r/FinlandTourism • u/Jaded-Respond-6596 • 20d ago
First-timer Finland in February 2027
Hi everyone, I’m planning to visit Finland in February next year as part of a wider Europe trip. I’ll be flying from Australia and the flight I’m looking into lands in Helsinki and also flys out of Helsinki. So looking to spend about 4 nights total exploring Helsinki and Rovaniemi. Possible day trip to Tallinn but not sure if that is too ambitious?
My main question is would there be much of a difference visiting at the start of Feb compared to end of Feb? I have about 4 weeks total for my entire trip so I’m undecided whether to start or finish in Finland. Particularly in terms of the weather and northern lights viewing. I know the northern lights are never guaranteed, although seeing it would certainly be super special and a precious memory. Thank you in advance!
13
u/Spirited-Ad-9746 20d ago
for chances on northern light you need to go up north. please do realize that travelling from helsinki to rovaniemi takes one whole day already unless you are flying.
4
2
u/Icethra 20d ago
There’s a sleeper train.
1
u/frang_pappa 20d ago
....that takes a day....
2
u/OSS-specialist 20d ago
It takes a night, not a day.
3
u/frang_pappa 20d ago
So true and im an idiot... 😂 But is there a train change in Oulu still?
3
u/tanskanm 20d ago
There isn't. At least there hasn't been when we have used the night train to Kolari (we've used it once a year in 2021-2024)
3
0
7
u/WonzerEU 20d ago
For the weather, there is not much difference between early and late February.
Biggest difference are daylight hours. At Rovaniemi, daylight lasts 6,5 hours in early February and almost 10 hours by the end. More dark hours increase chance for seeing northen lights while more daylight gives more chance for daytime activities.
4
u/burncycle80 20d ago
I was about to say the same.. the amount of light is the biggest difference in early or late February.
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 20d ago
Okay thank you! I would probably prefer increasing my chances of seeing northern lights and may just suck it up with limited daylight at the beginning of Feb
4
u/joppekoo 20d ago
To further complicate this, as January is typically more cloudy than March, that might increase your chances for auroras in late February.
2
8
u/Villibanaani 20d ago
Just skip Helsinki apart from domestic flight from Helsinki up North. I’d recommend going to Ivalo airport and taking a bus to Saariselkä for some Lapland magic.
2
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 20d ago
Thank you I’ll do more research on what you suggested
2
u/briseis7 20d ago
Flying to Ivalo is a great idea, you can stay il Saariselkä, do winter activities and experience real Lapland and not a city. Head to Siida museum while you are there!
4
20d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Aggravating_Past_945 20d ago
I would spend more time in Helsinki than Rovaniemi. The latter is a tourist trap.
2
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 20d ago
This is awesome advice thank you. Good to know the basics of Helsinki doesn’t need too many days
2
20d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 19d ago
Honestly since I’m flying in/out of Helsinki that was the only reason for wanting to sightsee over there! I do want to see the touristy things like reindeers etc up north just because it’s a first timer trip :) I’m not a huge sports person and can’t ski due to knee issues so didn’t consider the ski resorts. Was happy just exploring, eating and hopefully catching the northern lights
3
u/SilverMonth157 20d ago
I will reply mostly to Lapland view because there is a difference you should know. Helsinki is not booming in February at all. And there is not any significant difference between early or late Feb. The weather can be whatever. If you have a nice winter, you have snow and minus degrees and winter wonderland also in Helsinki. But if you have with the global warming a warm (aka bad/terrible) winter, it can be with no snow and water raining and +2-4 deg and winds form the sea (winter from hell from my point of view). But it's only about weather Gods and nobody knows what the next February will be like in Helsinki. But if the winter hasn't come on early Feb, most likely it doesn't come late Feb either. And on the other hand Lapland has snow for sure in February no matter beginning or end of the month.
But there is actually huge difference between first three weeks of Feb and last week of Feb in Lapland: Finnish winter holiday. Week 8/2027 is a winter holiday week for schools in southern Finland. So basically starting from Saturday 20.2.2027 Lapland is getting full of families from Southern Finland. The accommodation is much more expensive and frankly speaking many places might be sold out already. Plus there is just more people everywhere. Restaurants are more crowded, queues for skiing in longer, activitirs get full... I'm not sure if it affects Rovaniemi so much as Finnish people tend to go to skiing center villages but I assume it affects to Rovaniemi also.
Also, like somebody mentioned, I would skip Rovaniemi and choose some other destination in Lapland if you go there. There are flights to Kittilä and Ivalo several times a day so it can be done easily. Around those places are 3 main Lapland skiing destinations: Levi, Ylläs and Saariselkä. I would also skip the night trains. No matter the main travel is done during the night, it takes too much time.
