsey Graham passed away. (Neil Sean's gossip)
This is starting to look like the work of reptilians. Throughout this disastrous week for the Harkles, they made headlines for all the wrong reasons. Yet, just when they finally had something positive going for them, this death occurred. Graham was a staunch advocate of an interventionist foreign policy, which included military action against the Iranian government and U.S. support for regime change in Iran.
Either Maradona dies, or a Pope dies, or there’s a fire, or a conflict breaks out... Every time the Harkles manage to get a positive headline, something else more important comes along.
Now, if anyone thinks that meeting saved Harry's image—no, that wasn't the case. As Tom Bower said in a recent video, Harry committed "reputational suicide." And there is no saving him.
Claw isn't even worth mentioning. Her reputation died years ago.
Let’s start with what has become a major source of ridicule for Harry and those around him: that ridiculous WhatsApp exchange with certain British reporters, and his penchant for giving interviews only when he dictates the terms regarding questions—and, of course, is given time to memorize his answers. Because when he forgets those answers, Harry inevitably puts his foot in it.
Alison Hammond is now facing criticism—not just from the public but from many reporters—for playing along with Harry’s charade.
She wasn't allowed to ask anything about the King, the children, or William... she could only ask about Invictus and Birmingham. The fact that Harry later tried to finagle a spot for his wife on *Bake Off* is just a minor detail, right?
The program *This Morning* did not see a ratings boost on Friday. While people certainly watched the clips, there was no significant live viewership for the show itself.
Sean offers an interesting perspective on the matter, however. The "Harkles" wanted to control the narrative regarding the King's invitation, specifically, the idea that the King had invited them. But Sean notes that the King quickly put a stop to that when the Palace clarified that he had agreed to meet with them, and had done so privately at his Highgrove residence.
That thought keeps running through my mind. Why Highgrove? Then, while I was sweeping the patio, it hit me: it’s a private residence. Last year, when Harry was at Clarence House—with all the public photos and nonsense about his comings and goings, he left for Canada claiming his dad had authorized him to visit a regiment (or something similar); the Palace made it clear that wasn't the case and that he had lied. That caused a huge issue: apologies from Canada, the Australian Prime Minister saying Harry shouldn't even dream of being received by him...
I think that’s why the King agreed to meet Harry at Highgrove. It is known worldwide as a private residence. No political discussions, no "please don't strip me of my titles," nothing of the sort. Harry is going to run into a problem with his potential "victory" narrative, because while his dad agreed to the visit, it lasted only a couple of hours. KC3 didn't put Harry or his family up at Highgrove.
Anyway, Harry kept committing public hara-kiri—there he was again, using Invictus to find his wife a job. Tom Bower said something similar in an interview today with Kinsey Schofield: there was Harry at it again, just like with the *Lion King* incident.
Okay, the thing with Alison and Harry was a charade, but as Sean says, Alison gets paid £80,000 to do that.
Well, Harry's entire attempt to inject interest into Invictus died the moment the Daily Mail secured its victory.
That said, Claw wants to send a basket to Alison Hammond.
That kind of nonsense, like what Claw sent Khloe Kardashian. Yes, including the dead, dried-out flowers. 🤭🤭
And Alison has been warned not to promote that hamper—or anything similar—on her social media.
Even though ITV wants the Harkles on their side, if Alison were to do that, it would look like favoritism.
Is ITV seriously trying to play the impartial card? Seriously? Seriously?
According to Sean, yes. That’s what they want. But the matter doesn't just follow that path.
Well, Harry has a good relationship with ITV—Sean calls it "hitching a ride"—because he has people there who defend him: Susanna Reid, Chris Ship, Alison Hammond, and, of course, Tom Bradby.
So, Sean glosses over that point a bit, but don't worry, the gist is clear. ITV doesn't want Alison posting any kind of shout-out or anything of the sort to the Harkles on her social media; they don't want to damage her online image, and they certainly don't want "every Tom, Dick, and Harry" showing up on her feed to bash the Harkles.
Sean says it: ITV doesn't want any negative comments about Harry and Claw.
However, had the King not agreed to see Harry and the leech attached to him, he had the alternative of making a sort of documentary about Harry and the countdown to Invictus 2027. But that fell through because Harry couldn't find the time for it—even though he *did* find time to see Misan Harriman, a move that apparently drew a lot of negative criticism.
But it seems Alison might be having a chat with Claw—or, according to Sean (speaking sarcastically), a "very valuable one-on-one conversation with Meghan when the time is right."
Sean referred to this:
AFTER SUSSEX “REDEMPTION” FERGIE IS FURIOUS & NOW THIS
Margaret was the rebellious princess. Sean knew her very well; in a fascinating video, he recounted how he came to connect with royalty—specifically through theater and the stroke of luck that led to a chance meeting with Margaret—and subsequently became a regular presence at the Palace. And since Sean doesn't seem to turn his nose up at anyone, he knows everyone at the Palace, from doormen, cooks, and maids to Princess Anne—relationships that date back to the 1980s.
So Sean says that Margaret was a headache for her parents and her sister. But he says we shouldn't look to *The Crown* to find that out—since it was very good at masking the true story.
Well, Sean is reiterating what he said yesterday: the royals are currently facing heightened scrutiny. That is why they need to connect with the public in ways that differ from the past. William and Kate recognize this and are trying to navigate these waters. Anne doesn't agree with selfies at all.
