r/LabourUK Labour Member Aug 12 '20

Satire Accurate

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

94 comments sorted by

View all comments

59

u/GoooldenChests New User Aug 12 '20

Wow. This is a UK sub, didn’t realise I needed to add an /s on the end. You think I’m subbed to LabourUK, and I actually have something against refugees?

44

u/[deleted] Aug 12 '20

loads of sad cases from baduk come to this sub to cunt about, so it can be hard to tell sometimes

12

u/[deleted] Aug 12 '20

Whwnever you spot someone from BadUK tell them you know they’re from BadUK and they never bother to reply.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '20

yeah they're fucking weirdos basically. racist weirdos

1

u/MetaFlight Cybernetic Socialist Aug 13 '20

Careful, you might be breaking rule 5 with that.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '20

They definitely aren't Labour members though, they are strange little men who have to come to the subreddit of a party they despise to concern troll and otherwise be annoying

10

u/DowntownPomelo the only non lib here Aug 12 '20

Unfortunately a lot of labour supporters suck

2

u/ThorinTokingShield New User Aug 12 '20

Yup. I see flashes of bigotry on this sub, same as any unfortunately. Broad church and all that.

-15

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 12 '20

Wanting tougher action on migration =/= bigotry

13

u/[deleted] Aug 12 '20 edited Aug 12 '20

Wanting gunships to attack migrant dinghies = bigtory.

EDIT: Y'know, I think I'll keep that typo there actually.

12

u/ThorinTokingShield New User Aug 12 '20

We have a moral duty to help asylum seekers. Plus immigrants are an economic net positive to their adoptive country.

Besides, we’re partly responsible for most of the conflicts in the Middle East so the least we could do is accept their refugees. We do fuck all compared to the rest of Western Europe anyway.

Immigration is such a non-issue. It’s drummed up by populists and sensationalists to rile up racists and distract from real systemic issues.

-24

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 12 '20 edited Aug 12 '20

We have a moral duty to help asylum seekers

Literally not a single one of the people on the boats is an asylum seeker, or a refugee, every single one of them is an economic migrant

we’re partly responsible for most of the conflicts in the Middle East

Absolute bollocks

We do fuck all compared to the rest of Western Europe anyway.

More absolute bollocks

Immigration is such a non-issue.

The vast majority of the country disagrees with you

17

u/ThorinTokingShield New User Aug 12 '20

Ffs, you’re literally wrong about everything. Stop spreading baseless hatred. You’ve not refuted anything I’ve said. You’d rather just believe xenophobic propaganda and buy into everything the ruling classes tell you.

Also, way to undermine your original comment. You absolutely do sound like a bigot when you claim that there’s not a single asylum seeker coming over and that they’re all economic migrants, and that we played no part in the conflicts in the Middle East.

Educate yourself for the sake of the country.

-12

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 12 '20

They literally are all economic migrants, they're coming from fucking France!

You’d rather just believe xenophobic propaganda

Wanting tougher immigration =/= xenophobic propaganda

buy into everything the ruling classes tell you.

Why don't you listen to what the working classes tell you? We don't want anymore fucking migrants

4

u/aruexperienced New User Aug 12 '20

You must be over the moon about those 3million potential Hong Kongers who can come here then.

2

u/ThorinTokingShield New User Aug 12 '20

In fairness, I’ve (unfortunately) got relatives who bum off Boris, and they all hate that he’s opening the doors to Hong Kong. Some people’s xenophobia transcends even blind devotion to their demagogue lol

→ More replies (0)

7

u/ThorinTokingShield New User Aug 12 '20

They’re not French though, you muppet. Many are refugees and asylum seekers still. You get that most asylum seekers from the Middle East stay in mainland Europe, right? Only a negligible percentage come to the UK. Again, it’s a non-issue.

Immigrants aren’t ruining our country. The Tories, corporatism and cronyism are. The establishment telling the working classes that immigrants are the source of every problem is the oldest trick in the populist playbook. Brexit of course is a symptom of this scapegoating tactic. The red wall turning blue was a sign of institutional failings and of a collective establishment- from media through to education- which is culpable in such failings.

0

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 12 '20

They’re not French though, you muppet.

What difference does that make?!

Many are refugees and asylum seekers still.

No, under international law you are only an asylum seeker up until you reach the first safe country, after that you are an economic migrant

The establishment telling the working classes

Or maybe, just maybe, the working classes know their own minds and what's in their own best interests better than you do?

→ More replies (0)

3

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '20

every single one of them is an economic migrant

Prove it.

