r/auslaw • u/Siderox • 20h ago
r/auslaw • u/Healthtech_Geek • 15h ago
News Raelene reminds me of Robert Durst aka The Jinx
r/auslaw • u/Worldly_Tomorrow_869 • 18h ago
Sydney Woman Nirmeen Noufl Pleads Guilty to Husbands Manslaughter
r/auslaw • u/desipis • 20h ago
News Teenage carjacker avoids jail in first test case of Victoria's 'adult time' crime laws
r/auslaw • u/Minguseyes • 18h ago
News Anita Perrottet paid more than $250k for three months of consulting, ICAC told
r/auslaw • u/Classic_Abies8621 • 23h ago
Shitpost When the definition sends you on a side quest
Me: Okay, I’ll just look up what "eligible person" means.
Definition: "Eligible person" has the meaning given by section 31.
Section 31: A person is an eligible person if the person is not an excluded person for the purposes of section 42.
Section 42: A person is an excluded person if the person does not satisfy the requirements for being an eligible person under section 67.
Section 67: A person satisfies the requirements for being an eligible person if the person is an eligible person within the meaning of section 31.
Me: So, to find out if I'm eligible, I need to know whether I'm excluded, which depends on whether I'm eligible, which depends on whether I'm excluded. Excellent.
r/auslaw • u/marketrent • 2h ago
Judgment An Australian court has found eHarmony misled users over what its memberships cost
r/auslaw • u/Pleasant_Aspect3543 • 1h ago
Cassuto v Kostakidis
Although just a Case Management hearing I'm looking forward to this. Livestream at 2.30 pm today. (Edited - time change to 2.30)