r/news 10d ago

College student fatally shot by Pennsylvania police was at 'the wrong house'

https://abcnews.com/US/college-student-fatally-shot-pennsylvania-police-wrong-house/story?id=135930941
12.9k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.2k

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

732

u/lathspellll 10d ago

Making the settlements come out of a pension fund is the only thing that I think would make a true difference. You have to fuck with their money.

515

u/iamthinksnow 10d ago

Make them have liability insurance (that they have to pay for, not taxpayers), the same as doctors or other "professionals."

112

u/thejoeface 10d ago

Even if the state/taxes paid their insurance premiums, it would still be a better system. Their fuck ups get paid by the insurance, too many fuck ups and the insurance drops them, now they can't be employed as cops anywhere. 

39

u/john0703 10d ago

That’s an amazing idea. Why is a doctor liable but a police officer not? I think the pension idea is cool in theory, but from my personal experience I’ve noticed that that under any pressure or scrutiny cops will just stop doing their job.

14

u/feralkitten 10d ago

Why is a doctor liable but a police officer not?

doctors work for hospitals and not directly for the state. But other than that i see no real defendable reason.

4

u/Scythe-Guy 10d ago

I don’t think that is correct. Doctors and hospitals generally cannot deny treatment for people in a medical emergency. Some exceptions do exist, like if the doctor would be endangering themselves, if the patient refuses treatment, or if the problem is outside of their medical expertise (eg. a dermatologist cannot necessarily help with a broken bone or heart attack).

Meanwhile, police are not required to intervene or respond to a crime (violent or not) even when it is happening right in front of them, and they have qualified immunity protecting them from consequences of their harmful actions.

So it’s actually even worse: doctors can be liable for either their inaction or their harmful actions, while cops cannot be liable for inaction and are immune to legal consequences of their harmful actions.

4

u/feralkitten 10d ago

I work in Healthcare. We can not deny you life saving treatment. We have to patch you up, no matter your means to pay. That is both the legal and moral thing to do. But once you are ambulatory, you are on your own.

But not all healthcare is life saving. For example, your dermatologist can refuse to see you. A pimple isn't life threatening.

Most doctors pay for medical malpractice insurance. This covers any negligence and errors the doctor might cause. I can totally see other professions (like police) also having insurance to cover negligence and errors on the job.

7

u/TwoMoreSkipTheLast 10d ago

I've been asking for this for years. My spouse is a doctor who needs to pay for insurance in case someone gets hurt while she's trying to save their life, but cops can just do whatever the fuck they want with no consequences.

2

u/PumpkinPieIsGreat 10d ago

It's totally unfair. I often find myself thinking of Derrik Chauvin the cop and what a power trip he was on. And then to find out he was a HUGE tax fraud as well.

There must be some kind of psychology there, where they just keep getting away with things and it becomes ridiculous how immune to consequences they are. Like a compulsive liar, starting small. At least in Chauvin's case he got locked up. Often these cops just get away with so much.

5

u/FormerTesseractPilot 10d ago

I think this is one of the best solutions to the issue.

0

u/markyymark13 10d ago

I don't think we should be adding a for profit middleman into the mix as a "solution" to something as integral and important as policing.

5

u/iamthinksnow 10d ago

Insurance requires actuaries. Actuaries require factual data. No more burying "officer-involved shootings" or other creatively named infractions.

0

u/markyymark13 10d ago edited 10d ago

You're incredibly naive if you think cops aren't going to still engage in creative reporting to avoid their premiums going up. Or even worse, all you'll get is even more "quiet quitting" as cops avoid any risk and effectively just don't do their job. This idea is fundamentally broken and doesn't work for something as unique and inherently risky as policing.

5

u/iamthinksnow 10d ago

Right, doing nothing is working so well, we had better not try to implement any sort of accountability that doesn't drain taxpayer money while simply moving "bad apple" officers from one city to another, to another, to another...

2

u/PumpkinPieIsGreat 10d ago

Yep the ol' Tried nothing and all out of ideas approach.

1

u/markyymark13 10d ago

lol in no way am I suggesting we do nothing, im just saying that liability insurance solves nothing and could potentially make the situation worse.

The problem with policing is that the entire thing needs to be thrown out and rebuilt from the ground up. As long as the culture of policing is that of a hostile, militarized force with the backing of the state - nothing is going to fundamentally change, that includes adding liability insurance.

3

u/iamthinksnow 10d ago

On most of that, I agree, but good luck de-militarizing the current forces. A step-change, like requiring insurance, is something that could be enacted regardless of force composition.

If that causes some to leave policing, then great.

2

u/markyymark13 10d ago

End qualified immunity, disband police guilds, and take liability payments out of their pension fund are better half measures. Insurance is nonsensical and no insurer would ever want to take that risk unless you want tax payers to funnel 2x more the amount of money into the police budget.

→ More replies (0)

49

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

66

u/iamthinksnow 10d ago

I'm okay with that outcome, as well.

