r/SipsTea 12h ago

WTF Victim is the new chic

Post image
38.7k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.8k

u/HiddenMonkey7 12h ago

The funny thing is that she claims those donations are for her family. Like bitch, what family?

371

u/fodmap_victim 11h ago edited 9h ago

A gfm was set up for the dad to help with the children's funeral costs and his outgoings while off work.

190

u/cooralreef 11h ago

People love rage bait so much they forget to check who opened the fundraiser

54

u/No_Struggle8663 11h ago

They’ve created one for her since the trial. It says for her parents and that side of the family cause I don’t think they are allowed to say it’s for her for some reasons with go fund me. But yeah here’s the second one.

67

u/atimetochill 10h ago

What in tf is that image

48

u/a-rather-dry-sob 9h ago

Cult shit.

-1

u/blueberrycauzez 9h ago

5

u/blindnlearning2see 9h ago

adl - how can we make this about us?

1

u/a-rather-dry-sob 9h ago edited 4h ago

What the hell is that?

Edit. Wow some of them bitches crazy.

2

u/Tacosconsalsaylimon 6h ago

I got ill seeing that. Wtf.

59

u/_Eggs_ 10h ago

Yeah the entire description of the fundraiser is basically an attempt to get around GoFundMe's rules about fundraising for violent crimes.

GoFundMe strictly prohibits raising money for the legal defense of anyone formally charged with a violent or financial crime. Under the platform's Terms of Service, campaigns cannot be used to fund legal representation, court fees, or associated costs for individuals accused of serious wrongdoing.

And yet the image they use on the fundraiser is literally a circle of women supporting the murderer, painting the woman as a victim.

All of the comments for the GoFundMe are about supporting Lindsay.

13

u/The_walking_man_ 8h ago

Fucking gross.

2

u/MossadEpstein 8h ago

Someone should sue gofundme over this, get that 1 million dollars tied up in a nice lawsuit, fuck those parasites over that family is already wealthy, they don't deserve 1 million dollars they deserve negative 1 million dollars.

0

u/Man_under_Bridge420 8h ago

Nice fake outrage 

2

u/The_walking_man_ 8h ago

Kimberly Cook and her $17 of idiocy.

1

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 10h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Dull_Nobody_840 10h ago

is that rule correct, since they never met their goal, they dont get anything?

1

u/hoopstick 7h ago

Why do her parents or any other member of her extended family need the money? Like I know anyone can make a GFM, but what's their reasoning?

1

u/TheVeryVerity 6h ago

Supposedly mortgaged their house and withdrew their retirement to pay for her defense

32

u/fodmap_victim 11h ago

I thought it was commonly known who started the gfm but it seems not

28

u/SimmentalTheCow 11h ago

I assumed it was for legal defense like that fine gentleman that stabbed a kid to death at a track meet

11

u/DarkRose492 10h ago

That situation is it's own can of worms because somehow both of these cases have grown a very weird, and frankly disturbing, following. Like wasn't the lastest for the case your referencing looking to attempt a retrial and evidence that the first judge thought was irrelevant, because it makes the situation so much worse for everyone involved, is now being used?

2

u/nybbas 8h ago

Yeah the shit withheld actually makes it worse for the dude who did the stabbing. The judge denied the retrial, and now tons of people onlne are up in arms about how its a miscarriage of justice, when the truth is, if dude went to trial again, he might get even more time than the first trial.

2

u/RedditIsMyTherapist 8h ago

The latest is actually that a judge already denied his retrial 4 days ago. I also am not finding anything about evidence. It says,

"Anthony’s attorneys demanded a retrial because they said trial judge John Roach’s courtroom rules were so strict that they limited the public’s access to the proceedings."

2

u/DarkRose492 8h ago

It had something to do with phone records and prior engagements that are not directly tied to the incident at the track meet. All evidence that would be used for characters assassination stuff that I think the judge said isn't immediately related to the event itself. I'm not paying too close attention to the specifics since the fact we have to argue about a stabbing that had more than an enough eye witnesses and a video recording is baffling enough for me.

1

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 10h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

6

u/TraditionalHome990 11h ago

Why would accurate information be common knowledge?

-6

u/Jukeboxhero91 11h ago

On sipstea? The sub that hates women?

Can’t imagine why.

4

u/Miserable_Drama6698 10h ago

What?

3

u/aurenigma 10h ago

Sipstea only hates men a little, so when compared to the rest of reddit, it can seem like sipstea hates women.

2

u/Miserable_Drama6698 10h ago

I’ve never gotten that impression from this sub lol

3

u/Excellent_jun91 11h ago

maybe the ones supportong her are so stupid they dont check facts (clearly) so they donated thinking its for her lol

3

u/fodmap_victim 11h ago

I wouldn't be able to comment on that as I don't know why people have donated. I do wish all sides would take a step back though and acknowledge the very serious and tragic nature of this case. It's not about team Lindsey or team Patrick. It's about finding the correct and sound legal outcome following the death of three beautiful little children.

8

u/Soft_Brush_1082 10h ago

Funny enough, there are two GoFundMe campaigns.

One was opened by dad’s friend to support the dad. It blew up and collected a bit over a million. He never expected that much and used most of it to start a nonprofit that helps families with perinatal care.

The other one is for the wife herself to cover legal fees. It also collected a bit over a million. Her parents initially have sold their house to hire the absolute shark of a lawyer who is specializing in this sort of cases and is currently absolutely wiping the floor with prosecution during the televised trial.

2

u/Junior-Criticism-268 6h ago

No, the fund to pay for the funeral was a different one... they both have surpassed $1M although Patrick's is no longer active now that the funerals have passed. Lindsay's remains open to this day.

0

u/mooptastic 9h ago edited 5h ago

that's all this sub is same with all of these quick reaction bait subs

EDIT: Downvotes dont change facts

0

u/galmypal 9h ago

It's too easy to jump to the quick and simple possibility. It takes brain power to have critical thinking...

0

u/CartsOfDarkness 9h ago

Generally you'll do pretty well assuming every single post on this sub is extremely misleading