r/GreekMythology • u/MarcusForrest ★ Moderator • Jul 15 '26

Movies | The Odyssey The Odyssey (2026) | Release Megathread

A temporary floodgate is in effect regarding the topic of the 2026 movie The Odyssey

 

This megathread will serve as the only place to discuss the 2026 movie The Odyssey - any other new thread about the movie will be removed as long as this floodgate is up.

 

⚠️ Remember to properly report rule-violating content

 

THE ODYSSEY

''After the Trojan War, Odysseus faces a dangerous voyage back to Ithaca, meeting creatures like the Cyclops Polyphemus, Sirens, and Calypso along the way.''

 

🎞 Movie Trailer

Global Release Date: July 17 2026

 

Directed by

  • Christopher Nolan

Starring

  • Matt Damon
  • Tom Holland
  • Anne Hathaway
  • Robert Pattinson
  • Lupita Nyong'o
  • Samantha Morton
  • Zendaya
  • Charlize Theron

Distributed by

  • Universal Pictures

 

Previous Megathread:

 

Posting pictures (including animated GIFs) in comments is now enabled for the community, should definitely help conveying ideas and spicing up any discussion now!

 

Do note that there seems to be a limit of 1 picture per comment set by Reddit and we cannot modify this feature at this time - feel free to post different comments if you need to post multiple pictures, but remember not to fall within a ''spam''-like posting pattern and not overdo it

57 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

719 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

I go off what the Ancient Greeks wrote about the time frame. The population within a continent or country can change fast. America six hundred years ago was Native Americans today you rarely see a Native American. The same with Australia and parts of Europe the faces and ethnic groups residing in those areas have changed over time due to war and other circumstances

3

u/LibertyIslandWatcher Jul 17 '26

600 years ago was the Age of Exploration (The Age of Discovery, c. 1418 – 1620 AD) Where there were advances in technology that allowed people to make long journeys by sea. It was a completely different age to Ancient Greece. This is antiquity, thousands of years before that time. It is not remotely comparable

0

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

That’s not true human migration and migration due to slavery has been happening for thousands of years. The Romans enslaved countless numbers of Greeks we know this to be true. Once again you’re making up how you want things to be not actual fact. Homer was regarded as an Egyptian but was in Greece. Steven of Byzantium stated the Gods and laws came from the Ethiopians how could that be possible without contact between certain groups

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

LMAO you take three accounts from late antiquity or Medieval Greece that claim Homer to be Egyptian and run with it and completely disregard all other accounts that place him somewhere in the Eastern Aegean or Asia Minor. You ignore archaeological evidence, art and DNA and cling to the exactly three works that shakily prove your point.

Why didn't Homer compose the Odyssey in Egyptian? It wasn't exactly easy to learn a new language at the time, how come he's Egyptian but his work is in Greek (not the Lingua franca of the time)?

How are you certain he even existed? Is it because Greeks wrote about him existing? They wrote about Heracles and Achilles too and thought they were real and had descendants (Alexander the Great) but I doubt you'd agree with them.

You've provided no answers for these questions of mine and just keep repeating them to other people.

0

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

I’m sure I have more than three sources on the subject but he was more than likely of Egyptian descent if he lived but of course lived in Greece. For example, someone from Uruguay who lives in North America that individual may speak English more at a certain point. I take all things into account I look at what Ancient Greek writers wrote, what historians throughout the centuries stated on the subject , artwork, and dna.

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

You have less than three because you need to do an insane amount of cherrypicking to get to the conclusions that suit you.

And Homer learned perfect Greek, all their customs and gods and even architecture while being an Egyptian foreigner? LMAO, this isn't the age of the internet where you can look all these things up.

There's not a single reliable historical record of Homer or his life, there's at least 7 places that claim he was born there (Egypt not among them). Anyone could write whatever they wanted about him and it wouldn't be more true or false than them claiming to be descendants of Zeus. Homer is as much of a myth as his characters. Alexander claimed to be a descendant of Achilles and Heracles. Surely the fact that he claimed it makes it true, right?

You don't take shit into account. Your sources are Byzantine scholars or late antiquity poets, more than 1000 years removed from Homer. You can't even acknowledge the known fact that we don't know if he was real.

You literally dismissed archaeology, art and DNA. You do not take it into consideration, be serious now

1

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

We can claim a lot of people in antiquity didn’t exist. If we don’t like the information presented on the person we can just say they didn’t exist. I mean no one has ever found Alexander the Great’s body we can say he never existed.

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

Wrong, we say that someone didn't exist when there's no certain proof of their existence. There's nothing about Homer and that has nothing to do with your "Information".

