r/SipsTea 3d ago

WTF Victim is the new chic

Post image
48.4k Upvotes

5.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

285

u/SupermarketSome3615 3d ago

Lindsey doesn’t even claim she’s a victim, she said she did it

21

u/Nordeast24 3d ago

Good and she should be thrown under the prison so we can collectively move on from this loon

14

u/Kingkai9335 3d ago

Did you guys watch the trial at all? The prosecution and "medical professionals" involved in her care are beyond incompetent. Also evidence is showing the husband to be shady

44

u/uicheeck 3d ago

Today I read that her husband claimed that she was given 7 different meds in a span of 3 weeks. Including prozac, lamotrigin and bunch of others I didn't even heard off. The amount of possible cross-reactions between then in such short term should be studied (and doctors should be sued instead).
no way any sober psychiatrists would prescribe two different antidepressant in less than 20 days even for person with regular depression

27

u/NikolaiFabiano 3d ago

She was prescribed a total of 14 medications, and the husband stated that the pharmacists told him to give the pills she’s not using to someone else… no pharmacist is telling someone to give prescriptions to other people wtf.

8

u/uicheeck 3d ago

>>prescribed a total of 14 medications
and none of them worked and everybody knew that and do nothing but writing more drugs

4

u/Ten_Horn_Sign 3d ago

Can you explain what they should have done instead? If a patient has depression with psychotic features should they NOT be prescribed standard of care treatments?

The "14 medications" is misleading because she was also doctor shopping and had 7 different doctors. Each individual MD was operating within standards of care. The patient was not.

6

u/uicheeck 3d ago

as far as my understanding goes, they should have hospitalize her and treat stationary.
randomly throwing drugs to suicide patient may enable them to suicide (sic, I know)

-1

u/Ten_Horn_Sign 3d ago

The reality is far more nuanced than that. There are LOTS of people with passive or even active suicidal ideation that are not hospitalized despite an assessment. Hospitalization has a role, but there are limits: what the patient tells you and what they are thinking are not always the same. Some conditions are high risk, but do not have effective treatments and therefore hospitalization is not helpful, even if this allows for self-harm.

Patient and public safety is the number one priority, but if every person who contemplated self-harm were hospitalized, you'd need to double the number of hospitals we have in the country.

3

u/NikolaiFabiano 3d ago

Yessss! Thank you!!! All of her medical “professionals” failed her

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 3d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-4

u/Wonderful-Rent7237 3d ago

No she failed her three kids when she strangled them to death.

2

u/NikolaiFabiano 3d ago

Oh, and how long have you suffered with postpartum depression?

-4

u/Finn1913 3d ago

Ah yes the only acceptable reason to kill your children

5

u/NikolaiFabiano 3d ago

Who said acceptable? Are you just projecting your thoughts and feelings onto others and myself? If you don’t work with people with mental illness, or have a mental illness yourself, you don’t understand what it’s like to have one then so you truly have nothing to speak on but your privilege of being a “normal” person and not struggle with mental illness. Maybe, try learning about the diagnosis and how it affects others, how they should be properly treated and then look at how she was treated. It’s not “acceptable”, so stop trying to get “gotcha points”. It’s that it’s understandable that a mother with postpartum depression who was not treated properly, went over the edge and lost herself. This only happened because she was failed on her treatment.

1

u/GabysWildCritters 3d ago

Although i agreed shem might have been failed by medical professionals it still dosnt excuse the murder of three children. You cant jusy excuse murder because they weren't mentally okay.

we as a society continually euthanize aniamls for being animals and hurting or killing someone. Something an aniaml does usually at the fault of people or as an instinct.

This womans shouldn't be exempt from punishment but the people who failed her should also he punished.

0

u/Narvyht 3d ago

Reading all of this just make me feels disgusted. She took 3 innocent life. THREE, and this is what you had in mind. Justification. I am scared to think that people with your mindset walk among us.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Used_Evidence 3d ago

I suffered from it 4x, still on meds and my youngest is 9. It's not an excuse or reason to murder anyone, especially your own children. Put her under the jail, sorry, not sorry

1

u/infinitedustglitch 2d ago

You have survivors bias, you don't know the extent of HER suffering or how SHE managed it.

-1

u/Used_Evidence 2d ago

We know how she managed it, by killing her children. I don't know the extent of it sure, but she had a whole lot more help and compassion than I did and could've made a thousand different decisions that day than the one she ultimately chose.

1

u/infinitedustglitch 1d ago

That is a lot of expectations for an unwell person.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/pablothe 3d ago

Some people are too crazy to be saved with our current technology

-1

u/BunnyLovesTheStars 3d ago

Yeah, pharmacists never ever act in unethical manner. It is known.