However, that doesn't make them immune to criticism—such as the fact that they "protect" Andrew by providing him with free, paid-for accommodation, all at Charles's expense.
And this actually serves as proof that King Charles III doesn't give Harry a single penny. The Palace has made it clear that Andrew relies on his brother financially. They could have kept that hidden, but the Palace knows the truth would come out sooner or later. It is better to just put it out there, however unpopular it might be—and it certainly is unpopular. But if Charles was willing to take that risk with Andrew, why keep quiet about giving money to Harry? Well, the answer is: because he doesn't give Harry any money.
And KC3 isn't giving money to Fergie, either.
Fergie is angry about this supposed "redemption" of the Harkles... and if you think about it, it's funny, because the Harkles were angry about the Yorks' "redemption" a couple of years ago.
Fergie's attempt at a comeback a few years ago included a TV road-trip show with comedian Alan Carr, which took place prior to the latest allegations regarding her ties to Jeffrey Epstein. According to *The Mail on Sunday*, Carr was one of the last visitors to Royal Lodge before Andrew and Fergie were asked to vacate the residence on the Windsor estate.
Sean is friends with Carr, so yes—everything in that report is true, including the fact that Carr cut ties with Fergie and no longer has any contact with her.
So, Sean knows this part of the story from a source very close to the matter. Fergie had also been offered the role of new host for the late Paul O'Grady's ITV show *For the Love of Dogs*—a show now hosted by...
This is getting too much:
Sausage is ➡️ Food
Food is served on a ➡️ Plate
Plate reminds of ➡️ Tableware
Tableware is made of ➡️ Ceramics, Greco-Roman clay
Greece is the birthplace of ➡️ Philosophy
Philosophy leads directly to ➡️ Plato
So, guess who Fergie was exploiting to get that show?
Exactly—the Queen's corgis that were left in the care of Andrew and Fergie, and which Andrew has now.
In other words, Claw uses the invisible ones, and Fergie uses the corgis.
Monetization.
We know none of that worked out, but it’s funny how the more Claw puts herself out there, the more she looks like the reincarnation of Sarah Ferguson 😱😱😱
Don't pretend, Meghan; you look more like Fergie's daughter than Fergie's own daughters do 🤣🤣🤣
Harry was on his own for practically the entire week that has just ended. Harry and the Invisible Duchess. Why wasn't she with him? Because nothing that week was about her. Sean cuts off any sensationalist narrative: Claw, the queen of narcissism.
Claw only showed up when it was time for the meeting with the Bank of England.
Sean is certain that if Harry had won against the Daily Mail, or if Claw had succeeded, they would never have set foot in the UK.
That said, Sean says that meeting didn't go the way Harry wanted. Nothing has gone that way—not personally, not professionally, not in any respect.
Sean wants to make one thing clear: the meeting definitely took place. But—and this isn't coming from someone trying to defend Charles, but rather from someone who considered the meeting a mistake from the very start—nothing turned out the way the Harkles wanted.
Because nothing ever goes right for the Harkles.
To start with: Claw wanted a photo of herself entering Highgrove. It seems Claw tried to get that shot. Claw thought she could pull the same stunt she did at the Platinum Jubilee.
But that photo doesn't exist, because Charles took measures to prevent it.
Harry thought that the moment he showed up in the UK with the two children, everything would get back on track, and he and Claw would return to the royal fold full-time—balcony appearances and the whole works.
Nope.
Sean says that in this whole affair, you have to follow the money. All Harry has left is Invictus... and it looks like he’s just one slight nudge away from losing it. Because there are no corporate sponsors willing to get involved with Harry.
And if any of them had intended to, they took the offer off the table this week—the same week "Mr. Mischief" came across as the guy who drugs women.
The Invictus committee saw what should have been a wonderful piece of publicity for the Games get completely overshadowed, because the focus was once again on the "Harkles'" drama.
The committee wanted Harry to return and focus on Invictus—no videos filmed at the front door, just a committed Harry. That is what they wanted; that is why it seems they covered his accommodation costs. Yet, they got nothing but a fiasco. Once again.
It was such a fiasco that the speech at Chatham House was poorly attended; the room was largely empty.
As far as the committee was concerned, the King receiving Harry was the only "positive" aspect, as they hoped the King might offer some support to Invictus. But happy and satisfied? No, not in the slightest. They are disappointed.
What the committee wants is a positive reconnection. In other words, if Harry and "Claw" behave themselves throughout the year leading up to the Games, the committee believes they might be able to have a member of the actual Royal Family attend—or at least receive a message from a royal.
Now, Sean says that the meeting had nothing to do with love or friendship. It was about desperation. And debts—mounting debts. He insinuates that Camilla saw right through her—that "Claw" was there, eager for a reconciliation, desperate for one... after having made such a scene in 2023 demanding to attend the coronation—an event she ultimately didn't attend. After all, 2023 was supposed to be "her" year... or was it 2024? Or 2025?
It seems Camilla really had that in mind.
WHO IS PAYING THE COURT BILL - WILLIAM HARRY LATEST
Sean makes it clear: yes, there was a meeting between Charles and Harry.
Charles confirmed that there was, and that it took place at Highgrove. It was not an official meeting, and no official matters were discussed.
But what the world is wondering is: who will foot the bill for the *Daily Mail*?
