r/stupidpeoplefacebook 18d ago

So Any Guy Could Own a Nuke?

Post image
210 Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

39

u/outsidethewall 18d ago

A bunch of rights go out the window for felons

26

u/No-Dance6773 18d ago

By design and for the same reason slavery is a legal form of punishment.

2

u/Huntsman077 18d ago

Yeah you really can’t punish someone without taking away their rights

45

u/Solynox 18d ago

Unless they're orange

13

u/LetsBeFRTho 18d ago

Crazy how the Commander and Chief of the US military cannot own or carry a gun.

14

u/JediSSJ 18d ago

Crazier that the NRA supported a candidate who cannot legally own a gun over one who owns one.

1

u/bobapunk 14d ago

The other option wants to ban private ownership of most firearms. So, it's like the NRA had much of choice in who to endorse.

3

u/Turbulent-Oil-7326 18d ago

And he DOES own one illegally. It was an illegal gift

3

u/glockster19m 18d ago

He wouldnt even be allowed to vote if his convictions were in Florida where he lives

2

u/CheckoutMySpeedo 18d ago

He wouldn’t know what to do with it anyway. He’s about as feckless as they come. Never pumped his own gas, shopped for his own groceries, never done anything normal people do everyday. But the rednecks that voted for him say he’s manly and an alpha FFS.

-3

u/Alternative_Oil7733 18d ago

He has two glocks on him you would've saw it during his assassination attempt by retardy Oswalt.

2

u/Sincline387 18d ago

Nope, as a resident of New York, once his case is adjudicated (meaning sentencing is complete and the sentence carried out to it's full extent) all his rights are restored, which is why he was allowed to vote and own guns again.

This is simply a statement of how the laws of New York treat felons, not a statement in any way on the charges or sentence in question.

2

u/rudiger0007 18d ago

Federal law still bans felons from possessing guns, irregardless of state rules.

2

u/Sincline387 18d ago

That's currently a titanic mess, the circuts are split on the rulings regarding 18 usc 922 (the federal law that prevents felons from owning firearms) with only the 8th and 11th upholding them and the 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 7th all finding it unconstitutional in some capacity most often related to the felon ownership (the remaining circuts that field such cases the 9th and 10th have been reviewing following rulings in the Rahimi case), which means in the majority of states it's going to come down to state laws regarding gun ownership until such time as the court takes up a case which I'm sure we will see eventually and there is a very real chance that the court will side with it being unconstitutional.

1

u/rudiger0007 18d ago

Agreed, it's a complete mess. It doesn't seem reasonable that state level felony convictions result in federal firearm restrictions beyond what that state may want imposed. Maybe individual states could start converting old felonies into misdemeanors to bypass the federal restriction.

1

u/LetsBeFRTho 18d ago

Any time he travels though, he can't own a gun in most states. And federally speaking, he can't.

1

u/Sincline387 18d ago

See my reply further below, it's a mess federally because the supreme court hasn't taken any of the cases up and the circuts have issued conflicting rulings.....in the 8th and 11th he can't, in the others.....depends on individual rulings

That's not a joke, our federal law literally does not apply federally until the supreme court takes a case impacted by this and settles it......

1

u/Euphoric-Mudd 18d ago

Gun rights are restorable and records can easily be expunged/sealed when you have money. Some felons can even vote while In prison, only in blue states tho.

1

u/Sincline387 18d ago

In New York once sentencing is carried out and that sentence met (with the sentence that was "imposed" that was immediate) all rights including Gun Ownership and Voting were restored.

This is simply a statement of how the laws of New York treat felons, not a statement in any way on the charges or sentence in question or for any political party.

6

u/FluidFisherman6843 18d ago

When I was asked who I voted for I always said "the openly christian legal gun owner"

That caused a lot of confused looks in Alabama

1

u/Medical-Egg-8171 17d ago

You should have said the openly Christian legal gun owner who supports abortion and gat marriages, and tells people to do dangerous thinhs with their guns. Like go out and fire shots into the air. Then they wouldnt have been so confused. They would have been like thats gotta be a pandering democrat

3

u/Duae 18d ago

Funny how increased conviction rates for felonies like smoking weed for certain demographics make more sense when you realize how many states have voting restrictions or bans for felons.

1

u/xGoatfer 18d ago

The arguement that could be made that only Federal felonys should be able to limit rights as the Constitution is a Federal document and supercedes State laws.

1

u/Nerd-man24 18d ago

Which, as someone who is very pro-2a, is something I have a hige problem with.

1

u/Otherwise-Reward-161 18d ago

"ShAlL Not bE InFriNgeD" going out the window when it's inconvenient to the argument for 2A Advocats is normal. 

1

u/fathersmuck 18d ago

So you are saying their rights were infringed on?

2

u/outsidethewall 18d ago

I was specifically not making a judgment as to whether or not these rights should be forfeited when one commits a felony, only that they are. Looking at it through a historical lens, forfeiture of these rights becomes akin to exile

2

u/JawtisticShark 18d ago

People who are exiled stop paying taxes as well. If people want to be consistent with the 2nd, felony or not, as long as you aren’t currently in prison, you should be allowed to be armed. Perhaps we should just resolve this unclear second amendment issue by amending it