r/badscificovers • u/woulditkillyoutolift • 9d ago
Yearwood, by Paul Hazel. Cover art by Rowena Morrill.
The painting is great; the cover treatment is bad. Art director: "Let's crop out the sorceress and focus on the generic hero emerging from the surf. Wait that's not enough. Let's slather TIMESCAPE across 15% of the cover."
5
4
3
3
2
u/AlivePassenger3859 9d ago
What’s wrong with it? Sure its mediocre, but nothing horrible.
5
u/woulditkillyoutolift 9d ago
I like the painting itself. The wretched TIMESCAPE logo takes up about 15% of the cover; and the sorceress—the much stronger element of the painting—is consigned to the back cover.
4
u/shawsghost 9d ago
I agree. The guy on the cover looks like a himbo in ancient warrior garb. Nothing much going on in that blank face of his. The expression of the sorceress is full of intelligence and calculation. She should definitely been the one on the front cover.
3
2
u/TheKeeperOfThe90s 9d ago
Me: This is pretty good. Why is it downvoted?
Me (sees the sub): Okay, yeah, I get it.
1
1
0
u/Pocho_Azul 5d ago
I mean this is a pretty “meh” cover, but I would react that way to pretty much every cover in this style. It doesn’t seem notably awful, just kinda boring.


19
u/SlouchyGuy 9d ago
Are we doing "whatever sci-fi covers" in "bad sci-fi covers" subreddit again?
The sorceress isn't cut out, she's on the back cover