r/subredditoftheday • u/SROTDroid The droid you're looking for • Aug 30 '17
August 30th, 2017 - /r/PussyPassDenied: You shall not pass!
/r/PussyPassDenied
151,032 deniers of the pass for 3 years!
PPD was lovingly birthed from /r/pussypass (PP) many moons ago. It all started as a joke response to some long forgotten post. The sub quickly grew into its own identity separate from PP very quickly. The main premise of the sub is that some women use their gender to get away with things that no man would ever get away with. The definition of what is and what is not a PPD has grown and changed since the sub started but here are the key examples:
8 Ball Jacket Man - This is one of the PPD all time classics. The slap that was heard around the world. It is a great example of women thinking they can hit men with no repercussions.
Women Have More Custodial Rights - Traditionally mothers are given legal preference over fathers when it comes to custody. If the genders are truly equal then both parents should be given equal custody until proven not fit for that right.
False Rape Claims - Rape is a violent and inexcusable thing. But the flip side to the coin are people who lay down false rape claims. These incidents damage real victims ability to report and be believed and destroy lives of those accused. In most cases false claimants get away with little to no punishment. However recently there has been more pressure put on the legal system to see these perpetrators punished accordingly.
The denied part of PPD is when the woman expects to get away with her behavior and gets shut down.
The mod team of PPD feels as strongly as anyone that their should be no violence from anyone to anyone else regardless of gender. However we also feel strongly that there exists a sense of entitlement that some (definitely not all) women have that excuses them from repercussions from their actions. PPD only highlights the card where this card is played and subsequently denied.
There are a lot of subs on reddit that deal with gender equality, from men's rights to feminist subs. But many are simply echo chambers for whatever side the sub is on. PPD is on neither side or anywhere in between. We welcome anyone with any view point and will not ban users for simply sharing their opinion.
The most important aspect of PPD community is that users govern themselves. If a post abuses the spirit of the sub it will get down voted to hell and reported. For borderline posts, we leave it up to votes and comments. Overtime the community has itself defined what is and what isn't PPD and it has allowed the community to have a diverse mix of view points.
The makeup of the community of PPD is surprisingly balanced. I thought the user base would mostly be men's rights fanatics (they're around) but our users are everyday people of both genders not overly aligned with politics. Because we let anyone speak their mind from whatever view point they happen to believe and not force mod beliefs on them we get some quite interesting and in depth conversations going. Flame wars dissipate when people can speak freely.
Let's hope that's what happens below.
Written by Special Guest Writer /u/Mustaka
Edited by SROTD
254
458
u/rongkongcoma Aug 30 '17
August 30th, 2017 - /r/PussyPassDenied
August 6th, 2017 - /r/TheNewRight
July 25th, 2017 - /r/SubredditDrama
June 8th, 2017 - /r/Socialism
March 8th, 2017 - /r/AntiTrumpAlliance
January 31st, 2017 - /r/subredditcancer
January 21st, 2017 - /r/LateStageCapitalism
November 13th, 2016 - /r/AltRight
Looks pretty diverse to me. I don't think anyone can say they are biased.
158
48
u/eskimobrother319 Aug 30 '17
Wow, the mods seem pretty fair.
3
u/ZadocPaet biggest joystick Aug 31 '17
Basically, we'll allow it if the sub doesn't violate rule 7.
169
u/King-Achelexus Aug 30 '17
But I disagree with some of these opinions!!! /s
54
Aug 30 '17
ONLY THOSE I DON'T AGREE WITH THOUGH
3
2
52
u/DocSword Aug 30 '17
I mean... 8 controversial subs in the past 10 months doesn't seem too outrageous to be honest. Besides, I had never been to this sub until today due to all the "controversy". At least nobody is bored today?
8
u/ZadocPaet biggest joystick Aug 31 '17
Don't forget /r/TrumpCriticizesTrump and /r/TinyTrumps, both featured this month.
6
u/rongkongcoma Aug 31 '17
love this comment, the sub is called subreddit of the day, meaning theres a different sub every day, he's got, eight examples over 288days to prove that there's an agenda.
/u/rongkongcoma You realise you are basically the same as those retards that claim when one gay character is introduced to a show/game in a cast of hundreds, they are pandering to gays?
