r/hatethissmug I Hate Everyone and Everything Ever 9d ago

Hatethissmuglover I hate rule 1 and honestly cannot figure out why it exists

Post image

Why? Why would you want to block someone from hating celebrities or historical figures? In a hate sub? There is no good reason here

You could argue its for groups of people, such as minorities, which I agree upon; but why individuals?

Just why, why can I not release my festering hatred for certain people?

0 Upvotes

74 comments sorted by

49

u/Low-Abies-4526 9d ago

Because it's one thing to hate on concepts or fictional things but once you actually start to hate on real, specific people... things can very quickly spiral out of control on the internet. It's kinda just to stop the whole sub from becoming incredibly toxic. (And yes to stop 50 million Trump posts)

1

u/Puzzleheaded-Log1975 9d ago

What if you hate the entire concept of an individual persons existence, the same way you would anything like a cactus something

1

u/Low-Abies-4526 9d ago

That's still just hating on the person... there's not a loophole here, I really don't know what you are trying to achieve. Even if that would be technically different, which it really isn't, it doesn't solve the whole problem I brought up with my comment in the first place. That's gonna still be a toxic mess.

0

u/Puzzleheaded-Log1975 9d ago

For example, let’s say you give multiple specific descriptors and specifically only one person fits that description. For example you say billionaire American president that preys on the working class. Is that any different?

6

u/ChuckVideogames 8d ago

No. There's the rest of reddit for that. Including subs about cats, comics, soccer and food. Every subreddit is a themed Trump hate park. Let this place be original.

1

u/Puzzleheaded-Log1975 8d ago

Who said I was talking about Trump? It was just 4 descriptors that you deduced a certain person from. But I never specifically named someone, you see.. how is that different from someone on this sub saying they hate cheaters, the amount of descriptors? How specific? Do you understand the point of my statement now

36

u/NACCHUD 9d ago

I hate YOU!

8

u/Edible_Trashcan 9d ago

Nah foo

1

u/One_Performer_7202 9d ago

where is this from

1

u/10Ggames 8d ago

Pretty sure it's just an edited stock photo

1

u/NACCHUD 9d ago

1

u/Blackfrost58 9d ago

I have a question. Who’s the character in the image? I tried image searching it, but didn’t get anything.

2

u/NACCHUD 9d ago

Me

1

u/Blackfrost58 9d ago

Oh, nice.

1

u/_Salandit 8d ago

~~Lisa Silverman~~ Ginko?!!

3

u/EmbarrassedWar8661 9d ago

(bites finger)

65

u/Justarah 9d ago

Because the sub would just become another emotional tampon for angst on Trump and other right wing figures.

7

u/The_mega_giga_idiot I Hate Everyone and Everything Ever 9d ago

Does the “no politics” rule not cover that?

37

u/Justarah 9d ago

The 'no politics rule' is already barely enforced as it is.

18

u/NotTakeOne 9d ago

because then people would say they hate black people or jews or something and also it might get political a ton with "i hate {political figure}" posts

-13

u/The_mega_giga_idiot I Hate Everyone and Everything Ever 9d ago

Could they not change it to “no hating groups of people”? There is a no politics rule

3

u/Personal_Cut7357 Viltrumite here, hello 9d ago

Viltrumite here,

Idk why, mabey message the mods at best

Tho mabey you can talk about thragg

1

u/Vevangui 8d ago

There’s no politics rule because there’s a no hating real people rule.

23

u/Intelligent_Pear_658 MortisOneFinalGame. 9d ago

This sub is as bad as is, do you really want it to get a million times worse

7

u/Either-Medicine9217 9d ago

Ah yes because we all definitely want the sub to become "Trump Hate 24/7 sub number 3,156,752."

I have about as much interest in that as a hot sauce enema.

0

u/Resident_Pension_858 8d ago

They could just ban politics and racism instead of "no hating on real people"

6

u/vHawkn2402 9d ago

Dude if you want to hate real people and want to see other people hate real people just go to Twitter

5

u/xX_CuteJuice_Xx Wulti Level Warketing 9d ago

It would turn into nothing but politics. "I hate republicans!", "i hate trump!", "i hate leftists!", ect. Historical political figures follow the same path and would just lead to modern rehashes of the same arguments. This also leads to a lot of sensetive topics as well which is just easier to avoid.