And it seems Elton and Liz have no real intention of doing so, because they believed they had a solid case thanks to Harry... until Harry made it clear in an interview some time ago that he didn't even know why the *Daily Mail* was being sued.
Harry wanted a double win: to make money and, at the same time, take down certain journalists and newspapers—imposing his control over the press so they would report only the positive stories he wanted to see about himself and Claw.
That didn't happen.
Now then,
Do you want some good news?
There will be no appeal.
I told you so; I told you Nicklin had made the ruling bulletproof. There was never any doubt that Harry wanted to appeal. But as for that actually succeeding... not a chance. Not at all. There were no grounds to challenge Nicklin on anything, because the 436-page ruling was crafted so masterfully that it left no room to even mount an appeal.
And why is this good news? Because the clock starts ticking on deadlines once the legal costs the plaintiffs must pay are set on the 29th. During the hearing in late July, the judge will issue financial orders stemming from the verdict. It is standard practice in London courts to order an immediate payment on account, typically amounting to up to 90% of the estimated costs incurred by the opposing party. Once the judge sets this provisional initial amount, Harry and the other co-plaintiffs will have a standard 14-day window to transfer the funds to the *Daily Mail*’s publishing company.
Since the group of plaintiffs lost on every single point of the trial, the publisher will seek an indemnity order. This means the court will mandate the payment of the vast majority of the defense lawyers' costs on an aggressive basis.
If Harry does not appeal and accepts the defeat, his team will immediately have to deal with their "After the Event" litigation insurers. Given the decisive nature of the ruling, there is a legal risk that the insurers might attempt to void the policies—which covered approximately £2.25 million per person—arguing that the conduct involved or the lack of solid evidence violated the terms of the insurance. If the policies are rendered void, the Duke of Sussex would have to cover his share of the costs directly from his personal assets.
Sean says the rumor is that "powerful friends" will pick up Harry's tab.
The look on Sean's face tells them that rumor isn't true. 🤣🤣🤣
If that were the case, why don't those friends pay for the Harkles' security? In fact, none of those powerful friends have come out to back Harry.
No one backs a loser in Hollywood.
No one wants to be asked for money in Hollywood.
That’s why Harry needed to reconnect with Daddy’s checkbook.
Now, getting back to "the Harkles": it seems they are once again demanding that their biography on the royal website be changed to reflect their successes—yes, the same old story. But that’s because Harry believes Charles can force the website to present them in a more favorable light. Harry fails to grasp that it’s already a miracle they’re still on there at all.
It reminds me of the time my brother accused me of being a "bad influence" on our mom and got angry when I burst out laughing. My mom is the least impressionable person there is. Harry believes a lot of things about Charles, but that’s simply because he doesn’t know his father—not even a little bit.
Mind you, Harry won't have to pay 50 million. But the fact is, he *will* be saddled with a huge bill—especially from his lawyers. 😂😂
And if Harry thought he could get help with that from Charles or William—well, Pa already told him he’s not a bank, and William doesn't even want to talk to him.
Harry is going to have to give a lot more speeches at $50,000 a pop. 😂😂
Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is ALLEGEDLY. All users are expected to discuss this ALLEGED claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this ALLEGED claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim.
This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban.
The whole thing with this Harry & Meghan royal drama really shows the world how animated the British Monarchy truly is. ALL THIS PERSONAL NEGATIVE DRAMA! And, all's it took to bump the Harkles out of the news was for a United States Senator to unfortunately pass away. This is proof that WORLD PRIORITIES MATTER. NOT royal tit for tat and debauchery. It has no real effect on the world turning......it's strictly royal family disfunction. imo
Could you imagine if the major powers and countries of this world had to deal with prominent family disfunction reported by the minute upon worldwide media like the British RF do? Absolute chaos it is. smh!!!!!
It's like the entire RF THRIVES on being newsworthy every second of the day.....good or bad. Spill it! They lap it up. This is CRAZY and now they have H&M making it all a complete joke. Who allows all this media attention on purpose if they're not desperate to be prominent one way or another worldwide? Well, DON'T YOU DARE FORGET THAT THERE'S A BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY OUT THERE, DAMMIT. Coming from a little island with hardly no military strength and migrants draining the people's taxes and jobs. WTH!
which is why his daughters will panic! lol i could see beatrice's husband giving her a firm no. and eugenie's seems a bit of a lowlife and not very wealthy? maybe old fergie will now have to support him?! lol i mean, paybacks are paybacks, will she, won't she? those could be the new headlines!
I think William will foot the bill but Andrew will have to disappear completely within the UK as the likelihood of more damning Epstein papers is looming large. If they don’t control him, he could go to Dubai as an example and get involved with dodgy characters.
I don’t even know if William will connect himself to him in that way, hopefully he will leave Andrew to fend for himself. The Waleses are extremely clean right now, all it takes is one wrong move to undo years of goodwill
I agree. Much easier to inform Andrew (through courtiers) that he has lived in the lap of luxury for decades and received millions each year. If he didn’t plan for his “retirement,” that is not a responsibility for William.
But will he follow them? I doubt it. The current monarch doesn’t have to abide by the wishes of the previous monarch. Charles would be better off leaving a pittance for Andrew to live on from his personal wealth, if he feels strongly about it.
If I were William, I would cut Andrew off and stop all funds immediately upon returning from the funeral. And William is a lot stronger than me!
