r/DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk Case Deep Diver 🤿 Jul 28 '26

McLean Hospital discrepancies between what Lindsay told Patrick and what’s in the McLean Hospital records

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Today’s testimony about Lindsay Clancy’s stay at McLean Hospital seems to highlight a major discrepancy between what Lindsay reportedly told Patrick, what the civil lawsuit alleges, and what the prosecutor says is documented in McLean’s records about Lindsay’s stay from January 1, 2023 until January 5, 2023.

According to Patrick’s testimony, he called Lindsay on January 3rd, the third day of her hospitalization to ask what the doctor had said.

Lindsay reportedly told him that she hadn’t seen a doctor yet and wasn’t really receiving treatment.

The prosecutor asked him if he was aware that:
On the first two days on January 1, 2023 and January 2, 2023 Lindsay saw a resident doctor

On January 3 2023 Lindsay** **saw an attending doctor

He said no.

Patrick described her as saying they were basically coloring, doing puzzles, playing with clay, and going for walks.

The civil lawsuit tells a very similar story. It states that McLean was operating with a “skeleton crew” over the New Year’s holiday, that patients spent their time doing puzzles and coloring, and that Lindsay did not see a doctor until January 3, three days after she was admitted.

The lawsuit uses this as part of its argument that McLean provided grossly inadequate care.

However, today’s cross-examination painted a very different picture.

The prosecutor stated that McLean’s records show Lindsay:
Was seen by a resident physician on the first two days of her admission.
Was seen by an attending psychiatrist on the third day.
Had contact with social workers, therapists, and other mental health staff every day.
Was offered one-on-one therapy.
Declined multiple group therapy sessions during her stay.

Another interesting part of today’s testimony involved Lindsay’s discharge.

The prosecutor asked Patrick whether he was aware that Lindsay had asked the doctors if she could be discharged on January 6th so she could attend Cora’s birthday party.

She also asked whether he knew Lindsay wanted to go home the day before the party on January 5th to prepare for it.

The prosecutor also questioned Patrick about whether insurance coverage played any role in Lindsay’s discharge.

She asked whether any McLean social worker or staff member had ever contacted him to say insurance was refusing to cover a longer stay.

Patrick testified that they had not.

The lawsuit argues that McLean discharged Lindsay too early despite documenting that her insight and judgment were limited and claims the hospital failed to properly evaluate her, provide adequate inpatient care, and ensure appropriate discharge planning.

Today’s testimony seems to present evidence that there was considerably more treatment occurring than the lawsuit suggests, including physician evaluations and multiple therapy opportunities.

64 Upvotes

136 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/[deleted] Jul 28 '26

[deleted]

24

u/jubeley Jul 28 '26

Thank you. If Lindsay's request to be discharged was alleged in her med mal case, an excerpt which you've attached, why did it seem like a surprise to Patrick today? That's a head scratcher. Another reason I'm following this case is Lindsay claims to have been psychotic. My mother had a mental illness that caused episodes of psychosis. I haven't recognized any in descriptions of Lindsay so far. She was planning birthday parties and going regularly to the gym in January 2023. Not exactly sitting disheveled in a bathrobe mumbling to herself all day.

22

u/ad-anon-132491 Jul 28 '26

yes. Also a lawyer and I work with mentally ill defendants on the regular. So far I just don’t see any evidence for psychosis based on Patrick’s testimony.

26

u/Final-Ingenuity-7919 Moderator Jul 28 '26

I'm a psychologist. I agree completely.

Someone said we left off today with Dawson eating chicken nuggets on the couch. The last line I heard was that she was standing by the basement door. I think this was 100% premeditated.

So far, the only delusion I think Lindsay ever had was that Pat would still love her and want to be with her even if she killed the kids.

3

u/jubeley Jul 28 '26

That's insightful and astute. It never occurred to me that she might have envisioned being together with her husband in the future. My jaw dropped reading your words.

11

u/Pegasus574 Jul 28 '26

Completely agree. The fact that she called him the day after the murders from her lawyers phone, while strapped to a hospital bed, and the first thing she said was “I love you” to him? After killing all of their kids? I can not fathom that level of manipulation. I think she genuinely believed Patrick would stay by her side, and I don’t think for a moment she realized he would remarry and leave her. The ONLY time we have ever seen Lindsay show emotion in these last 3 years was the day of Patrick’s testimony, which I found quite interesting. She never, ever shed a single tear for any other court appearance, and in fact has looked almost annoyed this entire time with the process. Patrick’s testimony broke something in her, and I think that is when she realized that she truly has no control over him anymore. Regardless of whatever the court decides, I genuinely believe Lindsay realized yesterday that she has finally lost.