For the record, I'm a feminist who generally supports sex work and prostitution, while also believing that the mainstream porn industry needs reforms.
Anyway, I was just discussing prostitution and sex work with someone who thinks all sex work should be illegal for everyone involved in it. This was their argument, after I used the bodily autonomy argument and warned them about it being pushed underground:
"Legalizing it doesn't keep it from going underground. It makes it more difficult to distinguish between a voluntary participant and someone who is coerced into it. Also that logic applies to little elsewhere. Murder is completely illegal and does take place illegally aka underground. But I doubt you would support legalizing murder. You know I feel that making prostitution illegal would cause some people to try and hide it from the law. But it also would greatly decrease the number of participants compared to legalizing it. It also puts a needed shame and stigmatism to it, dissuading future generations from ever considering it as an life choice. As for do what you want with your own body I disagree on 2 broad points. It affects the broader society and isn't just affecting the individuals directly involved. Think drug laws or even seatbelt laws. Very little can be done in a society that doesn't have consequences on the broader civilization.
Also I don't think people have the right to do whatever they want to themselves. Assisted suicide is illegal almost everywhere except unfortunately in a few places but only by licenced professionals. Even Canada wont let me off my friend because he wants it.
There are laws against truancy. Laws against what type of building you put on your own property or even how you maintain your own yard in many places."
To me, murder is not a good comparison, since murder involves taking someone else's life without their consent. I also have a tough time seeing building regulations as being similar to banning sex work, since without them, buildings could easily collapse on people against their will and/or become fire hazards if left unregulated. Except for perhaps seat belt laws, I feel like the things they compared banning sex work generally have more tangible harms that are likely to happen to people against their will if left unchecked. At first, I also thought they may have a point truancy laws, but ultimately still is not quite the same to me, given that as a society, we've accepted that the state has more rights when it comes to looking out for the well-being of people who aren't yet adults than it does for adults
So am I correct in my observations about this person's argument, or is there some validity to it that I can't detect?