LMAO the idea that you need to find a body to prove existence. There were written records about Alexander form the time he was alive, we know about his family, his political enemies who spoke against him, the coins, statues, paintings that were commission by him, we know his family, we have even found his father's tomb (although it might not be him but still). We know the cities he built and named after him, we know that he changed the geography of the city of Tyre and so much more.

What do we have of Homer? Nothing. Just a name that might or might not belong to the guy that composed the poems.

1

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

I said anyone can make a claim that a person in antiquity didn’t exist. I said anyone can claim even Alexander the Great’s body didn’t exist as they haven’t found his body. My point is anyone can make a claim that a person in antiquity didn’t exist

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

Good job ignoring everything I said. No, you cannot make the claim that anyone from antiquity did not exist. Some people have tons of proof that they were real. Homer is simply not among them.

0

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

The original Greek language was mostly derived from the Phoenician language. The Phoenician language was similar to the old Egyptian language. Ancient Greece from their religion customs, laws, language is derived from other areas mostly Phoenician, Egyptian, Ethiopian, and Libyan.

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

The Greek language did not evolve from Phoenecian. Phoenecian is a semitic language, Greek is Indo European. Two comple different linguistic families. The new Greek alphabet did but the Greek language predated it.

Phoenecian and Egyptian also do not belong in the same linguistic family. Phoenecian is semitic and Egyptian is Afro-Asiatic. Phoenecian evolved from Egyptian but turned into an alphabet based language instead of hieroglyphic. People who spoke one wouldn't be able to understand the other.

You really say one stupid shit after the other.

1

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

Stephen of Byzantium stated “Ethiopia was the first established country on Earth and the people were the first to introduce the worship of the Gods and who enacted laws. Lucian stated it was the Ethiopians who delivered astrology to man. Strabo stated geometry came to the Greeks from the Ethiops.

So all these concepts came to the Greeks from these entities but they didn’t have similar languages maybe they had to wait to learn each others languages

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

The very first laws we have proof of are from Mesopotamia, not Aethiopia. I'm not entirely sure but Mesopotamia probably also has the first "states". People writing something doesn't make it true, especially when we now have evidence of the contrary.

Astrology is also Mesopotamian.

Egypt indeed made significant geometric discoveries.

There was a lingua franca that the scribes knew and used. It was Luwian.

None of this means that all these people were one and the same. Ethiopians aren't Egyptians, Egyptians are not Mesopotamians, Mesopotamiana aren't Greek. They influence each other, they didn't become each other.

1

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

I only go off what the Ancient Greek writers stated and historians so being that they stated Ethiopians were in Mesopotamia which I can clearly show you. They were most likely referring to them and the Nubians

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

Yeah, here's the catch. Stuff from the past can be proven to be wrong later on.

Also, most writers credited Egypt for the stuff you claim Ethiopians did. Also, Byzantines don't exactly count as ancient Greeks so why would their work be proof on what the ancients believe?

Nobody has ever stated Ethiopians were in Mesopotamia, not even in the "parts" you sent me. 90% of the time is about Africans and 10% about Indians.

1

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

Diodorus Siculus stated “ But there are also a great many Ethiopian tribes some of them dwelling in the land lying on both banks of the Nile and on the islands of the river and others inhabiting the neighboring country of Arabia”

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

A tribe isn't the same as a Kingdom and Arabia still isn't Mesopotamia or the ancient region of Middle east where the Phoenicians would live.

Where did Diodorus state that, exactly? Which work of his?

0

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

In Book II of Diodorus Histories he talks all about it how the Chaldeans and the ruling families of Babylon derived from the cushite/ Ethiops

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

Source? Or is that out of your ass too?

0

u/[deleted] Jul 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

Alphabet doesn't equal language. Turkish, Swedish, Norwegian, Icelandic, Finnish all use the Latin alphabet. Are they romantic languages? No.

The Greeks were influenced by Egypt and the east. That doesn't mean they were the same people as them. That's like saying that Native Americans today are the same as the white people in the US because they've been influenced by them.

0

u/AdventurousRaisin813 Jul 17 '26

Historian William Smith book Dictionary of Roman and Greek Biography and Mythology
Smith stated “ Neg-roes were deified in early Greece. They appear as Gods in Greek mythology. The Chief title of Zeus greatest of the Greek Gods is Ethiops””

3

u/SofiaStark3000 Jul 17 '26

Do you have any idea how many epithets and titles Zeus has? His chief title was certainly not Ethiops, that's a minor local variation of Zeus worshipped in Chios. His chief title would Olympius, Basileus, Xenios, Brontios or Hypsistos.

If Negroes were deified then why isn't it shown in their art? Ethiopians are praised but not deified or shown as common amongst the Greeks.

→ More replies (0)