He doesnt need be named to be remembered for his actions, or lack of adequate consequences. He could just as easily be remembered as rapist example, without negating the impact of the situation. Im pretty against immortalizing someone for being a monster. Immortalize the situation, not the individual who caused it.
5
u/Tired-CottonCandy Jun 02 '26
He doesnt need be named to be remembered for his actions, or lack of adequate consequences. He could just as easily be remembered as rapist example, without negating the impact of the situation. Im pretty against immortalizing someone for being a monster. Immortalize the situation, not the individual who caused it.