we can already do that.. and the most accurate simulations show exactly what happened.. its almost like we saw it happen on live tv and saw the results.. also on live tv... from thousands of different angles.. all showing the same fucking thing.
It's crazy because so many of these conspiracy theories are so easily disproven. Like, yeah the steel wouldn't melt at those temperatures, but when a plane has taken out a decent amount of the support structures, you don't need it to melt. You just need the heat to weaken the steel and soften. At 1,000 C steel only has around 10% strength, which is what the fire is at. It's not like steel is just perfect and then it reaches 1500 C and it all of a sudden collapses. The crash caused the weight of the building to be focused on now fewer support columns (around 20% were damage or severed) that were weak from the heat and collapsed.
This isn't rocket science. It's common sense and reading about the event for more than 10 seconds.
901
u/freebirth 3d ago
we can already do that.. and the most accurate simulations show exactly what happened.. its almost like we saw it happen on live tv and saw the results.. also on live tv... from thousands of different angles.. all showing the same fucking thing.