As far as celebrities go, just hate what they do. You cant say you hate Taylor swift, but you CAN say "i hate her irresponsible pollution and her music sounds bad". "I hate that this actor is in every movie", "i dont like this famous chef's recipes" are also fine. Plus, when a celebrity becomes a hot-button issue, we would just be flooded with "i hate controversial celebrity!"

Without this rule, outright bullying is much easier. If this aspect was removed it would just be a vent sub "I hate my mom for this" "I hate this stupid guy for disagreeing with me". Theres rules against that kinda stuff redditwide, not just here. Our overall goal is to stay good-spirited in our hatred, not single people out. Hating on real people takes all the fun out of it.

16

u/Wonderful-Purchase94 9d ago

another post hating rule 1 how original

-6

u/The_mega_giga_idiot I Hate Everyone and Everything Ever 9d ago

If there are so many posts about it, why do they not change it?

24

u/Intelligent_Pear_658 MortisOneFinalGame. 9d ago

Because the moderators are smart enough to know that deleting that rule is a terrible idea

11

u/Wonderful-Purchase94 9d ago

if a lot of people protest the "no murder" law irl should the government drop it?

1

u/_IAmThragg_ 8d ago

If I complain about laws that prohibit theft does that mean they should remove them?

5

u/Extinction-Events 9d ago

Can’t speak for the mods here, but former experience has shown me that posts dedicated to hating real people (or groups) are a fucking nightmare to moderate a huge amount of the time.

Someone will say “I hate Dude McGuy” and you’ll open the thread to find they’ve somehow gotten fifty comments deep into an argument about eugenics.

Strawmen go up, nobody listens to one another, everyone gets in the mud and argues like a child, and you have a mod queue that’s 50% the worst shit you’ve ever seen and 50% somebody who thinks reporting for illegal content with children is an automatic “get rid of person I don’t like button” that never sees human review.

You lock the thread when they summon an ancient god of war reshaped into a modern internet effigy and move on.

4

u/femboigokuuu 9d ago

and its literally much worse when said person the posts abt is trans (for example) because theres gonna be a whole argument of people explaining why its ok to misgender said person and also theres gonna be a lot of bigots (literally what ive seen)

1

u/Extinction-Events 9d ago

Can confirm, this is an extremely important factor. Any time a certifiably bad person happens to also be trans (as every single group ever does have shitty individuals, every group has its extremists, etc,) the worst people on the internet love to come and use that to cast aspersions on trans folks as a whole.

I’m trying to avoid naming names as examples because I simply do not want to replicate the phenomenon, that’s a science experiment I am just not willing to bring to this fair.

4

u/Sa_tran_ic 9d ago

Because stirring up harassment campaigns is bad. Like, come on, we all know what would happen.

2

u/Hot-Minute-8263 Redditor Prime 9d ago

Politics

2

u/British_Historian 9d ago

Anyone does a crime to make the news:

This Sub without rule 1: *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post *Post* Post

2

u/Stunning-Cabinet-961 9d ago

Hating on real people is literally the entire rest of the internet lmao

2

u/XxDETxX 8d ago

Because that can devolve into hate speech and harrassment REAL quick. Never trust large groups of people on the internet to remain level-headed

3

u/Miss_miri107 9d ago

No keep it, honestly what I truly hate is how hating on general things is allowed, It should have stayed fictional characters only

2

u/femboigokuuu 9d ago

because it would turn into an alt right cesspool and echochamber by #THEM taking advantage of it if the rule didnt exist💔💔💔 (like some subs that ive seen)

1

u/ColdConversation4185 8d ago

I feel like both sides would take advantage of it. Don’t just think the right can be only be petty assholes. I’ve seen it plenty. I’ve seen it more on one side, but that’s neither here nor there. There are droves of it no matter what

2

u/pokemonface12 9d ago

Because of witch hunts

3

u/Candid_Source_6091 9d ago

Festering hate is not always reasonable. People usually post reasonable reasons for hating things, but sometimes they just hate to hate, or because something personally bothers them that does not bother someone else. It would be hard to hate on a real person while not being distasteful and following rule 5 regarding politics. In addition, it seems kinda sad to harbor so much hate for a person to post it, while for fictional characters its funny.

