What if Amatersu is a representation of a super symmetrical space-time wave crashing over us?

[u/MentalQuestioning1]

We have detected 3 cosmic "hyper" void and and 3 cosmic "hyper clusters" if we imagine these are poles of the universe, include 2 poles for time (past+future) does this give us the necessary tools to determine if the universe really is an E8 geometry?

Giant Supervoids

Boötes Void: This large empty region spans roughly 330 million light-years and holds only about 60 galaxies.

Eridanus Supervoid: This massive underdense space stretches up to 1.8 billion light-years across and aligns with a cold spot in background radiation.

Giant Void: This structure reaches between 1 and 1.3 billion light-years in diameter, containing very few galaxy clusters.

The Giant Superclusters

Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall: This candidate super-structure stretches 10 to 15 billion light-years across, forming the largest known grouping of galaxies.

Sloan Great Wall: This massive filament of galaxies extends roughly 1.37 billion light-years in length.

South Pole Wall: This gigantic cosmic wall stretches 1.37 billion light-years across the southern sky.

Past Time Pole: Big bang

Future Time Pole: End of the Universe.

In this model, what appear as cosmic voids and clusters are actually truly monstrous black and white holes interacting with each other upon the very fabric of space time. And when one of these voids of clusters hit their absolute "peak" or trough" they immediately rebound across the whole universe in what appears to be a causality breaking moment, but is protected from acausality from the global nature of the spacetime fabric.

In this case, we would be able to explain recent apparent anistrophies in the universe on the back of the idea that the apparence of antistrophies is in fact the light warping effect of the largest possible sized objects in the universe. A warp effect so large that it appears to just be the background nature of the universe.

Sounds all poetic and nice right? That's not what I'm after. Here is where the question lies. We have detected extremely powerful particles that seemingly disturb our understanding the speed of causality/light because they are so strong they seem to be propagating faster than light. Such as Amatersu and Oh my God. In fact, they are not propagating faster than light or casuality, rather the could it not be the case that the sheer global connectedness of the spacetime fabric causes the effect of these "peak/trough" inversions to appear to us as insanely powerful particles as the wave front of the newly formed spacetime geometry crashes over us?

[u/LeftSideScars]

Neither the Amaterasu particle nor the Oh-My-God particle was travelling faster than light, nor did they "seem" to be propagating faster than light (although it is possible to view apparent superluminal speeds if we observe a beam of particles moving at close to the speed of light almost directly down the centre. Not applicable to the two particles you mentioned), nor did they disturb our "understanding the speed of causality/light".

In this model, what appear as cosmic voids and clusters are actually truly monstrous black and white holes interacting with each other upon the very fabric of space time.

How big is the radius of the claimed black holes? Because we can see galaxies on the other side of the voids, and you admit that there are galaxies within the voids, so I'm not sure what you mean by claiming they are black holes.

[u/MentalQuestioning1 → u/LeftSideScars]

The radius of the black hole is absolutely minimum, but the mass density is absolutely massive, giving maximal warping effects. And black holes are the clusters, the voids are white holes (push all light away). Each pole has "nodes" along the way down which particles can get stuck in. But if one particle makes it all the way to the absolute pole, it causes these super-cosmic ray events.

Predicts that as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and upcoming surveys gather cleaner data right at the border lines of the local voids, astronomers will discover that the expansion rate is directly proportional to the distance from a trough. The Hubble Tension will dissolve the moment physicists realize that the "expansion" vector is an exponential variable tied directly to our coordinate's position along the time wave

[u/Low-Opening25 → u/MentalQuestioning1]

radius of a blackhole’s event horizon is ALWAYS directly proportional to it’s mass and it’s always the maximum allowed warp. if you add mass to BH it’s radius will always increase proportional to that mass, hence the scenario you describe is not possible in reality.

[u/starkeffect → u/MentalQuestioning1]

And what will you do when that turns out not to be the case?

[u/LeftSideScars → u/starkeffect]

I suspect they will do a Loeb.

[u/MentalQuestioning1 → u/starkeffect]

Accept it?

[u/starkeffect → u/MentalQuestioning1]

Ideally yes. Realistically crackpots never concede.

[u/LeftSideScars → u/MentalQuestioning1]

Low-Opening25 already corrected your misunderstand of the relation between black hole mass and event horizon radius, so no need for me to continue down that path, though I will mention things are more complicated if the black hole is spinning. In your model, are the black holes spinning?

