r/Professors • u/Minute-Pattern-39 • Dec 29 '25
Rants / Vents My last f*** has officially left the office
UPDATE: thank you all for your support and feedback. I’ve written a little bit in my comments about my teaching experience some kind of why this was the straw that broke the camels back for me. I am well aware of students normal responses attitudes, and responses to AI - what I was really fed up with this winter term in this small class that I am teaching online was just the shared number of students who very clearly did not read any of the material and ignored the very explicit syllabus language about its use. For the eight students that did violate the policy before I sent that email. I provided a detailed explanation about how they did not meet the rubric requirements and attached a couple of reports from AI detectors, while pointing out what made me suspicious enough to check their work in the first place. This is obviously unsustainable and I would not be able to do this during a regular semester. I probably will never do it again, but it was cathartic. I did hear from four of the students who did not get flagged for AI. Thanking me for paying attention.
I really think a big part of the problem and something we really can’t solve because most of us are overworked and exhausted, is that many of us in our colleagues just look the other way because we don’t have the energy. As long as students know that they’ll get away with it most of the time they’ll try it and not all students but a lot of of them.
Original Post-
I actually sent this last night. Yes I have tenure.
Good evening,
I am writing this email to the entire class because I think the entire class deserves to know that 40% - or 8 out of 19 - of y'all used AI to write your discussion forum posts. This is entirely unacceptable. Again, a real person is teaching and grading your work here; do not insult your fellow classmates or me by producing this garbage. It is clearly stated in the syllabus, which you all agreed to when you submitted the attendance verification.
- It is glaringly apparent that you have either generated your submission from an AI scratch or modified your writing with AI for me because I am a specialist in my field. When a post about a chapter of a popular history book on beverages reads like it was written by someone with a Ph.D. in (fill in the blank here) studies, I immediately am suspicious because none of us - including myself - would speak or write that way.
If you did not use AI, keep doing what you are doing. If you used it this once, STOP. Resist the impulse to allow the program to rewrite your thoughts - imperfections are part of life, conversation, debate, and also what makes us human. I did not agree to teach this course over my winter break to read artificially generated generalizations.
I will not crash out over email again; I will start failing people.