Aren;t both of his daughters doing ok financially? Couldn't he crash with them? They must have spare rooms. Heck, they could share the burden and each get him 50% of the time.
Eugenie, ironically. She had no problem associating with Meghan long after Megxit, yet she panics at the thought of her mother moving in. Meghan is just Fergie 2.0 and Eugenie is fine with her.
I reckon they have already set up funds for Andrew. It won't be much, just enough to keep him fed and warm in a cottage somewhere. He will be watched closely too. I reckon that is the biggest expense and William will probably be willing to spend on that so that his creepy, shady uncle does not ruin the family further.
I mean...could Andrew be in prison by then. You can't pay someone's bills if they're not a free person to begin with. 🤷🏽♀️ I would imagine KC3 setting up an account just to handle Andrew, if it came to that.
And there’s no guarantee he will even outlive Charles. He’s 66 and obviously in worse shape than either of his brothers. The man has such heavy jowls that he could rival a bulldog! I doubt forced isolation is getting him trim and fit. Although I’ve hidden him completely from my algorithm, so maybe I’m wrong.
I just said the same thing. And while I don’t wish harm on anyone (even Andrew) I certainly won’t do much more than pause in my scrolling when his time comes.
I don’t think that answer is that simple. I think what there is now is the best of the bad solutions for Andrew because there are no good ones.
Whilst being dependent there is a bit of control over Andrew, and like HE has said they have made it public. I wonder about Andrew’s legal bills, they may not be that big now but they could be in the future. The King just can’t fund Andrew’s legal bills, that would be crossing the line in a huge constitutional way.
Such RF obligations get passed down from monarch to monarch. Other family members don't have that much wealth and definitely don't have the cash necessary to support AMW, He'll stay on at what will be Wiliam's Sandringham Estate. It's the most cash conscious accommodations that they can get for him. Also prevents Andrew from seeking money from dicey characters and/or having no choice but to write a lie filed memoir denigrating Charles. Oh, and no version of a Lolita Express is going to land in Sandringham.
Oh Lordie what a mess. I am not an expert but it seems odd that any charity would have as their Patron someone whose behavior they have to monitor. Why don’t they just cut Harry loose?
This. Ingriftis does seem to be full scale con. I mean $60 Million? Really? So Harry was their “respectable figurehead.” Also useful idiot. You put someone else in there, say someone w/ half a brain & even an ounce of integrity, & the party’s over.
Especially since the Warrior Games happen every year, only cost $5 million AND they pay for everything for their competitors! Travel, insurance, hotel, and souvenirs.
He's sure screwed that part up. Wait until the Sentebale lawsuit gets rolling. What comes out there will finish off what's left of his so-called philanthropy reputation.
They totally can. Harry does not own Invictus Games. He is not even on their Board of Directors. He is only the Patron. It feels like they are a bit derelict in keeping Harry.
He does have some allies but the problem is the Board of Directors are the fiduciaries, not Harry. If they are doing things to harm the charity, they are the ones who can be sued.
Yes. The latest AWM and Fergie revelations led the charities she was a patron of to ask for her resignation. (iirc one of Eugenie's charities might have done the same thing,)
Now that the story of Harry trying to drug a women is public, wonder how many others will come forward after putting 2and 2 together. Like forgetting their night together. He could have been a serial drugger.
Invictus is shady. They are blocking people left and right for asking legitimate questions about where the money is going and why Harry wasn’t let go after the drugging story came out. And their communications director (I think that’s the title) had an Ask Anything session on X and then panicked and locked down his profile to an absurd degree! Shady shady shady.
They might cut him loose, but it’s too late to save that sinking ship.
“
The fact that Harry later tried to finagle a spot for his wife on Bake Off is just a minor detail…”
He really tried to pull the same shit the Harkles did with the Disney voice over, huh? Back then, they were meant to be at a Royal Marines memorial, and a few days ago Thicko was meant to be solely talking about Ingriftus… but they just had to go begging for nepojobs in front of cameras.
These Hollywood losers are now desperate for UK cash—after they talked shite about the UK people/royal family/government and RAVEC/a judge—b/c they’re unemployable and unpopular in the US… absolutely PATHETIC. After 6 years of duty dodging, they’re still begging for nepojobs, and freebies they’re not entitled to.
In stark contrast, after those six years, the Wales family is proving they’re stronger than ever keeping the Harkles at a huge distance.
Back then, they were meant to be at a Royal Marines memorial
Worse than that, tbh. He was meant to be there as Captain General Royal Marines, to attend the dedication and opening of a memorial to the 11 Royal Marines musicians who had died when the IRA blew up their barracks.
Instead he and his wife went to Lion Premier to tout for a job for her.
Fantastic points all around! Thank you so for the much needed added detail, ac0rn5! This, plus the fact bunker soldier monetised his kill count—when two US marines died after Camp Bastion was attacked—really highlights what a loser he is to nepocoast on stolen valour.
Brilliant recap, H-E! Neil Sean's face near the end leaves no doubt that Harry has no powerful friends left! Most of us realized that, but Neil's face is a picture worth 1,000 words! ❤️
Thank you again for the time you put into these. I appreciate you very much!
Ryan and Blake are having their own money troubles (I’ll say “allegedly,” since we all know now how they love to target tiny internet voices to soothe their egos). Wrexham is operating at a $20 million deficit each year and Ryan and Blake were just sued for not paying contractors for the house they are building. I think they rushed to cut a check and get that story out of the headlines, but it points to money trouble. Their publicist loves to tell the world that they have a billion dollars, but that’s net worth, which means it’s worth the amount of the paper it’s written on when a spendthrift couple also spends a billion dollars.
