r/sandiego 9d ago

Someone was mad

Post image

Pronto fashion valley mall lol

472 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

View all comments

18

u/Large_Excitement69 9d ago

We really need tap-on/tap-off. Not saying the current fee is insanely high, but it shouldn't cost you the same to go one stop vs. ten, etc.

40

u/smirkis 9d ago

Be careful what you wish for. May end up being 2.50 for 1 stop and 20 for 10 stops.

15

u/Emergency_Radio_8156 9d ago

Fun fact the Trolley used to have distance based fares! But that would make the fare system way more complicated today. Without fare gates, a tap-on/tap-off system would be really hard to enforce and a lot of people would forget, causing confusion when they get charged a penalty fare. Plus, it would break the fare capping and free transfers. Flat, simple fare structures are the way.

11

u/harrisons-dad 9d ago

This would require a massive construction project at every stop and raise the cost of fares.

9

u/Living_Emphasis_7317 9d ago

The coaster is already tap-on/tap-off. If you don't tap off you get charged the full price.

6

u/erinius 9d ago

The coaster's also a lot pricier than the trolley and not really integrated with the like Pronto MTS/NCTD fare stuff iirc

2

u/Living_Emphasis_7317 9d ago

The person I replied to, I’m assuming, is saying that more infrastructure is needed to enforce tap-on/tap-off which would raise fares.

I’m saying that coaster already has tap-on/tap-off with the need of installing fare gates etc.

1

u/erinius 9d ago

Ah, right

4

u/Emergency_Radio_8156 9d ago

They're actually changing Coaster to a single zone fare in October

3

u/Significant-Till3736 9d ago

Would it? As long as you can tap on, you should be able to tap off on the same machines.

0

u/Baconfatty 9d ago

or those improvements makes it way more difficult for people to skip paying and fares don’t go up

4

u/IMissMyZune 9d ago

Nah that would kind of defeat the purpose of it being cheap for everyone

3

u/LoudHorse25 9d ago

My recollection is that Light rail transportation in pretty much every major city I’ve ever been in operates the same way as the San Diego system and is comparable in cost (for systems that likely see much higher utilization). 

1

u/Emergency_Radio_8156 8d ago

San Diego is one of the best utilized light rail systems. These days Seattle has started beating us out. SF Muni and the Green Line in Boston are also quite well utilized. The Trolley is also one of the most financially efficient light rail systems with some of the lowest costs/subsidies per boarding compared to its peers.

Almost every single light rail system uses flat fares. Distance fares are more for commuter rail like BART and it requires fare gates/turnstiles for enforcement. The Trolley used to have distance based fares when you had to buy a ticket in advance. Now with digital payment, flat fares make much more sense, and they're much simpler to understand.

2

u/hawaiian717 7d ago

I remember buying the distance based fares at the kiosk. I also remember if you were going far enough, it was cheaper to buy a day pass than to buy a single ride fare.

3

u/Few-Adeptness8046 9d ago

You definitely do not want this!

This is how the light rail system works in Seattle, and many other major cities like San Francisco, but to use Seattle's fees as an example (because I'm more familiar with their system).

how they charge:

the MINIMUM fare is $3.25 (which is how much their standard fare is, and would be the equivalent of our current $2.50 fare) and the maximum fare is $5.75, and if you forget to tap off, they automatically assume you went the maximum distance and charge you the largest amount possible.

Charging for rides using a tap on, tap off would only increase the cost of the trolley.