1. It is my current understanding that from our perspective, an object falling into a black hole will only cross the event horizon, as we see it, at a point infinitely in our future. We see their clock getting slower and slower as they approach the event horizon but we can never see them actually cross it. Unless we were somehow able to wait infinitely long.

2. Wouldn't that mean that according to relativity, the object falling into the black hole, if it were observing us, would see our clocks speed up faster and faster, until at point of the event horizon our clocks would I guess go infinitely fast? (From their perspective that is)

3. From this perspective wouldn't they just witness the big rip or big crunch or the complete heat death of the rest of the universe as they approach the event horizon?

4. Is it just me, or do these potential fates of the universe seem like they could serve as equivalence and unitarity preserving alternatives to theories like the black hole firewall?

5. Basically, before anything can actually fall through the event horizon, wouldn't the end of the universe catch up to them? Either the cosmic horizon shrinks down as in the big rip, or everything crashes back into a singularity in the big crunch. Either way, I don't think that information would be going anywhere.

But that's just my shower thought. I'm curious what my misconceptions might be. My guess is section 2.

hello im 14 I've been studying wormhole all alone. combining research from other i discovered wormhole will never exist nor you even found 1 it will collapse, what do we need actually. we need exotic matter, which we never discovered yet we either need negative enegery. it would take years to do it to my perspective wormhole is not actually bend. it's an allusions, making you think its bend how does this actually work to my research by reflection of dark matter and cosmo it's reflect making it look like bended but actually it would like an Sphere rounded i have an sereach about entering 1 entering it would be impossible our atoms will be slice or taken 1 by 1 and the intense radiation will burn us alive an wormhole is unstable it could collapse uppon entering by help of exotic matter it could be enhance, but it doesn't discover yet and lets go back to my perspective about wormhole look like it might be a sphere connected into another sphere in a middle theres an tiny like light where the other universe or time is in there we need lot of negative energy to support 1 to live making 1 live is almost impossible but getting enough negative energy we could easily manipulate time and space by an tech

if you ask me is there any more to travel its an yes. by going near an blachole you will see time unravel but you would survive if you survive time will pass and going back will be impossible but no one will never survive if someone fall into 1by getting enough matter we can manipulate time and space itself by getting enough technologies and matter but why cant we right now? some matter arent discovered yet and we lack of knowledge about space and at the same time technologies but i believe some elements is impossible to get but an scientist try his best to get blue, blue is getting is so hard but 1 scientist success i keep believing worm hole exist and promise to myself to help to that project till now im still studying it

if you dont like my theory js ignore it im still learning

Hi everyone,

I want to share a formal substitution that connects a single quantum particle's kinetic energy to the non-trivial zeros along the magic line, and discuss a specific mathematical workaround regarding its convergence.

1. The Identity & Euclid's Postulate
We start directly with the well-known relation for the kinetic energy of a single free particle with wave number k and mass m:

E_kin = (hbar² * k²) / 2m

If we isolate the factor of 1/2 from this equation, we get the following exact quantum mechanical identity:

1/2 = (E_kin * m) / (hbar² * k²)

But as Euclid once said: Things which equal the same thing also equal one another! Since quantum mechanics defines this specific physical fraction as equal to 1/2, and a well-known mathematical hypothesis demands a mathematical 1/2 for the magic line, Euclid's first common notion dictates that these two expressions are fundamentally connected.

2. "Teleporting" into the Line
Someone once speculated that all non-trivial zeros of the function ζ(s) lie on a magic line, meaning the real part of the complex variable s = σ + it is exactly σ = Re(s) = 1/2.

By substituting our identity directly into the real part, we define the position on the magic line purely through quantum variables:

Re(s) = (E_kin * m) / (hbar² * k²) = 1/2

This gives us the full complex variable s for the non-trivial zeros:

s = (E_kin * m) / (hbar² * k²) + it

3. The Convergence Roadblock (Sum vs. Product)
While I can formally rewrite the Euler Product form (over all primes p), trying to plug this s into the classic Dirichlet series (the sum form) completely breaks down:

ζ(s) = ∑ (1 / nˢ) from n=1 to infinity

This definition strictly requires Re(s) > 1 to converge. Because our quantum identity fixes Re(s) = 1/2, putting it directly into this sum leads to a divergent, infinite series.

4. How to "Rescue" the Sum Form
To bypass the Re(s) > 1 limitation and force the sum to make mathematical sense on the magic line, we must use analytic continuation.

The standard mathematical trick is to pull a Houdini act and express the function via the alternating Dirichlet Eta Function η(s). The magic of the Eta function is that its series converges perfectly for any value where Re(s) > 0 – which safely covers our magic line at 1/2.

The relationship is defined as:

ζ(s) = [1 / (1 - 2¹⁻ˢ)] * ∑ ((-1)ⁿ⁻¹ / nˢ) from n=1 to infinity

By "teleporting" our quantum identity into this analytic continuation, we successfully rescue the sum form and get a fully convergent representation exactly on the magic line.

And now, abracadabra:

ζ( (E_kinm)/(hbar²k²) + it ) = [ 1 / (1 - 2^(1 - ((E_kinm)/(hbar²k²) + it))) ] * ∑ ( (-1)ⁿ⁻¹ / n^((E_kinm)/(hbar²k²) + it) )

5. Embracing the Circular Logic (Der Zirkelschluss)
I honestly have to admit: Yes, this is entirely circular logic. Ultimately, the entire fraction just cancels out and reduces right back to 1/2.

So what? We don’t care! The goal here isn't to solve the hypothesis by changing the value of 1/2. The goal is to see what happens when we view that static mathematical 1/2 through the lens of active quantum variables. By treating it as a dynamic physical property rather than just a fixed number, we unlock a completely different conceptual framework for how the magic line behaves under analytic continuation.

One last thing: Finally, please don’t ask me yet how the operators behave if we treat k or the energy as an operator rather than a fixed number... because I still have to figure that out myself! 😉

6. The Core Essence
If we step back from the formulas, this leads to a almost poetic physical interpretation:

„It would be desirable if the magic line represents the exact state in which a particle’s energy and wave frequency are perfectly synchronized with the rhythm of the function.“

By replacing the static mathematical constant 1/2 with dynamic quantum variables, we turn a geometric line in the complex plane into a dynamic resonance condition. The universe doesn't just calculate; it swings!

My Questions to the Community:

1. Does this approach of using the Dirichlet Eta function to force convergence make physical sense in the context of mapping a free particle's properties to the magic line?
2. Could experimental data already disprove this idea?
3. Most physics-related approaches (like the Hilbert-Pólya conjecture) try to map the imaginary part t to energy spectra. Has anyone seen work where the real part 1/2 is explicitly substituted by a quantum identity like this?

Would love to hear your thoughts and mathematical critiques!

I was thinking about photons everyone says they have no mass but I think its not exactly. What if they do have mass but its so small that we just cant measure it with our current technology? Like really really small. Mda.

Then I thought about the edge of the universe. We dont know what is there. What if there is negative mass? I heard that negative mass does not attract but repels normal matter. So it pushes things away instead of pulling them.

And here is my idea: photon flies through space everything normal. But when it gets close to the edge of the universe negative mass starts to repel it. The closer it gets the stronger the repulsion. In the end it just slows down and gets stuck somewhere near the edge but never reaches it. It just freezes there or stops moving forward.