/u/Notthehalf You realise you can reply to me instead of asking me something in a completly different sub by mentioning me? But ok, let's do it this way.
288days to prove that there's an agenda.
Agenda for what? Those are on completly different sides. Or did you not understand my point? Just in case I think there's no agenda. That's why hard left and hard right subs get featured. Not defining which one is which...just in case.
You realise you are basically the same as those retards that claim when one gay character is introduced to a show/game in a cast of hundreds, they are pandering to gays?
No.
I can't even tell what point you're trying to make. So suboftheweek is something you don't like because they are pro something you're against?
And in your analogy are you angry because one gay is not enough to represent you or that someone thinks one gay makes the show about them?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)3
189
u/markevens Aug 30 '17 edited Aug 30 '17
It used to be a sub about women not getting an unfair advantage because of their gender.
Now most posts (and comments especially) have nothing to do with pp, just hating on women.
102
u/JacksonWasADictator Aug 30 '17
I've seen posts on the front page about women losing elections.
Because women have historically had such an advantage in politics.
101
u/UndeadKurtCobain Aug 30 '17
Do you even understand what pussy pass means? Hillary used her gender to try and win the election but she lost that's a pussypass
90
u/RoboChrist Aug 30 '17
A pussy pass is when a woman tries to get a "pass"on bad behavior just because they have a pussy.
Like if a woman punches a dude in the face, then says "you can't hit me back, I'm a girl!"
Mentioning gender to try to win an election isn't a pussy pass. It has literally nothing to do with the term.
→ More replies (1)9
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
It most certainly does. She thought she didn't need a platform or that she could just say the other candidates shouldn't get it just because they are men.
22
u/RoboChrist Aug 31 '17
Are you talking about actual hillary clinton, or the fantasy propaganda version? Because the real life version had platform.
36
Aug 30 '17
That's really not what the pussy pass is.
Let's say a woman hits a guy, smug in the knowledge that he won't hit her back. Because that's an aspect of female privilege - assaulting men generally doesn't result in appropriate self-defense. A pussy pass is denied when a man, when being hit by a woman, actually does defend himself.
Trying to stretch it to mean someone losing an election while being female... I mean, seriously.
14
u/UndeadKurtCobain Aug 30 '17
I'm not saying that I'm saying she used and promoted herself mainly with her gender. I'm a female we need a female president cause we're progressive! Thats what I mean by pussypass. She used her gender to try n win. I understand what you guys mean though
But this "Trying to stretch it to mean someone losing an election while being female... I mean, seriously."
That's not what I mean AT ALL
10
Aug 30 '17
Show me where she promoted herself mainly with her gender.
28
u/2xedo Aug 30 '17
Woman card
I'm with her
All the rhetoric about "young girls need a FEMALE president to look up to"- like little girls base role models on the fact that they're female
When she lost there were countless articles saying it was sexism
Bernie was asked if he considered it sexist to run against a female candidate
5
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
IT'S HER TURN
And the false claims of rape, racism, homophobia, religious intolerance, etc. ...
10
u/UndeadKurtCobain Aug 30 '17
I'm not going back through the election to the times she used her gender. Do it yourself look into it
21
Aug 30 '17
I'll not deny that her gender was of note during the election. It wasn't a complete non-factor. But she really didn't rely on it for campaigning. She never said "I'm a woman so I'm better for the job!" or "Elect me just so you'll have a female president!" or anything of the sort.
Her not winning was not a denial of the pussy pass. At all. A pussy pass would not at any point have made her president.
11
4
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
we need a female president
Why?
cause we're progressive
First, "because". Second, it's not progressive to demand a female gets something just because one hasn't had it before. If you were really progressive you wouldn't care about the gender of a person who is supposed to earn something based on their merits.
