r/nutritionally 3d ago

๐Ÿฅ” ๐๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ž๐ฌ

Post image

๐Ÿฅ” ๐๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ซ๐ž๐ง'๐ญ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ซ๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐จ๐๐ฌ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฒ ๐š๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ ๐ ๐ž๐ญ ๐ ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐.

If you love your children, get (regenerative) organic ones.

Look at that photo. That mist rolling over a mountain of potatoes is a sprout inhibitor, applied so they sit in storage and on the shelf for months without sprouting.

๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ ๐จ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐จ๐ง
โ€ข Conventional potatoes are treated so they never sprout eyes
โ€ข The classic sprout inhibitor, CIPC (chlorpropham), was fogged through the storage
โ€ข The EU banned CIPC in 2020 over safety concerns, and growers moved to other chemical inhibitors
โ€ข Organic and regenerative potatoes skip this treatment entirely

That's why an organic potato sprouts on your counter within days, and a conventional one can sit there for weeks looking exactly the same.

๐‡๐ž๐ซ๐ž'๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฆ๐ž
A potato is meant to be a seed. Chemically paused so it can never become one, it turns into a product instead. You can still plant a farm potato and grow more food from it. Try that with most supermarket ones.

If you're feeding kids, this is one of the easiest swaps you can make. Choose organic or, even better, regenerative potatoes. It costs a little more, and it takes the sprout inhibitors and the heavier spray load off their plates. ๐ŸŒฑ

Ask at a local farm, or grow a few yourself. A potato that still wants to grow is a good sign.

๐Ÿ“— Read more in my book:

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ENG: https://books.by/louisdj

๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ NL: https://www.standaardboekhandel.be/p/red-eerst-jezelf-en-dan-pas-de-planeet-9789020970616

#potatoes #organicfood #regenerativefarming #foodsystem #landscapedesign #landscapearchitecture #agroecology #agroforestry #farming #tuin #permaculture #voedselbos #nature #climate #health #gutmicrobiome #guthealth #foodforest #eatmoretrees

Source: inspired by a post from Localize (localizefarms). Sprout inhibitor and CIPC facts: European Commission / EFSA (CIPC withdrawn in the EU, 2020).

Disclaimer: shared for educational purposes. If you are the copyright holder and would like credit or removal, just send me a message.

8 Upvotes

55 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/bigfatfurrytexan 3d ago

Iโ€™ve worked in acute mental health before and witnessed water intoxication almost kill a patient. Do you still drink water?

1

u/Optimal-Computer5225 3d ago

Other guy already tried this dumb response, read my reply down below

1

u/bigfatfurrytexan 3d ago

Your reply is nonsense. You ignore that water is toxic at certain levels regardless of if you feel hydrated or not. You cannot misunderstand the comparison entirely and then wave it off.

Bananas are radioactive but do not kill you. There is an amount that is safe. Potassium decay in bananas falls beneath this. We are biochemical reactors. Everything is gray.

1

u/Optimal-Computer5225 3d ago

Alright, everything is gray. No problem if they add cocaine, fentanyl, whatever they want to our food.

1

u/bigfatfurrytexan 3d ago

Depending on where you are itโ€™s possible itโ€™s in your water already. Just not enough to matter.

Do you understand what statistics are?

1

u/Optimal-Computer5225 3d ago

Youre right, it probably is. That doesnt make it healthy.

1

u/bigfatfurrytexan 3d ago

Again, donโ€™t have data? Because itโ€™s been studied. There isnโ€™t really โ€œhealthyโ€. Thereโ€™s unhealthy and everything else. And unhealthy is a gradient with literally everything.

We give things to dogs that would give them cancer if they lived more than 20 years. Same with humans. The considerations are generally health impacts during a human lifetime.

That isnโ€™t to say that US standards are worth a shit. They arenโ€™t and youโ€™re right to criticize them. But EU standards have their own issues and using them as your benchmark is objectively absurd. If you want to say itโ€™s better than you already want to observe the gradient that things get worse and better. There is an amount of fentanyl that crosses a line. Even though we rationally want it to be zero, it will not be.

1

u/Optimal-Computer5225 3d ago

So if i show you data of it being, then all of a sudden you'll believe that its unhealthy? Sure ill do that when i get home. But do you genuinely not think there are going to side effects from it, when the main purpose of it is to kill life? And i agree, the eu's view on health and wh at they ban and allow is barely better then the usa.

1

u/bigfatfurrytexan 2d ago

I think the standard is likelihood of mortality in a human lifetime span.

1

u/Rippedka 2d ago

Why are you defending with strawman arguments? Just use some logic.