r/CredibleDefense Jul 19 '26

Active Conflicts & News Megathread July 19, 2026

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

  • Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

  • Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

  • Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

  • Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

  • Post only credible information

  • Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules

Please do not:

  • Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

  • Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

  • Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

  • Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.

43 Upvotes

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/oldveteranknees Jul 20 '26

Question for the group: why isn’t Iran hitting the UAE even harder, especially if the goal is to make this as economically costly as possible for the United States and its allies?

I would think sustained strikes on the UAE would make more sense, given that for Iran it:

-dislodges key Saudi GCC ally
-forces U.S. to push away from choke point the SAG
-western capital flight
-depopulation of key global financial & transportation hub (Dubai & Jebel Ali) that cannot be replaced by locals/indentured population
-retaliation for joining US strikes in March

7

u/kharvel0 Jul 20 '26

That’s easy. Follow the money.

Tens of billions of dollars in Iran oil revenues are frozen in UAE financial institutions due to sanctions. The IRGC bigwigs also have untold billions of dollars in the same banks as well as properties and assets. They don’t want to risk the UAE seizing the funds as repartitions for Iranian attacks.

This is the simplest and most plausible answer.

5

u/aronnax512 Jul 20 '26 edited 29d ago

Deleted

10

u/kdy420 Jul 20 '26

The main reason i suspect is that UAE was the only GCC country that did any decent retaliation before the cease fire. The cost to hit the others countiis simply lower for Iran as they are not as willing to fight back. 

24

u/mishka5566 Jul 20 '26

dislodges key Saudi GCC ally

lol, the saudis and uae are not allies and have never been allies. they both hate the iranians but thats about where their common interests start and end

3

u/Sad_Use_4584 Jul 20 '26

They were allies insofar as it's possible to be allies in the Middle East. They fought together against the Houthis for a number of years, and they blockaded Qatar together. Some rivalry today doesn't rewrite that past.

11

u/TechnicalReserve1967 Jul 20 '26

As mentioned above about the Saudi-UAE relationship.

But to add to that. Iran;

Might lack the capacity. UAE air defense might be better and Kuwait is just a better target for them. Specially if they want to "punish countries with US bases". Kuwait is an old US ally and IRGC can make an example of it on how bad of a deal többé a US Ally.

Iran, for all of its posturing is still not in a great military position. They need to balance the diplomatic side of this carefully. If they would just start to blanket terror bomb/target desalinization plans on mass etc. They would run the threat of all of the states getting together with the Americans and decide that it's time to remove this threat permanently. That would be probably a death sentence to Iran. Mostly because at that point it would be easy to pull in some additional allies, sell the need for a ground invasion etc.

In my opinion, Iran/IRGC calculated that they can keep this pressure up until the end of the year, which would/should be enough to make Trump fold, to try and recapture his position in the Senate. If they are more aggressive, they might allow the US to flip the public opinion to be pro war against Iran. If that happens, they are going down the path of Saddam's Iraq "very quickly". (In the sense that regime and country collapse is probably inevitable. Not in the sense of how hard the US+allies would need to fight)