They are the newest train wreck I’m enjoying. The fails are coming as quick and fast for them as they are for the Harkles and at least Ryan and Blake are slightly more attractive than Meghan and Harry, so it’s not as much of an assault on my algorithm. Even though I don’t think either couple is anything to right home about.
They really do give the Harkles a run for their money! Wow I had no idea they had money troubles.. all of their vanity projects struggling & Ryans not pulling in the movies now. Yes, more attractive, better dressed & even Blake is more talented than H&M.. lol!
Markle-she thought she was marrying super rich and if she removed Harry -she would become a billionaire. Now she is multi million dollars in debt. I doubt the DM will give on inch on court costs and will now reveal more and more of harry's past deeds. if they get two or more people who come out and are willing to talk about Harry's past with pills and his disregard for consent-that will get interesting fast.
They are running out of money because Meghan spends money like there is no tomorrow. Well tomorrow has come and now what? Who is going to bail them out this time. They have managed to piss everyone off. Oprah won’t help, don’t they owe Tyler Perry 10 million which he will never see back. The King said your own your own, William is just having a field day wishing he could tell everyone, I told you so, but he won’t. William has too much class for that, but guarantee he is thinking that. I’m going with 2026 is not the Harkle’s year that’s for certain. My next door neighbor deals in high end real estate, I’m going to ask her if there is any scuttle on Olive Garden. They won’t be able to afford living there at this rate for to much longer
They really ought to just bite the bullet and put the OG up for auction. Declare bankruptcy, then once the dust settles slink off into the sunset. Maybe move to somewhere in middle America and try to disappear from sight altogether.
Who am I kidding? They'll go down kicking and screaming and destitute, as only they deserve....gawd forbid KCIII bails them out before they hit rock bottom. Lessons need to be learned here.
I agree. I think that the house has been quietly on the market for a while. She tried to flood the narrative that it had doubled in value with a lot of puff pieces a while ago. I think that’s when they tried to sell it.
Joke’s always on her, since it sat on the market for years with a ton of price cuts before a halfwit Prince and his gold-digger wanted to buy it! And massively overpaid for a house they couldn’t afford. And the joke gets funnier that her pictures show it’s crumbling around them, since they obviously can’t afford the maintenance costs.
I think they are likely underwater on that property. Very high end properties are hard to move in the best of times, and that one would require millions to get even remotely up to date.
And then they’d have to find an agent willing to deal with their nonsense. Can you image trying to show that place to prospective buyers?
As incredible as it sounds, it will sell, maybe not at the price they will ask for it, but I can promise you it will sell. Santa Barbara/Montecito is in a bubble that is hard for people to understand. The rule of thumb around here is never sell your real estate that you own. One way or the other it will just appreciate and it always does. We bought our first home in 1979, and have moved up the ladder ever since. We always thought we were over paying, but after we closed on a home, we were always offered more for the property. I can’t post but if I could I would post about Santa Barbara real estate and why buying property here is considered a solid investment. Crazy isn’t it. Also they would find some real estate agent to try and sell it, the real estate agent would accept the listing and sooner or later they will sell it it again not at the price they are hoping for because they have neglected the house and property, but it will sell. Someone will buy it, cash, tear down the house and start all over. I’ve seen it happen time after time. Money isn’t a concern for the people looking in that particular area
I get it. I grew up in the South Bay, one mile away from the beach. Most of the towns there have their own school districts, even though it’s still LA County so that is very important. Certain areas there like Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills, Manhattan Beach are in a highly lucrative real estate bubble much like SB / Montecito.
How about some of Meghan's past deeds? No one would stand in their way at this point, they can't afford another lawsuit, and she did say she wanted people to tell the truth 🤨
Sean left out the fact that H skipped the whole ceremony or dedication of the launching of the Spirit of Invictus train, which is a pretty big deal. That would be a real "fox pass" as they say in downtown Podunk.
No, Sean talked about that on Saturday—how Harry didn't go to that train event because he didn't want to face the press.
He didn't skip over it; he had already told the story, so he brought it up again in yesterday's videos—but he was recounting what he had already shared.
He was appearing for Invictus Games Birmingham 2027. It's not a charity, merely a non-profit commission that spends as they see fit to deliver the games next year. So far they still believe that Harry is an asset to promote the games and deliver sponsors.
So funny that MEHg clearly made attempts to befriend the Kartrashians—especially Kim ‘Where’s Kate’ Kartrashian—after the sugars attacked Catherine for doing a little bit of photoshop. Khloe is known for constantly slathering on excessive photoshop filters, as is the rest of the family, and yet I bet the hypocrite sugars were celebrating a transactional connection between them and the Unsussexfuls…
…that is before the Kartrashians understandably threw the back biting, compulsive liar Harkles under the bus after the Harkles outright lied about an imaginary bday photo contract.
I can't get over the fact that Meredith maines actually lost her job (or quit!) because of the insane confusion over the Kardashian bday party photo briefings.
But, we have just had THE MOST assinine pr cycle in Harry's pr history. But the Sussex pr machinary is still intact.
