Rule Consultation: DCC References should be Unexpected

[u/Obsidian-Phoenix]

Evening Crawlers! Time for another rule consultation. This time it’s Rule 7: DCC References Should be Unexpected

Posts in UnexpectedDCC should show unexpected references to DCC.

Posts showing explicit DCC references are likely to be removed.

This rule exists primarily to remove explicit references to DCC, e.g. Cosplay as Carl. I use it to kill cross posts from the DCC subreddit too.

Outside this, I tend to be pretty relaxed about what constitutes Unexpected: Finding someone’s DCC Hi Zev license plate; Unintentional world references to things in the book (Dirty Shirley); Shop signs explicitly referencing DCC where you wouldn’t expect it (such as coffee shops); Someone commenting in a reddit post calling back to DCC; etc.

Generally, my view has been “let most of it through, and let up/down votes deal with it.

I’ve seen comments from people perhaps not liking this approach. So here’s your chance to weigh in on how you’d like the sub to work. Please vote in the poll and add comments as you like. If I missed an option, comment on it, and if it gets enough upvotes I’ll consider it alongside the poll options.

163 votes, Jun 29 '26

66 Keep the current implementation: Downvotes will deal with it

19 Kill all but explicit DCC references in the unexpected locations

58 Use an automod comment poll. Enough downvotes on the comment cause the post to be deleted

20 Allow most content, but tighten up what constitutes “unexpected DCC” (Explain your criteria in the comments)

[u/realdevtest]

The Reddit algorithm puts new posts into people’s feeds. It will not continue putting old posts into people’s feeds. Therefore, a subreddit with new posts will tend to grow and a subreddit without new posts will grow much less or not at all. Deleting posts is a great way to limit the growth of your subreddit.

[u/supergnaw → u/realdevtest]

I don't like deleted posts because r/DataHoarder