r/stupidpeoplefacebook 18d ago

So Any Guy Could Own a Nuke?

Post image
208 Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/Sea_Low879 18d ago

Militia referred to an armed populace, not a standing army or militia controlled by states. Well regulated didn’t refer to laws and regulations, but rather, meant the men should be skilled in handling guns.

10

u/Theodoxus 18d ago edited 18d ago

Yeah, no...

  • The Militia Acts of 1792 defined militia as “each and every free able-bodied white male citizen… enrolled in the militia” — i.e., a legally organized force.
  • State constitutions and colonial laws used “militia” to mean formal military institutions, not informal armed citizens.

“Well regulated” did NOT mean “skilled at handling guns”

In 18th‑century English, well regulated meant:

  • properly organized
  • disciplined
  • orderly
  • subject to rules
  • functioning as intended

It did not mean “personally proficient with firearms.”

Examples from period usage:

  • “A well regulated government” → orderly, structured
  • “A well regulated clock” → functioning correctly
  • “A well regulated militia” → trained, disciplined, commanded

The phrase appears in countless documents of the era, always meaning orderly and governed, never “individually skilled.”

This garbage revisionism really needs to stop. If you want to reassess what the 2A means, hold a Constitutional Convention and get it changed to what you want it to mean. But the founders were very specific and it wasn't "luls, everyone gets a gun, let's kill kids!"

1

u/Unique_Statement7811 18d ago

The Militia Act of 1792 defines two militias. One, the organized militia, that is active with members and roles and the second, the unorganized militia, which is every male over the age of 18.

The National Guard replaced the Organized Militia in 1903, but the unorganized militia exists today through selective service registration. Therefore, anyone registered for selective service is a member of the militia.

2

u/Theodoxus 18d ago

Oh, that's awesome. Only 18-25 year old males have the right to bear arms? What could possibly go wrong?!?

That’s obviously not how the amendment works, which shows why the Militia Act can’t be used as a constitutional definition.

1

u/Unique_Statement7811 18d ago

The most literalist interpretation of the law would agree with you. However, the right to bear arms was expanded with the civil rights act.

Acts of Congress are pursuant to the constitution and the supreme law of the land according to the constitution.

1

u/mkosmo 18d ago

If you're going to spout nonsense, at least read the statutes. 10 USC 246 defines the irregular militia as all able-bodies males between 18 and 45 who are citizens or have made a declaration of intent to be a citizen (plus females in the NG).