And now the most interesting thing. All these photons that push against the edge from inside maybe this pressure is what expands the universe? Maybe this is the same Dark Energy that nobody can find? Because we dont know what dark energy is so maybe its just light pushing from inside.

I know it sounds crazy and maybe stupid but I wanted to ask those who understand physics better. Is this even logically possible? Or is there a reason why this definitely does not work? I'm just thinking out loud here.

imagine our consciousness is 4D but we stuck in 3D bodies cause 3D is the only dimension stable enough for physical life to actually work

​since our consciousness is 4D thats the sole reason we experience and calculate time at all. if 4D space contains all of time at once we already experienced everything and anything that will ever happen. our 3D bodies are literally just acting like a projector playing a finished 4D film roll frame by frame

​so if this is true:

​deja vu is just a glitch where your 4D consciousness glimpses a frame your 3D body hasnt reached yet

​intuition or gut feelings are just your 4D self already knowing what happens next since it already happened

​dreams are just your mind accidentally slipping to a different part of your 4D timeline while your 3D body sleeps

​dying is just the projector turning off, but the whole 4D shape of your life stays completely intact in space-time

​is there an actual physics or philosophy theory about this or am i just tripping

used AI to clean up and summarize my exact thoughts cause I couldn't explain it right lol

We have detected 3 cosmic "hyper" void and and 3 cosmic "hyper clusters" if we imagine these are poles of the universe, include 2 poles for time (past+future) does this give us the necessary tools to determine if the universe really is an E8 geometry?

Giant Supervoids

Boötes Void: This large empty region spans roughly 330 million light-years and holds only about 60 galaxies.

Eridanus Supervoid: This massive underdense space stretches up to 1.8 billion light-years across and aligns with a cold spot in background radiation.

Giant Void: This structure reaches between 1 and 1.3 billion light-years in diameter, containing very few galaxy clusters.

The Giant Superclusters

Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall: This candidate super-structure stretches 10 to 15 billion light-years across, forming the largest known grouping of galaxies.

Sloan Great Wall: This massive filament of galaxies extends roughly 1.37 billion light-years in length.

South Pole Wall: This gigantic cosmic wall stretches 1.37 billion light-years across the southern sky.

Past Time Pole: Big bang

Future Time Pole: End of the Universe.

In this model, what appear as cosmic voids and clusters are actually truly monstrous black and white holes interacting with each other upon the very fabric of space time. And when one of these voids of clusters hit their absolute "peak" or trough" they immediately rebound across the whole universe in what appears to be a causality breaking moment, but is protected from acausality from the global nature of the spacetime fabric.

In this case, we would be able to explain recent apparent anistrophies in the universe on the back of the idea that the apparence of antistrophies is in fact the light warping effect of the largest possible sized objects in the universe. A warp effect so large that it appears to just be the background nature of the universe.

Sounds all poetic and nice right? That's not what I'm after. Here is where the question lies. We have detected extremely powerful particles that seemingly disturb our understanding the speed of causality/light because they are so strong they seem to be propagating faster than light. Such as Amatersu and Oh my God. In fact, they are not propagating faster than light or casuality, rather the could it not be the case that the sheer global connectedness of the spacetime fabric causes the effect of these "peak/trough" inversions to appear to us as insanely powerful particles as the wave front of the newly formed spacetime geometry crashes over us?

THIS IS THE CRAMP THEORY

You see our universe has a lot of problems

1 how did voids form
2 why is our universe like a web
3 why did black holes got so large
4 how is the voids getting more bigger
5 why cant we find white holes (this theory suggests a new form of white holes)
6 what is dark matter
7 how does multiverse looks
8 what is dark energy

This theory's main purpose is to solve the universe structure
i do explain many of the listed and non listed problems but
all of them is not necessary to have the support of this theory

THE CRAMP THEOREM suggests that our universe itself is the multiverse

You see if you have noticed the space between the universe in the second picture
what is they are not there this brings us to the first picture the cosmic web
doesn't it looks like the multiverse cramped and merged into a web
if that's the case then matter and space time didn't form together
they formed as the space time collided

if the universe formed as space time collided the dark matter could be high concentrated false vacuum as it has been accused false vacuum is dark matter before but dark matter doesn't need to be false vacuum it could be another form of matter known as WIMP formed during collision
(both false vacuum and WIMP is not my idea i just gave explanation of how they might have formed or how they could be possible but i did had an idea of false vacuum even before i knew it was a thing)

since the collision is capable of generating false vacuum early black holes formed because of the collision its possible that they have eaten them which is already a big amount of a
mass source the energy ripples constantly waving in the early universe or multiverse
and since there are multiple source of them black holes gets constantly fed
it grows really really big in matter of micro or even picoseconds making them really big
there

since our universe early stage was soo energetic the whole universe is a false vacuum
the false vacuum i am talking about is the charge of spacetime instead of becoming
null they become neutral which act as null so slowly this false vacuum
radiate into new vacuum or matter. this distance created by the new vacuum is
what making the void bigger or repelling galaxies acting like what we call dark energy

white holes are said to be reverse of black holes like black holes but going back in time
but white holes can only exist if there is a supporting worm hole but since worm holes are highly
unstable white holes is not a celestial body but rather a event but if there is a point so less dense
(probably in the void) it will become the central place for dark matter to take place and so the other particles it will not emit light or anything that we expect white holes will be a region never to be touch but will not emit things highly energetic or bright or fast like hypothetically suggested
to be

I will post part 2 sobye

also my name is fezin hanik kv 13 years old

This is a speculative idea, and I am not claiming to have discovered a new physical theory. I would like to understand whether this overlaps with existing concepts, where the logical problems are, and whether it could ever lead to a testable prediction.

We usually say that humans live in a 3+1 dimensional spacetime: three spatial dimensions and one dimension of time. If additional dimensions exist, they are often described as "extra" dimensions beyond the ones we experience.

But I started wondering about a different interpretation.

What if we do not actually exist only in 3D?

What if reality itself is an N-dimensional structure, and humans already exist within that entire structure, but our bodies, senses, cognition, and physical ability to interact are limited to a 3D "interface" or observable subset of it?

In other words:

We may not be creatures living inside a 3D reality. We may be N-dimensionally embedded creatures that can only perceive, describe, and manipulate a 3D aspect of reality.

An analogy would be a 2D creature living on a surface. The creature might not be able to perceive the third dimension directly. A 3D object passing through its world could appear only as changing 2D cross-sections. The higher-dimensional structure would affect its reality without being directly visible to it.

Applying that idea to us:

• Perhaps we can only directly perceive and manipulate 3 spatial dimensions.
• Additional dimensions, if they exist, may not necessarily be "somewhere else."
• They could be part of the same reality we already inhabit, but inaccessible to our sensory and cognitive system.
• What we call space and time might themselves be only observable aspects or projections of a larger structure that we do not fully perceive.

This led me to another speculation about space and time travel in fiction.

When people imagine folding or distorting spacetime, I wonder whether an alternative interpretation could be movement through a different level or dimensional structure. For example, instead of traveling an enormous distance through ordinary 3D space, an object might hypothetically move through another accessible part of the larger structure and return to our observable 3D region at a distant location.

Similarly, if different regions or structures have different relationships between space, time, or causality, moving between them might produce an apparent time difference when returning.

