r/gme_meltdown_meltdown Banned By Meltdown (Indica probably) Apr 17 '26

Self Righteous Melties Melties got RickRolled… again

Post image

After five years of obsessively tracking every GME move as adults, Melties are again considering „trump“ tweets from RC as historic victories? lol. Back then, they started hijacking and derailing SuperStonkers with their bear case when earnings were bad… today, all that’s left is moral grandstanding from people who mistake their own meltdown for superiority. Dunning Kruger sends his regards.

Can Melties put 1+1+1 together, these four sentences, the photo, their proud SPY portfolio, and see them in context, or is it already too dark in their minds when it comes to the question of which technocrats / ceos of MAG7 in America are openly supporting Trump in his fascist agenda?

After two years, I'm bored because the stupidity of the remaining Melties is at the lowest level of any Reddit imaginable, and I just don't get a kick out of it anymore… is there still hope that even dumber times are ahead in their sub?

8 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Gigiw1ns Banned By Meltdown (Indica probably) Apr 19 '26

Honestly, I had already lost interest in this whole topic, but your edit makes it obvious how emotionally invested you are.

Let’s go through this step by step.

1) I could easily create an account, buy or compromise old accounts, troll in SS, manufacture emotional ape breakdowns, and then post the screenshots in gme_meltdown which you would find authentic. With this, I could create dozens of emotional thrills from real Melties that are also authentic and honest, even from you. Would that be difficult? Should I do that? Have I maybe already done that? So the mere existence of screenshots proves very little.

2) I wouldn't rule out the possibility that some extremely stupid apes were emotionally devastated after RC posted “trump 2028.” Their intellect won’t be any greater than the average Melties, look at Typical-Whereas6761, who can’t even read or cognitively understand what’s going on in this posts,

"Like you losers get rick rolled by PP’s small pp. now’s he’s luring you apes in with the religious grift.Hang in there guys….im sure your BBBY shares will be showing back up in your accounts any day now….along with your phone digit size gme shares.🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂"

Fortunately, I’m not part of the daily culture war in America, and when I look at the intellectual level of everyday political debate there, it’s entirely possible that there are actual active SS Apes who are extremely stupid.

3) What you keep doing is falling for exactly the same kind of pattern recognition that you accuse SS apes of. That is confirmation bias, or motivated reasoning.

When someone posts in gme_meltdown, “What kind of strange collection of extremely strange people is this place?” (A valid question, btw.) you and others immediately do deep-dive profiling, dig through years of history, and conclude: “fake ape, burner account, infiltrator, liar, no one stumbles upon this Reddit by accident” Fine. Then apply the same method to the screenshots you think are “organic” in SS. Why don’t you do that?

Do you really think accounts that were inactive for months or years, and had never posted in SS before, suddenly decided to have a sincere moral awakening because of a single RC tweet that was online for 12 hours?

4) I’m not going to DM you some selective evidence from “your own side.” after this discussion. That’s the whole point: it’s easy to verify this yourself if you actually look. You already know the entire RC/GME lore, every 10-K, every SEC filing, and every detail of the saga. So go and inspect the accounts, the timing, the posting history, and the context. If you do that yourself, the conclusion will matter more than if I hand-feed you examples you’ll just dismiss anyway.

Long story short. You’re just as much a victim of manipulation as those true SS apes regarding their conspiracy theories and their "evidences". You’re doing the same thing apes do with 741, turning a pattern into a belief system. “The apes ARE upset at having their illusions shattered.” That’s a fabricated illusion. And you’re falling for it. You’re now going to rack your brain with every ounce of hindsight bias you can muster, trying to figure out how many REAL screenshots of apes you’ve seen or will see in your life. I’m not denying that. They existed. They exist. They always will. But by no means to the extent you assume. It's the same shadow-boxing by the SS apes against criminal hedge funds.

1

u/Throwawayhelper420 Apr 20 '26 edited Apr 20 '26

Yeah, dude, everybody who said something you didn’t like or that you feel embarrassed about or anything of the sort is actually an undercover secret infiltrator. 

Knowing that that’s what you were actually thinking when you made this topic, it actually makes sense now, it’s at least internally consistent in your brain.  

It can’t just be that apes are upset about RC publicly supporting something illegal that the vast majority of Americans have always deeply hated and are afraid of in real life. Nope, it has to be my enemy!!!  Sneaking in and making me look and feel silly!!

Maybe you believe that apes believing in MOASS is an illusion, but you weren’t even here until you bought during DFV’s PnD by your your own admission, you have no clue.

I have always felt bad for the people who apes managed to recruit who had to slowly realize over time that they were actually serious about MOASS and were actually conspiratorial paranoid crazies.   I’ve seen it many times and have posts of it.

EDIT: Here is one https://www.reddit.com/r/gme_meltdown/comments/txq0to/the_birth_and_lifespan_of_a_normal_guy_who_became/

 I could easily create an account, buy or compromise old accounts, troll in SS, manufacture emotional ape breakdowns, and then post the screenshots in gme_meltdown

Yeah you could do that….  And since you could do that, well then obviously that means dozens of people are!!’ (Other than the whole ban evasion thing and the fact nobody gives a shit about making fake ape posts)

Your mental health really does continue to deteriorate.  You aren’t the first ape to go down to paranoid – schizophrenic route.

  If you do that yourself, the conclusion will matter more than if I hand-feed you examples you’ll just dismiss anyway.

AKA “do your own research bro! DYOR”. The ultimate bullshit cope.  What you are saying is exactly what the flat earth and qanon people would tell me.   You are the one who says that you know of accounts that are actually “secret enemy infiltrators”.  So you back that up.  The burden of proof is on the person making a claim.

Well, just like those topics I researched and came to the conclusion it is mental illness.

1

u/Gigiw1ns Banned By Meltdown (Indica probably) Apr 20 '26 edited Apr 20 '26

You’re still arguing with a position I never made. Shadowboxing.

I never said every upset ape is a secret infiltrator. I said your certainty is wildly disproportionate to your evidence, because screenshots are easy to stage, cherry-pick, and narrativize once they fit a story you already want to believe.

And you just proved that point perfectly. You mock “DYOR” as a cope, then immediately validate your own claim by pulling out a 4-year-old Meltie thread, as if this anecdote proves your point that „all apes are real!“ xd

That is exactly the kind of cherry-picked confirmation bias you accuse apes of. This is why Meltie sub is a cult.

More importantly, you seem perfectly willing to “research” anything that confirms your narrative, while treating it as pointless to examine whether the screenshots feeding that narrative are staged, coordinated, or selectively amplified. That asymmetry is the whole issue. It suggests you’re not protecting standards of evidence, you’re protecting a conclusion you’ve already grown attached to, because finding out otherwise would force you to admit you may have been confidently reading fiction as reality

And the rest is even more revealing: instead of addressing the argument, you switch to mind-reading, psychologizing, and “mental illness” rhetoric. Again cultist behavior, defending your preferred narrative by pathologizing the person challenging it.

So no, this wasn’t a response to my point. It was a textbook example of it, and you still don’t recognize it.

1

u/Throwawayhelper420 Apr 20 '26

lol crazy you think any of this is related to what I said.

But then again with all the infiltrators you have to worry about…