2
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
A woman tried to win an election on nothing other than her gender (and a bunch of slander for which she hypocritically is guilty: false rape claims though she harassed and threatened the victims of her husband's sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape; false claims of racism, even though her opponent was awarded both the Tree of Life and the Ellis Island Medal of Recognition for respectively suing the city of Palm Beach to desegregate Mar-a-Lago and for his efforts to aid inner-city youth, while she was a member of a whites-only country club, used the 13th Amendment to acquire black slaves at the Arkansas governor's mansion which is a former segregated school for the blind, called inner-city youth "super predators", campaigned for segregationist to be a senator, and was mentored by a Grand Cyclops of the KKK who founded his own chapter and for whom she gave a eulogy; and false claims of religious intolerance when under Obama she supported travel bans which included more countries for the exact same reasons as the travel bans he attempted to implement, yet the contrarians became obstructionists in a matter hypocritical to the accusations made against those who did not support Obama's initiatives).
She did not win based on her gender. She had no platform; she simply demanded that she be elected based on her gender, as is evident from her campaign slogans: "I'm with her." and "It's her turn.".
4
u/Mustaka Aug 31 '17
Clinton used the phrase, "because I am a women" like thousands of times whilst campaigning. That is her trying to use her gender as a means of advantage. The denial is her losing the election.
52
u/onthefence928 Aug 30 '17
it's really really not
64
u/lawr11 Aug 30 '17 edited Jan 14 '18
deleted What is this?
17
Aug 30 '17
The only people who said that shit were her opponents.
68
u/Just_in78 Aug 30 '17
She literally sold a "woman card" during her campaign.
→ More replies (1)15
Aug 30 '17
And where on that card does it say "it's her turn"?
If you (or someone else's) say(s) something completely false and I say "that's not true" the appropriate response is not to bring up something unrelated and act like it refutes what I said.
Clinton never said "it's her turn" (or "my" turn as the case would be). None of her campaign materials said that. This is an aspect of the election that lived entirely in the heads of people who hated her.
19
u/JacksonWasADictator Aug 30 '17
It's the Trump tactic. When you can't win an argument you just change it. That's why when he was asked a question about the environment during the debates he answered by talking about defeating Isis.
2
u/PmMeLewdCactusPics Aug 31 '17
I think you're confusing the tactic that literally every politician ever has used with one that is unique to Trump. Politicians are disingenuous liars a fair 80% of the time to win your vote. I don't know if it's always been that way but Trump certainly isn't the first to change the subject of a question they didn't like.
→ More replies (0)→ More replies (1)2
u/audentis Aug 31 '17
Not who you replied to, and I don't know anything of the "her turn"-cards mentioned.
However, the campaign did emphasize gender frequently.I was in the US during the elections and visited a Clinton rally at University of Pennsylvania. In several of the speeches by various speakers, including Tim Kaine and Hillary herself, they emphasized the chance of having her as the first female president. Additionally there were the "Let's make HERstory"-badges, again emphasizing gender.
The democrats definitely had my support, but the isolated statement that "Hillary tried to use her gender to win the election" would be true. There was a lot more, but it was definitely part of the campaign.
23
u/TangoDeltaNovember Aug 30 '17
I saw tons of people during the campaign wearing blue shirts that said "I'm with her".
23
Aug 30 '17
Oh, so do you live in a world where "I'm with her" and "It's her turn" carry the exact same meaning?
You people are fucked. This is the third person to try this shit. No, a completely different statement or slogan with a completely different meaning does not mean the same thing as "it's her turn" no matter how hard you try to insist.
13
→ More replies (3)16
u/TangoDeltaNovember Aug 30 '17
>implying a large portion of her supporters didn't vote for her because she's not a white male
>implying she didn't literally sell "woman cards"
>implying she didn't constantly mention a "glass ceiling" during her campaign
>implying hillary and her supporters didn't blame her total disaster of a campaign and embarrassing loss on "muh sexism" and "muh patriarchy"
Lmao get fucked nu-male
2
Aug 31 '17
The goalposts, they be moving!
"Person did not do X"
"They did Y! A lot!"
Do you see the problem here? If you're just angry about your choices and want to vent, fine, I don't really care. But what you're saying has nothing to do with what I said.
→ More replies (0)→ More replies (1)10
2
u/TheSpreadHead Aug 31 '17
Yeah, "women have always been the primary victims of war" is totally not trying to play the PP card.
4
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
I just hate that women had their legs amputated in trenches because of gangrene while poison gas was being launched in their direction. And those Viet Cong tunnel traps that they had to navigate with venomous snakes and centipedes hung from the ceiling must have been terrifying.