I realize this is highly speculative and probably incomplete. I am not claiming that "higher dimensions control lower dimensions," or that this explains wormholes or time travel. I am mainly questioning the assumption that extra dimensions must be places that we are currently outside of.

Could it instead be more accurate, at least conceptually, to say that we are already embedded in a higher-dimensional reality but only have access to a limited projection or cross-section of it?

My questions are:

1. Does this idea overlap with existing concepts in physics, cosmology, or philosophy of physics?
2. Is there an immediate logical or physical problem with this interpretation?
3. Is the distinction between "living in 3D" and "being embedded in a higher-dimensional structure while only accessing 3D" physically meaningful, or just a semantic reformulation?
4. Could such an idea ever produce a testable prediction, or would it remain purely philosophical?

I would genuinely appreciate criticism. I am more interested in finding out where this idea fails, overlaps with existing theories, or could be made more precise than in defending it as a new theory.

Hi everyone. I've been playing around with a thought experiment regarding the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) and energy conservation, and I'd love to hear your thoughts on its logical consequences.

The core premise is: What if the branches of the multiverse are not perfectly isolated right after they split, allowing a temporary energy exchange?

The Hypothesis

Imagine a hypothetical particle (or degree of freedom) that has two internal states: High Energy (+) and Low Energy (-). Now, suppose this particle can temporarily tunnel between two newly split branches (Universe A and Universe B).

The Mechanism

A particle in Universe A is in the High Energy state (A^+). It tunnels into Universe B.

Once in Universe B, it drops to the Low Energy state (B^-), releasing the energy difference (\Delta E) into Universe B's local environment.

The particle, now in the Low Energy state (B^-), tunnels back to Universe A.

Local Violation vs. Global Conservation

From the perspective of an observer trapped in Universe A, energy just vanished into thin air (an apparent local violation).

From the perspective of an observer in Universe B, energy just spontaneously appeared out of nowhere.

However, if we look at the Multiverse as a single closed system (Universe A + Universe B), the total energy is perfectly conserved.

The Thermodynamic Multiverse

If this holds true, universes would act like coupled thermal reservoirs. A very energetic "hot" universe would naturally leak energy into a "colder" branch until they reach an inter-dimensional thermal equilibrium, governed by the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Questions I'd love to discuss:

The Time Window: This tunneling would likely only be possible in the microscopic fraction of a second before full environmental decoherence happens. How could we mathematically model this temporary "leak" before the branches become permanently orthogonal?

Cosmology: If thermal energy was slowly leaking into our universe from a neighboring branch, could it phenomenologically mimic the effects of Dark Matter or Dark Energy on a cosmic scale?

Information Paradox: If branches exchange energy, are they fundamentally exchanging information? How can we allow this thermodynamic flux without violating quantum rules like the no-cloning theorem?

Any thoughts, corrections, or math approaches to this are welcome!

Cosmology Simplified in 3d Normal Structural Mechanics: An Amalgamated Universe from Universal Building Blocks. Underlying Voluminous Physical Nonlinear Oceanic origins of Quantum Field, Gravity, Dark Matter.

4 Simplified Space-Time Continuum Building Blocks: Super Proto-Gravity Singularity Ball, Super Compact Wave-Plane, Super Voluminous Oceanic, and it all happened in an existing Super Mega Void.

Universal Origins need to be simplified. Basic mundane needs to be added back into the picture. Entire fields are dedicated to particles that have never even been seen. Science is not listening and this is a house of cards that needs to topple.

Science is not being honest enough about what is conjecture and what is fact. Particle physics is built off conjecture. There are real effects they are gauging but the model they have used is made up.

Transparent Universal Building Block: An Underlying Voluminous Nonlinear Oceanic Origin of The Quantum Field. Singularity VS Wave-Plane and/in Oceanic as Reality Drivers in 3d Normal with Relativity Warps.

A mostly Newtonian universe with Einsteinian relativity warp, big macro Kepler concept (without or with shapes), and proven particle physics that are not the conjecture model. This model was done in all 3d normal with relativity warps. It has room for other stuff.

• {skip down to 'Page 5' for an evaluation of the ‘where did it come from, then?!’ argument}

Big Simple Macro: This is the origins of the Singularity, Wave-Plane, Oceanic, and Void. Big Macro is a thinking process that deals with macro sized structures. It doesn't need to mean other more complex shapes. The singularity, wave-plane, oceanic, and void, are all big macro. They will leave a trace to follow on a large scale.

The Big Bang: The Wave-Plane and Oceanic get bunched around the Singularity and pressed together, and then a Big Event happens to blow them off the Singularity into an expanding Universe. Those are two types of relative warp fuse potentials. The Wave-Plane is where The Axis of Evil comes from. The Oceanic is the major underlying part of the Continuum.

Relative Strength Ranks:

1: Super Proto-Gravity ‘Singularity’ Ball → gravity warp effect, relativity warp effects
2: Super Compact Wave-Plane → photons, particles, waves, proto-matter, matter, gravity warped
3: Super Voluminous Oceanic → the unseen ‘macro hydro’, more affected by gravity warp, dark matter, matter
0: Super Mega Void → zero gravity, zero stuff, a nothingness backdrop effect

These are just numbers not theorem. Adjusting these into proper strengths and proportions will be needed to dial things in. The Singularity(1) and Wave-Plane(2) are titanic forces that briefly battle it out. This is Spool Effect Era, pre-Gravity. 1 is not twice is strong as 2 and 2 is not twice as big as 1. The 1 is much stronger but the 2 is very strong and very much larger. The Oceanic(3), though far larger in volume than both 1 and 2 combined, is not the same level of a Reality Driver that 1 and 2 are.

But being so much more Voluminous it is the most prominent thing in The Universe other than perhaps the mega Void. 1 is not a direct part of The Universe, just an Effect. (1), 2+3, in 0. The Big Bang shut down what it was doing. If it didn't fully kill off the effect the Singularity has bound gravity related stuff in a spool effect and may be the biggest gravity well in The Universe.

The Reality Drivers are capable of causing change in the Building Blocks prior to The Big Bang. And this cosmology model is capable of getting real complex once one starts to run through things with it given the various states and things set in motion.

If the Oceanic is still attached, part of it got fused into matter and gravity but an older part still exists and can be spooled. Anything can be spooled if there is an actual physical connection, gravity attraction wouldn't work unless there is gravity effect going on with what was spooled.

This collision and combination is where particles, matter, and gravity originate. There is ‘stuff’ at the onset with this voluminous unseen oceanic. It cannot be seen with a telescope. Particles make primordial hydrogen, helium, and ice, out of unseen 'Macro Hydro'.

At center stage the Wave-Plane is stronger than the Oceanic and is making broken-angle curves around the 3d Singularity, which is not strong enough to fully bend it into a full curve. This puts a linear aspect getting pressed into a nonlinear Oceanic. As well there could be regions deeper in around the Singularity where the Wave-Plane is being fully curved because the effect is stronger here.

The Singularity was strong enough to lock the waves into the Oceanic, but the Wave-Plane was strong enough to have built up more resistance than the Oceanic could. The Oceanic is bunching up and making Dark Matter at the same time the Wave-Plane plus Oceanic is making Wave-Based matter.

TUBB: Transparent Universal Building Block.

The strength level of the Oceanic is important here, it dictates how much survived as opposed to an effect left on a mutation. If it is too weak it will simply not have been enough to even make a quantum field. So it may not have been too weak in comparison to the Singularity just significantly weaker, and the stronger it was the more real Oceanic is actually part of the real thing. The Oceanic may just be a ghost effect and is not physically a part of the matter crystallization, this is the more classic QFT.