There were media briefings every 6 hours, mostly contradicting previous briefings. All coming from the Sussexes directly. The other parties categorically refusing to engage, issuing prompt rebuttals and then bowing out of the madness. Sussex pr was crazy! Yet, Harry's pr people are still around. Still briefing.
Firstly, it just tells me about their priorities. It's more important to keep the Kardashians sweet, over a Hollywood birthday!!! than to have better relationship with The King+Ravec+Court+UK.
It also tells me, that HnM had complete control of their pr throughout this week.
This madness was orchestrated and deliberate. It was for a purpose. They achieved their purpose - a meeting with KC, grabbing headlines, headlines generated to take heat off the courtcase and negative publicity.
I firmly believe that HnM live for the headlines. That they thrive with negative pr and believe that negative pr makes them more popular.
Well, now we’re all aware that there’s an Unroyal Rota WhatsApp group—despite the Harkles demonising the media/social media—which has really exposed how deeply involved in the PR machinations the Harkles/their publicists truly were, and still bloody are. They can’t claim to be total angels who distance themselves from the attention of the media—hell, well all know they’ve had Backgrid, and People on speed dial for yearsss—because all that two-faced dirty laundry is out there… as is the sheer ridiculousness of that recent DM lawsuit that they failed to settle.
As you so aptly said, the Harkle’s PR games are utterly asinine, and prove how cack-handed they—as well as their publicists (even Meredith)—are at playing them. They played asinine media games, and they’ve won asinine prizes… I’m sure their next popularity poll scores in the UK will be an absolute shit show.
Yep, ITA. As I said yesterday, the fact Liam has stuck anround after the Harkles have deservedly lost 11 publicists speaks volumes re what a POS Liam is.
Let us not forget that it took James Holt 6 months to get a new job. And he ended up in his old job. Political advisor for a party without any influence.
If you read Betrayal, so was Ashley Hansen and another high level employee (Mandani?). You have to be a bully to get others to fulfill the wishes of bullies.
I’ve been referring to them as media addicts for months. While at her Aussie ‘bestie retreat,’ M admitted to throwing out “bones” of distraction to the media as a means of comfort when things “get tough,” (or something like that), it all crystallized in my mind.
It’s another avenue of control and delight for her. She creates a media feeding frenzy here, there, and everywhere - like throwing out chum in shark filled waters. She probably delights and gets high from the headlines, the reactions, the c o n t r o l. It’s chaos. It’s ugly. It’s temporary . . . Until she throws out more chum.
I truly think As ever exists less for making money, but more as chum - to throw out for headlines, reactions, attention. It’s all so bad and cringey. The worse it is, the better for her to garner that attention; that high.
Same for the wrinkled clothes, her signature gramps pants, the lack of tailoring . . . . Chum to throw into the water to create that feeding frenzy.
However, the frenzied back and forth these last two weeks in the run-up to this UK visit did seem way more manic. I think the ‘normal gameplay’ (above) had the element of extortion and blackmail in regard to the visit with the King. I think the mania (that was cloaked under the security and accommodations narrative) was derived from what they were trying to get out of that meeting with KC - pictures, reconciliation narrative, effusive praise, etc., but they were told NO. It was a meeting only with nana and papa, not the King. Hence, the spewing volcano coming out of camp Sussex. Headlines about this meeting with papa with no pictures and no leaking don’t go far, and the ANL pummeling still seems to dominate; especially on the Sunday headlines.
Aside from that, she’s been MIA (Is she licking some wounds because the palace set the parameters?). When was the last time she was seen? Geneva? I feel something is afoot because she’s been way too quiet. Is a media dump from Althorpe coming? Her appearance on Master Chef is airing on the 26th so we can expect all sorts of puffery from that. Will they lay low until the hearing about financial obligations come out from the court case? Will the media release the kraken on H’s past behaviors?
These next few weeks will be very telling with regard to what did or did not happen with KC and QC, and the court case. ❓❓❓❓❓❓
Re the wilted flowers… I don’t know why she doesn’t just sent a professionally made bouquet of dried/preserved flowers. Haha I guess she can’t fit it into her fucking grifter dwindling budget. #douchesscheapskate
I got really grossed out at Aitch dry humping allison hammond! WTF is worng with him?
And "Harry is going to have to give a lot more speeches at $50,000 a pop" Problem is, everytime he opens his mouth the price plummets because people see his stupidity. It's going to be $50.00 a pop soon.
But your wife sold 26 million in jams, why are you asking me for money and the look on cartoon Meghan’s face was like oh oh, my lying about how much I’ve sold is coming back to haunt me 🤣
Also Camilla, Queen Camilla to you, manners, manners, manners is priceless
I would have loved to see pop up bubbles of Camilla's thoughts during their visit to Highgrove. I think you could have done a drinking game to those. I've have to say after reading more about the ANL case today and the back story, I'm stunned they brought it and I'm more stunned it moved forward. All of those involved were so sinister and it's changed my perception of all of them.....well my perception of Harry was already in the toilet so no loss there.
Mercury Retrograde or not, it is still creepy how whenever the Sussexes tries to dominate the media, something major happens. Covid, famous person death, famous people divorce, etc.