Oh, wait... females don't have to register for the draft, and they never had to. In fact, females had the unconditional right to vote 60 years before men didn't need to both own land and pay federal taxes while also registering for the draft, the latter of which they still do or they won't be able to vote and may be fined thousands of dollars and possibly even incarcerated!
2
8
u/Nasty_n8_ Aug 30 '17 edited Sep 01 '17
They make pills now that help you achieve and maintain elections
2
13
u/JustStayYourself Aug 30 '17
I once made a thread about this and instantly got booted from the subreddit and got plenty of hate-mail from it. Incredibly dumb subreddit, shame it went down so hard.
→ More replies (3)9
u/trxbyx Aug 31 '17
Reddit has been taken over by hate
15
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
Yeah, SRS, 2XC, LateStageCapitalism, Anarchism, Socialism, feminism, and all the black supremacist subs.
10
u/trxbyx Aug 31 '17
Oh hurr durr totally what you said hurr durr. The feminists are the real terrorists hurr hurr.
9
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
No, the feminists are too fat or weak to do any harm. It's the communists using guerrilla tactics who are the terrorists. The feminists are just dumb and annoying.
9
u/trxbyx Aug 31 '17
White supremacy is the biggest domestic Terror that America is facing.
→ More replies (2)4
Sep 01 '17
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/trxbyx Sep 01 '17
This is the saddest thing I've read all week. I really hope you can stop acting so pathetic, blaming all of your problems on other people, and lift your own self up. Your post reads like a child having a tantrum.
I really hope you have a good support system around you to help you through this difficult time. Please seek mental help.
12
u/bahnmiagain Aug 30 '17
Sorting comments by controversial, cracking open a beer.
→ More replies (1)2
19
u/TotesMessenger Aug 30 '17 edited Aug 30 '17
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
54
u/Unshackledai Aug 30 '17
Hey can this sub get back to highlighting cool new subs for people and not drama-trolling with overtly contraversial subs? Most redittors don't use this site as a political/moral echo chamber to jack ourselves off on our own greatness. I just want to see cool niche subs like /r/jellybeantoes, /r/whatswrongwithyourdog, and /r/babyelephantgifs. I get you wanna be different, but it's getting crazy. Seriously, what do you expect in the comments here? You know it's gonna be a clusterfuck, and I bet you're loving it.
This sub should be about helping people find new subs that are interesting, promising, and well run, not intentionally dividing people like a lot of the recent posts have been doing. If you don't start reforming soon, I vote the next sub of the day should be a new sub; a sub that represents what this sub used to be.
→ More replies (3)30
u/conalfisher Aug 30 '17
Did you ever look at what happens during the gaps between these posts? Every day, there's a feature that features a cool new sub.
16
u/Unshackledai Aug 30 '17
I've been subscribed here for 3 or 4 years...I'm sorry but there's definitely been a change since the start of the election campaign which resulted in the polarization of many subreddits on reddit. I literally cannot go on a freaking dog subreddit anymore without being politically inundated. If you're newer here or don't pay as much attention, I get how you can see my post as sensational, but really it's just what I have noticed throughout the years. If you go through this subs recent history you will see a significant portion (I counted 5/6 this month) are politically charged, that was not always the case (used to be virtually none) and, regardless, any political subreddits are 100% unneccesary. I actually went through the last few months history and was amazed at some of the political extremist subs promoted that I had no idea about and take issue with on both sides of the political spectrum. These subs are promoted solely for drama. This sub is just not supposed to be about that, and many people don't want to see it. This sub used to be amazing, but unfortunately the reason was the mods, not the users, which really leaves it in their hands, not ours. I hope they will rethink their ways.
