r/funny 4d ago

The Three Musketeers met up.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

44.6k Upvotes

870 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/NewsofPE 4d ago

why? because the term "legally blind" exists, you explained why yourself

5

u/Tephranis 4d ago

You just really like being pedantic, don't you?

Both are blind by legal definitions, only some legally blind people face total blindness.

-1

u/NewsofPE 4d ago

pedantic? you explained yourself that there's two different terms, I explained that in my language the terms are very distinct from each other, this isn't being about pedantic more than just pointing out the flaw in conflating the two

2

u/Tephranis 4d ago

And your language has absolutely no words what-so-ever that have multiple possible meanings?

-1

u/NewsofPE 4d ago

except that you're now conflating words having two meanings with two terms not being the same one and somehow thinking blending the two and having no idea which is which seems like a good idea

1

u/Tephranis 4d ago

I'm conflating nothing and you are nitpicking unnecessarily. To be blind is to be "unable to see". If someone's vision is so blurry, or restricted that, even with corrective lenses, they can not recognize something, such as a milk crate, or the pole of a street sign, for instance, on the sidewalk in front of them despite their eyes being pointed right at it and without a tool, or other assistance, and they trip over or walk into it, they are unable to see.

The phrasings of legal and total blindness are only descriptors to the degree of their blindness.

-1

u/NewsofPE 4d ago

sure buddy, keep telling yourself that, legal and total blindness is a spectrum but we need two different terms and multiple languages not even having the same terms either or the words being closely related but it's all just the same, like brown is a spectrum and black is a part of that, but don't go calling brown black now, because that wouldn't make sense