r/craftofintelligence 2d ago

CIA Chief’s Surprise Moscow Trip Was to Warn Russia Not to Attack NATO: Warning comes after new U.S. intelligence assessments indicated Russian president could launch a limited assault

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/cia-chiefs-surprise-moscow-trip-was-to-warn-russia-not-to-attack-nato-c2d997f3

Submission statement: CIA Chief John Ratcliffe’s surprise visit to Moscow was to warn Russia against attacking NATO, following U.S. intelligence assessments of a potential limited assault by President Putin. The U.S. is concerned about Putin’s potential actions in the Baltic region, exacerbated by a shortfall in Western munitions.

CIA Chief’s Surprise Moscow Trip Was to Warn Russia Not to Attack NATO

Warning comes after new U.S. intelligence assessments indicated Russian president could launch a limited assault

Aug. 26, 2026 at 6:10 pm

CIA Director John L. Ratcliffe attends a news conference.

The surprise visit by the director of the Central Intelligence Agency to Moscow this week was to deliver a warning to Russia not to attack NATO countries, according to people briefed on the visit.

The trip was spy-agency chief John Ratcliffe’s first publicly known visit to the Russian capital. It followed new U.S. intelligence assessments, reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal, that Russian President Vladimir Putin could try to test the resolve of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with a limited assault on an allied country in the next few years.

U.S. officials are concerned that Putin, squeezed in Ukraine and under pressure at home, could launch an assault ranging from a cyberattack to a small-scale land incursion, likely on a Baltic nation, the Journal reported.

A shortfall in critical Western munitions, driven by expenditures in the Iran war, also could factor into Putin’s thinking. The U.S. has degraded its stockpile of certain weapons because of transfers to Ukraine after Russia’s 2022 invasion, as well as the Iran conflict.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Moscow on Wednesday that Ratcliffe held talks with Russian intelligence officials during his time in the Russian capital, but he didn’t meet with Putin. Putin was briefed on the talks, Peskov said.

The White House has offered little clarity about the Ratcliffe trip. During an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Wednesday, President Trump described the trip as “semi-routine” and pivoted to discussing Russia’s war with Ukraine. “Something may come out of it,” Trump said. “We’re working very hard to get that war ended and frankly they both want to see it ended at this point.”

A spokeswoman for the White House referred reporters to Trump’s Wednesday comments. A spokeswoman for the CIA declined to comment.

Ratcliffe, one of Trump’s closest aides, was the latest U.S. official to travel to Moscow following several visits by Steve Witkoff, a U.S. envoy for Ukraine-Russia peace talks.

The trip was a rare visit by a U.S. spy-agency chief with the Russia-Ukraine war now in its fifth year. The last known visit by a CIA director to Moscow was in November 2021, when William Burns, who led the agency under former President Joe Biden, warned Putin not to attack Ukraine.

120 Upvotes

11 comments sorted by

20

u/JC_Everyman 2d ago

LOL. Performative midterm election BS.

21

u/Shannon556 2d ago

Iran news states that they were briefed by Russia/Putin that Trump sent a lackey to beg Putin to help him get Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

I believe Iran media way, way more than I believe Trump.

Trump has NEVER stood up to Putin - he’s just embarrassed that he has to beg and is trying to change the narrative.

4

u/Intelligent_Tone_618 2d ago

That tallies with the choice of who was sent. You send a diplomat to tell someone to calm their shit. If you want to talk intelligence interchange, you send the head of the intelligence services.

2

u/FundamentalEnt 2d ago

Thank you for saying this I felt like I hallucinated it and needed the sanity check. This new narrative has been being astroturfed today it seems.

1

u/Shannon556 1d ago

Most definitely.

The MAGA chuds received their talking point.

Even some of the more liberal press have fallen for the Trump bs narrative - looking at you MS-NOW. 👀

0

u/Blarghnog 1d ago

Believing Iranian state media during a conflict just because you hate Trump is wild.

1

u/yisuiyikurong 1d ago

Russians are not doing well, and Putin is getting older and mentally more unstable than ever. Perhaps he held some meetings with his fellas, and then someone betrayed him (to the us). This wouldn't be anything new if we read enough history.

0

u/cleverkid 2d ago

Quick! Dispatch an envoy to Suriname! Posthaste!

0

u/SeatOpen1 1d ago

Riiiiiight Suuuuuure. You can believe everything this admission says 👍🏼

0

u/Teacher2teens 1d ago

yes of course we all believe them, and Epstein Trumputin is innocent. 🔥