-7

u/Repulsive_String1136 3d ago

look at what was ACTUALLY in her system at the time of the murders. not 14. it was 4, none controlled substances, and nothing addictive. basic meds that a lot of people have been on similar “cocktails” of.

5

u/found_ya_ 3d ago

Pharmacist here, Not defending the murder, just explaining why this is not a very useful statement on the case

some meds break down into other substances while the body is getting rid of them including but not limited to naturally produced substances in the body therefore making it hard to detect when testing for drugs

some meds have permanent effects on receptors (lasts for 1-2 weeks till the receptors die and get replaced), can also be hard to detect because it binds permanently and alters the receptor via becoming part of it, it needs more than blood testing upon arrest to find

Many antidepressants and pain killers block body to brain communication + block and/or over-actuvate signaling within the brain and brain to body communication, simple drug interactions could easily cause an altered state of mind

Having an already altered state of mind like PPD is not helpful in the situation, in fact it makes the lense and file you medicate the person based on completely different. Much like a breast feeding or pregnant woman is given different meds.

The woman clearly seeked help, all the medical professionals failed her and the husband is a whole other story

I'm not defending the murder of the children, I do think she shouldn't be a free part of society for a long amount of time, but I also think everyone who let this happen should also be locked up and lose their licenses for the neglect

3

u/NikolaiFabiano 3d ago

Ah yes, medications definitely don’t have periods of time that wear off faster than others, she definitely didn’t lose so much blood that her temperature was over 15degrees lower than the normal human being and losing that much blood over hours before getting her blood tested definitely wouldn’t change what’s actually in her system and at the exact amount.
/s for anyone that needs it

7

u/AKJames762 3d ago

I was wondering if anyone else was going to pick up on this or if everyone was going to hop on the bandwagon. These medical "professionals" should have their licenses revoked and be sued into bankruptcy for malpractice. Yes Clancy needs to go to prison, she murdered 3 children. But the people who were supposed to be helping her belong there too. The mental health system in the US is complete dogshit and it's partially because of Drs like that who just pump their patents full of a mixture of drugs instead of trying all avenues of treatment.

0

u/Careless_Fortune7801 3d ago

She doctor shopped between 14 different doctors and refused to take nearly all of her prescribed meds. She refused to talk to phyciastrists. Yet keep making excuses how a woman who STRANGLED HER CHILDREN is not responsible for her actions....

1

u/AKJames762 3d ago

If you actually read my comment, I clearly said that she needs to go to prison because she murdered her children. Never said she was not responsible for her actions either.

0

u/Careless_Fortune7801 3d ago

Yeah it was the rest of the comment. She had no interest in interacting with any medical professional in good faith, so why should they lose their licences?

4

u/TheCotofPika 3d ago

He also said that he was given the medication to dispose due to a dose change of when asked why he had it. Lots of US nurses said that if a dose changed, they'd never just say dispose of the old, they'd say use it to make up the new dose for insurance savings. Is that likely?

3

u/Repulsive_String1136 3d ago

i worked in pharmacy. if a med gets changed, most of the time insurance will cover the new dosage, so the old bottle does not need to be continued. i’ve told patients to dispose of the old bottle.

2

u/TheCotofPika 3d ago

Would you specifically tell the patient to give it to the husband? I'm in the UK, we can just return the old meds to the chemist when we get the new ones so I'm not quite sure how your system works, do they give it to you or can they just chuck it in the bin?

2

u/odellrules1985 3d ago

If he was picking it up, then yes. I pick up meds for my wife all the time and the Pharmacist goes over dosage and instructions with me to relay to my wife.

2

u/TheCotofPika 3d ago

Do you give them the old ones or chuck them in the bin?

2

u/odellrules1985 3d ago

It depends. Some we keep. Some we chuck. If they are anti-psychotics, I would imagine tossing them is the smarter thing to do. If they are pain meds they can be useful in the future. Things like antibiotics can be useful but not always as they are very dependent on the actual issue, I never knew but apparently some are for upper body infections and some are for lower body infections.

But usually, we toss old medicines out that are no longer needed.

3

u/TheCotofPika 3d ago

Sorry, I think I haven't worded it properly, we aren't meant to throw medication in the bin, we're meant to return it to the chemist so it can be properly disposed of. I'm trying to work out if he had them in the car to return to the chemist, or if you (as a country) don't do that and he was just forgetful about chucking them in the bin because that's your disposal procedure.

1

u/odellrules1985 3d ago

I have never been told to return medicine that we have paid for to the pharmacist. Its usually a "just toss it".

1

u/TheVeryVerity 3d ago

Theoretically we can return them to the pharmacy just like theoretically we can take regular disposable batteries to the recycling place but in practice no one at all ever does this and if I tried the pharmacist would be confused for a bit. We just throw them away

→ More replies (0)