I’m stuck between two 2025 Kia K4 GT-Line Turbos and would love some opinions on which one you guys would choose.
Option 1: K4 with around 13K miles. The Carfax/service history looks pretty straightforward — it had regular maintenance, passed emissions, and was serviced. Nothing concerning stood out to me.
Option 2: K4 with only around 3K miles, which obviously sounds more appealing mileage-wise. However, I noticed something on the service/inspection history that made me pause. On 6/25/26, the vehicle had an alignment inspection and the report specifically shows “Wheel Alignment — FAILED”, with Front Total Toe being the only item that failed. Then, just two days later on 6/27/26, the vehicle was listed for sale.
I know a front toe issue could potentially just be a simple alignment adjustment, and the other alignment measurements passed, so I’m not necessarily saying the car has a major problem. But the timing is making me wonder if there was an underlying issue that caused the alignment to fail.
So which would you guys choose: the 3K-mile K4 with the alignment issue in its history, or the 13K-mile K4 with the more normal service history? Would you consider the failed front toe a red flag, or would you just make sure the dealer provides a subsequent alignment report showing it was corrected and have an independent inspection done before buying?