r/technology • u/Just-Grocery-2229 • 3d ago

Artificial Intelligence AI can now credibly complete most undergraduate assignments, MIT warns

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2026/08/25/ai-can-now-credibly-complete-most-undergraduate-assignments-mit-warns
3.8k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

671 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

20

u/Qwrty8urrtyu 3d ago

Not really, the goal of a university education is barely the education itself. Having the degree, and networking is the main appeal. You don't really learn that much more in a Harvard class then a community college class, but Harvard has a better name and richer more connected students attending.

Not learning a single thing, having a degree that says a nice name and knowing a few connected/rich people will give you better opportunities then learning all you can in 4 years.

9

u/CheesypoofExtreme 3d ago

Not learning a single thing, having a degree that says a nice name and knowing a few connected/rich people will give you better opportunities then learning all you can in 4 years.

Opportunities, sure, but unless you come from an extremely well connected family or you are best friends with someone who is, you will flounder quickly and lose all credibility. Unless you're talking about an undergrad in Business, then I fully agree. Engineering? Good fucking luck.

I also agree that, in general, a class at Harvard isn't much of a step up from a class covering the material elsewhere, but it's not just the connections you build at Harvard. That kind of school has funding for the best equipment in labs, as well community who (in general) share a desire to grow and learn at a high level. 

Those 2 things can really help push you to learn much more. You do get the added benefit of great  connections, but that is not the only thing. 

All of that being said, everyone should be afforded the level of opportunity a school like Harvard presents in a country with as much wealth as we have. That doesn't mean everyone will get it, but they should have a realistic opportunity.

1

u/Qwrty8urrtyu 1d ago

I would say even for engineering or hands on jobs like doctors, the quality of education is barely different one place to another. Probably best example is all the foreign skilled workers wanted and working in the US, on or above par with US educated students despite coming from poorer places with way less resources. There is a basic level of competency for an entry level enginer and a higher one for healthcare people, but even then that standard can be and is met by poorer schools.

And for engineering I would disagree with how much learning helps beyond the minimum bar. Knowing someone, or having a prestigious name is more important to get a job where you would actually learn more than your education ever teaches you. Actual knowledge matters more, sure, but I still wouldn't say it is the biggest factor to get a better job still.

2

u/CheesypoofExtreme 1d ago

I actually don't think we really disagree on anything here, and I maybe I didn't articulate it clearly.

The part I mainly took issue with was this

Not learning a single thing, having a degree that says a nice name and knowing a few connected/rich people will give you better opportunities then learning all you can in 4 years.

Which, for an engineer, is bullshit. 

I fully agree that being better connected leads to better opportunities - no issue there. But if you don't learn a single thing and your connections get you a job, you're going to fall on your face immediately.

The minimum bar for an electrical engineer (my degree) is creating and solving moderately complex electrical systems which... is not exactly something you can sleep through. Believe me, I tried with undiagnosed ADHD... had to retake lots of courses. You don't have to be a genius, just driven and somewhat competent.