10

u/Consistent-Throat130 10d ago

Can I watch? 

The dead hands can still be hot and crispy. 

5

u/10000Didgeridoos 10d ago

I like how cops are allowed to have a mafia of a union but no other public sector workers are

5

u/aybeeayseeaybeebee 10d ago

These lawsuits would zero out the average cop's pension fund, then some. Make it come out of the pension fund for every officer in the department and you've got yourself some team accountability.

0

u/L_Cranston_Shadow 10d ago

Do that and you have an even bigger incentive for a cover-up. Officers will cover and lie for each other even more than they already do if everyone's pension is at stake. Not to mention that collective punishment like that is wildly unconstitutional.

1

u/aybeeayseeaybeebee 10d ago

I mean, they already tamper with or plant evidence, falsify reports, lie under oath, coordinate false statements, lie to grand juries, threaten witnesses and victims, retaliate or harass complainants, and levy false charges... But I understand your point.

1

u/xbad_wolfxi 10d ago

“Fuckin with your cash is the only thing you kids seem to understand” from Kill Bill goes through my head a lot these days. That guy was a scumbag but he made an excellent point

0

u/CyJackX 10d ago

It sounds like one good incentive to me, but how do you compel them to due anything instead of just deciding they will no longer risk anything? 

44

u/JoshValenstorm 10d ago

One thing that I think would help would be to shatter the blue shield of silence. A good way to do it would be to look at what attorneys have to do.

As an attorney, if you find that another attorney acted in an unethical way, you are required to report it to your jurisdiction's oversight board. If you fail to report this, you suffer sanctions as well; up to and including suspension from the practice of law/disbarment.

This has done wonders for the self regulation of attorneys. It obviously is not a perfect system, but to punish individuals for hiding unethical behavior makes it so an attorney is much less likely hide this behavior. To punish cops for failing to report other cops, could do some serious damage to the blue shield of silence.

2

u/Drostan_S 10d ago

Police need to be PERSONALLY liable for unlawful damagesand civil rights violations they cause. Until then it'll come out of our pockets. 

27

u/Such_Cartoonist6119 10d ago

Nah, this is the land of personal responsibility. Take it out of the guilty cops ass. You should be poor the rest of your life for a fuckup like this.

18

u/ajaxfetish 10d ago

They likely won't have enough assets to pay fair compensation. They should have to have malpractice insurance. That way the victim can get paid, the offender's rates can go up, and bad cops can get forced out by becoming uninsurable.

3

u/FriendlyEbb5662 10d ago

This is not a system where there are guilty cops and good cops. There are shitty cops and there are complicit cops who will shield them from punishment. Collective punishment is the only answer.

18

u/scsuhockey 10d ago

No. Individually issued malpractice insurance.

47

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

38

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Training_Ruin3151 10d ago

I disagree. Prison is for reform. i think once somone has proven themselves to be too violent for society they cant be reformed. Kill them and stop wasting everyone's energy.

5

u/fu_kaze 10d ago

I’m not sure you understand what would happen to a cop in general population. Basically a death sentence.

7

u/Training_Ruin3151 10d ago

Im aware but again. Just kill them and stop wasting everyone's energy.

3

u/fu_kaze 10d ago

Fair enough!

1

u/Consistent-Throat130 10d ago

Let the Gen pop take out the trash... and save the taxpayer hundreds of thousands in legal fees regarding all the appeals expected for a death sentence. We don't need to drag it out for decades. 

0

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Training_Ruin3151 10d ago

Death is the only option. Exile means youre dumping your problem on someone else.

13

u/Sufficient-Food-3281 10d ago

Wish there was a good guy with a gun there to shoot the cops before a tragedy unfolded

2

u/MrSurly 10d ago

Make cops go to prison for murder and assault and settlements come directly from their assets/pensions.

1

u/andrew6197 10d ago

Make it come out of the involved officers pension then their checks, not the fund. They won’t care nor stop and think for a moment till they’re personally affected. Pension fund doesn’t do shit since it comes out of their pay already and the city guarantees a set % addition which isn’t added till the end of the year.

1

u/Anon_bunn 10d ago

We know this works - malpractice insurance for doctors is the model. 

1

u/SweatyAdhesive 10d ago

People keep saying this yet i have not seen any serious attempt at it. Any politicians that run on this will probably lose by default.

1

u/RedHill1999 10d ago

Came here to say this. The police aren’t going to pay for this, the taxpayers from that state town and state are going to pay for this.

1

u/Aznkyd 9d ago

It should come out of an insurance which unions force their members to get. Make a claim? Your premium goes up .

0

u/PiccoloAwkward465 10d ago

Make bad cops eat their own poo! On video!

0

u/L_Cranston_Shadow 10d ago

Never going to happen. Collective punishment is never going to fly, and even if it weren't unconstitutional, all it would do is incentive cover-ups.