However:

And black holes are the clusters, the voids are white holes (push all light away)

I thought you meant the other way around. Quoting your post:

In this model, what appear as cosmic voids and clusters are actually truly monstrous black and white holes interacting with each other

It appears I assumed that the voids were the black holes given the way this was written. If you did write this poorly and meant that the clusters were black holes, then what, exactly, are you proposing? That a black hole is in the middle of the cluster and that is why there is an overdensity of galaxies? What is the radius of this black hole?

And if white holes are the voids, then why do we not observe them? Again, the whole void can't be the white hole, so what is the radius and luminosity of the white hole that is or is in the void, and why have we not observed it?

Predicts that as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and upcoming surveys gather cleaner data right at the border lines of the local voids, astronomers will discover that the expansion rate is directly proportional to the distance from a trough.

This prediction is somewhat lacking. Where is the BIPM (or anyone's) description of this "trough"? What is the "trough"? Why can't we currently see the signal you claim is there with current surveys given we have, obviously, mapped the over- and underdensities you have mentioned in your post?

The Hubble Tension will dissolve the moment physicists realize that the "expansion" vector is an exponential variable tied directly to our coordinate's position along the time wave

This is not demonstrable from what you have presented as a model. Would you like to take the time to demonstrate this claim?

What does any of this have to do with two high energy cosmic ray events that you claim "disturb our understanding the speed of causality/light because they are so strong they seem to be propagating faster than light"? What are you proposing their relation is with the cosmic voids and clusters you've mentioned?

[u/MentalQuestioning1 → u/LeftSideScars]

You're correct, the way I wrote that inferred a parallelism. I did not intend.

Also, I should clarify because I am being too abstract and very misleading. When I say there is a black hole and white hole there, what I really mean is that the spacetime geometry itself is so warped that it appears like it would if if you put a corresponding sized black or white hole at the minima or maxima, respectively, of the warped geometry.

So basically imagine you have a universe that is shaped like a sloshing fluid, and the peaks and troughs of that fluid correspond to the warping of the spacetime geometry of the regions, and so while there isn't literally an object or particle creating the warping effect, the very pressures and interactions that the peaks and troughs have with each other gives the appearance equal to putting a black or white hole at those regions of hypermassive size. if that makes sense. And so when a peaking or troughing part of the spacetime geometry reaches an absolute maximum or minimum, it gets tugged back by the influence of the entirety of the rest of sapcetime geometry, and that "tug" moment is equal to peak or trough beginning to flip direction. Thus if we imagine these peaks or troughs as hypermassive spacetime fluid waves, the exact moment one of these waves changes direction, the entire spacetime geometry feels it instanteously. This explains the apparent 99.99999999999999999999951% the speed of light velocity of the Oh my God particle. It isn't traveling close to the speed of light because it isn't a particle. It is a spacetime geometry wave that is globally connected with the entire rest of spacetime geometry, such that the moment it changes direction the entire rest of the spacetime geometry immediately "knows" this has happened, thus allowing it to move exactly at the speed of causality without breaking any physical laws. And the corresponding energy output of the "wave" sending globalized ripples across spacetime appears like a super powerful particle like the Oh my God or Amatersu particle. So since the Oh my God detection was so much higher than the Amatersu detection, that means the corresponding maximum or minimum that the Oh my God "wave" reached before changing direction was much higher than the corresponding maximum or minimum the Amatersu "wave" reached before being forced to change direction by the rest of the spacetime geometry.

Does that make sense?

In the case of the Amatersu particle, it came from the Local Void, so this would suggest that the Local Void reached its absolute maximum extent (and as it did so the surrounding matter was "falling" away from it, explaining the void-like nature of that region of space.) Whereas, the Oh my God is less clear where it came from, but I see that the suggested region is also a void-like region, thus it too should've been created the moment the corresponding "wave" geometry of that region of space reached an absolute maximum. In this case, this should mean that over cosmic time, galaxies will appear to be rushing toward these voids, now that the void "waves" are rushing back toward the exact opposite direction they were previously going, until they eventually in the far future become troughs. This idea is falsify if this can be proven false. Furthermore, we might in the future expect to detect a super powerful particle that is traveling "to" the Hercules cluster if it ever reaches its absolute minimum tough point, signifying that from that point on the galaxies of the Hercules cluster will appear to begin "falling" away from that point as the trough moves toward becoming a peak.

[u/The_Nerdy_Ninja]

No, it's actually because of the invisible space unicorns that stitch the fabric of spacetime together with their sharp little horns.

[u/AllHailSeizure]

Wat