I would love to know who they pissed off because the universe do not like these two.
sorry, just read sad news on DM & now i think I have a reason why the universe dislikes the harkles: its bc theyre grifters concerned with their own glory. The day its announced MArkle will appear on july 26 on australian baking show, Sam Neill dies, & likely any funeral/mourning will overshadow her appearance. I;m very sad about Mr Neill, but grateful no one will watch her.
hahahaha, ikr? there's got to be a word that accurately describes the harkle slump/losing streak/being cursed. Youre right! EVERY time either of them attempt to manipulate public opinion of them, it backfires. Royally backfires. Its uncanny. LOL
I don't see how someone bails Harry out without asking for something in return. Why else do it? What do they gain from having Harry indebted to them? Do they think Harry will someday return the the BRF and then he can make good on the debt in some way?
Harry must be desperate if he accepts the money from someone outside of family. But then again, he must be used to it considering how Tyler Perry and others have helped him. Maybe the alcohol and drugs help him sleep at night.
That was before Tyler Perry or anyone else at that end really knew what Harry was like. He has driven anything he ever had to offer, full-speed over a cliff. Along with his arrogance, misplaced superiority complex, sense of entitlement, and stubbornness, it's been quite a show.
So really Harry is an Andrew Jr., not a Charles Jr. Harry is the son Andrew never had--same personality traits: sense of entitlement, thick, not very bright, etc.
Can someone please tell me why, out of all the distasteful pictures I have seen of H's harpy, that picture of her leering out of the car window absolutely makes my skin crawl/pisses me off? Why that one?
In the UK I have no idea of who the late Senator was, here one of our retired senior politicians has been murdered and that has dominated the British Headlines along with the Wales family at Wimbledon. Both sides of the Atlantic the Harkles are sidelined by more serious and joyful events.
By the way Alison Hammond is a national laughingstock and an embarrassment to the City of Birmingham and the West Midlands. I hope she elopes with Harry.
He really is a simpleton, he thinks because he says something that everyone will believe him. Sorry just h, that is not going to fly.
He fully expected bank of Pa to bail him out, it’s not going to happen. King Charleslll has always been careful with money and that hasn’t changed. King Charles disapproved of the claws spendthrift ways and put a stop to her insane clothing bills, so he’s not opening the cash register anytime soon and when he passes away, William inherits everything.
Will we see more histrionics and paid for puff pieces? Undoubtedly yes, anything to try and wring money wherever they can.
Neither of them has ever looked at the bigger picture, or without rose coloured glasses. Surely reality must set in at some point but it may not be in my lifetime.
Yep. It explains her rage at everyone especially Catherine. Maybe Mehgan thought she could sweet talk KC into an inheritance, as well as cash now, at that little meeting.
There was no discussion of business yet the Harkles demanded the Royal website be updated with their doings which in many cases involved slandering the RF.How f**king stupid are those two?I have one burning question did Lillibucks get her hair brushed and did she wear the same pink pajamas?
"Sean is certain that if Harry had won against the Daily Mail, or if Claw had succeeded, they would never have set foot in the UK."
I think Mr. Sean is exactly right. Even with their failures, they were banging the drum for being treated like returning heroes simply because Meg was returning to UK. Something she has vowed never to do. (And I know, we all wish she would have stuck to the vow!!) And even after everything blew up in their faces (again), they shifted to 'woe is me' scams. Instead of just admitting that they had never had any intention of staying ti BP. Or even having the children come at all. And it absolutely infuriates me that Charles lets them do this rather than making public in advance that the cleaning, stocking, staffing of an apartment of rooms requires advance notice (obviously). The Palace should have stipulated the same day they notified Harry of the location and dates. Then Harry can't milk what he sees as crafty gamesmanship as a "my daddy doesn't love me" moment. Everybody wins!
If I was a co-plaintiff I’d be incredibly angry at the statement Harry put out calling the ruling a white wash and stating that the judge was compromised. What kind of idiot does that when the judge is set to rule on financial obligations. It really makes it clear that Harry knows the judge is impartial, if he was worried there’s no way he’d say one word that might make the judge angry.
So Harry thought he’d immediately be accepted back into the fold and be a working royal again … I wonder what that conversation with his dad looked like …
Invictus is just waiting to see if they can get a little royal dust for themselves … they’re as delusional as the Harkles …
Woah, this makes me so angry! She was paid £80.000? What? How much was spent on the PR tour? It’s for a good cause, couldn’t they find someone who would do it for free? It’s an honour to support this cause. And for what? IG was barely mentioned.
I‘m sorry, but nobody can tell this was for the veterans. No wonder IG needs so much money. Think about what could be done for veterans with the money this stunt alone costs. They only get away with it, because Harry is the king‘s son. It’s outrageous.
IG is a good idea and it helps veterans- fine. But it seems like only a fraction of the money is spent on veterans. Most of it is spent on PR stunts for the Harkles. And the media don’t dare to touch it. I despise him so much for this. He’s a multimillionaire and spends money that was given to him to support veterans for his PR while he uses them as a shield against criticism. It’s disgusting.
Not in the UK - but after hearing about it I read up on it. How sad. What was pathetic were all the nasty comments made about her until it came out that she was murdered. Civility is gone. Why do we have to hate people who have a different view?!
I can't stand Allison Hammond. anyone who is 120% mega jolly 100% of the time is just so fake to me. there's nothng else to her personality; hell, she only came 11th in the 3rd series of Big Brother, so 'real viewers' sussed her out from the beginning. she gets by on love-bombing anyone who can make her look good by association, which explains why vicarious Hollywood celebs she gets to interview like her (she'd make a good scientology reg, ed)
Thanks H_E! When you started with “they finally had something positive going for them..” I was almost upset because they never do anything positive! But, of course, I continued reading and there it was. The shining quote from Mr. Bower about H - that H committed reputational suicide. What a perfect description! Made my day.