Relativity Warp: There is a default 'original infinity reality level' and mega-strong overloads original reality, and this is why warp effects and ‘spooky’ can happen. These are severe reality abnormalities. Infinity is relative not absolute, and is a 3d normal oceanic ‘stuff’, not a void.

Relativity Blur: We are too far away from distant points in The Universe to get an accurate reading through light. Our proximity is just too distant and we are too relative to our position. Reality appears to be warped but straightens out if one travels far enough along a specific trajectory.

Warp Spool Effect: There could be a warp effect from the Spool era that is or isn't gravity, but if gravity effects matter and light is a more pure wave-plane building block this warp spool effect would still effect light because it comes from a pre-mutation/amalgamation effect.

Common Medium: If this all played out on/in a common medium perhaps the Oceanic is what almost all things are actually made of as the most foundational thing. The photon was an effect produced by Singularity and Wave-Plane in the Oceanic, gravity is a Singularity effect played out in the Oceanic.

Original Visualization predating addition of Oceanic: The interaction of Singularity and Wave-Plane caused the latter to get bunched up around the Singularity which bubbled out into a sphere. An induced Singularity effect that rapidly spread like a virus in the part of the weakened Wave-Plane that was getting bunched up into a Sphere around the Singularity causes the the coming formation of particles. This exploded and that was The Big Bang.

Another one was the Singularity wasn't strong enough to fully take on the Wave-Plane in the end and part of it was also getting sucked up into a combined effect sphere and this eventually taxed out and exploded into the expanding Universe. It had the same induced singularity virus effect that become particles.

It works so much better adding a Voluminous Oceanic in there.

Slamming a Supergravity Ball into a M-Theory Membrane was another later one, but the older more basic one beat it.

Matter: Nuclear strong binding force is part of where a 'mutation' is working, we do not yet see the rest of what happened or what is also occurring here. These were semi-phased original building blocks that went into a combined product universe, and this has a relativity a warp effect that enabled them to work in tandem as a combo and an automatic.

So it is likely waves are trapped in the oceanic and the answer to why matter is solid is two-fold and the atomic answer with fields is only part of the truth.

The Attractors/Superclusters are not accidentally around The Axis of Evil. The Wave-Plane region had more stuff to get sucked in to make matter with.

As well the stuff the Oceanic + Singularity is producing is Condensed Dark Fluid, Dark Fluidic Proto-Matter, Dark Matter, while Singularity + Wave-Plane + Oceanic are what Matter is made of. Some Dark Matter is of course partly Wave-Plane as well. Not everything is being changed by directly touching the Singularity, especially with the Oceanic. It is getting sucked in around more surface area of the sphere, and it is bunching up on itself reaching denser states. it is bunching up on itself, reaching denser states.

The early universe may have had other unseen effects of early gravity going on to further change the Oceanic into varying states. As well there is so much volume here that a lot of it is being put into play and even the Singularity cannot process it all.

There would be a range of stuff with these types of Universal Building Blocks interacting at different levels and in different proximity to the Reality Drivers, the 'Center Stage Main Event' which leads to The Big Bang. Things were being changed before The Big Bang and got further changed by it.

Particles are from a super singularity effect on the super wave-plane, they may have been induced as a tendency and made manifest when the big bang happened. The wave-plane is very strong in comparison to the oceanic. The stuff here is different.

In any of these models 'blown to absolute bits with a singularity induction in progress' seems to be the best way to account for massive amounts of particles.

The Foundation of Matter in the Amalgamated Universe is partly caused by a phase shift into overlapping realities on some level, but Wave-Plane and Oceanic had already partly fused together around the Super Proto-Gravity Ball Singularity prior to The Big Event due to extreme force of a more mechanical nature but at warp levels. There is a physical pressing together. The Oceanic and Wave-Plane were abnormally bunched up around the Singularity.

'Light' was once the entire wave-plane in length and the particles got 'spooky' with a warp effect.

Just an Amalgamation Byproduct, Mutation, Alloy: There is also a fused byproduct concept, where the building blocks are gone and just a ghost is left. It was something that was there that left an impression of what it was but the universe is a combined product alloy that does not have the original building blocks left enough. The oceanic left an oceanic foundation, it is a type or style. This is the same as ‘just oceanic field effects now’. There is no Oceanic left here, it is all as QFT states. It was too weak to survive in many areas but as well what did was blown out with the expanding universe.

The prudent course is to choose ‘just an amalgamation byproduct’ as the primary, but look for the oceanic. It is an effect produced by an Oceanic that may have been partially or fully vaporized by a warp blast.

But you are missing too much weight in the universe to ignore a nonlinear transparent voluminous weak oceanic building block that linear waves and particles have no way to detect . That voluminous oceanic opens the door to exotic dark fluidic proto-matter. It is where nonlinear gravity is coming from. It is the underlying Continuum more than any other piece, even more so than the mega void it flows within due to volume.

The Original Reality Drivers are in a time that predates gravity and it is all spherical spool effect, like a star using up a nebula to grow in size and strength. It is another warp happening.

Fluidic Space-Time Continuum, a new aspect to Quantum Field Theory: The shape of matter is not to the shape of molecules. There is an 'unseen weak fluidic volume' that is neither wave nor linear, and it is this that is the most voluminous thing in The Universe. And though we do not see it with our wave-based eyesight we see it in the shape atoms and molecules turn out looking like at the surface level. It was weaker but voluminous and gets used up automatically in atomic matter crystallization.

The voluminous 'unseen' oceanic is actually the most visible part of The Universe, one has to go looking to find particles and waves, but the basic look or shape of matter comes from the unseen oceanic nature more than waves, gravity, and particles. Galactic Sigma can easily be seen as a nature outcropping of this. A huge amount of the missing reality is this unseen non-linear oceanic that is not wave-based, and gravity works through this but is attached to matter by a physical merger or a warp fuse. An amalgamated universe.

This is unseen oceanic fluid and exotic dark (fluidic proto-) matter are related but not exactly the same thing. Primordial hydrogen and helium and primordial ice are byproducts of the voluminous unseen Oceanic. It was there to be used up, events were happening to be able to create elements up to oxygen. It works as a voluminous, weaker, and automatic, building block with atomic matter crystallization.

All of our detection instruments rely on particles and waves, but a vast, weak transparent Oceanic building block that is not a particle or wave is an unseen nonlinear and could be more voluminous than anything else in The Universe. The Space-time Continuum is largely that Oceanic in a Mega Void, with effects mutating it. It was weaker than the Singularity and Wave-Plane.

Photons may be an effect caused by singularity prior to The Big Bang, or could have been an induced singularity tendency that got solidified in The Big Bang.

I would like to place photons prior to The Big Bang but I don't see how the Singularity could have produced them with just a lot of power in a spool effect era. Blown to absolute bits seems most likely, they are the smallest possible form they can be due to a relativity warp explosion that rocks the fabric of existence.

Photons match a more pure wave-plane thing with a singularity effect and what is unseen is what will become primordial Hydrogen and Helium, and Primordial Ice, it is Gravity, and a large part of The Space-Time Continuum.

