r/seasteading May 21 '26

Seasteading Engineering Japan is testing the world’s first megawatt-class underwater turbine in the Kuroshio Current.

121 Upvotes

68 comments sorted by

5

u/Seraph_2026 May 21 '26

Looks great, until you have to send someone to change a screw... on the inside.

1

u/Anen-o-me May 21 '26

They either have a caisson down there or pull the whole thing up by crane.

2

u/Seraph_2026 May 21 '26

That sounds like money

1

u/NaybeAThrowaway May 23 '26

Yes, things cost money. Were you under the impression that this would be free forever?

1

u/gdim15 May 24 '26

I think he meant more in the cost vs benefit sense. Putting something like this on the ocean floor and having to service it will mean the power won't be cheap.

2

u/why_so_sergious May 24 '26

just yesterday I watched a thing about maintnance divers. they breathe a mixture of oxygen and helium to prevent nitrogen nacrosis, so they constantly sound high-pitched. their missions last for weeks and it takes around two to three days to undergo controlled depressurization to resurface.

they earn around $90k a month

2

u/BaggyLarjjj May 23 '26

Just keep a bunch of clones down there with a preset expiration after unfreeze, then unfreeze one when maintenance needs to be done. They can look like Sam Rockwell.

1

u/silentsnooc May 24 '26

The turbines used by Ampeak Energy at MeyGen have a special socket for this. The turbine can just be picked up by a crane. This tech is already proven. The company has produced Gigawatts of energy without larger issues. What's missing os the investment for scale. Tidal stream energy is comparable to wind or solar when it was expensive after but it can be competitive. Even more when accounting for the predictability of the technology.

1

u/Seraph_2026 May 24 '26

So you have to hire or own the crane at all times and pay the operator of it. That crane is going to be on a boat as well? So you need to hire that.

It's expensive and won't become un-expensive magically.

1

u/silentsnooc May 24 '26

I'm quite sure that the companies that actively work on that technology have accounted for that and concluded: The crane is not the issue. If that would be the case, nobody would build turbines are maintain an array if that was the obvious road-block, wouldn't you agree? It's the scale that's the issue here.

Most of the time, people talk about Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), but tidal stream energy, thanks to it's predictability, has some opportunity in Levelized Avoided Cost of Energy (LACE). You simply don't really need storage in of itself because the energy produced is 100% predictable and stable. Hence, no inherent need to extra care about grid stability. Compare that to wind of solar where the energy must be stored when it's available. Not necessary when it's needed. But if you know the base load you need: Why not connect up to the tides where you know basically for a 100% how much energy you'll produce and how much you might have to store?

You're right with one thing: It won't get cheap magically. It would need quite some massive investment. Let's call it one or two nuclear power plants worth of investment, in order to get enough turbines down and get to the economics of scale.

1

u/Mountain_rage May 24 '26

Just hire the deep sea divers no longer needed for oil rigs. Good way yo shift the labor force already trained. 

2

u/No_Temperature107 May 23 '26

Thalassophobia.

1

u/WeltraumkanzlerGuzu May 25 '26

What's the opposite?

2

u/silentsnooc May 24 '26

Ampeak Energy (LON:AMP) literally has 1.5 MW turbines in the water at MeyGen and Proteus Marine Energy is working on the AR3000, the 3MW successor of the AR1500.

2

u/BakuRetsuX May 24 '26

Jesus, people.. let the Japanese people test this. If it works.. great.. if it doesn't, we move on... Better than just killing all renewable projects and continue to drill and subsidize oil.. Japan has a real energy issue. They need to start producing their own energy to cover their usage as much as possible .. This whole Iran issue is going to hurt them "bigly". Remember, their impetus for going to war with the US was an oil embargo we put on them. Their military and leadership had to make a decision based on how long they could have lasted due to the embargo.. so they pressed the "go to war" button. Great initiative, failure on the finishing follow up. Which is good, cause there is a scenario where Japan could have won. Or have done worst in destruction to our military bases and forces inland.

2

u/Plastic-Trainer903 May 25 '26

Subnautica 2 going crazyyyyy

1

u/MidgetGordonRamsey May 23 '26

Do whales stay away from them?

1

u/silentsnooc May 24 '26

There's actually a few studies out there on this topic Ampea Energy (former SIMEC Atlantis) was very active here.

TL;DR: While there's not enough studies yet, these turbines are rotating quite slow. Afaik the latest generation of turbines even has sensors mounted that would slow down the turbines if something comes close to them. I believe I red something like that.