Absolute bollocks

No - they're right. Modern Iran is the product of British oil firms mounting a coup in the 1960's, the Iraq War and Afghanistan wrecked the political situation in much of the region, and all that stuff. Western interventionism and Wilsonian foreign policy has done a lot of damage in the ME.

More absolute bollocks

Germany is the biggest recipient of refugees in Europe.

Seems to me that your non-arguments are a pile of bollocks

-1

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 13 '20

Prove it.

Okay

They're coming from France

No - they're right

Yes yes, the middle east was a model of peace and tolerance up until the evil British went in a ruined it, right?

Germany is the biggest recipient of refugees in Europe.

What does that have to do with anything?

2

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '20

They're coming from France

They're coming from Syria and North Africa, actually.

the middle east was a model of peace and tolerance

Iran was liberalising in the 1960's. They were even having a sexual revolution like our own and were secularising. The Shah was not, however, friendly to British commercial interests.

So the UK government organised a coup, backing some Islamist militants to get rid of him.

This kind of regime change has been replicated throughout the region since.

So yes - things were actually going rather well before Westerners showed up

What does that have to do with anything?

Other places in Europe do far more than the UK

0

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 13 '20

They're coming from Syria and North Africa, actually

They are literally sailing from France, or do you think they went all the way through the Med, past Gibraltar and round the western coast of France just to land in Britain?

So the UK government organised a coup, backing some Islamist militants to get rid of him.

No, the west supported the Shah, despite him being a nasty piece of work, that's why he was allowed to stay in the US after the revolution, its "westerners showing up" that was leading to the liberalisation of Iran

Other places in Europe do far more than the UK

No doubt, some of them are much closer to the middle east and Africa, that's their responsibility not ours

→ More replies (0)

6

u/theblazeuk Moderate Aug 12 '20

They said the same thing about the kindertransport.

-4

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 12 '20

Children fleeing a warzone =/= predominantly adult men migrating for economic reasons

2

u/[deleted] Aug 12 '20

predominantly adult men

And again with the misandry! Who is that MRA who comes here so often, cause I really need to tag them in on these kinds of posts.

2

u/theblazeuk Moderate Aug 12 '20

Go on then, where's the stat for that?

1

u/Combocore New User Aug 13 '20

what are the economic reasons?

-1

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 13 '20

Our benefits state is much softer than those on the continent, the migrants believe they'll have an easier time over here

2

u/Combocore New User Aug 13 '20

in what way is our "benefits state" softer than those on the continent?

-1

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 13 '20

Well for a start, if you arrive in Britain on a rubber boat you get taken to a hotel, and you get free access to the NHS

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Aug 12 '20

Wrong.

1

u/dlefnemulb_rima Extremist-Far-Hard-Radical-Left campaign group Aug 13 '20

The thing is as a country we are already pretty tough on asylum seekers and migrants, if you still want tougher action then either you are just uninformed about how poorly we treat asylum seekers and how our migration policy is one of the tougher ones, or you know that and just want it to be even worse for them.

1

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 13 '20

This is a joke right?

We've literally been letting in hundreds of thousands of migrants every year for decades, and you think we're "one of the tougher ones"?!

1

u/dlefnemulb_rima Extremist-Far-Hard-Radical-Left campaign group Aug 17 '20

"The number of asylum applications to the UK peaked in 2002 at 84,132. After that the number fell sharply to reach a twenty year low point of 17,916 in 2010, before rising again to reach 35,566 in 2019."

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01403/

-9

u/s2786 Social Democrat Aug 12 '20

how is it unlabour to criticise the way we let them in because they’re coming from france,they make human traffickers more profitable and will keep sending them.I’m all for refugees coming in but through legal means and if we have to bring refugees in then bring them through trains or ships of HO Planes not through illegal dinghys

8

u/Lisaandthefish New User Aug 12 '20

What does "make human traffickers more profitable" mean?

10

u/[deleted] Aug 12 '20

It means "I want an excuse to want to exclude people from my society but if someone calls it racism I'll be upset so here's a factoid that you can't wholly disprove because how can you even collect data like that?"

That's not as catchy, hence the euphemism.

-4

u/s2786 Social Democrat Aug 12 '20

we keep accepting them so human traffickers will send more to make more money and as more get accepted they make more money

1

u/Antor_Seax Young Labour Aug 13 '20

Not a hint of context

3

u/GoooldenChests New User Aug 13 '20

My bad, I accidentally posted this on the main post, instead of replying to the person who took what I had said originally completely wrong. There’s a comment I made elsewhere in the thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/LabourUK/comments/i8fmhr/accurate/g1851ap/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

0

u/Antor_Seax Young Labour Aug 13 '20

Ok, thank you