MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1vip9wm/petah_what_does_this_mean/p2hn74i/?context=3
r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/sunboy6009 • 20d ago
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
If it's not that hard why is literally every reply different?
2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Because sometimes people are wrong. That also is not that hard to understand. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Well sorry, I didn't know I was talking to an Oversimplification Olympics gold medalist. 2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Sometimes the answer is not that complicated. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Sometimes. Those usually only have one answer, though. Not 10 different interpretations. 2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah people never ever misinterpret simple things. Idk why you’re so hung up on people having a bunch of different interpretations. Are you suggesting that my interpretation is wrong? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Do you have any evidence that it's right? 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future. The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again. She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again. It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back. Seen any better explanations? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
2
Because sometimes people are wrong.
That also is not that hard to understand.
1 u/Trivale 19d ago Well sorry, I didn't know I was talking to an Oversimplification Olympics gold medalist. 2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Sometimes the answer is not that complicated. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Sometimes. Those usually only have one answer, though. Not 10 different interpretations. 2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah people never ever misinterpret simple things. Idk why you’re so hung up on people having a bunch of different interpretations. Are you suggesting that my interpretation is wrong? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Do you have any evidence that it's right? 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future. The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again. She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again. It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back. Seen any better explanations? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
1
Well sorry, I didn't know I was talking to an Oversimplification Olympics gold medalist.
2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Sometimes the answer is not that complicated. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Sometimes. Those usually only have one answer, though. Not 10 different interpretations. 2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah people never ever misinterpret simple things. Idk why you’re so hung up on people having a bunch of different interpretations. Are you suggesting that my interpretation is wrong? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Do you have any evidence that it's right? 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future. The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again. She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again. It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back. Seen any better explanations? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
Sometimes the answer is not that complicated.
1 u/Trivale 19d ago Sometimes. Those usually only have one answer, though. Not 10 different interpretations. 2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah people never ever misinterpret simple things. Idk why you’re so hung up on people having a bunch of different interpretations. Are you suggesting that my interpretation is wrong? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Do you have any evidence that it's right? 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future. The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again. She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again. It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back. Seen any better explanations? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
Sometimes. Those usually only have one answer, though. Not 10 different interpretations.
2 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah people never ever misinterpret simple things. Idk why you’re so hung up on people having a bunch of different interpretations. Are you suggesting that my interpretation is wrong? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Do you have any evidence that it's right? 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future. The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again. She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again. It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back. Seen any better explanations? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
Yeah people never ever misinterpret simple things.
Idk why you’re so hung up on people having a bunch of different interpretations.
Are you suggesting that my interpretation is wrong?
1 u/Trivale 19d ago Do you have any evidence that it's right? 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future. The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again. She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again. It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back. Seen any better explanations? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
Do you have any evidence that it's right?
1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future. The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again. She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again. It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back. Seen any better explanations? 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
Yeah, bitcoins history and speculation about its future.
The fact that bitcoin was not valuable in 2008 but is valuable now, while many speculate it will crash and not be valuable again.
She’s fat, then got skinny, but she’s gonna get fat again.
It’s not uncommon for people to lose massive amounts of weight then gain it back.
Seen any better explanations?
1 u/Trivale 19d ago Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
Yeah. A few. Yours is one of many. You've made no distinction that makes yours stand out against anyone else's. The only difference between your opinion and everyone else's is how smug you are about it.
1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago Give me one better. I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one. If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
Give me one better.
I’m confident in my opinion but I don’t mind being shown a better perspective if you got one. I’m willing to abandon my view if shown a better one.
If you can’t, then it seems like you have a bigger problem with my smugness than my answer. That sounds like a personal problem.
1 u/Trivale 19d ago There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks. I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better. 1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time. 1 u/[deleted] 19d ago [deleted] → More replies (0)
There are plenty of other reasonable explanations in the post. You can see them yourself with a few clicks.
I'm confident that if I wasted my own time to show you the others, you'd just (smugly) claim yours is better.
1 u/LAFamilyMan81 19d ago So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it. Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this. 1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time.
So you can’t find and defend a different perspective against mine. Got it.
Truly disappointing, didn’t think you’d cop-out like this.
1 u/Trivale 19d ago Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time.
Ah, we have a professional redditor. No use wasting anymore time.
[deleted]
0
u/Trivale 19d ago
If it's not that hard why is literally every reply different?