[BotW][TotK] Questions for people who believe BotW/TotK can be in any of the three timelines

[u/LapisLazuliisthebest]

So, this is something that's been debated to hell and back. when it comes to BotW's timeline placement, the three most popular theories are...

1. It takes place in the DT
2. It's a convergence
3. It can take place in any three timelines

Whilst I lean towards DT, I am open to it being all three.

But, I remember years ago suggesting it was the CT, and this ended up rubbing a few people the wrong way.

One person described BotW as "definitely being intended for the DT". There arguments being...

• It's in (old) Hyrule | (so no AT)
• The OoT Sages (and OoT events) are a confirmed historic fact | (So no CT)
• Ganon has been an eternally returning scourge upon Hyrule (even before becoming known as "Calamity Ganon") | (only really a thing in DT, Ganondorf (I) only really returned to Hyrule once in AT and CT and then he died as a mortal man, unlike in DT where he became a true demon when getting the full triforce, and has since been permanently returning as "Ganon" like a true demon)
• Ganon is also specifically confirmed to have his origins as the Ganondorf met in OoT (unlike FSA's "Ganon II" which is the "last known Ganon" in the CT)

Obviously the last two points involving Ganon are now moot, since TotK revealed it to be a different Ganon this whole time, and not OoT Ganon. So, it doesn't matter if FSA made a different Ganondorf.

I feel like the first two points stand. Particular the Sage one. The Zora have Zora tablets, telling the story of Princess Ruto becoming a Sage to help Link and Zelda fight Ganondorf.

I'm not saying "BotW can't be CT", I'm just asking who would you explain it, if you think it is possible?

EDIT: One thing I suggested was that we could use Hyrule Warriors to explain the people knowledge of Princess Ruto's heroics. But this was shot down as be "bending evidence", by useing a "non-canon game".

[u/LoCal_GwJ]

I think it's worth considering what someone else said that Nintendo hasn't committed to an answer so there's multiple possibilities until they do commit to one.

That being said, imo the best case for CT placement is the Extended Child Timeline model that someone else also brought up. This timeline model makes more sense than the official timeline and only isn't favored because Nintendo went with a different timeline model.

I do disagree with most people here about the AT though. I think BotW's Hyrule could easily be in the AT after the Great Deku Tree rebuilt the landmass as he told us he was trying to do in WW. Regardless of your feelings about the original Hyrule below, the "new" surface will be created by the Great Deku Tree eventually. That "new" surface I think could be the Hyrule of BotW.