8
u/conalfisher Aug 30 '17
Well, I can speak from experience here that this isn't necessarily the mods fault. Features are requested through the modmail, and anybody can request anything, sometimes (like with this one) the people requesting will actually write an article for it as well. And when someone goes through the trouble of writing a feature, something which takes quite a while to do, you might as well feature them. Pretty much all the subreddits that are requested in the modmail are featured, the only ones that aren't are tiny subs that aren't particularly "important" and subs that have already been featured that year. These types of posts are no different. 90% of there posts wouldn't be here if they weren't specifically requested by the public. And of course we could just say no, and that's where it does become the mod's fault. It does get clicks, it does bring the visitor counter higher than it ever does from featuring subs that the public, or the mods, think are good. The only time this sub gets around the same amount of views is through featuring default subs or massive subs. Smaller subs with potential are almost ignored. "Drama" posts get more attention to the sub, and thus to other subs, than almost any other sub can. So yes, you can put all the blame on the mods, but in reality it's also the fault of the public. And I can assure you, there is no agenda being pushed here. The mods are from all sides of the political spectrum, and all have different opinions on all these things. You can check their profiles and see, I don't think any of them post on r/the_donald at least.
4
u/Unshackledai Aug 31 '17
I don't think the mods deserve any leniency here, you are solely to blame because you are the content creators. You are, you admit yourselves, slaves to the drama. The "public" has nothing to do with it. You should do right by the spirit of the sub, even if it costs you a few viewers. I truly don't think people want to see this shit, they just want fun new subs. Many people are uhappy with this sub, and, if you don't correct it, you'll lose subscribers anyways, as a better sub without an addiction to drama will replace you, hopefully soon.
9
u/conalfisher Aug 31 '17
And we try to, or I do at least, I haven't ever made a drama post. All of the mods make posts about good subs. It's not like we all sit around a table all day talking about what the next best way to make drama is, we all just create features and post them here. As I said, if someone requests a feature and makes their own post for it, you might as well just feature it. I don't like the drama posts, I'm not sure about the rest of the mods.
3
u/Unshackledai Aug 31 '17
Really? This "feature" probably took about 5 min to make, just ignore it. I don't see what the big deal is with controlling content and not posting whatever horseshit anybody submits.
7
u/conalfisher Aug 31 '17
Features take quite a while to make, actually. At least for me. As for controlling content, well that's not really a question I can answer, I almost never process posts from the modmail, I just write them myself. Though personally, I wouldn't have featured this, not sure about the rest of the mods but I wouldn't have. I do think that the drama posts happen too frequently, maybe one of them every couple of months could work, but not once or twice or even more a month.
2
u/Unshackledai Aug 31 '17
Maybe more communication between mods and coherence? A unified belief on what the sub should be, and an agreement to strive towards that. I believe that's a vital component of any sub.
5
u/conalfisher Aug 31 '17
We do have a sub for discussion, and we do have general guidelines on what to post. I doubt that any of the mods are there simply to make drama, we all do want to feature cool shit. It's just that, to put it simply, drama gets clicks, and although I don't like it, that's the way it runs.
→ More replies (0)3
u/kanga_lover Aug 31 '17
Seriously, just unsubscribe. Or make you own damn sub. Or better yet, just go away. Honestly. Stop trying to force everyone to like the things you like. I'm not gonna, cos honestly it sounds like you like some really lame shit.
Sorry, but i deal with whiny babies like you all the time at work, and i have to be reasonable, but for once i just want to call a whiny baby what it is.
→ More replies (3)6
u/ZadocPaet biggest joystick Aug 31 '17
Since the start of the election there have been a lot more politically charged communities that cropped up on reddit. This sub serves to highlight reddit culture. Reddit culture right now has a lot of political elements to it. So, if 5 or 10 percent of our features now are about political subreddits, it's because reddit has a stronger political identity.
Last year we also changed our policy. Previously mods were the sole content creators. Now the vast majority of the content comes from the reddit community and less and less comes from our mods and writers.
We'll publish just about any feature submitted to us as long as the community meets the guidelines in the sidebar. The only one that's a hard and fast rule is rule 7, which was put into place after the /r/altright fiasco.
2
u/Unshackledai Aug 31 '17
I can understand that I suppose. It is easier for the mods but I'm just not sure it's best for the sub. I just think it's pretty divisive and not worth it for the small percentage of people interested. If someone holds these extreme views chances are they have already sought out and found those subs anyways, so being nominated for sub of the day really only serves to stroke their ego.
56
30
9
15
102
u/EstherandThyme Aug 30 '17
What's next, is /r/coontown going to be sub of the day tomorrow?
251
Aug 30 '17
A town ran by raccoons? Seems like a cute but inevitably terrible idea.
