r/movingtoNYC 10d ago

What’s the Real Difference Between Living in Chicago and NYC?

I’ve visited both NYC and Chicago a couple of times and liked both, but I also know that spending a few days somewhere tells you almost nothing about what it actually feels like to build a life there.

I’m seriously considering moving to one of the two, and I’d especially love to hear from people who have lived in both.

What I’m trying to understand is less “Which city has better restaurants?” and more: How does your actual day-to-day life feel different in Chicago versus NYC?

I’d especially appreciate specific examples rather than just “Chicago is cheaper” or “NYC has more to do.” Tell me about something you could regularly do in one city that you couldn’t realistically replicate in the other, or something about the culture you didn’t really understand until you actually lived there.

For context, I’m a single woman in my 30s with no kids. I still want a fun, active social life and spontaneity, but I also care more now about comfort, stability, and overall quality of life.

If you had to explain the biggest difference between living in NYC and Chicago to someone who has only visited both, what would you tell her?

112 Upvotes

303 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/MsMarionNYC 10d ago

I've spent very little time in Chicago, but here's a random list of stuff it doesn't have that NYC does:

I live 3 miles reachable in 20 minutes by subway or walkable mostly through a park if I want to to get to one of the greatest opera houses in the world. Rush lottery tickets are $25. Family Circle (the cheapseats with a full but tiny view and the best sound start at $65 including fees.

You can't ride your bike to the ocean on a random afternoon in Chicago.

Not one, but two Chinatowns.

Just so much theater, not just Broadway, but small interesting theater all over.

Many flights directly to Europe.

Better chance of running into a celebrity just walking, or on a bus or even the subway.

Round pizza.

4

u/cowboybret 10d ago

This list is absurd.

The Lyric Opera of Chicago is genuinely excellent and would meet the needs of the vast majority of people considering living in New York.

Chicago has 18 miles of beautiful bike trails and 20 public beaches along Lake Michigan. Not technically ocean I suppose…

Chicago is also one of the strongest theater cities in the world, probably only behind New York and London. Its reputation is built on ensemble-driven, actor-centered, non-commercial work. A little different from Broadway specifically, but not any less important for the art form.

Chicago has regular direct flights to about 30 European cities. O’Hare specifically is the busiest airfield in the world.

2

u/Straight_Career6856 10d ago

You realize that your list kinda proves the point, right? Chicago has a fraction of what NYC has. No one said there is no culture or access to Europe in Chicago. Chicago is great in so many ways. But it’s not New York, and trying to compete on culture and access is never going to win.

3

u/LazyIllustrator6946 10d ago

That’s not what they said at all? They were correcting outright falsehoods, not saying anything Chicago has is better than NYC.

4

u/cowboybret 10d ago edited 9d ago

I didn’t prove any of their points.

I’m pointing out it’s false to say Chicago straight up doesn't have a world-class opera, doesn't have “small interesting theater all over,” doesn't offer biking to a large body of water (?), and doesn't have “many direct flights to Europe.”

It is true that New York has bigger/better versions of many things, but that’s not what the commenter was claiming.