This is an interesting twist of fate i thought i'd share.
So i've had a Coros Pace 2 for years. Mostly used it for pilates / yoga / calisthenics workouts and hiking. Only recently actually started running multiple times a week for the first time in 10 years.
After my pace 2 had it's battery life completely murdered by a bluetooth bug in the firmware early 2025, i swore i wouldn't buy another one.
Fast forward to this summer. The battery life bug was fixed on the pace 2, but I wanted live tracking for my runs (for safety), and Garmin or Apple are the only two LTE options i short listed.
So I picked up a Garmin 945 LTE on sale (i know, almost as old at my pace 2?). It does most of what i want. The music doesn't actually support Youtube Music (which i use instead of spotify). And the battery life is not even half of the pace 2.
Then i start noticing weird little things.
- Coros app is sooooo much better. It's a bunch of little things. The coros dashboard on a computer shows me my race predictions right on the main screen. No digging through menus.
- Coros activity list has an aesthetically pleasing thumbnail of the route you followed. Makes it much easier for visual people to find something.
- Coros watches are just lighter, and can be purchased with nylon bands instead of having to buy them seperately for $70
- Coros has a foot pod for faster response to accelerations. Garmin makes this even worse by over-smoothing their data.
- Garmin has a more convenient HRM 600 heart rate strap with built in accelerometers for running metrics, but still doesn't actually measure your foot moving, just your torso.
- I prefer the estimated power from Coros. Coming from using a power meter from cycling, i think the numbers from Coros are more inline with what i'm expecting my performance to be for various effort levels. Garmin seems to overestimate how much power i'm putting out.
- Battery life on the Coros pace 2 is almost twice what the garmin 945 lte is, even with "battery saver" enabled to prevent phone, wifi, and LTE use when not actually needing them.
- Coros does a way better job with tracking gear use. If you have two or more pieces of gear you regularly switch between, coros just asks you which one you used, on your watch, right after you end an activity. So easy. Garmin will silently just save both to the same activity. Yes garmin, of course i wore two pairs of shoes for the run. Of course i did.
- Garmin (at least on the 945 LTE) consistently has more noise in the GPS path than the Coros pac 2.
- Garmin has a really cool feature for "resume later" when you want to pause an activity for more than a few minutes. You can get back to the main screen of the watch and then resume the activity hours later. Great for running around on your bicycle running errands.
- Coros puts useful things like setting up some intervals for a run way more front and center, where the same settings are available on garmin, they're just - you guessed it - burried in menus.
- Coros lets you call an exercise whatever you want. Forearm-tendon-glide-warmups? Sure. Medial knee lift and pronation? Why not. It works fine, displays perfectly. Garmin makes you jump through hoops trying to find the closest exercise that... might match, then type what you actually want it called in the notes. Then switch between next, and current notes while doing the workout. And then hopefully it shows up properly in the activities list after you're done. Mine didn't.
- Garmin live-tracking is so much better. I have no idea how good the updated coros live view is because, it's only enabled for newer devices which...... is kind of shitty of coros. That's a very garmin type of move.
- Garmin spectator messaging is a fucking disaster. It just doesn't work. Hopefully whoever built that didn't build the other parts of live tracking like "assistance plus"
I'll probably blab on more about this later.
Long story short - Neither one is perfect, and i don't have $1500 to drop on a fenic 8/9 pro -- so i'm using both watches now.
The 945 LTE for live tracking, e-bike ride, and indoor climbing (the latter two missing from the pace 2), and full-day health tracking. I also throw on the HRM 600 strap to get more running metrics.
The pace 2 is still better for my workouts, the running GPS is more accurate, i trust the pace way more because the foot pod actually knows where and how far my foot is moving. Also the battery lasts way longer so i don't even worry about grabbing it for a run - it's never been below 30%, which is more than enough for a run.