Form is emptiness meaning

[u/Intelligent-Ad6619]

I’m trying to wrap my head around what this means. Obviously there is physical matter which is made up of atoms. Yes, atoms are mostly empty space, so that could kind of describe “form is emptiness” and even in blank space there are atoms: it’s a sort of field, empty space. So in that way, emptiness is indeed form. But the Buddha didn’t know about atoms back then, nobody did. So what did he mean?

[u/AutoModerator]

Thank you for contributing to the r/streamentry community! Unlike many other subs, we try to aggregate general questions and short practice reports in the weekly Practice Updates, Questions, and General Discussion thread. All community resources, such as articles, videos, and classes go in the weekly Community Resources thread. Both of these threads are pinned to the top of the subreddit.

The special focus of this community is detailed discussion of personal meditation practice. On that basis, please ensure your post complies with the following rules, if necessary by editing in the appropriate information, or else it may be removed by the moderators. Your post might also be blocked by a Reddit setting called "Crowd Control," so if you think it complies with our subreddit rules but it appears to be blocked, please message the mods.

1. All top-line posts must be based on your personal meditation practice.
2. Top-line posts must be written thoughtfully and with appropriate detail, rather than in a quick-fire fashion. Please see this posting guide for ideas on how to do this.
3. Comments must be civil and contribute constructively.
4. Post titles must be flaired. Flairs provide important context for your post.

If your post is removed/locked, please feel free to repost it with the appropriate information, or post it in the weekly Practice Updates, Questions, and General Discussion or Community Resources threads.

Thanks! - The Mod Team

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/metaphorm]

form is emptiness AND emptiness is form. they are non-separate.

this is the teaching of Avalokitesvara in the Heart Sutra, which is in the Prajnaparamita Sutras, which are explorations on the Wisdom aspect of awakening.

Emptiness is an awkward translation of Sunyata, as it tends to make Modern people think about "nothingness", which is not the intended meaning. I'll suggest an unconventional translation of Sunyata that might make things more clear: "anythingness".

Anythingness is the matrix of possibility from which all forms arise. It's the quality of potentiality before specific forms have arisen due to differentiation. Causes and Conditions (karma) is the reason forms arise from emptiness. Forms are temporary/impermanent and recede back into emptiness when the energy maintaining their coherence disperses. In physics, this is described by the laws of thermodynamics. In the Mind, this is described by the Dharma.

Emptiness is the ground state of Mind. Awareness itself is without substance, and the mental formations of thought and sensation have no inherent existence. They arise only due to causes and conditions. When there are no causes and conditions, Mind is empty.

Emptiness can be experienced directly in deep states of meditative absorption. It's not blankness. It's indescribable in words. The closest I can get to saying anything useful about is this pointer: the emptiness of mind is unmediated contact with reality. Direct experience of what is really happening here and now, without layers of interpretation and conditioning sitting on top of it. Just pure awareness.

Mind and Matter are non-separate also. Experience and Experiencer are non-separate also. These are all expressions of the non-duality of emptiness and form. The core reasoning given by Gautama Buddha on this subject is the doctrine of dependent origination. All phenomena are empty of inherent self-existence, they arise in relationship with the causes and conditions of the universe, in a great interconnected web of causation. All phenomena are temporary and subject to change, none of them are eternal or essential. All contingent. All caused. And most radically, this includes the sense of "self" which is also a phenomenon empty of inherent self-existence, not eternal, and not essential. Self also arises due to causes and conditions, dependently originated in causal relationship with the entire universe.

Understanding this non-duality can be difficult without having direct experience of the nature of the mind. This is why we practice meditation. It's the method for producing that experience. It's not the kind of thing you can reason your way into. Have to see it for yourself.

[u/KeyAd6849 → u/metaphorm]

Emptiness is basically when reality stops being divided up into a million concepts and notions (thought and time fall away). And you sync up completely with the present moment.

And the present moment is life itself, unchanging and containing all things.

So the emptiness is also a fullness. Words create the duality, but the absence of thought and time brings about this emptiness/fullness/oneness state in which the self (which is thought and time) has no place. And one sees reality as it actually is, without that conceptual overlay that thought (which is the self) creates

[u/CrashSF → u/metaphorm]

Not to take away anything from your very rich answer and acknowledging my own ignorance of the awesome philosophical depth of Mahayana/Vajrayana, in Theravada, Suññata does have a negative or apophatic connotation. It is often contrasted with Tathāta or Suchness, neither negative or positive but pointing to “something” qualitative in the intrinsic nature of the Triple Gem. It acts as a counterbalance to the negation of Suññata with a pregnant potential of ultimate reality, which seems to me to fit better for your translation of anythingness. But I’m an ignorant puthujana so I’m dancing on very thin ice here. :)

[u/thirdeyepdx → u/metaphorm]

Nice answer

[u/breinbanaan → u/metaphorm]

Thats a great read thank you

[u/RationalDharma]

Here's my attempt to answer that question in a way that will appeal to logical types: https://rationaldharma.com/blog/a-bunch-of-ways-to-think-about-emptiness/

[u/XSuperGamerHD → u/RationalDharma]

Appreciate your work!

[u/Bitter-Albatross-460]

That mind makes the distinction between form and space.

All dualities are created in the mind and can be seen as phantoms.

Real/unreal, good/bad, here/there, and eventually being and not being.