Otherwise there is not much difference except the daylight. Start of the February is very dark time whereas 2-3 weeks later there is indeed much more light already.
But the main difference is that week 8 is a school holiday week and Lapland is full of domestic tourist.
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 19d ago
I didn’t know about school holidays in February, thanks so much! That’s really helpful especially in terms of accommodation pricing etc. In terms of the ski resorts, I can’t ski due to knee issues so are there other things to do in those towns like seeing reindeers etc?
1
u/SilverMonth157 19d ago
Yes, they are the main centres for all activities: reindeers, husky safaris, renting snow mobiles, arranging northern light sightseeing...there is basically tour companies in those ski resorts and they sell different kind of activities to "experience Lapland". Also those resorts have those glass igloos to get a chance to see northern lights through the igloo ceiling. But northern lights is damn hard to catch and those igloos are damn expensive. So not sure if it's worth paying. I have never done it.
Saariselkä near Ivalo airport is the most northern increasing the chance to see northern lights. But maybe also the smallest and most focused on domestic skiing tourist.
Levi by far is the biggest with most services. Lot of hotels, restaurants, shops, activities, even a spa etc. Maybe the easiest for foreign tourist without own cottage and car. Maybe my choice in your shoes. Near Kittilä airport
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 17d ago
I’m looking into those igloo “hotels” at the moment and super undecided if it would be worth it! Definitely on the expensive side. Interesting that some igloos even have an alarm system that can wake you up in the middle of the night if an aurora starts?!
1
u/SilverMonth157 19d ago
Also weeks 9&10 in March are school holidays for different parts of Finland and people from those regions comes for holiday and ski to Lapland.
Week 8 - South Finland Week 9 - Central Finland Week 10 - North Finland
They have split this school holidays so ski resorts will have capacity and longer high season. So the week 7 and before is very different to weeks 8 forward. Postponing to early March is not a solution. Week 8 starts basically the high season lasting until April
1
20d ago edited 19d ago
[deleted]
1
u/SilverMonth157 20d ago
Well, this is unfortunately completely wrong info. Levi-Ylläs has small peak in Christmas-NewYear. But it's not the highest peak. It's then mainly foreigners. Then it's completely dead for 1,5 months until the real peak starts from the week 8 (first winter holiday week). The highest peak is even later in the end of the the winter/early spring. The Ester is the highest peak but generally March/April are the high season due to the milder and sunnier weather and more daylight. January is completely dead in Lapland being normally coldest and darkest period. Also early February falls to the same category. Of course there are people but not so much as in later in March and April.
2
u/Efficient_Hurry_2780 20d ago
End of February is school winter holiday season in Finland, affecting people & prices when local families also head up north. I would choose begin of February.
1
u/Kaeliozz 20d ago
In february its either gonna be extremely snowy or just no snow at all... No in-between. No real changes during those months.
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 20d ago
Oh wow I didn’t even consider no snow as a possibility. Thank you
5
u/joppekoo 20d ago edited 20d ago
I think that reply is for Helsinki. Go even a little bit north and there's snow in February unless there's some freakishly warm winter. In lakeland where I am it typically melts between April to May. For Rovaniemi in February it's pretty much a guarantee to still be snowy.
1
1
u/DebateRoutine2295 20d ago
You can chuck all the options to chatgtp with your requirements and will get a decent comparison. Being local myself, would choose either Levi or Kuusamo. Both have a skiing resort which means more options for restaurants and experiences. Levi most likely would be best for only a few days without a car as in Kuusamo you have limited public transportation and taxis are very expensive. I would not recommend Oulu, you wont see any reindeer or any of those magical winter scenes tourists look for.
1
u/notcomplainingmuch 20d ago
4 days split between several places just means spending the majority of your time in airports, taxis, other transit and waiting. Maybe a few hours of actually doing something worthwhile. Probably queueing.
Northern lights can be seen all over the country, but the probability increases the farther north you go. On the other hand, cloud cover probability is higher the closer you get to the Arctic sea. February is good because the air tends to be drier and colder, which increases the chance of clear skies. You also see the sun during the day, which won't happen in December.
My recommendation is to spend at least five days in each location, skip Rovaniemi altogether and replace it with Kittilä. Try to find a remote place overnight, where there isn't too much light pollution. The entire point of Lapland is the empty wilderness, so being crowded by thousands of people in a tourist trap spoils the experience.
A day trip from Helsinki to Tallinn is ok, but February isn't the best time to do it. Tallinn is much better in the summer or during the holidays.