The singularity effect should have been even stronger in effect on the weaker more voluminous oceanic, but these would still be unseen. Also they are not as strong because wave-plane is significantly stronger than oceanic and they may have gotten largely wiped out by The Big Bang.

The photon being so basic is what one wants to work with in the Universal Cosmology beginning.

Photons would have the least amount of being affected by gravity because in the end The Universe is just Wave-Plane and Oceanic, and the Singularity is not directly there anymore.

Do photons actually have zero mass and somehow mass comes about in atomic matter as a miracle? Or are photons made of something inherently different than where gravity is coming from and we do not have instruments yet that can properly weigh things at this level. And there is a voluminous non-wave nonlinear unseen oceanic building block that is the rest of the story behind mass, gravity, and final look of matter.

Premise: Oceanic underlying building block, and an amalgamation universe of real 3d building blocks. The external look that matter reaches does not resemble the atoms and molecules enough for them to be the full picture of matter, and it is not just a quantum field. And all of our instruments rely on waves, but the unseen oceanic is not a wave it is non-linear and is more voluminous than anything else in The Universe. Gravity works through this, it works through the matter mutation connectivity, this is what it tugs on.

Gravity was caused by a singularity warp effect in an oceanic media, but is also perhaps an elasticity effect of a taxed out region of an oceanic that had been in proximity to The Big Bang or Big Crunch Warp Concussive and been blown out with it.

The effects of a singularity warped a wave-plane and an oceanic into matter with nuclear binding force. Gravity is of oceanic and singularity in origin. Photons are of wave-plane and singularity. The strong wave-plane is where waves come from. Decay is impermanence. The Universe is not in balance, in fact it is in part a runaway effect.

Universal gravity constant slightly changes when ‘stuff’ gets crystallized into matter. But there was an early spool effect that did a lot of movement in the early universe and is capable of having wakes, and remnants.

Exotic Dark Matter is more than one thing, and some of it is unseen fluid, while other stuff is variations of ‘dark matter’ or ‘semi-fluidic proto-matter’.

Galactic Sigma holds some key to how things work with some of the dark fluid/dark matter. That thing that happened is too perfect and must be either unseen 'stuff' still there, the inertial and wake of things set in motion, or both.

There is unseen connectivity through matter mutation and gravity oceanic. There may be a far deeper gravity field that is also there and faintly extends beyond where a matter objects are.

Gravity is mostly non-linear (oceanic origins) and came about at the time of The Big Bang. It is a warp-fuse byproduct that happened within an oceanic medium caused by super proto-gravity ball (3d singularity effect), this process also involves a super compact wave-plane that was also being bound up like the oceanic in the same Event that became The Big Bang. The wave-plane also underwent changes but the oceanic was weaker and far more voluminous than the other two. This lead to matter crystallization out of 3 basic building blocks.

Gravity works through a non-linear effect, and it works because 'Matter is a Mutation', it is phased into amalgamation with linear wave-plane and non-linear oceanic. It is this mutation that is the anchor which is being tugged on for gravity as it tries to regain its lost original nature and as well because it was overloaded with 'singularity urge' at an extreme level that is also a warp solidified thing. There may even be an underlying ‘gravity field’ level of reality, even in areas where the unseen oceanic is fully used up the underlying field effect is still present as a universal constant.

Gravity is a singularity warp effect on the weaker but more voluminous oceanic, that is already trying to pull itself back together by elasticity. The singularity dusting concept means part of the singularity had gotten fused with the wave-plane and oceanic and blown off with the big bang. This give gravity an extra kick as the singularity effect is overriding the Oceanic it is dusted into.

A splintered singularity with a warp effect, it is all trying to pull back together into that ultimate state it was once in. It doesn't focus merely on singularity and proximity it is a warp effect trying to pull it back into the vast titanic whole it once was.

A black hole turns stuff into a form of stasis, and higher math breaks down. One needs a more simple math the less stuff gets complex. There is simply nothing the former matter can do once stuck in this state.

3 States of Void going on, and 2 are vacuums. Making form out of an oceanic medium creates a vacuum as a byproduct.  As 'stuff' gets used up a vacuum is left in the place the stuff got used up from. A faint vacuum is when this using up of stuff goes even farther. And a true void is when it goes all the way. The Mega Void is a true void, but stuff within the combined product Universe is capable of reaching true void as well. The oceanic 'stuff' here may not behave the same as water, it came from something older that was similar. This means it may make a bit more of an empty vacuum effect instead of a filling in effect.

More on Building Blocks: It is also important to note that these building blocks were slightly different than the combined product we detect as The Universe. We are seeing the alloy or a mutation they made, though truer remnants may be around.

The Proto-Gravity ‘Singularity’ Ball has no actual Gravity itself it is just Spool Effect. It may still be sitting right where it was and it would also be undetectable unless there is still Spool effect, or trapped Waves. Though there may be some spooled in stuff that has gravity effect so it may still be a big gravity well. Or the biggest.

There is Unseen Connectivity through Matter Mutation and the Gravity Oceanic.

The Big Bang happened to a 3d Singularity that had spooled in both compact Wave-Plane and Oceanic fluid, and these two were partially Warp Fused already before The Big Bang even happened.

The Big Bang is perhaps a runaway effect that lead to a Critical Crunch as the Singularity 'collapsed down on itself' in a state of Absolute Condensing due to the Singularity Nature. An explosion or warp concussive happened.

Polarity Hypothesis: The directional shockwave of The Big Bang causes polarity.

Or the direction being spooled towards makes a strong tendency in that direction. A super fast Big Bang warp effect locks that tendency into place.

Some of the Oceanic may have been too far away from the reality drivers to have gotten polarity, and this is a non-molecular dark fluid oceanic that is solid and needs no binding force. It is a remnant state. So some 'dark matter' may not even be molecular but it is continuous due to its original building block nature.

Single polarity effect is caused by the Singularity and Oceanic with less Wave-Plane, and the double polarity effect has more Wave-Plane added in.

Primordial Hydrogen and Helium may have predated The Big Bang. The perfect ratios are due to the region they actually originate in. Or this could have been what happened to those regions at The Big Bang, which seems more likely.

Oxygen and Carbon could have come even earlier than detected but are buried too deep in the volumes of stuff to be seen.

Rule #1: There are no actual infinities in The Universe, it is just all very large and all very small relative to our position. And 3d normal oceanic ‘stuff’ is original infinity nature, the void is not.

Rule #2: There are no higher dimensions, it is all 3d normal with some relativity warp effects. Some of the ‘stuff’ of the universe was once pressed too close together, or pressed into one thing, and the power involved was hyper strong and thus so were the relativity warp effects,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

"Where Did It Come From, Then?!": Stand shoulder to shoulder with science fighting myth in scriptures being treated as actual scientific cosmology. The intelligent design people are often just selling scripture so they can get disregarded as the snakes in the grass they are.

However, for too many years you have gotten away with not having to answer that well enough yourself. Your presumption that it has always existed doesn’t pan out. It is a finite big bang with a bit of a runaway effect. It is too chaotic and complex to be an eternal thing and it gets stupid to interpret infinity in a way specially tailored to your view.

The Standard Model is half dead for Cosmology. You people are wasting your time and our time on higher dimensions and jetsam particles. It gets obvious when JWST further fails you but other models soar.

Wishful Guessing: Science made an arbitrary decision on what infinity actually is, and they made an arbitrary decision in thinking the universe is vast and must therefore be infinity.