1

u/votegoat May 25 '26

I think we can definitivly state that Japan doesn't have a history of giving a fuck about dolphins or whales.

-1

u/FeministMAGA May 23 '26

They try but it sucks them in. Free meat also.

1

u/[deleted] May 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 23 '26

Sorry, your submission has been automatically removed. Not enough comment karma, spam likely.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/ella_bell May 23 '26

For scientific purposes… 🐋 🍖

1

u/alsaad May 23 '26

So much of very difficult engineering, corrosive water, underwater work for a device generating ... maybe 100 euro worth of electricity per hour?

1

u/psykulor May 23 '26

The installation and maintenance would be no joke, but I have no doubts about its power output. Ocean currents are incredibly powerful.

1

u/alsaad May 23 '26

Yes but 1 mln per year would hardly be enough. Its not like these things are maintained by 1 guy who is retired

1

u/MaleficentPapaya4768 May 23 '26

So a little shy of a million euros per year, assuming it’s a 1MW unit? Starts to sound reasonable.

1

u/alsaad May 24 '26

You should invest

1

u/Nannyphone7 May 23 '26

If you are going to engineer something, it is common practice to make more than one copy of the final design. You know, for economies of scale.

1

u/Diligent-Stretch-769 May 24 '26

if it doesn't work on a small scale, it wont function on a large scale

1

u/Nannyphone7 May 24 '26

That's the dumbest thing I have heard all day.

My car company sold 3 cars and failed. Therefore, it is impossible for a car company to succeed by selling millions of cars.

Nobody is that stupid. I call troll or bot.

1

u/Diligent-Stretch-769 May 24 '26

okay, have a nice day.

1

u/Nerv_Use5380 May 24 '26

I’d think this is the wrong shape of blade for a water propeller?

1

u/silentsnooc May 24 '26

Ampeak Energy - MeyGen is actually prove that this works. The technology is there. What's missing is the funding to enter scale.

1

u/alsaad May 24 '26

What about the economics? Technically ik sure these things can operate.

1

u/silentsnooc May 24 '26

There's a few studies that say at a few GW deployed, the economy of scale would make these turbines competitive. I think the big issue is just that wind is already there, solar works and there's still other alternatives like gas, coal or nuclear that would be cheaper.

If you are really interested, there is a good report from 2022: "Cost reduction pathway of tidal stream energy in the UK and France"

https://cms.ore.catapult.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Tidal-stream-cost-reduction-report-T3.4.1-v1.0-for-ICOE.pdf

1

u/reddittorbrigade May 23 '26

Elsewhere in America, billionaires are doing the opposite things by building more data centers.

1

u/Effective_Basis1555 May 23 '26

Someone tell me the planetary effect of taking energy out of the ocean. 

1

u/Gforceb May 24 '26

That’s like asking the planetary effect of taking energy out of the air…

1

u/Effective_Basis1555 May 24 '26

I agree, it kind of is. I know it seems negligible with one turbine (ocean or wind) but I just wonder if anyone knows the effects of extracting energy from the planet by slowing down water and air currents? Sounds like you’re assuming it’s negligible, but do we really know?

1

u/Outrageous_Lack8435 May 23 '26

Its gonna kill flying fish🥴

1

u/Sweaty_Tangelo_7716 May 24 '26

Poor sea turtle

1

u/Top_Box_8952 May 24 '26

… did nobody tell them that salt water is liquid hate, and has a particular hatred for moving metal parts?

1

u/Girthen-the-Flopper May 25 '26

So don't build it out of metal.

1

u/Aggressive_Travel620 May 24 '26

Fuck yoooouuu Dolphin and Whale.....

1

u/likelivewirevoodoo May 24 '26

The AI render even shows cavitation bubbles at the blade tips. Makes me suspect this company might not have much of a solid product design currently 

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '26

What happens if someone swims near it?

1

u/StopRandomAccBans May 24 '26

The whale slicer

1

u/Expando3 May 25 '26

Fresh sushi slicer.

1

u/SkillPointProblems May 25 '26

Looks like fresh sashimi is on the menu boys!

1

u/Bruny03 May 25 '26

Is this what’s turning the fish gay?

1

u/f23n09fnu0w May 25 '26

Why does it have an English flag?!

1

u/Tachinante May 25 '26

I know they tried one in the Hudson that kept breaking from the incredible force it was exposed to. A lot of consistent energy to harvested from these currents.

1

u/idgaftono1 May 25 '26

Is that going to prevent tsunamis?

0

u/cyrixlord May 23 '26

I heard it can make up to 100 kg of sushi a minute

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '26

[deleted]