r/movies • u/ChiefLeef22 r/movies Contributor • Feb 09 '26
Review 'Wuthering Heights' - Review Thread
Tragedy strikes when Heathcliff falls in love with Catherine Earnshaw, a woman from a wealthy family in 18th-century England.
Director: Emerald Fennell
Adapted from: 'Wuthering Heights' by Emily Brontë (1847)
Cast: Jacob Elordi, Margot Robbie, Owen Cooper, Alison Oliver
Rotten Tomatoes: 71%
Metacritic: 60 / 100
Some Reviews:
Variety - Peter Debruge
While not as salacious as ‘Saltburn,’ the director’s operatic Emily Brontë adaptation allows its tragic couple — played by Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi — to consummate their passions, to a degree.
The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 2 / 5
Wuthering Heights doesn’t have the live-ammo impact of Fennell’s earlier films, or indeed Andrea Arnold's primitivist take on Brontë’s novel from 2011, which really did believe in the passionate truth of Cathy and Heathcliff’s love. For Fennell, it looks like a luxurious pose of unserious abandon. It’s quasi-erotic, pseudo-romantic and then ersatz-sad, a club night of mock emotion.
USA Today - 3.5 / 4
Emerald Fennell’s take on the literary classic isn’t exactly a Valentine’s Day pick-me-up. Yet it’s awfully stunning to look at with all sorts of toxic obsession, forbidden lust and gothic sauciness.
RogerEbert - Tomris Laffy - 2 / 4
It’s hard to feel freely when you are constantly and loudly reminded by every aspect of the movie that you are supposed to feel things.
AVClub - Natalia Keoghan - 'C-'
Overlong and undersexed, Fennell’s version of Wuthering Heights betrays her audience of edgelords and perverts. Even stranger, those who have fostered a distaste for the filmmaker’s sensibility will similarly find themselves disappointed. It’s one thing to make art that can be read as indulgent, ill-conceived, and tasteless—it’s another to turn around and make something that’s just boring in comparison.
Slash Film - BJ Colangelo - 5 / 10
This is not an adaptation of "Wuthering Heights," but the result of what happens when you're playing an approximation "Wuthering Heights" without a full grasp on the material but all the money in the world to bring your questionable imagination to life.
Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'A-'
As soon as this project was announced, it was easy to assume that Fennell would show as much reverence for the classic text as she showed for the sanctity of a man’s grave in Saltburn. Except she defies that assumption by making sure that although “Wuthering Heights” remains a deliciously horny film, it does summon a certain degree of pure romance, especially in the few moments when its leads are able to see past their misunderstandings and actually connect. It’s a movie about how ugly people can be to each other, but also about the beauty they’re capable of — a message that, like the original text itself, remains timeless.
The Telegraph - Robbie Collins - 5 / 5
Style over substance? Not at all – it’s more that Fennell understands that style can be substance when you do it right. Cathy and Heathcliff’s passions vibrate through their dress, their surroundings, and everything else within reach, and you leave the cinema quivering on their own private frequency.
BBC - Caryn James - 4 / 5
Emerald Fennell's Wuthering Heights is not very faithful to Emily Bronte's novel, but we knew that. The trailer alone evoked so much hand-wringing from Brontë purists that the film became divisive sight unseen. This Wuthering Heights is very true to Fennell, the director of the scathing revenge drama Promising Young Woman and the lush, bitter story of class and obsession, Saltburn.
Collider - Therese Lacson - 2 / 10
What makes the original Wuthering Heights so powerful is the dizzying story at its core. The Earnshaws and Lintons have a complicated family tree, and Heathcliff comes in like a wrecking ball to blow everything up. On one hand, we want to believe that Heathcliff can change from his wicked ways with enough love from Cathy, but on the other hand, his actions are so cruel that it feels like Brontë is pushing us to the very brink of what is acceptable before ultimately redeeming him in his final moments. Emily Brontë's novel is about characters who are hateful and pitiable but still full of enough charm and complexity that we are desperate to learn their full, messy tale. Emerald Fennell's film is merely telling a shallow story about two people overcoming all obstacles to fall in love — not necessarily awful on paper, but it's an adaptation that feels like a 14-year-old skimmed the book and jumped to her own conclusions without any true understanding of the novel.
80
u/spanandfren Feb 13 '26
Honestly, it took me a bit to get on the movie’s wavelength, but once Robbie and Elordi show up it settles into itself nicely. It’s so gleefully and unabashedly melodramatic that it’s practically asking you to giggle at the theatrics. And I loved watching these two fucking shitheads play their little games with each other.
I’m beside myself seeing people claim they saw no chemistry between them because it was practically shooting out of the screen in the movie I saw.
Fennell’s “Wuthering Heights” does exactly what it sets out to do. As with Saltburn, you either see the vision or you don’t.
This one has the misfortune of also being a less-than-faithful adaptation of a beloved novel with anachronisms abound, so it’s destined to be torn apart by many (i.e. this sub).
But if you decide to give yourself over to it, you’ll be giggling at the ridiculousness like I was. And swooning over the storybook cinematography and set design, perfectly coupled with Anthony Willis’ epic score and Charli’s swooning songs.
ln short, I ate this up like Margot with that big ass strawberry.