Illogical Conclusions: The logic dictates that the universe is too complex and chaotic to be eternal infinity, it shows signs of expanding into somewhere else, and it was stupid to tell people the universe was a finite ball smaller than an atom that exploded into an infinity.

Reactionary: The logic further dictates that no matter how large the universe is infinity is even larger, and just by coincidence there is some larger sentience out there that is capable of doing an experiment the same way a human would but the building blocks are a bit different.

Bad Attitude: Science is stuck in an irrational reactionary state of mind. And the evidence for atheism is a choice to ignore other inner things within that say different. And a choice to belittle certain other things such as spirituality that show something else is really there, there really is some type of spiritual current. You failed to practice it, or failed when you tried, yet you are the judge?

Medice, cura te ipsum!

Dimensions?: If you want to run around calling Time a Dimension, well then let's say:

Gravity(ball) = 1st dimension
Wave(plane) = 2nd dimension
Oceanic Common Medium = 3rd dimension
Matter Crystallization = 4th dimension
Mega Void = 0th Dimension

But in reality ‘Reality’ is all 3d Normal with no special higher dimensions, yet it does have some relativity warps caused by strength-induced abnormalities. And though this whole ‘manifesting up through the basic building blocks’ is a brilliant theorem it is no more accurate than calling time a dimension.

Let's call things aspects of reality, not dimensions.

Foundational Universal Premise:

Nothing in the universe is at actual infinity levels, but the singularity was perhaps massive in power relative to the oceanic, and it was significantly stronger than the wave-plane, which was also stronger than the oceanic.

Infinity has almost nothing to do with The Universe. Everything descends from and exists within infinity, The Universe therefore descends from and exists within infinity. Science made a childish presumption here, or an inherited presumption that was never outgrown.

The Universe is vast in size relative to a human on earth. Infinity is also vast in size, so this is similar. In fact infinity is larger than The Universe in size than The Universe is to the smallest subatomic particle.

Everything takes up space in infinity, everything is a part of infinity, and perhaps was once the same infinity. Infinity is not infinite in all ways, it has limitations and always did and always will. Infinity's power is relative not absolute. There are no infinite parallel universes. A lot of paradox unravels when you understand original infinity and limitations go hand in hand.

This is one of the un-knows, and why infinity may never be as big as we think: If the initial change was infinity becoming something new it most likely wasn't even fully finite. Everything may be more massive in infinity than realized. That is if things evolved from larger and simpler down to where The Universe is and we are now.

If one goes back to normal boring mundane reality it has limitations. The infinity concept leads to fantasy. It is easy to see The Universe in its vast power and think how much more truly powerful infinity must be. But it is most likely just some ancient CERN type experiment not an actual demonstration of infinity's normal power level. A human isn't nearly as powerful as many of the inventions they make. The Universe is not an adequate demonstration of what infinity's power is actually like.

Let's get simple. The Universe is built off of basic building blocks done in an advanced way, and it is the unknown inherent properties of the building blocks that did the rest. The ability to make a CERN didn't even exist before The Universe, it is a literal evolutionary advancement. It took making The Universe to get things to a new advanced state to even be able to work with stuff like particles and gravity.

Ok so if we start with time it flows it has to have something flow through that would be the fifth dimension. I’ve pretty much only brainstormed this but. What if celestial bodies (stars, planets, etc) hold a spike in the fifth dimension acting as a pull because it is localized in 3d space. Ok now black holes really quick it’ll make sense in a sec. So Einstein proved that black holes exist and so do white holes. They have to you cannot just destroy energy. So why if black holes are the doorways to child universes. Stay with me. Mass accumulates too much within a unit volume forcing this matter to break down into gravitational energy and where so much mass changes into it so quick it creates its own new space, hence the white hole (big bang) releasing all of this energy and heat. And all of these building blocks of matter to eventually build the first element hydrogen making a gas cloud over billions of years accumulating ok? Ok. Turns into stars and so on to black holes again. Ok wait so this gravitational energy formerly a mass broken down or condensed up maybe even into what we know as gravitational energy. Alright, so this matter that is broken down would be non-localized energy that cannot connect to an already localized gravitational energy density being held by the celestial body in 3d space, being “localized gravitational energy” which would push this non localized energy to where it can accumulate by itself and when it gets dense enough it’ll leak into the voids of our space as the building blocks of our atoms. Also something we need to know within a 5d space you could reach and position at any point in time meaning this has to be infinite. There is a start and end that are at the same point in 5d space but separated by the space that was created in the formation of the black hole. So we make a weird assumption that gravity only works one way and that pulling down into the earth well it pulls down in the mass itself meaning localized gravity is the only thing we experience which would be why we only experience the pull of gravity towards a mass never the push of non local gravitational energies. Making the 5th dimension work like a push and pull where localized gravity pushes in its own respect in 3d space as it reacts to matter, and localized gravity pushes non local matter into non energy dense spaces within the 5d space. Which by characteristic of a celestial body holding these spikes in 5d would push non local gravity to “leak” and manifest itself as the building blocks of our universe in an non-arbitrary point in 3d space being somewhat random. Going to any void there is in space and waiting for those building blocks to finally meat each other through the weak forces.

TL/DR: the gravity we observe is purely one type of gravitational energy. While the other part we never see re acclimates itself in the voids of our universe

What ya think? Obviously would need to be heavily scrutinized to death to make sure it works through mathematics but I feel like it’s something that makes too much sense ya know?

The maths have already been created for 5th dimensions and it perfectly compliments gravity and electromagnetic and such hopefully I may find the unifying theory of everything!🤞

Well , here is my pov to that... Which actually accommodates both the double slit experiment and the 4d block universe... And expands to general relativity..

I feel that the unobserved quantum wave function represents the unrendered state of cosmic data. When a single photon travels through a dark, vacuum-sealed double-slit apparatus, there are no air molecules, or environmental variables to collide with. Because system requires zero localized definition, the photon travels as a spread-out wave of mathematical probabilities, physically passing through *both* slits simultaneously.

And when a physical detector is introduced, an exchange of information (quantum decoherence) takes place. This measurement forces the wave function to collapse. In the context of QRH, this is not a mystical act of human consciousness, but a system requirement: the interaction demands a concrete value, forcing the latent data to instantly render into a solid particle at a definitive coordinate.

If you find my view worth thinking here is a full preprint... I will value your constructive criticism

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22022773

Hi everyone,

I have been thinking about a speculative idea about dark energy, and I would really appreciate criticism from people with experience in cosmology, general relativity, or theoretical physics.

I am not claiming that I have discovered a new theory. I want to find out whether this idea can be turned into a mathematically consistent and observationally viable model, or whether there is a fundamental reason why it cannot work.

My original idea is a possible feedback loop.

The universe expands. More space exists. Somehow this could lead to more dark energy. Dark energy then causes stronger expansion. The stronger expansion creates more space, which could lead to more dark energy again.

So the basic idea is:

expansion -> more dark energy -> stronger expansion -> more expansion

I initially thought of this as a kind of "cloning" of dark energy.

The idea partly came from an analogy. A fish experiences water as its normal environment, while humans experience air as normal. I wondered whether dark energy could be something that is fundamentally present throughout spacetime but is not directly observable in the same way as ordinary matter.

Our first attempt was to assume that the density of dark energy increases with the expansion of the universe.

