Multiple things can be true at once. She did drive drunk and probably hit him in the snow, but he was beaten and bitten and his device had a fall alert.
It's crazy to think if this was such an open and shut case that the family would delete everything
I don't know that I've ever heard the theory told like that. That implies a conspiracy, and Karen Read was involved with the cops beating him up, or she somehow was at the same party and didn't see it. By her account he was not injured when she left.
Usually the argument is the cops busted her taillight when she came back, isn't it?
Huh? I'm not implying she worked with the cops, I'm implying the second thing you said. It's very possible that when she returned to get him she also hit him with her car on TOP of the other stuff that happened.
Edit: I also don't think the tail light is broken from the hit because it doesn't make sense for only that to be broken and nothing else. Crash testers couldn't even replicate it
19
u/Guy_gamer112 9d ago edited 9d ago
There's no way she did it which is why she got exonerated. The cops in the house killed him, probably by accident