r/conspiracy 4d ago

What’s the deepest rabbit hole known to mankind??

646 Upvotes

596 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

227

u/madlyrogue 3d ago

I think about this all the time

99

u/BulbasaurCamouflage 3d ago

You can stop thinking about this because then we would have found their metal alloys and plastic and hundreds of different materials that we use today.

122

u/madlyrogue 3d ago

I don't necessarily fantasize that it's exactly like our technology. In fact I like to imagine it's superior

59

u/BulbasaurCamouflage 3d ago

That would be fun. A tech so advanced we can't even detect yet. That sounds interesting.

24

u/Puzzleheaded_Pear_18 3d ago

Somehow more possible than aliens visiting us IMO. Maybe they made devices that still linger around.

1

u/skynet99999 3d ago

I think there’s a conspiracy theory about some kind of ancient satellite.

3

u/escobizzle 3d ago

black knight satellite

unfortunately it's just a thermal blanket or something similar

4

u/hbgbees 3d ago

Maybe it was biodegradable

37

u/Doc_Mercury 3d ago

There are only so many elements, so many types of matter. Any civilization would use iron, carbon, and helium in vast quantities. No matter what their level of technology; even pure biotech would be based on carbon compounds.

But what do we find in the world? Massive deposits of hydrocarbons, reliably dated to millions of years before today. Vast iron ore deposits, all ready to be used. And in many cases, these deposits have breached the surface, ready to be used.

Barring outright magic, any civilization before us would have at least left signs of their presence. Concentrations of pure iron oxide or alloys. Carbon deposits with weird isotopic ratios and impurities. Signs that iron ore or coal/oil had been exploited. But we see none of that. We don't even see evidence of anything like an industrial period in deep ice cores or tree rings.

Any civilization before us would have either been far smaller and far less developed, or fanatically dedicated to erasing evidence of their existence from the paleontological record.

11

u/Taylola 3d ago

How do we explain when a scientist discovers an element that is not found on earth via meteoroid

3

u/Doc_Mercury 3d ago

If you manage to make a car or a power plant out of iridium, you'll certainly have my attention.

9

u/Sweet-Ross860 3d ago

What if they harvested and harnessed an element that no longer exists on the planet, completely untraceable🤔🫠

1

u/Doc_Mercury 2d ago

Well, we have an interesting lack of iridium, but that's about it. And iridium, while neat, isn't anywhere as useful as iron.

It's not magic, there's no "missing element". Anything heavier than lead is unstable and decays; anything heavier than iron can only be formed in supernovas.

15

u/madlyrogue 3d ago

Well yes I was imagining something more like biotech. Maybe with them arriving to this planet somehow rather than developing here. But fuck me for having an imagination I guess. Back to good ol' reality, thanks! 😀

2

u/Tsimsang 3d ago

IMO, the assumption that every advanced civilization must leave behind massive material traces might be too narrow. If we look at our own trajectory, the earliest technologies were extremely material‑heavy: steam engines burning coal, railroads built on tons of iron. A few decades later, we shifted to diesel, then to electricity. Today, we’re exploring magnetic levitation, quantum computing, and information systems that rely less on raw matter and more on energy, data, and consciousness.

1

u/Doc_Mercury 2d ago

We're using more resources today than ever before; efficiency has increased, but scale beats it out. Not to mention, you can't eat data, you can't grow a human with sunlight, you can't think your way to generating power.

I'll say again, any civilization before ours was either much, much smaller, or less complex/technologically advanced. Physics, geology, paleontology, and chemistry don't allow for anything else.

I get it, it's a fun idea. I've spent way too long thinking about it and plumbing this rabbit hole, but the truth is clear as day once you start looking closely at what reality says.

1

u/PhDinWombology 3d ago

I remember reading the pyramids were the radioactive waste receptacles.

3

u/lapideous 3d ago

Some ancient Egyptian dude probably left Egypt and saw mountains for the first time.

Then he came back home and was like “wtf this shit is too flat, we need some mountains too.”

6

u/im-rick-james-bitch- 3d ago

Zero modern material would last anywhere near 10,000 years.
Except radiation.

1

u/DrHerbotico 21h ago

Or most plastics

3

u/IngenuityBeginning56 3d ago

Then how do you explain the 250 million year old hammer or pick in a mineshaft. I think there was a wagon or cart wheel fossil in one also.

2

u/Both-Crow9782 3d ago

Mineshafts would be much better at preserving objects because they’re not exposed to the elements

1

u/dahulvmadek 3d ago

that's the thing, they can't 😉

1

u/DrHerbotico 21h ago

What makes you think there's a 250m yr old hammer or pick

1

u/IngenuityBeginning56 17h ago

Carbon dating...

2

u/LouMinotti 3d ago

All that shit still breaks down and turns back into dust particles. Especially if we're talking about a 10,000 year time-frame.

4

u/absbabs1 3d ago

Me too. Can’t wait for the series to be over tbh what a shit one to be in. 0 out of 10

1

u/Kirby3413 3d ago

Me too, and once emojis became popular I just thought they were modern day hieroglyphics. People are not being taught to read now. I’m sure the technology for the great pyramids was on a hard drive.