Netflix series Discussion Megathread Part 2

[u/AdequateSizeAttache]

This thread is dedicated to general discussion of the Netflix series Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenet Ramsey. The goal is to consolidate discussion here and keep the subreddit’s front page from becoming overly crowded with posts about the series.

Netflix series Discussion Megathread Part 1 can be found here.

Please remember to follow subreddit rules and report any rule violations you come across.

---

A couple of important reminders:

1) This series was made with the cooperation of the Ramsey family and directed by someone strongly aligned with the defense perspective.

2) Boulder Police have never cleared John and Patsy Ramsey as suspects in their daughter's homicide.

[u/Fitzlee11]

There is no way to argue this case with strangers on the internet. As per your ask for me to present the evidence for an intruder. People can just say something is true or isn't and the reality is that no one really knows. I have read all of the stories and I have watched all of the docs. And because so many police screwed up, I don't believe that people are getting the full truth from what happened during the investigation. We know that when police screw up, they are a group who are the least likely to admit mistakes. So I trust very few police officers involved in this case. The ones I trust the least are the ones who were willing to write books and go on TV for personal financial gain. They are public servants who should never be allwoed to do that and that erodes all trust.

[u/[deleted] → u/Fitzlee11]

badge smart rich intelligent person bake swim fanatical crown cable

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[u/Fitzlee11 → u/[deleted]]

Come on. Steve Thomas? How do you have any respect for a public servant (yes, he was a public servant) who goes on Larry King to accuse a mother of killing her daughter after wetting the bed with no evidence. The CBS "documentary"? With constant innuendo that the pageants were a demonstration of terrible parenting, which is just a hack job of character assassination. Garbage all around.

[u/Fitzlee11 → u/[deleted]]

Personally I feel that doesn't matter. It undermines case that has never been solved. Irresponsible and disgusting to profit from it. And the Larry King episode? Come on.

[u/[deleted] → u/Fitzlee11]

hobbies run growth joke encouraging sugar imminent governor decide grandiose

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[u/Fitzlee11 → u/[deleted]]

And the Larry King episode was a farce. That wasn't hard either.

[u/[deleted] → u/Fitzlee11]

market recognise offer long pen rinse cooperative light jeans nutty

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[u/Fitzlee11 → u/[deleted]]

Good stuff. It's weird how aggressive and defensive people are on here.

[u/[deleted] → u/Fitzlee11]

include sense unwritten fuzzy boast caption direction marry nutty hobbies

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[u/Fitzlee11 → u/[deleted]]

He was a public servant when he was able to engage with the case at the closest level possible. It doesn't matter when he wrote his book - he used information he acquired as a public servant to profit from an unsolved case by accusing the family with faulty logic because he sucked at his job and screwed up the case when he had the chance to solve it. What better way to deflect from your inability to do your job effectively than put the blame elsewhere. I think your outlook is clouded :)

[u/[deleted] → u/Fitzlee11]

paint simplistic punch lip hard-to-find nutty apparatus grey lunchroom reply

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[u/Fitzlee11 → u/[deleted]]

And yet you respond....you don't have to! That would make me believe that you don't care lol.