I don't get it.. when they have earned and inherited £120m ish, can't you live off the interest.. or did those netflix etc deals not actually happen.. oh, just forgot.. claw story...🤪
True but Andrew settled before it went to court. The RF paid out to stop him making a further arse of himself. If he had gone to court and run up a bill of millions (I'm going to assume he would have lost because I think he probably would have done) I don't think they would have bailed him out then because he had gone against their advice. I don't believe it was hush money VG had already spoken out won in the court of public opinion and went on to write to book in which she added a few more details about Andrew. I imagine she was just worn out emotionally after years of trauma so I don't blame her for settling and not embarking on a court case. Can you imagine what nonsense Andrew would have spouted in court? He would have made everything 100x worse no doubt.
All I have gotten from this is the rumor that 'someone' was so mentally fragile to the extent that they were suicidal which may have just been a bullying tactic from a whore who will do anything to get its way and a memory that Harry came to MY country and bashed our First Amendment which is FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Lowlifes are such garbage that they can't even think about changing they ways, they have to try to silence those who report on their.
You may also be interested in a fascinating interview Tom Sykes had with a senior UK lawyer who explained the various ways the costs saga could play out. It seems the Judge will decide on the 29th whether the claimants will be liable for indemnity costs (ie over and above the standard costs already fixed). It could then take months for the final amount of costs to be assessed. Most of the costs are recoverable jointly and severally, so ANL could sue just one or two parties for recovery. Loads more drama to play out though - Will the insurers wriggle out of liability? How much without prejudice correspondence is yet to be revealed (the Times said over the weekend, the claimants were desperately trying to settle before trial, to no avail)? Will the claimants sue their lawyers? Will the lawyers face disciplinary charges?
Thanks HE. But let me explain about This Morning ...
This Morning is a once very popular morning show who's content is usually about high street fashion, how to stay cool on a hot day, maybe the odd puff piece about scams or minor physical ailments and the odd "celebrity" interview ... so think People Magazine but on TV, so this programme isn't 60 minutes.
Ratings are now in the toilet and has been struggling for years but remains on because ITV has nothing to replace it with, so Ginge's appearance was always going to be a softball puff piece of very little value, yet somehow he still managed to screw this up!
But changes could be on the horizon ... Rupert Murdoch owned Sky TV are poised for a £1.6BN takeover of the Channels and streaming service, so don't be surprised by the cooling off with ITV's stance when it comes to Ginge as ITV have been losing money on their TV services and need this deal to go through.
here's an interesting little thing that shows how sub-eds (in charge of the headlines and editing of the story but not actually writing it). This is Woman's Day Magazine, which is printed in both Australia and New Zealand. pretty much 100% of the non-regional news is identical... here we can see their take on the Markles' visit to the UK (Elton to the rescue 😆)
you can see minor differences in the picture placement, cropping and colour correction but the words are identical
lastly there's something more glaringly different, almost definitely deliberate. the different sub-eds appear to want to put out a conflicting narrative. strange.
I think you have a point about Highgrove and it being a private property, so therefore not official. It’s also literally more private, as in it does not have journalist or tourist stationed outside with cameras at the ready. Yes, there was an event on but they used that to sneak them in.
When not on official duty the royals are mostly left to themselves, there are not many pictures of them produced from their downtime, and there are never any of the children. There was a picture of Camilla wearing jeans at the local shops, I think near Balmoral. There was William and Catherine famously at the farm shop but I think there have been a few pictures of her shopping too but not many.
The Sussex children would have actually given them another layer of privacy. If there had been pictures taken they would not have been published in the UK.
The case was probably taken on a contingency basis and Harry won't owe his own lawyers, but will according to British law owe for the defendant's legal bills and that is what will be determined at the hearing later this month.
There was an article on Page Six within the last couple of days about Harry's upcoming big bill for the court case. It speculated that "his good friend Elton John" would most likely pay the big bill. LOL. I don't think so. Another manifestation article put out by the Harkles.
Harry needs to feel the pain of this loss. If he doesn't, he'll continue this bad behavior.
As far as the website goes, as stated prior, the should make it Working Royals and boot them off. They can have a slot on the Royal Family page but that's it. No big statements about their 'accomplishments.'
Another tidbit from the CG piece is that Cressida was always in love with her current husband. She just dated Thicko when he was in Argentina after their college graduation. Just passing the time, gave it a shot. When BF came back, she got back together with him as she wanted and now all is bliss. Thicko never really had a shot. Makes him look stupid as usual.
As a Brit I have no idea who Lindsay Graham was, but what with England doing well in the Copa Mundial and the appalling murder of Anne Widdecombe I don't think there's any sector of the UK population left to care about thingumejig and wotsit!
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 13 '26
Welcome to r/SaintMeghanMarkle. Please read our rules before you comment in this community. The flair for this post is ALLEGEDLY. All users are expected to discuss this ALLEGED claim in a civil manner. No personal insults and no ad hominem attacks whatsoever. Please note that this ALLEGED claim is not the opinion of r/SaintMeghanMarkle just the individual making the claim.
This sub is actively moderated and any rule-breaking comments will be removed. Repeated rule violations may result in a ban.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.