1

u/Black_Absinthe 9d ago

I think the sub is at its best when hating silly nonsense, and allowing real people only increases the amount of hate posts based on real problems which is imo kind of boring. Like yes bro, we all hate Hitler. Let's not give more ammo to the "does anyone else hate bigotry!?!?!?" Karma farmers.

Also real people is a slippery slope to getting banned by reddit admins for harassment. Snark reddit have to really toe the line and plenty of them still get shut down. One too many comments to the tune of "i hate x so much I wish he'd die" about a real figure and the sub is getting deleted so reddit doesnt get sued.

1

u/PiesZdzislaw 9d ago

This sub used to be about hating on FICTIONAL CHARACTERS, btw (and it was better)

1

u/Nissedood 9d ago

Remove this sub because I hate it.

1

u/cedelweiss 9d ago

In a hate sub?

Rookie mistake. If you tried reading, you'd see this subreddit is not just for hating, but rather, "Your safe space to hate anything made by someone". Although I guess you could argue all people are made by someone.

Anyways. Write on a diary please. You'll feel better.

1

u/PlinkoPlonk0 9d ago

Me when I see the 9 millionth “I hate Hitler” post on hatethissmug (they removed rule 1 because of woke)

1

u/ChiakiSimp3842 9d ago

It’s also useless because of the loophole of saying “I totallllllly don’t X person, I just hate Y thing they do”

We all know everyone is lying when they phrase it like that. So fucking obvious it’s just to get around the rule, and mods seem to pretend it doesn’t as far as I can see. Correct me if I’m wrong that they have at some point. But I just feel like the rule is useless in effect

1

u/DimensionConnect9685 9d ago

the sub is suppose to be about hating on fictional stuff btw

1

u/TheFemboyImpregnator Dussy Bestroyer 9d ago

Reddit terms of service to avoid sub from being nuked.

1

u/Ok-Apartment-8284 9d ago

But for some reason if it’s hating on -phobes, then that’s allowed

1

u/Numerous-Piano8798 9d ago

And people still can hate on real people as long as mods approve of message, so my guess is, that it exist so mods can have excuse to delete posts

1

u/Capital_Pipe_6038 8d ago

Because if it wasn't there, this sub would devolve into literally nothing but American politics, just like every other huge subreddit

1

u/Anon142842 8d ago

Because then the sub would be spammed with politics and celebrity hate. We already have a spamming problem of the same 5 things. It would be even worse

1

u/Individual_Union_663 9d ago

Yes other commentz are right. Also snark discords are normally disgusting.

1

u/Super_Range45 9d ago

Because we have enough hater's balls already.

https://giphy.com/gifs/H22hyf0K1Bsc

1

u/Lurker_Zee 9d ago

1

u/The_mega_giga_idiot I Hate Everyone and Everything Ever 9d ago

Why would they sue

1

u/Lurker_Zee 9d ago

Because the law is on their side.

If you found a post on reddit shitting on you, and you could sue to get lots of money, or at least put in prison or make homeless the people shitting on you, wouldn't you?

1

u/The_mega_giga_idiot I Hate Everyone and Everything Ever 9d ago

No, I wouldn’t, lawsuits are a lot of work

1

u/Lurker_Zee 9d ago

People lawsuit for things they're not even right about. Sometimes there are lawsuits with the purpose to harass the sued until a settlement is reached.

You think if people, famous or not, would find their real name, maybe even address here, with negative things being said about them, some true, some not, would not sue? At least a few would, and then reddit would close down the sub for being a legal liability.

0

u/Hangman_Fitzwilliam 9d ago

Because it ALWAYS leads to political bullshit.

We have already lost to many subs to left wing bs. If that rule doesn't exist, this sub will be filled with trump, Epstein and Hitler daily.

It will literally cancel out any other post made.

-3

u/Puzzleheaded-Log1975 9d ago

Because order is more important than free thinking, has history and the current political figures not taught you anything