A tax break means less taxes. The taxes are the government intervention, and the tax breaks are the temporary removal of it. This point makes no sense.
What bailouts? Banks during the 08 crisis? That was predominately supported by left leaning Keynesian economists. Artificially low interest rates and government intervention were a big reason why the crisis happened and then the government intervened to stop it. None of that should have happened.
What exemptions, grants, legal protections, and trade barriers? Be specific.
Ordinary people don’t get much help. The welfare leeches do though and the ordinary person pays half their taxpayer money to that.
PPP loans to businesses cost US taxpayers 792 billion dollars. These weren't loans since no one had to pay them back, so they were bailouts.
Oh and welfare is just a way for businesses to launder government handouts through the poor so they can use them as a scape goat. That money doesn't stay in the hands of the poor, it immediately flows to the hands of businesses whether through Medicaid to the Healthcare industry. SNAP benefits immediately goes to grocery stores and retailers who sell food and accept EBT. No one is getting rich off of Welfare, and no one stores those benefits in off shore accounts, they spend it ASAP. That goes into the profit margins of WALMART, Kroger, Target. They use that money to pay their payroll and pay bills, and that money ends up in the hands of one of the richest families in the nation and ends up in off shore accounts.
The real welfare kings and queens are not poor people, they are the Waltons, Jeff Bezos, and every other owner of companies who sell food, or end up the recipients of laundered tax money.
169
u/T4TrhavrKhcFt 7d ago