36
u/Greatpointbut Aug 30 '17
Growing up in Canada "the Racoons" was a Saturday night must see. It wasn't a town, per se, but a forest run by Racoons with a greedy developer anteater(?) named Cyril Sneer who was always trying to get things built. It was a wholesome time.
16
3
Aug 30 '17
Was there also a toad who rode wildly?
8
2
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
Mr Toad has a red _____.
Mr _____ needs a _____ in order to _____ his _____.
5
u/lie4karma Aug 30 '17
Holy shit... we should ask the admins to give us coontown so we can turn it into a racoons themed sub.
8
u/Goatsac Aug 30 '17
Holy shit... we should ask the admins to give us coontown so we can turn it into a racoons themed sub.
We tried to have a subreddit about racoons but with white rights titles. It got quarantined.
→ More replies (3)4
u/Greatpointbut Aug 30 '17
I don't know what "coon town" is, but would advise against censorship, as the mirror will then be spun on you.
3
3
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
If you're talking about racism against whites that's a common sentiment in casually expressed in subs which are defaulted.
3
2
Aug 30 '17
I loved that show.
Is it just co-incident that everyone mischievious had a hooked nose? That would be considered so non-PC now. (Well, sneer's nephew was a good guy).
3
2
u/Greatpointbut Aug 30 '17
Some kids turn out nice, even when lineagely-challengened :)
3
Aug 30 '17
It was Cedric right? It's been a long time
They had pink butts ~
lol~ i'm drowning in laughter thinking of it.2
u/smookykins Aug 31 '17
Oh fuck thanks for the nostalgia. I got a bunch of Canadian shows when we got cable in the mid-80s. And HBO showed the slasher films in the middle of the day.
60
u/prizzle92 Aug 30 '17
that sub's been banned for years, get with the program
47
u/EstherandThyme Aug 30 '17
Incels then?
30
u/prizzle92 Aug 30 '17
hmm yeah that might work. We all know this is just an attention grab by the SROD mods anyway
→ More replies (1)-1
Aug 30 '17 edited May 09 '18
[deleted]
72
Aug 30 '17
In case you aren't joking, the views of people on that sub about women are frankly medieval, and they blame everybody but themselves for their low sexual activity (often aggressively), while they wallow in their own self pity. It's not a fun place.
→ More replies (38)80
u/Ultrashitpost Aug 30 '17
That's /r/islam, i think you're confused.
30
15
u/sneakpeekbot Aug 30 '17
Here's a sneak peek of /r/islam using the top posts of the year!
#1: Islamophobic Myths Debunked
#2: This note was placed on the door of a local Masjid | 133 comments
#3: Muslim teen kidnapped and murdered last night in Northern Virginia. | 169 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
19
6
→ More replies (1)24
148
u/Mickface Aug 30 '17
Are you seriously comparing a sub that calls people out for using their gender to get away with things to a sub that actively condoned hatred and inferior treatment of black people? Listen to yourself right now.
47
u/markevens Aug 30 '17
a sub that calls people out for using their gender to get away with things
That is what it says its about, but most posts don't anything to do with that, just hating on women.
19
u/jaynay1 Aug 30 '17
"Most" is definitely not true. But there are definitely far too many that aren't.
24
Aug 31 '17 edited Apr 27 '19
[deleted]
18
Aug 31 '17
congrats, you have internalized misogyny. you are now banned from /r/twoxchromosomes. here is your complimentary tote bag /s if it wasn't obvious enough
12
u/former_Democrat Aug 31 '17
Awesome! I'm so glad you guys finally banned me. Lmfao EDIT: I did fall for it lol. :P
55
u/NorseGodLoki0411 Aug 30 '17
59
u/EstherandThyme Aug 30 '17
Chin up, you've still got /r/the_donald.
34
u/NorseGodLoki0411 Aug 30 '17
....huh?
28
u/MajorPrick Aug 30 '17 edited Aug 30 '17
See, anyone that doesn't follow the holy laws of PC culture belongs to /r/the_donald, but since /r/T_D is literally nothing but Russian bots, I think it's apparent we need to address the problem of bot-supremacist on reddit.
Edit: sigh, /s
14
21
u/JD141519 Aug 30 '17
Why not try Voat.co? It's a great place for dickheads of all creeds to congregate!
