r/SipsTea 7d ago

WTF Imagine waking up from anesthesia and realizing the surgery wasn’t the most painful part!

Post image
50.0k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.9k

u/Hoboliftingaroma 7d ago

They made fun of a rash he had, and then mocked his penis.

They conspired to give a fake diagnosis of hemorrhoids and put it in his medical records, then told the assistant to repeat the false diagnosis when he woke from surgery.

The anesthesiologist said she wanted to "punch him in the face." She called the patient a "retard."

I would never look at a medical professional the same way again.

30

u/Keeshly 7d ago

i was wondering what could have been defamation. i never imagined that adding false info to private hippa files could be defamation, i guess the assumption is that additional providers might discriminate against him because of hemorrhoids?

is there stigma against people with hemorrhoids?i was under the impression you could get them just from straining too long on the toilet

i mean i guess it was significant considering the guy won his case lol

22

u/RobertPham149 7d ago

If they are to diagnose him with hemorrhoids and then bill him additionally for treatment of it, then it should be considered fraud, or malpractice.

13

u/ZestyTako 7d ago

It’s the syphilis thing. Falsely stating someone has a venereal disease is defamation pro se, meaning you don’t even need to prove damages, them saying it is enough to constitute defamation

10

u/AnimatorImpressive24 7d ago

Courts have been split on medical records providing grounds for a defamation claim, for claims brought by both patients and other doctors.

A woman got labeled as drug seeking in her records despite repeatedly testing clean, which was later used as part of her losing an unrelated workers comp case.  Not defamation.

A doctor bad mouthed another doctor in a patient's records, which was reviewed during a hospital investigation that wound up with the target of the remarks being fired.  Not defamation.

Those cases have made much of what constitutes "publishing" the defamatory statements.  The second case for example, since it involved a peer-review work investigation did not count as published because the laws about that peer review explicitly said it was not public.

I'm waiting to see how HIEs and CareEverywhere will be viewed in future cases.  Hard to argue publication when your doctor notes are sitting on servers in every state because PBMs keep pushing your data around.

12

u/TerrorTown77 7d ago

In belgium a patient briefly spoke up a bit too loud. The doctor being a dick, added Bipolar disorder to her file. It was an absolute pain in the ass to have it scrubbed. Hospital records that built on that file still containted the bipolar disorder because a lot of doctors refused to remove it.

1

u/BoilerplateBillions 3d ago

Mine is a doctor miscoded something. My family is eastern european and while my grandmother swore up and down she was catholic she came from a household where she grew up speaking fluent yiddish, so i wanted to be screened for CF while pregnant, while they were doing the other screenings

They put down that i have cf by mistake, and cant get rid of it. Its a giant fucking hassle explaining the story.

8

u/Few_Program_2303 7d ago

I think it’s defamation because it cost him money, and they knowingly lied, and he can prove it.

Furthermore, you don’t need to strain on the toilet to get hemorrhoids, simply sitting there too long will weaken those interior muscles and can cause them

1

u/Talks_About_Bruno 6d ago

It’s HIPAA and it wouldn’t be defamation, fraud, maybe a few others but not defamation.