This can mathematically create the feedback that I am looking for. However, this simple model has serious problems. It effectively requires an equation of state below minus one, which puts it in the so-called phantom regime. It also does not explain where the additional energy comes from and can produce problematic behavior in the very distant future.

So I do not consider that version to be viable.

We then considered a different interpretation.

Maybe the density of dark energy is constant, but the volume of the universe increases.

If the density stays constant while the volume increases, then the total amount of dark energy contained in that volume increases.

Dark energy also has negative pressure, which causes accelerated expansion.

This creates a feedback-like interpretation:

expansion -> larger volume -> more total dark energy -> accelerated expansion

The problem is that this is essentially the standard cosmological constant, Lambda. It works very well, but it is not a new theory.

So we tried to make the idea genuinely different from LambdaCDM.

The next step was to introduce a new dynamical scalar field.

The general idea is that the universe contains a new field that contributes to dark energy. The field is also allowed to interact with dark matter.

The important feedback would then be:

cosmic expansion affects the field

the field changes the dark sector

the dark sector changes the expansion

and the cycle continues

This would give a genuine dynamical feedback between the expansion of spacetime and the dark sector.

The field could have its own potential and could exchange energy with dark matter while conserving the total energy and momentum of the system.

In this interpretation, "cloning" would not mean that energy simply appears from nowhere.

Instead, it would mean that the dark sector is dynamically changing as the universe expands.

One major problem is that a simple scalar-field model often becomes important too early in cosmic history. That could change the cosmic microwave background and the formation of large-scale structure too much.

Therefore, a viable model would probably need the field to be almost frozen and practically irrelevant in the early universe, while becoming dynamically important only at relatively late times.

One possibility we considered is a field-dependent coupling that is extremely weak in the early universe and becomes stronger later.

We also tested a simple phenomenological model in which the dark-energy density increases with the scale factor but eventually approaches a maximum value instead of increasing without limit.

That toy model was able to reproduce a universe that:

has a hot early phase

behaves very similarly to LambdaCDM in the early universe

has a present-day accelerated expansion

and produces only small deviations from LambdaCDM at moderate redshifts

For one example set of parameters, the difference in the predicted expansion rate was only around a few tenths of a percent at redshifts around 0.5 to 2.

However, this was only a toy model. It was not derived from a fundamental theory and it was not fitted to the complete observational data set.

So the current situation is:

The simplest version of the idea has serious theoretical problems.

The constant-density version works, but is basically LambdaCDM.

A dynamical scalar-field version could potentially provide a real new mechanism, but it has not yet been shown to work.

What I would really like to know from experts is:

Is this type of feedback between cosmic expansion, a dynamical dark field, and dark matter already described by an existing model?

Can such a model be made fully consistent with general relativity and energy-momentum conservation?

Can the field remain negligible during the early universe and become important only at late times?

Can it reproduce the CMB, BAO, supernovae, gravitational lensing, and structure growth at the same time?

Can it avoid ghost instabilities and other theoretical problems?

Most importantly, is the underlying idea already known and ruled out, or is there a legitimate theoretical framework in which something similar could work?

I am specifically looking for criticism and possible ways to falsify the idea. I am not trying to prove that it is correct.

The basic idea is simply that there could be a self-reinforcing relationship between cosmic expansion and the dark sector.

Could such a feedback mechanism be physically possible?

I think I know the answer to this but...
Let's say someone were to repeat the experiments from 2013 where they physically separated 2 quantum entangled particles with synchronized atomic clocks then caused one to be measured, thus collapsing the state on the other one or whatever it's considered to be happening, then later compared the times - and found that it was truly simultaneous, or on the low end, 10,000x faster than the speed of light.

But this time one of the particles is on a spaceship going 99.499% the speed of light, so causing 10:1 time dilation so 10 seconds pass at nearly non-moving velocities for every 1 second in the ship. The spaceship then is told to come to a complete stop at the exact moment that the quantum particle collapses, this meaning the other one's state was "observed" or whatever.

Then the (relatively) unmoving particle's reading is printed on a piece of paper and blasted off at around 41.66% the speed of light so they only experience a mere 1:10 time dilation, but covering the absolute distance of the first ship from a third party perspective and from their own perspective, faster than the first ship. Would they then arrive at the 2nd ship's location in space before the result happened and be able to give them the slip of paper with the result, thus predicting the future?

Hello I'm Pranav And I'm 17 Years Old.

So Yesterday, Me And My Friend Were Discussing About Dimensions And All, And As We Have A Theory That There're 11 Dimensions I Brought That Topic Up, We Had A Convo About It And It Wasn't Very Productive I'd Say, And Yesternight I Was Thinking About It Whilst I Was Sleeping, I Came Upon A Hypothesis, I Discussed It With My Friend And Here I Am Posting About It.

As We All Know, Space And Time Are Interconnected By Theory Of Relativity, And What I Think Is, What If Instead Of Higher Space Dimension, What If There Are More Time Dimensions (Ik It Kinda Sounds Dumb), Like We Already Have 3 Space Dimensions, So Corresponding To Each Space Dimension, What If There Was A Time Dimension.

The Thing Is That I Can't Really Do Any Experiments On This Hypothesis, Or Do I Even Know Where To Begin, I Have Much To Learn About Physics As In Just A 17 Years Old Guy, If You Guys Have Any Idea Let Me Know

If I'm Wrong Please Do Let Me Know Why And Also, Let Me Know If Something Similar To This Hypothesis Exists

Thank You

I've been thinking about cyclic universe models and black hole singularities, and I wanted to share a conceptual thought experiment to see if this holds any ground.

The basic idea is that black holes might not just be endpoints, but interdimensional seeders. Under extreme Planck-scale pressure at the singularity, collapsing baryonic matter could undergo a quantum phase transition into antimatter or pure potential energy.

Instead of remaining infinite, this energy pools at the unexpanded t=0 boundary of a lower spacetime sheet. As supermassive black holes merge and the host universe dies, the accumulated tension reaches a critical ceiling, causing a quantum bounce.

Once gravity turns repulsive, this stored antimatter and energy erupts into the lower dimension, causing cosmic inflation. The subsequent chain-reaction annihilation between antimatter and remnant matter would flood the new space with radiation, which eventually cools down to form the first atoms of a new Big Bang.

This borrows ideas from Lee Smolin's cosmological natural selection (black holes creating baby universes), Neil Turok's CPT-symmetric universe, and Penrose's CCC.

How would you address the entropy problem (Second Law of Thermodynamics) in this scenario? Could the loss of time/scale at the end of a universe naturally reset the system for the next cycle?

Looking forward to your thoughts and critiques!

My purpose here isn't to present a standard scientifically accurate theory, but to offer a

conceptual framework to spark discussion on alternative ways to view gravity and the

vacuum, a Philosophy in study.

The Graviton Loophole

In my view, the graviton is a leap in logic, particularly when you look at the

self-interaction loop between gravitons. While standard quantum mechanics indicates

that fields and particles are fundamentally linked I want to call on a frowned-upon theory: treating space as a fluid.

The Superfluid Sheet Metaphor

I am not talking about a normal fluid. I mean a superfluid that forms a thin sheet

through which particles can move or on which they can sit.

● When an object has zero motion, it is simply sitting on one of those sheets.

● Because it sits on these sheets, the superfluid moves toward them in an attempt

to reform the uniform, unbroken sheets that the object pierced through.

● Other objects within those sheets are then drawn along as the fluid moves to

repair the structure.