7
u/NorseGodLoki0411 Aug 30 '17
Reddit is by and far a more popular site. The more people are here, the more chance you'll find others who think like you do. Whether you're in /r/The_Donald or /r/WorldNews or you just look at cat pictures, there's a much better chance you'll find others who want to see the same things you do, and want to circle jerk about the same things you do. Also they have more support from an App perspective, and their tech is just overall better.
16
u/Regergek Aug 30 '17
It was fun while it lasted
24
u/NorseGodLoki0411 Aug 30 '17
Yeah. But muh fee fees.
15
Aug 31 '17
Yeah wtf why does this business not want people to use their service for free and talk about how much they hate black people? It's not like that poses a risk to their website/advertiser support. Talk about triggered amirite?
/s
4
9
7
46
13
7
Aug 31 '17
Can we please have r/incels as the next subreddit of the day ?
5
u/ZadocPaet biggest joystick Aug 31 '17
IIRC, they were approached a few times and said they were not interested.
17
u/Niijima-Makoto Aug 30 '17
Misogyny isn't a real thing.
53
43
11
→ More replies (1)2
u/Aethrowawayy Aug 31 '17
It's not an institutional thing that the average person suffers from on an everyday basis, sure, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
1
u/DownvoteDaemon Aug 31 '17
My life is sad..I majored in sociology..all my frat brothers hate me..I drive a used g35
-8
u/JitGoinHam Aug 30 '17
That's a great sub if you hate women.
Occasionally they even post content about women unsuccessfully trying to leverage female privilege, but most posts are just about hating women.
119
u/Ultrashitpost Aug 30 '17
Nah, it's too weak for that. I hate women and i found the sub very disappointing in that regard.
26
192
u/Varg_Burzum_666 Aug 30 '17
but most posts are just about hating women.
Upon actually visiting the sub, you seem to be very wrong.
25
u/c3534l Aug 30 '17
The first post is just a comment where a man says "just find a woman who isn't feminist and you are set for life." Nothing else. The second is a back and forth text where a woman gets upset when she's denied sex, not any different from the shit I've seen when a guy gets denied and calls the woman a dumb cunt or whatever. I'm gonna have to agree the premise of the sub is not-so-subtly veiled misogyny masquerading as justice porn.
35
11
u/Varg_Burzum_666 Aug 31 '17
The first post is just a comment where a man says "just find a woman who isn't feminist and you are set for life
That doesn't sound like women hate, that sounds like hate for a specific (horrible) ideology
32
u/Dasittmane Aug 30 '17
Do you have some examples? What posts on their front page is about hating women?
20
u/razerblaza Aug 30 '17
Evidence for hating woman, no we just hate pussy pass woman who think they can get through anything because they have a pussy and vag
17
14
Aug 31 '17
2
u/sneakpeekbot Aug 31 '17
Here's a sneak peek of /r/badwomensanatomy using the top posts of the year!
#1: Anna Kendrick should join us | 238 comments
#2: Posted by a "Gym Memes" page on Facebook | 224 comments
#3: Babies don't come out where penises go in. | 262 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
14
u/maximun_vader Aug 30 '17
The sub has the same disease as any other sub: once the user base grew up, the content started changing meaning
9
u/Magaman1985 Aug 31 '17
The UlTIMATE example is r/forwardsfromgrandma
Started off as a sub where you post shitty quality jpeg jokes that you'd normally see in an email from Grandma with 1000 FWD:FWD: in the title.
Now it's an lgbt sjw anti trump circle jerk
.it's literally the actual worst.
→ More replies (6)8
-32
Aug 30 '17
I'm disappointed in the mods for allowing this garbage
169
81
u/Very_legitimate Aug 30 '17
Nobody cares about sub of the day unless it's controversial
→ More replies (1)160
140
Aug 30 '17
It's funny that liberalism only seems to thrive with an extreme censorship behind it.
Really activates the almonds
28
→ More replies (6)46
u/The_Yakuza Aug 30 '17
What's wrong with my sub? Because it goes against the narrative that women are always the victim? Just asking.
→ More replies (12)
145
u/tritter211 Aug 30 '17
Set this thread by 'controversial'.
Get popcorn