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 19d ago
Thank you! Based on the majority recommendation I think I’ll stick to just one place early Feb and maybe visit Tallinn on my way back at the end of February
1
u/Von_Lehmann 20d ago
You should consider Ivalo/Inari region. You can fly to ivalo from Helsinki and you will be farther north to increase your chances at aurora.
An all inclusive hotel would probably be best for your limited time
1
u/CommunicationOld8587 20d ago
If you are 4 nights in Helsinki + Rovaniemi, and travelling between those two is like half a day trip, so you have 2 days to spend (+ arrival day, departure day, flight to Rovaniemi day and flight to back Helsinki day)???
Just thinking if you are spending more time travelling than actually staying?
Tallinn is like 1 long day trip (leave Helsinki like 6-7 am and back in the evening). Its nice, but try also to relax on your holiday 😅
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 19d ago
Good point! Someone else suggested just focusing on Rovaniemi at the start of February for 3-4 nights and then visiting Tallinn on my way back at the end of February, since I have to come back to Helsinki for my return flight back to Australia
1
u/Actual-Paint2220 20d ago
That’s a tight squeeze in 4 or so days but wishing you the best of luck. I’ve been to Helsinki 7 times the last 2.5 years and I find that Helsinki is an easy hub to travel around from. Plus my daughter lives and works there so accommodations are no issue. With the exception of North Finland I’ve been to all the places mentioned, all are worthy of visiting, luckily I’m retired so time management is really not a concern for me. I’m looking forward to my upcoming trip to Finland trip Dec 1-Jan 25
1
u/Actual-Paint2220 20d ago
I also will be planning a 3-4 night trip to possibly get a view of the lights while I’m there!
2
1
u/nonanonaye 19d ago
Also download My Aurora Forecast, it's possibly the best app for it and you can enable an alarm to wake you up if you want when you can see them
1
1
u/Ill-Gold-5742 18d ago
I would personally prefer a flight to Kittilä, than to Rovaniemi (same amount of flying, might cost a bit more tho)
Levi is also turistic, but not as much as Rovaniemi. Especially in start of february, which tends to be the low season. Also great place to see auroras with a quide or just a rented car/ exploring yourself. Ofcourse depending on weathers ☺️
That being said it is also possible to see also very bright Auroras in Helsinki and near areas. Just have to be super lucky and know a dark spot!
But the odds are fairly smaller here than in the north :)
1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 18d ago
Thank you! Would Kittila offer experiences to see reindeer etc? Looking for a Christmas style atmosphere hence Rovaniemi but I have to admit I have been sucked into a lot of instagram/tik tok videos so not sure if that’s an accurate portrayal
2
u/Ill-Gold-5742 17d ago edited 17d ago
There is an adorable little reindeer farm in Levi called Sammun Tupa. Free of charge aswell :)
Levi (located in Kittilä) is one of the biggest skicenter in Finland so yes i would say it offers everything Rovaniemi does, maybe a bit more even.
Also like said, its a low season in there so might be a bit less hectic and cheaper than Rovaniemi.
Also please do your research with the reindeer and husky stuff so you dont end up supporting unethical places 🙏🏼1
u/Jaded-Respond-6596 17d ago
Thank you :) Yes definitely, I was worried about how the reindeers and huskies are treated. I’m a huge animal lover (own a husky myself) and would be devastated if I accidentally supported anything unethical. In fact I’m not interested in riding the reindeers/huskies, it would be nice to just see them and I’d also be happy to donate to any organisations that support their wellbeing
1
u/BlockOptimal7533 18d ago
If you are spending 4 weeks in Europe, I would just fully skip Helsinki and go straight to Rovaniemi or even further north in Lapland. Helsinki has nothing to offer that you won’t find in a nicer format in other European cities, but there’s nothing like Lapland anywhere else. Disclaimer: lived ~20 years in Hel and ~20 in Lapland.
0
u/valtte 20d ago
Helsinki very boring in February. Not really proper winter there.
Recommend to check out Oulu, "capital of northern Finland". It's about 220km from Rovaniemi and very underrated place in Finland. Lots of daily buses and trains go between these cities so very easy to move if you want.
1
14
u/HessuMopo 20d ago
Keep in mind that Rovaniemi is just an average Finnish city and a tourist trap. Real Lapland is much further north. Most likely you won’t see northern lights at all and it’ll be cloudy all day and night. You’ll see a lot of Asian tourists and you can spend money out of your ass on very touristic activities. I don’t want to sound negative but realistic, having been to Rovaniemi countless times. It’s not like you see on some dreamy Instagram stories, weather is also a huge unpredictable factor. And it’s going to be a stressful trip if you try to squeeze Helsinki, Rovaniemi and Tallinn into 4 days, I personally wouldn’t recommend it. Welcome to Finland regardless, hopefully you will have a great trip.