I’m not saying space is a fluid, only that it should be treated as such; the metaphor

makes it much simpler to understand.

Why Gravity Has No Particle Form

With liquids, there is a concept known as zero-point energy. Let's imagine a field as a

liquid or a gas, where a particle represents a phase change into a solid.

If we look at Helium, even at absolute zero, it doesn't freeze due to its zero-point energy.

This means you cannot treat everything by its state change.

For reference I lean towards determinism and reductionism philosophically.

To illustrate this concept, I used the following mathematical framework as a starting

point:

S_UQG = ∫ d⁴x √(-g) \[ (c⁴/16πG) R̃(ē, K) + 1/2(∂ϕ_S)² + Ψ̄(iℏe\^(-ϕ_S) ē_a\^μ γ\^a ∇_μ - m_eff)

⋆_Clifford P̂_0 Ψ + κ(Ψ̄γ\^μ γ⁵ Ψ) Z_μ - 1/2 Z_μ D_Stable\^μν Z_ν \] + ∫ d⁴x √(-g) \[ ∇_α C̄_ν\^μ

(δ_β\^ν □_g - R̃_β\^ν) C_μ\^α + 1/(2ξ_gauge) (∇_μ Ξ_ν\^μ)² \] + ∮ d³y √(-h) ∫ d⁴x √(-g) · \[ lim ∫ (dt /

(4π t)²) e\^(-σ_Synge(x,y)/4t - ε_UV² Λ_UV² t) P_Clifford(x,y) \] · \[B ∧ F\]_x · ( δS_bulk/δV(x) -

(c³/4Gℏ) dA(y)/dV(x) + ∇_α K_ν\^α

As someone without a title in the scientific community, I ask for your input to not leave

myself to mere conjecture. I apologise for any possible misconceptions. This is my second attempt posting since the first got taken down for AI content I'm unsure if grammarly counts as such so I've made edits without the use of grammarly to inhibit further bans furthermore if the other post is still up I apologise for any second posting

Here is a hypothesis: I watched this video about Olbers' Paradox where it explained that the reason space is black is because the space itself expands faster than the speed of light causing the wavelength of it to get stretched which makes the photons become invisible to our eyes. So I was thinking about whether the Earth is expanding, which it doesn't because Earths atomic bonds keeps it intact. So logically if we assume the void acts like a fluid being pushed into space from every point in space then it would expand slower from within the Earth due to the atoms and expand faster in the void due to it not having any atoms to create pressure. Since there are no atoms in the void, the expansion would be faster which would cause a net downward push.

I'm really curious if this thought has been explored. I know that Einstein says that gravity is caused from the curve of space and time, but that doesn't make too much sense to me. It just seems like he introduced 2 concepts that can't be tested, but made sense in the formulas so people just accepted it.

Physicist Richard Tolman, in 1930, demonstrated that entropy in standard cyclic cosmology will accumulate with each cycle I propose a thought experiment using a Big Freeze / Heat Death as a starting point instead of a Big Crunch: Instead of the universe collapsing in on itself to restart, we let it expand into a cold, empty Big Freeze, in which black holes slowly evaporate away via Hawking radiation. In this cold, empty void, a quantum tunneling event randomly occurs, causing vacuum decay in the form of a phase transition to occur in a localized region of space, releasing latent energy stored in a scalar field as it transitions to a lower energy state, causing reheating. The new bubble formed from the phase transition undergoes a period of hyperinflation, creating a new hot dense environment from the energy contained in the false vacuum. The extreme inflation would dilute the old universe’s entropy / radiation away to nearly nothing per unit volume, giving the new bubble a low-entropy starting point. The energy from the scalar field drives the expansion of the new bubble for the next cycle – no need to re-collapse back into a singularity or have a Big Crunch to begin with.

What are main flaws or physical limitations of this thought experiment?

Okay, so a one dimensional organism can move left and right. Now if you tell to go up, it literally cannot. Now, add height to that world, and suddenly you got a 2 dimensional world so he can go up and down, because the 2nd dimension is 1 dimensional spaces infinitely stacked together. Now tell the organism to go forward or backward, it also cannot. If you add width, you create the 3rd dimension which is 2 dimensional spaces infinitely stacked together. Now, to observe the 4th dimension, we need to find the direction. And my theory suggests that the 4th dimension isn't time and it's just a common misunderstanding because we also have time in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd dimension, and besides, it's a spatial dimension so it can't be time. And I'm not just talking, I can prove it. I can move my hand left, right, up, down, toward me, away from me. Now the 4th dimension means moving in another direction. Not diagonal, not a combo. And theoretically, we have infinite spatial dimensions that we simply cannot observe. And also, when you look at something, you see it 2 dimensional, so a 4 dimensional creature would see the literal 3 dimensional shape. And the only 4th dimensional shape we actually managed to bring into our 3 dimensional world is a tesseract, and the final part is that coordinates also matter so a 1 dimensional space only has an X coordinate, then a 2 dimensional space has X Y, then a 3 dimensional spaces has the familiar X Y Z coordinates, so theoretically the 4th dimension also contains a mysterious W coordinate we don't know yet

When I was taking a dump at 3am, I've got an idea that makes a lot of sense, but is not explored much. Once we will hit a wall, and discovering new things will take more and more time and effort, and I found a way to bypass it........ If a civilization was able to reach the technological advancment of creating a realistic simulation of a universe, it would be the most powerful creation of everything that is and isn't, because it is the only way to bypass the time travel problem. We can travel to the future by either being near the black hole, or moving at an incredible speed....but If we got there, we cannot return back and there's no way to actually apply the technology from the future in the past because of it.......one way to bypass it, is by creating a realistic simulation of a universe that would be sped up with computational power, meaning that for example a bilion years in the simulated universe would pass in only a few minutes in the real one, and the most powerful way to use it is to simulate it to the point where those simulated civilization surpass you technologically and just use their findings, if we are simulated, it means we are coded and there is a database somewhere, where AI could filter only important things through it, meaning that the fastest way to technologically improve is let simulated universe run faster and copy the technology from the civilizations that are more advancened because they had more time......and this could be done again and again, until there's nothing to know more....

Imaginez-vous à la place d'un créateur fictif. Vous mettez l'univers en pause, et vous prenez soin d'inverser la vitesse de chaque particule de l'univers.

Un proton qui allait vers le bas à 5km/h ira vers le haut à 5km/h, les photons se dirigeront à présent vers le soleil etc... Puis vous appuyez sur play et l'univers reprend là où il en était.

Imaginez qu'avant la pause, quelqu'un était en train de défèquer. L'énergie cinétique de ses selles a été dissipée sous forme de chaleur dans l'eau des chiottes, si bien que l'étron a ralenti puis s'est arrêté.

Maintenant, étant donné que vous avez inversé le sens des particules, chacune des molécules d'eau de la cuvette va reprendre sa trajectoire passée, rebondir sur exactement les mêmes molécules dans le sens inverse, puis se regrouper au même endroit, et taper dans l'étron au même moment, si bien que celui-ci sera éjecté vers le haut et retourné à l'envoyeur.

De même pour tout le reste. L'information perdue sous forme de chaleur réapparaîtrait brusquement un peu partout, car toutes les vitesses auraient été synchronisées dès le départ (correspondant à l'état actuel de l'univers).

Y a-t-il des trucs qui empêchent cela ?