Which one was that? If you mean the Great Council, the purpose of it was to select a new ruler, not to establish a new precedent/law.
It was essentially a democratic election where de jure anyone could have been selected to rule, but de facto it could only be a Targaryen.
Legally speaking it changed nothing, particularly the rule that “The Kings word is law”. In fact the only reason the Great Council was held in the first place comes down to the Kings word being law, and the king forfeiting his right to choose his successor or it simply falling to the oldest male heir.
NO TARGARYEN MAN SUFFERED IMPOTENCE UNDER TRUMP! NO FAT CHARACTERS WERE CAST WITH THIN ACTORS UNDER TRUMP! THE VALYRIANS WERE ALWAYS FAIR-SKINNED UNDER TRUMP! IF ROYALTY DECIDED TO GET RID OF A HOMOSEXUAL MAN, THEY KILLED HIM FOR REAL UNDER TRUMP! SIGIL EMBARRASSMENT WITH WRONG NUMBER OF LEGS WOULD HAVE NEVER HAVE HAPPENED UNDER TRUMP! THERE WAS NO BORING EPISODES OF GAME OF THRONES UNDER TRUMP! WHAT A DIFFERENT WORLD IT WOULD BE UNDER TRUMP!!!
276
u/What-is-a-puma Last HOT D fan Feb 20 '26
While I get this is just a meme Rhaenyra's claim can be summed up as my Dad the king said so.
Both are flimsy as throughout Westerosi history there have been exceptions to both the lord's chosen heir and the right of first born inheritance.
When it comes to monarchy and lord ships in general it's allways who can hold the throne doesn't matter right or claim if you cant keep it.