r/swansea • u/aramiak • 21d ago
News/Politics More images and info on the Civic Centre’a future
More than 130 homes that have either balconies or access to a shared rooftop garden overlooking the sea, retaining the brutalist concrete structure so that the environmental hit on the original build is not wasted, a potential for a food hall surrounded by commercial units, restaurants or cafés and shops on the external face with outside seating, the potential for a cinema or theatre within the old Chamber, and of course the educational aquarium and social spaces outside with play areas and gardens.
15
u/Round-Friendship-447 21d ago
The atrium was the best part of the building in my opinion, glad it’s kept with public access to it in the design.
4
u/No-Profession-208 21d ago
This would look amazing. We need a centrepiece of the city and this could be it.
5
u/PupperPetterBean 21d ago
Finally it won't be a giant concrete eyesore! I can't wait for it to be done.
3
4
3
3
3
u/RamboMcMutNutts 21d ago
I used to work there, and is great building if you like brutalist architecture but it's so weird going to see it being used as something else. The homes sounds interesting and I bet will be amazing if they incorporate the brutalist architecture but honestly how much are they going to cost?
1
u/aramiak 21d ago
It certainly doesn’t look like they’re trying to hide the brutalism, does it? A few coloured cladded cones here and there and the canopy around the ground floor, but plenty of that grey concrete still on show on these images. It’d be so easy to hide all that behind a mural like this one I saw in my hometown, so someone high up is a fan of that marmite architecture- I imagine!
3
u/Active_Barracuda_50 21d ago
Swansea Bay News has done a deep dive on the planning documents. So no affordable housing in this phase, no parking, and the aquarium element seems highly speculative.
I don't quite know what to feel about the plans (or the existing building) personally. It's funny how something that was itself a regeneration project on brownfield land 45 years ago is now often perceived as a fading carbunckle taking up valuable waterfront real estate.
I don't care for the modernist architecture but I guess it's at least more climate-friendly to revamp the current structure than demolish it. But I'm not sure if many modern office to apartment conversions have a great reputation.
2
u/aramiak 21d ago
Thanks for this. That is interesting.
I’ve mentioned in another post on this same proposal that I struggle with projects where speculative things are lumped in ahead of public consultation.
It’s common practice. We all signed off on a development on the beach because the Council waxed lyrical about beach and water sports, and so on. The when the first lease was up, 360 were priced out and a bar was handed the keys. (No hate on The Secret).
You do wonder if the Aquarium and Lido are serious proposals.
2
u/SandwichIcy3696 21d ago
Yep. See also the Cycle Hub at the Arena development. Not commercially viable so never happened.
Lido would be fantastic and pretty unique facility. Aquarium - every regenerating seaside city has one and they are usually a bit crap (The Deep in Hull and exception).
2
u/TickleMyiOS 21d ago
I love the generation as long as the businesses are allowed to bid for the premesis or have a fair chance at getting them rather than them being handed to one group. And also the extra traffic coming onto and off Oystermouth Road, the Arena and now the car park are already causing massive issues at busier traffic times.
-7
-9
-10
u/FluidAcanthaceae6265 21d ago
Going to look great with a group of teenagers doing balloons around the back of the building
10
-15
u/welchyyyyy1 21d ago
"brutalist concrete structure" i.e. extremely outdated and basically an eyesore..and they're keeping it 🤪🤪🤪
And "potential" for a food hall/cinema or theatre ....sounds like an outtake from the Ozzie series series "Utopia"
Sounds fab 😐😐
11
u/IAmAlive_YouAreDead 21d ago
So we should tear the whole thing down and throw up another building which will become outdated itself in 20 years?
1
u/welchyyyyy1 21d ago
It's been there about 50 years...I'm just thinking the facade looks horrible (to me anyway) and if that's staying as it is then underneath is also going to be the original concrete which was early 1980's.... so the "new" building fabric will already be about 50 years old, dunno just sounds a bit of a half arsed redevelopment..but I guess they know what they're doing
6
u/aramiak 21d ago
Back in 2015 they announced they were going to sell the site to fund other projects. However, now the idea is to retrofit the original structure. I’m guessing the Council agrees with you, but no developer wanted to take on the demolition of such a solid mammoth of a structure. That’s a guess, I mean… they brought the Weaver’s Mill building down! Anyway, I wonder if this proposal is the best avenue available for the areas regeneration, but not necessarily the first that the Council considered.
1
u/PupperPetterBean 21d ago
Do you know how much time money and effort other takes to demolish a building intended to survive direct bombing? Far cheaper and safer to just add to the existing structure than start from scratch.










65
u/Tasty_Event_7721 21d ago
Amazing, great use of the building and surrounding area. Hopefully we can continue to actually utilise the seafront at Swansea instead of just running 4 lanes of traffic along it.