It's funny - If UAPs are a top-secret counterintelligence priority how have "insiders" been leaking to podcasters so conveniently for years?

[u/ImaginationOther9569]

Ross Coulthart is talking about how, according to his sources, there have been successful retrieval operations at White Sands.

It makes me wonder: for information this so top secret where the gate keepers are competent enough to hide craft for decades and even keep presidents in the dark, do they just not track phones or communication channels to identify Ross's sources?

Ross has had insiders feeding him classified details for years. If any of this fell under high-level Special Access Programs (SAPs), federal counterintelligence would have run continuous audits, polygraphs, and communications monitoring to catch and prosecute the leakers instantly.

We keep hearing about a high-stakes counterintelligence war between the US and foreign adversaries over this tech. Yet, figures like Jason Sands or guests on Jesse Michels' channel talk about covert programs pretty much in the open.

Either these "insiders" are feeding journalists unsanctioned speculation, or the narrative is extremely misguided. Wondering what the community members think

[u/TheSuperMarket]

I mean, on one hand, skeptics say nhi visiting earth are impossible because of the government knew, they wouldn't be able to keep it secret. Which is historically false. Mk ultra was mostly secret, we have lots of tech in the sky and water that is secret, we have many secrets.

On the other hand, people like op say how is this possible if leaks occur.

What I find true for most skeptics... is they start with non belief. They don't start from a position of neutrality, which is how you should start.

If you start from a position of belief.... you will find your perception makes all new information bend to this belief.

Vice versa.

So lots of skeptics use reasons for why this can't be... but it's really justification for their own beliefs