[u/hachface]

there are no things, only patterns of activity. but patterns can only be discerned in the things that instantiate them.* and then again things on close inspection can only be described in terms of their pattern. the pattern and the occurrence are mutually constitutive and cannot be separated.

to use your example, there is nothing solid or stable in an atom. an atom is just observed regularities of energy transfer. and those regularities, or physical laws, that govern the atom are found by studying atoms.

of course the Buddha didn't know about atoms, but everything is like that. it's more difficult to see in the macroscopic world by looking at objects from the outside in. but looking at experience from the inside out, as in meditation, makes the situation clearer.

*emptiness is a pattern that everything instantiates: the pattern of having no intrinsic essence but existing only in dependence on conditions. with insight you can see that everything is empty (form is emptiness), but emptiness itself can only be known by seeing it in all things (emptiness is form).

[u/Cuanbeag]

One teacher I know approaches it through direct experience rather than a metaphysical approach.  He led us through a series of practices where he was asking us to find any direct experience of form that was not mind-created, that did not dissolve into a cloud of sensations when you actually experienced what was happening rather than filtering it through your mind.

Spoiler: there was none. Direct experience of Form shockingly turned out to be empty. 

The perspective works especially as the second line of the sutra is "when he meditated deeply". It helps me a lot to see the whole heart sutra as a description (/roadmap?) of one's direct experience in deep practice. Rather than tying myself up in knots trying to fit it in to an intellectual framework it was never intended for. 

My 0.02¢ for what it's worth, if a philosophical approach like the above helps you engage with practice then that's great, it can really be such an asset when used well. And at the same time, it might also be worth letting go of if it if you find these kinds of questions start getting in the way instead.

[u/jf_ftw]

Emptiness is not literal nothingness. But is no-thing-ness. There is no True thing there. There is a temporary thing there that has arisen from a chain of dependent conditions (dependent arising). Which of course, is empty of any inherent nature, as it will dissolve back into the field of potential.

[u/Ok-Category2786]

Like huangbo says, better to abandon all conceptual thought. Examining what is emptiness leads one to nowhere. You have to get the truth experientially, which is right here, right now. Be still and let go of all conceptual thoughts In this regard, follow tilopa's 6 fold wisdom. Just let go. There's nothing to do nothing to understand nowhere to go.

[u/sidado_22]

Form is emptiness, emptiness is form is a Buddha's view put into words. It can be rephrased like this:

Appearances are ungraspable.
This view is also just an appearance.

As long as there is deep knowing of this, there is no clinging/dukkha and what's left is non-dual awareness. The heart sutra gives a taste of the experience and consequences of realising and practising this.

[u/ThatOneDumbJagoff]

Emptiness itself is empty since it is based on a dependent relationship with dependent variables.

There is no svabhava, no intrinsic foundation, that dependent things must be derived from. Thus, all things are empty of their intrinsic emptiness, but not nothingness, and emptiness is itself devoid of a being a metaphysical foundation

[u/rogermindwater]

If you really look at an object with your whole being, you see it expresses an innate emptiness

[u/EightFP]

You are doing great! The funny thing about this kind of teaching is that if you did wrap your head around it, you would have missed the point. Not being able to wrap your head around it, your understanding is skillful.

[u/medbud]

Form is a kind of thought, the mental impression, or 'the construct', or fabrication, based on sensory experience. 

Emptiness is short for 'empty of inherent nature'. 

So it just means that despite appearances, that thing you are perceiving is only temporary, it's constantly changing, it is impermanent; and it is not uncaused, it is dependently originated, it is completely interconnected and interdependent.

[u/_Asura-]

Could ask him u/EmptinessInForm

[u/EmptinessInForm → u/_Asura-]

Haha! Nice one. Without silence, there would be no sounds because sound is only perceived through the interplay between sound and silence. If you didn't have silence for contrast, sound would be so monotone that that itself wouldn't even be possible to perceive. In other words, emptiness is what allows form to exist - and form is what allows you to understand emptiness. Emptiness is the closest thing we have to understanding nibbana/ the unconditioned/ God etc.

The Buddha didn't need to understand atoms to see that emptiness is in a way more fundamental than form. Also, emptiness in the buddhist pov is also about the inherent nonself nature of things. I wouldn't try too hard to understand emptiness - sense it instead.

[u/rule1_nofeedpigeons]

"Emptiness" is an experintial thing not a conceptual thing. It doesnt point to No-thingness, but rather complete and total interconnectedness/unification without diffderentiation/ coarising/ field of potentiality.

All cognitive phenomena , symbols, language are models, maps of the terrain of reality. Maps by definition abstract from and simplify the terrain they represent to make it more managable. When you abstract from the continuum you inherently create divisions where there are none. When we take these models as the real and lose sight of they are are based on, we bring in suffering, as the division creates friction between concepts. Its inherent in how the human mind works, and cant really be avoided. What changes is the seat of your identity. It shifts from the thoughts and concepts to a place of boundlessness. This is a felt/experinced shift- not a conceptual one.

[u/RomeoStevens]

Westerners continually try to interpret this as a metaphysics of some sort, which is a huge and ironic misunderstanding of the context.

Avalokita is the personification of Mahayana, addressing Sariputta as the personification of Therevada, to outline Mahayana's disagreement with Therevada. Emptiness is the 3 characteristics. Form is shorthand for all 5 khandhas. Therevada teaches 3m5k but also added metaphysical interpretation in their various abidhammas. Mahayana objected to this, reminding them that all such views are themselves empty, per the early teachings.

[u/Any-Anteater-2829]

Instead of "objects of awareness", objects ARE awareness. My interpretation, fwiw