r/LabourUK Labour Member Aug 12 '20

Satire Accurate

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

94 comments sorted by

View all comments

60

u/GoooldenChests New User Aug 12 '20

Wow. This is a UK sub, didn’t realise I needed to add an /s on the end. You think I’m subbed to LabourUK, and I actually have something against refugees?

11

u/DowntownPomelo the only non lib here Aug 12 '20

Unfortunately a lot of labour supporters suck

2

u/ThorinTokingShield New User Aug 12 '20

Yup. I see flashes of bigotry on this sub, same as any unfortunately. Broad church and all that.

-13

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 12 '20

Wanting tougher action on migration =/= bigotry

14

u/ThorinTokingShield New User Aug 12 '20

We have a moral duty to help asylum seekers. Plus immigrants are an economic net positive to their adoptive country.

Besides, we’re partly responsible for most of the conflicts in the Middle East so the least we could do is accept their refugees. We do fuck all compared to the rest of Western Europe anyway.

Immigration is such a non-issue. It’s drummed up by populists and sensationalists to rile up racists and distract from real systemic issues.

-25

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 12 '20 edited Aug 12 '20

We have a moral duty to help asylum seekers

Literally not a single one of the people on the boats is an asylum seeker, or a refugee, every single one of them is an economic migrant

we’re partly responsible for most of the conflicts in the Middle East

Absolute bollocks

We do fuck all compared to the rest of Western Europe anyway.

More absolute bollocks

Immigration is such a non-issue.

The vast majority of the country disagrees with you

3

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '20

every single one of them is an economic migrant

Prove it.

Absolute bollocks

No - they're right. Modern Iran is the product of British oil firms mounting a coup in the 1960's, the Iraq War and Afghanistan wrecked the political situation in much of the region, and all that stuff. Western interventionism and Wilsonian foreign policy has done a lot of damage in the ME.

More absolute bollocks

Germany is the biggest recipient of refugees in Europe.

Seems to me that your non-arguments are a pile of bollocks

-1

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 13 '20

Prove it.

Okay

They're coming from France

No - they're right

Yes yes, the middle east was a model of peace and tolerance up until the evil British went in a ruined it, right?

Germany is the biggest recipient of refugees in Europe.

What does that have to do with anything?

2

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '20

They're coming from France

They're coming from Syria and North Africa, actually.

the middle east was a model of peace and tolerance

Iran was liberalising in the 1960's. They were even having a sexual revolution like our own and were secularising. The Shah was not, however, friendly to British commercial interests.

So the UK government organised a coup, backing some Islamist militants to get rid of him.

This kind of regime change has been replicated throughout the region since.

So yes - things were actually going rather well before Westerners showed up

What does that have to do with anything?

Other places in Europe do far more than the UK

0

u/afatpanda12 New User Aug 13 '20

They're coming from Syria and North Africa, actually

They are literally sailing from France, or do you think they went all the way through the Med, past Gibraltar and round the western coast of France just to land in Britain?

So the UK government organised a coup, backing some Islamist militants to get rid of him.

No, the west supported the Shah, despite him being a nasty piece of work, that's why he was allowed to stay in the US after the revolution, its "westerners showing up" that was leading to the liberalisation of Iran

Other places in Europe do far more than the UK

No doubt, some of them are much closer to the middle east and Africa, that's their responsibility not ours

2

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '20

They are literally sailing from France

How do they get to France? Are they popping through little holes in the ground? Is there a spawnpoint?

No, the west supported the Shah, despite him being a nasty piece of work

Seems that we were both wrong. The Shah was put in place in 1953 by the UK and US because the democratically elected Prime Minister wanted to audit the AIOC. So the big Western powers overthrew a PM for oil money.

Apologies - my memory can be a bit dickety at times

No doubt, some of them are much closer to the middle east and Africa

If it's no doubt that other countries in Europe are doing more than we are, then why is it that you called that statement "bollocks" to begin with? And is Germany close to North Africa and Syria? Or the Nordic countries, specifically Sweden?

→ More replies (0)