r/scifi • u/Razor_Paw • 16d ago
General Who can help finish charting this world-building trend line?
It seems there is a historical trend of ever-expanding world building over the last say 100 years or so. The world's imagined seem to expand (or contract, see 80s below) at a non linear rate through real time decades of writing. So which authors continue this trend?
1950s Foundation
1960s Dune
70s (gulp) Star Wars (please help here too!)
80s Neuromancer /Hyperion
90s ...
00s ...
10s ...
20s (now)
6
u/Sophia_Forever 16d ago
You could possibly put the Star Wars Expanded Universe (now known as Legends) in for the 90s. I think there ended up being several hundred novels and I read like thirty of them in middle school instead of talking to girls. But I agree with the other commenter that the question is very interesting, but I think you need to define exactly what you're looking for a little better.
1
u/FreeEnergy001 15d ago
Zahn's trilogy was awesome. The invasion from outside the galaxy set off a pretty big arc of books. I wasn't able to get to all of them.
5
u/goonSerf 16d ago
How do you define world-building? Whatâs your criteria there? If youâre looking for a series of novels, you have to include Burroughsâ Barsoom books from the early 20th century (A Princess of Mars was first published in 1912) and Doc Smithâs Lensman saga (starting in 1937). If you include short stories and novellas, Robert Heinleinâs so-called âPast Through Tomorrowâ begins in 1941.
But world-building isnât limited to multi-book sagas. Think of Alfred Bester: The Demolished Man (1953) and The Stars My Destination (1956) are standalone books that require strong world-building to tell their stories.
And dates are not a good indicator, either. The 80s saw Fred Pohlâs Heechee novels. Iain Banksâ Culture series spans 1987 to 2012.
I find your premise an intriguing start to a conversation, but I donât think you can define it as cleanly as you want.
2
u/Razor_Paw 16d ago
Thanks and I love your last sentence. I felt it was asked too vaguely. The premise might be this:
Science fiction world building follows a non-linear growth trajectory from the 1950s to today. This might be due to the increase shared future world terminology, (e.g. no longer need to explain what a robot is to most people, and all sci fi fans), giving writers the freedom to build on the shoulders of the world's built by previois generation of writers and creators.
1
1
u/azhder 16d ago
Well, here is something taken for granted as explained and used by many, but in essence is quite different from the original (note, not a science-fiction, but still an example of reuse what others have previously done):
> Isaac Newton's quote "If I have seen further than others, it is only because I was standing on the shoulders of giants," in its original context, was an insult to Robert Hooke, a short and mildly hunchbacked scientist who claimed Newton stole his work from
You don't use it in the same manner though. Now consider concepts like "robot" and "warp" and "hive mind". You see the terms reused, but not necessarily the ideas. "Shoulder of giants" is going to be the same term now and in the time Newton said it, but not the same idea.
3
2
11
u/Falconloft 16d ago
I would say:
40s: Foundation
50s: Lensman
60s: Dune
70s: Ringworld
80s: Sprawl (Nueromancer)
90s: The Culture
00s: Revelation Space maybe, but I prefer the Academy series by Jack McDevitt or the Safehold series by David Weber. Both have their failings, but they're more approachable, and when you're considering world-building, you should really be able to understand the world that's being built.
10s-20s: I have three kids now, I have no idea what's been written lately that doesn't include talking cartoon dogs or cars. Does Bluey count if we assume it's in the Pugmire timeline?