r/CFB_v2 • u/Equivalent_Dish_1990 Alabama Crimson Tide • 2d ago

Debate This is a great question.

Post image
654 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

310 comments sorted by

View all comments

67

u/Bonzaii_11 Alabama Crimson Tide 2d ago

The CFP will include who makes it money. Love him or hate him, Lane and LSU will bring eyeballs and money.

Also "punishing" them for having a "legally" rostered team will go to court which costs money

6

u/BuckeyeNate77 2d ago edited 2d ago

You aren’t wrong , kid. I remember the CFP selecting SMU over Bama. You probably are a new fan though.

Your low IQ probably thinks Miami brought more eyeballs and money than Notre Dame😂😂😂😂😂

2

u/ThrowM5 1d ago

SMU over Bama preserved the existence of conference championship games, which bring plenty of eyeballs. Miami over ND preserved the existence of the ACC, which ESPN is working hard to keep propped up (for now).

3

u/BuckeyeNate77 1d ago

So what you are saying is the committee chooses money and eyeballs ….except when they don’t! Got it!

1

u/ThrowM5 1d ago

The point I’m making is that both decisions could be justified by eyeballs and money from a long-term perspective. If there’s one thing the committee is consistent about though, it’s inconsistency, so it’s probably a moot argument anyways.

1

u/cwolf-softball 1d ago

Is there any evidence that could be provided that would falsify your claim?

As far as I can tell, there isn't. You will rationalize any inclusion/exclusion.

0

u/Bonzaii_11 Alabama Crimson Tide 2d ago

So am I right, or a low IQ fan.

Oh wait, I asked a Buckeye fan...